Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMitt Romney's 'clarification' on bin Laden is another foreign policy blunder
Mitt Romney's 'clarification' on bin Laden is another foreign policy blunder
by brooklynbadboy
First Mitt Romney tried to get the Obama campaign to stop talking about Romney's error in judgment on entering Pakistan to get bin Laden. Then he knuckled under, cried uncle, and praised the president for killing him. Now Romney is explaining himself by saying he only meant that then-Sen. Obama shouldn't have made his position on a major foreign policy matter clear to the public:
He's alluding to his support for former Pakistani President Musharraff:
This is another dumb foreign policy blunder on Romney's part. Especially considering what we have seen take place in Pakistan since 2007.
Musharraf, the guy whom Romney said we should support, was subsequently run out of the country under an oncoming impeachment for suspicion of assassinating Benazir Bhutto and other violations of Pakistan's constitution. He is now exiled in London. There is an outstanding warrant for his arrest that Pakistan has forwarded to Interpol.
What Romney is saying is that President Obama shouldn't have announced he would strike unilaterally into Pakistan because it would have damaged relations with Musharraf. In the political turmoil swirling in Pakistan at that time, his decision was to side with the guy that was subsequently run out of the country and remains a fugitive on the lam.
By contrast, what did candidate Obama say about Musharraf at that time?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/01/1087988/-Mitt-Romney-s-clarification-on-bin-Laden-is-another-foreign-policy-blunder
by brooklynbadboy
First Mitt Romney tried to get the Obama campaign to stop talking about Romney's error in judgment on entering Pakistan to get bin Laden. Then he knuckled under, cried uncle, and praised the president for killing him. Now Romney is explaining himself by saying he only meant that then-Sen. Obama shouldn't have made his position on a major foreign policy matter clear to the public:
I said that very clearly in the response that I made, but that I thought and many people believed as I did that it was naive on the part of the president at that time, the candidate, to say he would go in to Pakistan. It was a, if you will, fragile and flammable time in Pakistan and I thought it was a mistake of him
to announce that he would do this.
He's alluding to his support for former Pakistani President Musharraff:
We do not go out and say to a nation which is working with us, where we have collaborated and they are our friend and were trying to support Musharraf and strengthen him and his nation, that instead that we intend to go in there and potentially bring out a unilateral attack.
This is another dumb foreign policy blunder on Romney's part. Especially considering what we have seen take place in Pakistan since 2007.
Musharraf, the guy whom Romney said we should support, was subsequently run out of the country under an oncoming impeachment for suspicion of assassinating Benazir Bhutto and other violations of Pakistan's constitution. He is now exiled in London. There is an outstanding warrant for his arrest that Pakistan has forwarded to Interpol.
What Romney is saying is that President Obama shouldn't have announced he would strike unilaterally into Pakistan because it would have damaged relations with Musharraf. In the political turmoil swirling in Pakistan at that time, his decision was to side with the guy that was subsequently run out of the country and remains a fugitive on the lam.
By contrast, what did candidate Obama say about Musharraf at that time?
Musharraf resigned on Aug. 18, 2008, rather than face imminent impeachment proceedings, and two days later Sen. Barack Obama issued a bit of an I-told-you-so.
"I argued for years that we need to move from a 'Musharraf policy' to a 'Pakistan policy,'" Obama said in a speech before the Veterans of Foreign Wars National Convention on Aug. 19. "We must move beyond an alliance built on mere convenience or a relationship with one man. Now, with President Musharraf's resignation, we have the opportunity to do just that. That's why I've co-sponsored a bill to triple nonmilitary aid to the Pakistani people, while ensuring that the military assistance we do provide is used to take the fight to the Taliban and al-Qaida in the tribal regions of Pakistan."
"I argued for years that we need to move from a 'Musharraf policy' to a 'Pakistan policy,'" Obama said in a speech before the Veterans of Foreign Wars National Convention on Aug. 19. "We must move beyond an alliance built on mere convenience or a relationship with one man. Now, with President Musharraf's resignation, we have the opportunity to do just that. That's why I've co-sponsored a bill to triple nonmilitary aid to the Pakistani people, while ensuring that the military assistance we do provide is used to take the fight to the Taliban and al-Qaida in the tribal regions of Pakistan."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/01/1087988/-Mitt-Romney-s-clarification-on-bin-Laden-is-another-foreign-policy-blunder
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1357 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney's 'clarification' on bin Laden is another foreign policy blunder (Original Post)
ProSense
May 2012
OP
DCBob
(24,689 posts)1. They must have got some bad internal poll numbers on the attack.
The Romney campaign must be in total meltdown tonight.
C_U_L8R
(45,035 posts)2. Mmmm mitt meltdown
Warms my heart
liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)3. Everytime Romney has to backtrack, he looks more the fool.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)4. if only the hole he's digging for himself would actually trap him
in November ...
dig deeper, Mittens ... you'll get to China in no time ...