Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 12:58 AM Mar 2015

if true, Bill Clinton is a 2 faced bastard. One minupulates young interns and other backstabs dems.

In September 2012, when Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee, spoke at the annual Clinton Global Initiative gathering in New York, Mr. Clinton gave him advice backstage about how to appear in command when facing off against Mr. Obama in their coming debates.


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/us/politics/to-avert-repeat-of-2008-clinton-team-hopes-to-keep-bill-at-his-best.html?referrer=

The article doesnt cite sources.. So could be false. But is very disturbing nevertheless... You never know what the Clintons are up to ...


15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
if true, Bill Clinton is a 2 faced bastard. One minupulates young interns and other backstabs dems. (Original Post) srican69 Mar 2015 OP
Or, he could have been giving Mittens disinformation, The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #1
"And if you can get Obama to say, 'Please proceed, Governor,' A-Schwarzenegger Mar 2015 #2
LOL. nt Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #6
Rofl.. pic Cha Mar 2015 #11
he may have taught Mr.Natural how to olddots Mar 2015 #3
Clinton set this up brilliantly...he PUNKED Romney Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #4
based on what we saw whatever advice Clinton gave did not help him JI7 Mar 2015 #5
In your very own words: it doesn't cite sources & it could be false.But you hurried to bring it here Hekate Mar 2015 #7
hence I prefaced with ' if true'. srican69 Mar 2015 #9
Disingenuous Hekate Mar 2015 #10
I'm not so sure about that last part malaise Mar 2015 #13
heh Hekate Mar 2015 #15
you forgot "And he's married to Hillary who might be the nominee!!!" LadyHawkAZ Mar 2015 #8
Do you really think the Clintons wanted Obama to win in 2008? forthemiddle Mar 2015 #12
read the entire article. PASSIVE aggressive might be the best word karynnj Mar 2015 #14

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,927 posts)
1. Or, he could have been giving Mittens disinformation,
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 01:08 AM
Mar 2015

considering that Mittens didn't really appear in command after all.

A-Schwarzenegger

(15,596 posts)
2. "And if you can get Obama to say, 'Please proceed, Governor,'
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 01:13 AM
Mar 2015

then you've got him right where you want him."

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
3. he may have taught Mr.Natural how to
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 01:32 AM
Mar 2015

Pull the stick out of his butt .If he did Mitt didn't pay attention .

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. Clinton set this up brilliantly...he PUNKED Romney
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 01:37 AM
Mar 2015

Romney proceeded to fall right into Obama's trap.

Thanks, Bill.

Hekate

(90,934 posts)
7. In your very own words: it doesn't cite sources & it could be false.But you hurried to bring it here
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 02:07 AM
Mar 2015

....because why? And you embellished it with your subject line.

So, back atcha.

I can tell your contributions are going to be a real asset to this board in the coming couple of years.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
8. you forgot "And he's married to Hillary who might be the nominee!!!"
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 02:33 AM
Mar 2015

In case anyone might, you know. Forget. Or something.

forthemiddle

(1,383 posts)
12. Do you really think the Clintons wanted Obama to win in 2008?
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 07:41 AM
Mar 2015

If he had lost, Hillary could have run again 4 years later, instead of 8.
She will now be the second oldest President (if she is elected) when she is inaugurated. That is a big deal.
The DNC had apparently already "promised" her a clean primary if she bowed out and "supported" Obama, but as with all political beings (the Clintons certainly are that) their own ambitions came through, and they wanted her to be able to run in 2012 not wait until 2016.

These type of stories have been around since the 2008 election. It has never been a secret that Bill Clinton did not support Obama.

karynnj

(59,507 posts)
14. read the entire article. PASSIVE aggressive might be the best word
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:29 AM
Mar 2015

For it. No one here will mistake me for a Clinton fan. This article -on the surface praising Bill, resurfaces most of the worst stories of 2008 and then adds new negatives like that completely unsourced one.

Then there are the constant statements that they need an aide to control him. Add to this repeated comments on his frailty - even having an aide help him with his jacket.

Given the article as a whole and the way it "innocently" throws in that story with no comment that Democrats would be dismayed to hear it, it seems the intent was for people to think "I am so tired of the Clintons". Then rethink the debate -Romney's entire strategy was to go almost Fox News on Obama. Very aggressive and it counted on people not seeing it as disrespectful.


It succeeded to some degree because Axlerod and others advised Obama to just keep calm and not get angry. However it may have let Obama slap him down in the last 2 debates.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»if true, Bill Clinton is ...