General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders Has Already Taken More Press Questions Than Hillary Clinton
The Vermont senator starts his presidential campaign by engaging with the press, something Clinton has so far avoided.
By Patrick Caldwell
Unlike Hillary Clinton, his rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Bernie Sanders didn't use a splashy, big-budget video to announce his campaign. Instead, the Vermont senator opted for a series of one-on-one television interviews Wednesday followed by a low-key launch event outside the US Capitol Thursday morning. "I believe that in a democracy, what elections are about are serious debates over serious issues," he said Thursday. "Not political gossip, not making campaigns into soap operas. This is not the Red Sox vs. the Yankees, this is the debate over major issues facing the American people."
Pundits are already dismissing Sanderswho has, in the past, described himself as a socialist rather than a Democratas a long-shot candidate with little chance of defeating Hillary Clinton for the Democrats' 2016 nomination. But Sanders is already beating Clinton on one metric: Answering questions from the press.
Earlier this week, National Journal's Zach Cohen counted all of the times Clinton has answered press questions since she announced her presidential campaign on April 12. Cohen counted just seven "answers"about half of which ignored the actual question. When asked about whether a super-PAC would support her campaign, she said, "I don't know." When she was quizzed about her chances in Iowa, she said "I'm having a great time, can't look forward any more than I am."
Sanders, who needs all the press attention he can get, kicked off his presidential campaign by fielding a barrage of questions from TV news reporters in interviews Wednesday. Over the course of one five-minute exchange with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on Wednesday, Sanders answered seven separate questions. The trend continued at Sanders' campaign launch event Thursday morning, where he took six more questions.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrat-2016-press-questions
Communication not obfuscation
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Splashy coming out.
earthside
(6,960 posts)Sen. Sanders is about substance, not just atmospherics.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)LOL
earthside
(6,960 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)All of them.
stage left
(2,966 posts)And still be a Democrat?
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)If you really want to find dog whistlers, (which I rather doubt) head on over to this thread:
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6596249
Your continued mocking of this behavior doesn't help your case. At all...
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)On MSNBC right now.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)It will be tough for Clinton to say she wants the banks regulated when she took $400,000 from Goldman-Sachs and told them she thought some were picking on the banksters.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)I have been liberal all my life, Hillary is my choice she is
skilled enough to bring this nation together!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)disagree with? Maybe regulating the banks? Single payer health insurance? An end to the Patriot Act?
Again, what does the left and Sen Sanders want that you don't want?
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)They bash people who run for office and have to work with in
politics to get things done.
I am for single payer, and did not like Obama deals, but it is what
was possible. Obama care is good a improvement, it could be better, but it was
what was possible. (Left always bashing his improvements as not good enough)
Hillary cannot fix the banks, nor can she bash the banks, Dick Durin
said that the Banks own this country right now!
What Hillary and Dem's can do is run for office get some power,
she can play few political cards for the American people.
Hillary and Bill could have had 100's millions dollars, they only have
50 between the two of them. They have given most of their money
charity! In way they are Ideologues they want to get things done.
Hillary's are girl on the issues, and she knows to play politics to win on
behalf America: Lincoln the first rule of politics is to win, then you can
have say in policy.
The occupied movement was a wasted, because the didn't go home and vote, or run for office.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Seems your idea of compromise is that when you catch someone (banksters) stealing your money, you bow and let them at it and mock the Left that wants to stop the thief.
The Clintons are worth $100 million that they have accumulated in the last 15 years. http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/presidents/bill-clinton-net-worth/
There is a class war and the 99% is losing badly. Whose side are you on?
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Bernie's followers who bash her, when she is loyal Dem:
Dem's don't support compromise with criminals, the banks
did what they because Gore and Dem's lost a political fight. If Koch brother install
a crazy GOP person this country will be at war!!
Google Clinton net-worth Hillary 21million, with Bill its 50million:
Really no much to go against the GOP with!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)How can you call her loyal after she betrayed her party and help Bush sell the Iraq War?
I gave you a link that indicated that Pres Clinton was currently worth $80 million. Add that to HRC's wealth of $21 million equals over $100 million placing them in the top of the 1%.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Her staff are all about control over the terrain and selecting venues where she can duck or gets thrown softball questions.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Hillary has been head of the Dem's party that has provided real answers,
her and Bill, provided answers, the made all Americans richer, not just
rich. The country was in the black when they left office:
Bush crashed the economy and took this country to war: not one else!!
