Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:11 AM Apr 2012

Nutella to Pay $3 Million - Deceptive Ad

I sent an e-mail to the SEC over a year ago to investigate this ad too.

It's a candy bar in a jar...delicious, but not healthy - Justin's is a healthier choice.

Remember that California mom who sued Nutella maker Ferrero over misleading advertising that made the addictive and gooey chocolate-hazelnut spread seem healthy?

Well, her lawsuit was awarded class action status, and the New York Daily News reports that Ferrero has agreed to settle for $3 million. That works out to be about $4 a jar or less, if you're thinking of making a claim.

Quick recap: as we reported on the Shots blog last year, the trouble began when Athena Hohenberg realized that the Nutella she'd been feeding her 4-year-old daughter was "the next best thing to a candy bar," according to court documents. Hohenberg says she was taken in by ads and product labels that claimed Nutella was "healthy" and "part of a balanced meal." When friends eventually pointed out Nutella's high sugar and fat content, she sued Ferrero for deceptive advertising.http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/04/26/151454929/nutella-maker-may-settle-deceptive-ad-lawsuit-for-3-million

64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nutella to Pay $3 Million - Deceptive Ad (Original Post) otohara Apr 2012 OP
DARN! elleng Apr 2012 #1
No, elleng, and Wonder Bread doesn't build strong bodies 12 ways, either. :-) nt gateley Apr 2012 #4
Oh gate, I knew THAT! elleng Apr 2012 #6
if you take a slice SwampG8r Apr 2012 #28
Wonder Bread - used by plumbers as a plug on small water pipes when doing repairs. mikeytherat Apr 2012 #31
omg i went to plumbing school SwampG8r Apr 2012 #34
My mom fell for it hook, line and sinker. Or more probably, succumbed gateley Apr 2012 #51
I often wonder if it's bread n/t hootinholler Apr 2012 #37
??? Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #27
!!! elleng Apr 2012 #39
No more Nutella and bacon sandwiches for me. soleft Apr 2012 #47
I have seen that commercial lunasun Apr 2012 #2
Candy bar in a jar is a great description. nt gateley Apr 2012 #5
One of the favorite memories elleng Apr 2012 #8
Oh god yes. progressoid Apr 2012 #12
Heaven leftynyc Apr 2012 #21
i would buy that SwampG8r Apr 2012 #29
True. I use it over ice cream. RebelOne Apr 2012 #62
After I read the ingredients, roody Apr 2012 #3
It is a lot of fat and sugar but only some nut butter in it lunasun Apr 2012 #7
You can make your own without palm oil. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #15
It's ridiculous? The ad says one thing, the label says another, but the lawsuit is ridiculous? truebrit71 Apr 2012 #20
Yes. It IS ridiculous. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #24
Have YOu Seen The Ad? otohara Apr 2012 #30
The most recent ad has the kids bouncing off the walls, tearing the place apart, running in circles mikeytherat Apr 2012 #33
It's not up to the kids to read the labels. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #46
Define "healthy" and "choice" joeglow3 Apr 2012 #49
Okay, I had to look laundry_queen Apr 2012 #52
My guess... GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #56
Ask Nutella, Their Claim, Not Mine otohara Apr 2012 #58
So if a car company advertises that it gets 100 mpg... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #40
What if the car company says it is better for the environment? joeglow3 Apr 2012 #50
So, people are supposed to make their purchasing decisions based solely on advertising? GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #55
"It shocks me that people automatically believe everything they hear or read.." truebrit71 Apr 2012 #59
Sad, ain't it? GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #60
I mentored A young girl otohara Apr 2012 #61
Oh good grief! Meiko Apr 2012 #19
there's a label, for heaven's sake renate Apr 2012 #9
That was my thought too LadyHawkAZ Apr 2012 #11
Exactly CBGLuthier Apr 2012 #16
I agree. HappyMe Apr 2012 #23
But the ad didn't specifically advise people to avoid this protect 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #57
McDonalds Doesn't Claim to Be Healthy otohara Apr 2012 #64
YES! grasswire Apr 2012 #10
That Meiko Apr 2012 #13
I'd never tasted Nutella until a couple of months ago when there were samples at the grocery store. Vinca Apr 2012 #14
Next you'll be telling me that cocoa puffs aren't good for me. Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #17
Froot Loops are better because they have fruit in them. lapislzi Apr 2012 #32
That makes perfect sense. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #36
Actually filled with froot(TM) Spike89 Apr 2012 #54
. chrisa Apr 2012 #45
I would be interested in the details. How much of the settlement do lawyers get? rhett o rick Apr 2012 #18
Local News Said otohara Apr 2012 #22
I'll take my portion of the lawsuit Horse with no Name Apr 2012 #25
As much as I am for responsible advertising. sendero Apr 2012 #26
If the idiot mom was too stupid to read the label of what she's Codeine Apr 2012 #35
I know many people are enjoying the opportunity to mock and scorn, but its not a stupid lawsuit. redqueen Apr 2012 #38
+1 ctaylors6 Apr 2012 #41
I agree with you. trotsky Apr 2012 #42
I agree 100% truebrit71 Apr 2012 #43
+1 n/t Spazito Apr 2012 #53
This Is A Huge Win IMO otohara Apr 2012 #63
In America, "Cinnamon Toast Crunch" is part of a healthy breakfast too. chrisa Apr 2012 #44
Not as tasty as Nuttela though. Mr.Turnip Apr 2012 #48

