General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton leads all Republican challengers in Florida by 2-8 points
Hillary Clinton has leads of 2-8 points over all of the potential GOP contenders in the
state. Rubio comes the closest at just a 48/46 deficit and Bush is down by a similar
margin at 47/44. Rand Paul trails by 4 at 46/42, Mike Huckabee's down 5 at 49/44, Chris
Christie and Ted Cruz each trail by 7 at 48/41 and 49/42 respectively, and Ben Carson
(49/41), Rick Perry (50/42), and Scott Walker (49/41) all lag Clinton by 8 points.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_FL_32415.pdf
There is simply no realistic path to the White House for Republicans without the Sunshine State.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)My 17-year old would lead the Republican challengers.
The idea that the only person who can beat the Republicans is this weak excuse of a candidate is stupid. We can find a real challenger that reflects real Democratic values and beat these stupid, racist, wealth-stealing assholes. If the DNC and DLC cannot fashion a campaign narrative to win this election to place a true Democrat in the Oval Office, then that was the plan from the start.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)I don't believe I suggested she is the only Democrat capable of defeating the Republican, am I right?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)Wait til Hillary starts campaigning; her poll numbers will sink even further.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Do you have polling that suggests that other Democrats are leading a sitting senator and a popular ex governor who left office with an approval ratings in the 60s in their own state (Florida) ?
Thank you in advance.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)...and considering Hillary's history of tanking in the polls as soon as she enters the race and starts campaigning poorly, as is her history, that reality is obviously very concerning. All I'm sayin.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)Rand Paul is a virtual unknown and Hillary's negatives will only continue to climb.
It's time for the Dems to rethink coronating Hillary and start lookin for an alternative. I hear Al Gore is thinkin bout making anotha run.
Would make a worthy opponent, among others.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)That's the universe of voters that is being measured.
BTW, Barack Obama carried FL by .09% so of course it's going to close.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)After that, i will vote for the Democrat as I always do but I won't be emotionally invested.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)he sure went down in my favorables with that choice
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 27, 2015, 06:43 PM - Edit history (1)
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)There is no need to be obtuse.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Thank you in advance.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 26, 2015, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)
The title of the OP is
Hillary Clinton leads all Republican challengers in Florida by 2-8 points
But the title of the actual article is
Floridians Not Big On Bush, Rubio White House Bids
You are welcome.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)What does my choice of a title have to do with your suggestion that I stated that Secretary Of State Clinton is the only Democratic candidate who can win the presidency in 2016?
The title is a function of the fact that I believe "Hillary Clinton leads all Republican challengers in Florida by 2-8 points" is the most important finding of the poll...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)real challenger that reflects real Democratic values, that has expressed an interest in running in 2016.
Then, discuss what you are doing to support this real challenger that reflects real Democratic values. Why leave it up to the DNC and DLC, that you so clearly distrust?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Hands in ears
"lalalalalalalalala"
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Do you see any incongruity between your remarks about your interlocutor and the quotation in your signature?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I never said the person doing the mocking was philosophically impotent.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The laugh was worth the time it took to read it.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The mockery wasn't for me.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Actually sounds worse than simply being hypocritical. Take your pick. Original intent and current reading on your part aren't very flattering. Both are also pretty funny.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and it shows.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Which is a little odd, don't you think? She should be proud of her buddy
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)of Warren campaigning in FL with Regan. But you knew that.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)She actually voted to make him National Security Advisor and Sec Of State while Ms. Clinton was working as a young college student for Eugene MCCarthy in 1968 and a Texas organizer with her husband for George McGovern in 1972.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Lots of ties to republicans. Guess those things happen when you spend a good portion of your adult life cheering and supporting them. Unlike others like the Kissinger commenter above, I understand Warren understands her past errors and is a really good progressive. As is Hillary.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Not even really being serious. I really don't take the Benghazi crowd seriously. Just have a little fun with them.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)is part of "the Benghazi crowd".
You folks really need to improve your game.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)If you think it is a game, you wouldn't mind discussing Warrens support of deregulation for a good part of her adult life. Her support that helped to implement our current economic crisis. Come on. It's a simple game. You have brought us to Kissinger. Lets talk Regan and his supporters. Both would be stupid to do. That's why I don't get into it. Warren and Hillary are great progressives.
Lets play who is worse. Hillary and Kissinger or Warren and Regan. <- Don't you see how fucking stupid that sounds.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Yes, Warren admits she was wrong back then. Her positions, now, are quite different. But unless you are telling me Hillary has denounced Kissenger, then there is no comparison. At all. But hey, claiming anyone that points out Hillary's ties to Kissenger is part of "the Benghazi crowd" is a nice touch.
"Lets play who is worse. Hillary and Kissinger or Warren and Regan. <- Don't you see how fucking stupid that sounds." Who is Regan that you keep referring to?
djean111
(14,255 posts)She will not get my primary vote this time.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)How can any Democrat leading a Republican be welcomed with derision on a Democratic board?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)how the opposition is shapping up in the party and that is why some are angry.
I think most of them will support the nominee but they want a vivigorous primary anf at this point that does not look to be happening.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)As to supporting the eventual nominee of the party that's between them and their moral and political compasses...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Because it's counterproductive, futile, and it's between a person and his or her political and moral compass...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)IMHO, elections are more about getting those inclined to vote for you to go to their polling places and actually vote for you than persuading voters who are inclined to vote against you to vote for you...
I see a winning coalition waiting for Ms. Clinton that is waiting to be tapped and it's up to her to tap it.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)But most folks say the House is out of reach due to gerrymandering until the next census in 2020.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The senTe will be easier.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)That suggests, among other things, that Ms. Clinton is vastly more popular with her former constituents than Mr. Rubio is with his present constituents and Mr. Bush is with his former constituents.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Hillary has as good as 100% name recognition, and surely higher than Biden.
The average Republican troll, other than Bush, something like 30-50%.
Warren, probably around 30-40%.
Plus we all know from the history of every other damn election that these polls swing back and forth and back again constantly and only in the final months and weeks do they acquire any meaning.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)Rick Scott probably just got a boner, given his propensity for theft.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)still_one
(92,510 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)The governor is a R...All the Cabinet members are R*. The Senate is R dominated and the House ir R dominated. The congressional delegation is R dominated.
Bill Nelson is the only major Democratic office holder in the state.
*I believe so.
still_one
(92,510 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Did this poll ask how other unannounced candidates (which HRC still is) would do against all these unannounced Republicans? I checked, and while Hillary is matched against many others, it is only after her name is repeated many times before Biden and Warren are each checked against one Republican each. This is not a valid methodology.