General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsif true, Bill Clinton is a 2 faced bastard. One minupulates young interns and other backstabs dems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/us/politics/to-avert-repeat-of-2008-clinton-team-hopes-to-keep-bill-at-his-best.html?referrer=
The article doesnt cite sources.. So could be false. But is very disturbing nevertheless... You never know what the Clintons are up to ...
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,927 posts)considering that Mittens didn't really appear in command after all.
A-Schwarzenegger
(15,596 posts)then you've got him right where you want him."
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Cha
(297,898 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Pull the stick out of his butt .If he did Mitt didn't pay attention .
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Romney proceeded to fall right into Obama's trap.
Thanks, Bill.
JI7
(89,281 posts)Hekate
(90,934 posts)....because why? And you embellished it with your subject line.
So, back atcha.
I can tell your contributions are going to be a real asset to this board in the coming couple of years.
srican69
(1,426 posts)Hekate
(90,934 posts)malaise
(269,244 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)In case anyone might, you know. Forget. Or something.
forthemiddle
(1,383 posts)If he had lost, Hillary could have run again 4 years later, instead of 8.
She will now be the second oldest President (if she is elected) when she is inaugurated. That is a big deal.
The DNC had apparently already "promised" her a clean primary if she bowed out and "supported" Obama, but as with all political beings (the Clintons certainly are that) their own ambitions came through, and they wanted her to be able to run in 2012 not wait until 2016.
These type of stories have been around since the 2008 election. It has never been a secret that Bill Clinton did not support Obama.
karynnj
(59,507 posts)For it. No one here will mistake me for a Clinton fan. This article -on the surface praising Bill, resurfaces most of the worst stories of 2008 and then adds new negatives like that completely unsourced one.
Then there are the constant statements that they need an aide to control him. Add to this repeated comments on his frailty - even having an aide help him with his jacket.
Given the article as a whole and the way it "innocently" throws in that story with no comment that Democrats would be dismayed to hear it, it seems the intent was for people to think "I am so tired of the Clintons". Then rethink the debate -Romney's entire strategy was to go almost Fox News on Obama. Very aggressive and it counted on people not seeing it as disrespectful.
It succeeded to some degree because Axlerod and others advised Obama to just keep calm and not get angry. However it may have let Obama slap him down in the last 2 debates.