Hillary is just what the country needs, she will sign anything the
Dem's can get the votes for!
Clintons have never had it easy with questions!
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)The war against Iraq that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and other neo cons got going shortly after Nine Eleven.
But much of the prosperity the nation knew in the late Nineties had to do, not with the Clintons, but with the bubbling up of the dot com industry. Which went down like the Titanic in 2000.
Also, Bill did not hesitate one iota against signing onto the Bank Modernization and Reform Act. This one Act totally demolished the middle class-protecting provisions of Glass Steagal, and which in large part brought about the catastrophe we witnessed in 2008, when the entire economic house of cards came tumbling down.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)I am not arguing they were all things to all people: but they
raised taxes on rich, crime went down, the middle class was built up:
They proved Democratic policy are some of the best this country has had.
Bush and GOP, with Regonomics were disasters to the country!
Clinton's are loyal Dems, they will sign anything the Dem's get the votes for,
the have been very loyal to Obama, you won't hear of Hillary writing
book to bash Obama.
Indeed, I hoping he makes great speeches for her.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Hooray for Mr. Clean.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)social and economic injustices persist.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Secretary Clinton is listening to the voters to guide her on what her positions should be, whereas Bernie just wants to talk about his positions. I heard listening was better than talking.
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #14)
F4lconF16 This message was self-deleted by its author.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)who take the same positions on important issues?
I think Bernie reflects 99% of the views of the 99%. That's why, if he continues to speak truth, he will have a shot at overcoming the Billion dollar candidate. (You may have not adequately perceived my snark.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)In any case, Bernie's already been listening for years. It seems to be baked into how he fulfills the duties of his elected office, and not just in how he manages his campaigns.
=========================
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Welcome to DU!
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... where he may even get Republicans calling in to grill him on something.
I think he's prepared for this kind of questioning in a way that not many other politicians are ready for it. And it's good that he'll start using skill to his advantage and get his word out that much more and in a timely fashion for Americans to hear his responses in real time than stuff that is "rehearsed" that so many Americans are tired of now.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)and with a long voting history to back up their campaign rhetoric. While Hillary is still deciding "what her positions should be", Bernie already knows what his positions are that he will run on. He's lived it, and there is no "deciding" that needs to go on. I think I'll go with the real deal thank you very much. That's why my choice is Bernie Sanders.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)they will sit up and listen
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I've been listening to Bernie for a long, long time now and he has never disappointed me. In fact, I have donated to his Senatorial campaign in the past even though I'm in NC. I am anxious and excited to watch his campaign reach out to the segment of the population that has been largely neglected for most of my adult life.
Punx
(446 posts)Bernie has been taking calls Fridays on the Thom Hartmann show for years now. Sounds like listening to me. As I'm not there I can't say to what amount they are screened.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Nothing to corroborate that, though.
Punx
(446 posts)I've heard some pretty odd ball questions on the show for what its worth. In fairness, Bernie sometimes doesn't always specifically answer the question put to him. Being a politician, probably nothing surprising there.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)tritsofme
(17,399 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And one of her biggest faults has been described as her inability to connect to voters.
She expects voters to connect to her.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)She expects voters to connect to her.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)I don't want that to sound like Bernie-bashing because I like him just fine but would like to see more of him mostly because geographically I don't naturally pay a lot of attention to New England politics except for the big names like Kennedy (formerly) in Massachusetts, etc.
Anyway...Bernie has little name recognition, so of course he needs to put himself out there more, hence his willingness for press exposure. Clinton's massive name recognition is both her strong point and a weak point at the same time. So just because Bernie is taking more press opportunities doesn't in any way compare to Clinton's campaign methods.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)Why should Hillary be held to different standards than anyone else, especially Republicans who will be completely drenched in corporate money and none of their supporters care as long as they win.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)to one candidate alone based on ideals of what a system should be, but isn't, is not a realistic evaluation.
Anyway, I don't want to seem like I'm teeing off on your posts, so I'll just say that I do understand the criticisms of Clinton and let it go at that.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The media TELLS candidates that whoever raises the most cash has a better chance of winning but that's because the media is selling air time for the ads.
