Are "Pro-Lifers" against killing germs, as interfering with "God's plan"? Germs are forms of life.

[Bill USA]

I guess some "Prolife" people are against the "morning after pill" (maybe all of them are, I'm not sure).

I wonder when someone is sick with a deadly disease, should we kill the germs that infect them? Might not "ProLifers" consider that as interfering with "God's plan"??

Just a wondered...

[Manifestor_of_Light]

1. No antibiotics?

Besides, germs mutate to become resistant to antibiotics. This refutes their argument of "you can't see evolution happening".

[Bill USA]

3. very good point!

[guillaumeb]

2. it is okay to kill mutated germs

because they have evolved. a dirty word for some.

[MANative]

4. Dear Bill...

I fear that what you've outlined is far too complex for their tiny brains to comprehend, never mind contemplate. Logic, you know, is not their strong suit.

[n2doc]

5. They aren't "Pro" life

They are fetus worshippers. They don't even care about the health of the fetus, let alone the mother. Just the fetus, which must be carried to term no matter what, then abandoned and disparaged.

[TheKentuckian]

6. The only life they are talking about is fetal humans, they don't even care about born babies much

less microbes or people or anything in between.

They are pro forced pregnancy if there is any sex going on and that is it.
There is no value in clever analogies or thought provoking or even "gotcha" questions because it is all about control and punishment/consequences for pleasure.

You average "pro-life" fuck will be the biggest death cheerleader you can find. They are practically cumming themselves for ever war, the death penalty, starving grannies, turning away the sick from hospitals, destitution, mass extinctions, or whatever you got that ends with death.

The ones that are legit are not supporting the death cult, in my opinion.