General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Crushed In Oklahoma As State Supreme Court Rules 10 Commandments Monument Must Come Down
PoliticusUSA
In a decisive 7-2 ruling, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled that the Ten Commandments Monument erected at the State Capitol must be removed. The monument was a gift from Republican State Representative Mike Ritze. However, plaintiffs argued that the monuments placement at the Capitol involved the use of public property for the benefit of a specific religion. They argued, and the court agreed, that the Oklahoma Constitution clearly prohibits such a display promoting one religion over others.
Republican Governor Mary Fallin, was predictably upset by the ruling, and she vowed to work with the states Attorney General to evaluate the states legal options moving forward.
More
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/30/republicans-crushed-oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-10-commandments-monument.html
spanone
(135,917 posts)CanonRay
(14,125 posts)That was the last right wing head popping. How sweet the sound...
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Your legal options moving forward are to comply with the court's judgment and remove the monument.
Please look for your invoice from gratuitous consulting in the mail. Terms are net + 10. Thank you.
christx30
(6,241 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)constitution, this is Game Over. SCOTUS can't touch it.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)An appeal can be made to the U.S. Supreme Court if the monument men can successfully argue that the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision was based on a state constitution clause that is unconstitutional under the federal constitution. This gets pretty deep into the weeds, but it's unlikely that Oklahoma's state constitution conflicts with the United States Constitution on this point.
Which is not to say that the God-botherers won't file a petition for cert with the U.S. Supreme Court, it's just not likely to be granted.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)on/near government buildings.
I support this decision.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)must be nearly all republicans-which makes it even more difficult for them to swallow. Can't blame the LEFTIST or ELITEST Ivy leagues
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)The Ten Commandments does not promote 'one religion'.
shraby
(21,946 posts)than one god.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)the 10 Commandments as part of their beliefs. That is two different religions.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)The monument in Oklahoma has the protestant version. The Catholics, for example omit the graven images part . the jewish version has the clause about no other gods before me as part of the second commandment unlike the protestant which has it as the first.
This was very much a protestant christian monument promoting one flavor of religion.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)I wonder if the reason this particular religous symbol is going to be removed is because it was only recently put in place. I seem to remember other, similar situations where they were not removed but have been in place for decades or longer.
blogslut
(38,021 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Edit Add: Actually, cite the first five commandments, please.
tanyev
(42,646 posts)Jeff Murdoch
(168 posts)Satan statue--and Hindu monkey god?
Noooooooooooooo!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Takket
(21,661 posts)Is this the monument someone drove their car into in protest? Lol I vaguly remember a story to that effect.
madokie
(51,076 posts)they're talking about impeaching the Justices. I shit you not. LOL.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/capitol_report/lawmakers-will-seriously-consider-their-options-in-response-to-ten/article_de66a6a2-3fa8-571c-b0de-cf774a143aeb.html
In the immediate aftermath of Tuesdays ruling, lawmakers suggested impeachment of the justices and repeal of the portion of the state constitution on which the decision was based.
Speaker Jeff Hickman, R-Fairview, said he was disappointed in the ruling and had already heard from House members and constituents since the ruling was announced.
The implications of this Oklahoma Supreme Court opinion are serious and far-reaching, and should not and will not be taken lightly, Hickman said in a prepared statement.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)interpreting history. In the USA there have always been more than one way some group interprets the symbols.
The public grounds of government belong to all of us and not just one group that thinks they got it right. The confederate flag is one example of this - it stand only for the people who have an ancestor who was on the confederate side of the civil war and has been turned into a symbol of hate by an even smaller group of people. The flag does not belong on ground that belong to all of us.
The Ten Commandments likewise is a symbol of what one group of people in this country believe. They are not being asked to change their belief. They are merely being asked to take the symbol off of the government grounds that belong to all of us.
Mutual respect demands that we place our symbols on private property not on jointly owned governmental property. The flag can fly over a confederate museum or at your home. Likewise the Ten Commandment statue has a place it can rest - in front of churches.
To insist that we must all accept these symbols is childish - like the child who insists on taking his ball and going home if everyone will not play his way.