I bet they'd sing a different tune if they had to air ads for free as a public service.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)making it easier for incumbent politicians to gain reelection. Their name is already known and out there.
There should be competition ads as a free public service. That would be ideal if there was a level playing field.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)But that was back when the media asked for solutions to problems faced by the common folk.
That was back when the media gave a damn about the common folk.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)about the tenor here changing once Bernie announced. Apparently it's uncool to bash Democrats now that Bernie has entered the race, lol.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)But I would highly recommend a crash course in Senator Sanders history before you go there,as there are a fair number of us that have considered him America's Senator (and America's Congress person before that) for well over a decade.
Best to have your ducks in a row, before you run off at the mouth.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)How ridiculous to take anything said as bashing. That's just you looking to start something for no reason whatsoever.
It's only been two days since Sanders announced -- maybe you're the one who needs to bone up. There's a long way to go.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Project much?
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)My comment was referring to a locked thread from yesterday and how it noted that the tenor changed after Bernie announced, but before that it was okay to bash DEMOCRATS.
My comment was not about bashing Bernie. You are the one who went there and assumed that was my intent.
Hey, it's going to be a long, long campaign for you. Hang in there!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)A little like saying "McAuliffe won VA! He must be a great campaigner" and leaving out the near-indictment of his opponent.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)What does that tell you.
Two campaigns of lousy candidates and criminals for competition doesn't sound like Hillary just got lucky. Sorry.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The only Republican politicians left in the state represent the bright-red parts of the state. Representing those parts require them to be utterly unacceptable to the blue parts of the state, in order to avoid tea party primaries.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)They could have lived anywhere.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)eloydude
(376 posts)She didn't bother to reach out to people.
She expected people to REACH out for her....
She has no ability to connect with the people that are truly hurting.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)Beartracks
(12,821 posts)I am so frustrated and dismayed at the whole sports mindset surrounding the way that the mainstream media and far too many voters think of the most cherished tenet of democracy: voting.
=====================
captainarizona
(363 posts)And unlike hillary bernie voted against the iraq war and so did republican lincoln chafee!
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Lincoln Chaffee was/is a Republican. Regardless of what he calls himself now, I don't cast votes for Republicans; new, old, or ex-.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)talking to real people.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)She is smart to stay away from them. Bernie will learn that soon enough, if he's really playing to win. If he's in it to drive the debate he will be trying to get all the press he can.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Obama rarely did press conferences when he was running - at least until the general. He didn't take questions at his announcement either. They do events that the press covers. They interview with friendlies. Once in a while they talk to whomever is on the campaign bus.
Here is a blast from the past on Obama's announcement:
"Admitting the tactic is typical of aspiring candidates, Obama promised to overhaul a political system he says is dominated by lobbyists and special interest groups "who've turned our government into a game only they can afford to play."
"They write the checks and you get stuck with the bills, they get the access while you get to write a letter, they think they own this government, but we're here today to take it back. The time for that kind of politics is over," he said. "It's time to turn the page right here and right now."
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/
Sound familiar? LOL!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Two candidates with two completely different pasts.
Bet the house.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)manipulated into a statement that the press could easily change into "Bernie attacks Hillary" http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6594541
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Link please.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Sanders is experienced with handling open questions and hard issues. He can handle the media. For once, we have a candidate who is not going to play the game. Being with the media a lot keeps him engaging with the issues that matter to voters, providing him opportunities to show them that he is working on those issues.
He's also a whole lot less likely than most to fuck up and say something stupid, too. It's because he actually cares and has a strong understanding of the issues, and he talks about what he believes all the time. He does not have to hide from anything in his record.
You want to know why I think he'll be fine? Take Clinton. Now, I normally don't care for her speeches. I don't find myself engaged. But when she talks on gender problems, when she defends the oppressed sexes in this country, I am engaged. She rarely ever screws up in those areas, and it's because she believes everything she says. Those are real, important issues to her. Sanders is like that for basically everything.
He will be fine.
Logical
(22,457 posts)It will destroy her!
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I would be just as happy with him. I just don't think a 73 year old socialist can win in the general.
