Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,106 posts)
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:16 PM May 2012

The increasingly bizarre (and odoriferous) saga of the would-be exploding underpants bomber


from the Guardian UK:


A would-be "underwear bomber" involved in a plot to attack a US-based jet was in fact working as an undercover informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.

The revelation is the latest twist in an increasingly bizarre story about the disruption of an apparent attempt by al-Qaida to strike at a high-profile American target using a sophisticated device hidden in the clothing of an attacker.

The plot, which the White House said on Monday had involved the seizing of an underwear bomb by authorities in the Middle East sometime in the last 10 days, had caused alarm throughout the US.

It has also been linked to a suspected US drone strike in Yemen where two Yemeni members of al-Qaida were killed by a missile attack on their car on Sunday, one of them a senior militant, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Quso. .................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/09/underwear-bomber-working-for-cia



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The increasingly bizarre (and odoriferous) saga of the would-be exploding underpants bomber (Original Post) marmar May 2012 OP
You know, part of the change I voted for back in 2008 gratuitous May 2012 #1
Or it could have been a terrorist attack that was prevented. randome May 2012 #3
Why assume the worst? pmorlan1 May 2012 #5
Brilliant summary. bighart May 2012 #6
AM Kick. marmar May 2012 #2
Sometimes i think they push this stuff to determine how much we'll swallow. "Yeah, call it an HiPointDem May 2012 #4

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. You know, part of the change I voted for back in 2008
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:21 PM
May 2012

Part of the change I was hoping for in 2008 was a break with the fear-mongering practiced by the previous administration. This little episode seems designed to take some of the focus off our crimes against humanity (summary executions in Yemen), and the zeal with which the popular media have taken this new "threat" recalls echoes of the worst days during Bush the Stupider's Reign of Error.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Or it could have been a terrorist attack that was prevented.
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:11 AM
May 2012

I mean who can say?

Since we will never know the truth because none of us were present when it all happened, why assume the worst?

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
5. Why assume the worst?
Wed May 9, 2012, 09:36 AM
May 2012

lol It's called experience. Our government has been creating terrorist plots and then solving the plots they themselves created. It's so blatant and yet people still believe their claims.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
4. Sometimes i think they push this stuff to determine how much we'll swallow. "Yeah, call it an
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:30 AM
May 2012

'underwear bomb,' see if they'll go for that!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The increasingly bizarre ...