Logical
(22,457 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Hillary reflects the values of the third way and the entitlement of being the media's anointed candidate.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I would have gone over to watch the kick off. shit.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He is going to have to do things she doesn't have to. Common sense. She has cemented her name recognition. This is pretty weak as far as comparing goes. Six more questions from the press. lol. Sanders is a great spokesperson for the working class as is Hillary. Any time they get in front of a camera in this campaign cycle it is good for the working class. This is beyond stretching in order to be divisive. Bernie has to take all of the free press he can. It is the smart thing to do.
DFW
(54,436 posts)Here is his speech and Q&A at the NPC in March:
When my dad was alive, his office was in the National Press building just one floor below the National Press Club. I heard many a speaker there, both serious and nut case. I got to play live music before a president for the first time there. Many memories for me. I can imagine the buzz that was in that room the day this was recorded.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Media is controlled by Fox and Corporations, she should not be
making any statements to them.
She has been on many forums, where people in the line up
and ask her questions and she has answered every question
that was put to her.
I have watched her on C-span may times, that is why I know where
she stands on everything.
The Press don't' have questions, they just want to bash her,
they are not interested in the truth. Journalism dead,
they sold out to the corporations years ago!!
The book for Hillary cash and they email stories were created by
the New York times and the Washington post made a deal
with a corporation that is bashing Hillary and Supporting
republicans and fox fake news
Also Bernie, made only statement at his conference, cut off questions
very quickly. He wasn't interested in answering press question!!
cali
(114,904 posts)Sorry, but candidates have to deal with the corporate media. That's irrefutable. And there is more than just the corporate media.
As for your utter bullshit claim about Bernie, he spent more time answering questions at his announcement than he did making the announcement and yeah, he's always been far more accessible than Hillary. In fact, genius, Bernie answers unscreened questions every Friday on radio on Thom Hartmann's radio show. The program is called Brunch with Bernie.
And Hillary's long relationship with Wall Street banks and her support for such crap as the corporate sponsored bankruptcy bill, are real, not made up.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)The reason most American's are supporting Hillary is because the long
history they have had with her!!
Bernie supporters want to disallow Hillary's years of being a loyal Dem.
She has dealt with Corporation media for years: Where were you during
the most successful Admirations American history!! (Clinton's)
Bernie has talked good game, what has be accomplished!!
The Clinton's drove down African American unemployment to single digit.
It not surprising that Sanders supporter want to start Hillary history
with Bernie announcement.
Hillary hasn't just talked about the middle class, has actually done something
about!!
cali
(114,904 posts)and as I said, you know exactly jackshit about Bernie, hon.
sorry, his positions and record, make him a far better fit for me and many progressives.
polichick
(37,152 posts)to know who he is or what the people want.
Ask him anything - he tells you what he thinks. What a concept!
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)No Bernie doesn't have use focus groups, he will use the Dem's
party info, the party that has been working for the American
people, the party Hillary has been a part of for years~~
polichick
(37,152 posts)He knows the issues inside and out, and speaks honestly about how he sees them and what he would do to respond to them.
There's a reason that the words Clinton and triangulation are linked.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Triangulation is just another word for politics, and Bernie is
politician too!
Hillary is fine politician: that is the job of Presidency to bring
people together!!
This is why I don't care for Sanders supporters they are always bashing
Hillary who has been a loyal Dem, she was part the most successful
Administrations in American History. African American unemployment went
down to single digits.
Bernie has talked a good game, but what has he accomplished, Hillary
and Bill have actually signed bills into laws that have helped the American
people.
I am grateful to Hillary and Bill putting themselves out there taking all
attacks from the GOP on our behalf.
polichick
(37,152 posts)And I only mentioned the words Clinton and triangulation after you did.
fyi, some of us think Bill Clinton perverted the party with his triangulation and corporate focus.
cali
(114,904 posts)he doesn't need to rely on the dem party for his positions.
And long before Hillary was doing anything for people, Bernie was working for civil rights as a student organizer for SNCC and marching on Washington.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)They have sign bills into laws, that have actually helped in the
middle class.
Everyone, did better under the Clinton's, even minorities,
they raised taxes on the rich, the strength SS: Hillary is
also party another successful Administrations .
I like how she does not Dis her boss Obama; so many people
leave Obama then bash him in a book
Clinton's have put themselves out their for Dem party for years!
She will look out for the American people, as she always has!!
Bernie has only talked about what must be done, he has
accomplished very little.
He just knows the issues, like Hillary does too, but Hillary knows
how to get things done, because she has gotten things done!!
Its Bush and GOP policy that have crashed the economy, it was Bush that
made the decision to take this country war, it the GOP Regan policy
that have left middle class with nothing!!
Bash the GOP not Hillary, they are ones that don't' answer questions!!
cali
(114,904 posts)DOMA ring a bell? He signed that. NAFTA. Moving dems to the right.
You know nothing about Bernie. About what he accomplished as a four term Mayor- including the funding the first community housing trust in the country. He accomplished more for veterans than virtually anyone else in the country, particularly regarding
YOU really shouldn't talk about things you know nothing about.
I do know Hillary's mixed record and her record of "evolving" on the issues.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Bill was not the instrumental in any mass incarcerating:
The American people wanted the mass incarceration especially the GOP,
they still do! The GOP make money off prison, they in favor
privatizing everything.
Bill never advocated mass incarceration, he and Dem's worked hard
at keeping people out prison with full funded programs. The GOP
wined and wined about the wasted money:
Fox news and Rush were on the air saying people should go to prison
for smoking pot.
Crime went way down under the Clinton because people had jobs, there
no mass incarceration
Bash the GOP not loyal Dem's' like Clinton's
cali
(114,904 posts)bill took a tough on crime stance and advocated for building more prisons and harsher sentences. period.
you can't just make shit up.
And sorry, Bernie is better on the issues and doesn't have to "evolve". He voted NO on DOMA. Hill verbally supported it.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)NO he doesn't have to evolve, he stuck in one place!!
His votes had no consequences, he could vote anyway wanted!!
He could be an ideologue, while Hillary and Bill were keeping
the party going, so most American could get jobs.
Hillary and Bill were charged with the leadership the Dem party, they
ran it well.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)That is why I like them so much, they put themselves out there and
get in the fight for the American people. They signed bills into law:
they took on the awful GOP on the American behalf over and over again.
Bernie has sat worked on issues, and it only now he wants to get into fight!!
I am sticking with Hillary is dependable, respect her judgment!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)That way when she shifts right during the general, she won't seem like she's backing out of pledges
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Last edited Fri May 1, 2015, 03:07 PM - Edit history (1)
Bill and Hillary raised taxes on the rich: and drove African
American unemployment to single digits when they were
in office. We don't have guess at Hillary liberal credentials:
if you mean by shifting to right, that she has appeal to
independence, some GOP, yes she does: on one can get
elected with out the majority of Americans. I don't
care for the GOP but they are American too
The Clinton's were successful because they built up the middle class!!
Hillary will sign any bill Dem have enough votes for she is not
ideologue. She like Obama will do what they think is best for
America.: The GOP treat this country like rents, they just
don't care about is future as long as they get their money
Bush crashed the economy, it Regan and GOP policy that have
destroyed this country, not Hillary!
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)It's like how when you tell the truth, you don't have to remember your lie later.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Heck McCain has sat on the press' laps for years and is on the talking head shows more than just about anyone else. Does that make him more qualified?
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The entire right wing hate machine is not going after Bernie.
They are hoping and praying he wins the democratic nomination because they know it would be a cakewalk for Cruz, Walker or Bush to beat him.
Hillary is the democrat that puts the fear of God in them.
Expect the softball questions to continue for Bernie.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)that politicians must be accountable to, even represent, the voters. That they have a duty to lay out a clear policy agenda rather than just glossy pictures and American flags.
Corporate politicians have been working hard to try to eliminate that expectation from voters' minds. They have been subtly training us to view elections as sports events and to let go of any actual expectations of representation from our politicians.
Hell, the last official Democratic Party survey of voters didn't even mention the TPP or other important issues. And the Obama campaign had the gall to REFUSE to disclose his plans on Social Security to voters when asked *directly* about it on the campaign trail.
Bernie is changing all that. Americans are about to be reminded what a real representative political process is supposed to look like. And the contrast with the lying, manipulative, PR-based corporate advertising campaigns we have grown accustomed to is remarkable, indeed.