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
28. if you take a slice
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:28 AM
Apr 2012

of wonder bread and float it in water
it swells up but never disintegrates
homemade bread melts after a few minutes
just turns to dust
not wonder bread

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
34. omg i went to plumbing school
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:42 AM
Apr 2012

back in the early 80s and they told us that exact thing
i forgot it until now
lol

gateley

(62,683 posts)
51. My mom fell for it hook, line and sinker. Or more probably, succumbed
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:35 PM
Apr 2012

to my brother and me falling for the commercials and insisting she buy it. I swear every kid in my class brought sandwiches made with Wonder Bread.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
27. ???
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:21 AM
Apr 2012

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This lawsuit and settlment are clearly an illusory ruse concocted by the anti-Nutella crowd

Nutella promotes peace, freedom and general happiness (in addition to tasting great) so it clearly has no place in the impending One World Shadow Government takeover...

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
2. I have seen that commercial
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:22 AM
Apr 2012

It always wants to make me barf

No kidding! Cuz I know what nutella is and its not for breakfast....

elleng

(130,739 posts)
8. One of the favorite memories
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:01 AM
Apr 2012

for me and daughters was on a trip we took to Europe 10? years ago. Hungry after walking around Genoa, in our room with fresh croissants and NUTELLA!!! We'll never forget it!

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
21. Heaven
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:19 AM
Apr 2012

No trip to Paris is the same without it. Nutella is everywhere. Also on the Greek Islands.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
29. i would buy that
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:29 AM
Apr 2012

who wouldnt want a candy bar in a jar?
peanut butter and candy bar sammiches for everyone!!!11!!

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
62. True. I use it over ice cream.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 03:34 PM
Apr 2012

I love that stuff, but use it very sparingly, 'cause I know how unhealthy it really is.

roody

(10,849 posts)
3. After I read the ingredients,
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:36 AM
Apr 2012

I was through with Nutella forever. Second ingredient palm oil---wrong on many levels.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
7. It is a lot of fat and sugar but only some nut butter in it
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:57 AM
Apr 2012

According to the product label, the main ingredients of Nutella are sugar and vegetable oils (mostly palm oil[, followed by hazelnut, cocoa solids, and skimmed milk.

In the United States, Nutella contains soy products too

About50% of the calories in Nutella come from fat (11 g in a 37 g serving, or 99 kcal / 200 kcal)
and about 40% of the calories come from sugar (20 g, 80 kcal)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutella

nut butter is good w/o sugar soy palm milk etc.IMO

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
15. You can make your own without palm oil.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 07:51 AM
Apr 2012

That way, you don't have to be through with it. Here is one of many recipes for homemade Nutella out there: http://leitesculinaria.com/78672/recipes-homemade-nutella.html


I think this lawsuit was ridiculous. Don't people know how to read labels?

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
20. It's ridiculous? The ad says one thing, the label says another, but the lawsuit is ridiculous?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:17 AM
Apr 2012

Not so much. The law suit is spot-on imho.

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
24. Yes. It IS ridiculous.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:14 AM
Apr 2012

Half the fucking ads on TV are BS. Should we sue over those, too, because people are too lazy to read the labels? Why not just not buy the damn product? Does this really warrant taking it to court?

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
30. Have YOu Seen The Ad?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:33 AM
Apr 2012

from the get go, it says Nutella is a healthy choice for your kids. The entire ad is based on it being healthy, when clearly it's not.

Do people kids read labels? No, no they don't.

This is a good thing.

mikeytherat

(6,829 posts)
33. The most recent ad has the kids bouncing off the walls, tearing the place apart, running in circles
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:40 AM
Apr 2012

My first thought was, "Maybe you should ease off on the Nutella, mom."

mikey_the_rat

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
46. It's not up to the kids to read the labels.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:39 PM
Apr 2012

It's up to their parents. What their kids eat is THEIR responsibility, and that includes reading the label on whatever they buy to feed their children.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
49. Define "healthy" and "choice"
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:32 PM
Apr 2012

If it is healthier than peanut butter, than the ad seems reasonable. Anyone who sees the ad and thinks it is a healthy alternative to celery is a fucking idiot. If it is in fact a healthy alternative to peanut butter (which is its competition), they it seems to be a reasonably accurate description.

Now, I have not looked at the label, so if it is NOT a healthier alternative the peanut butter, then it could very likely be deceptive.

Finally, settling does not prove anything. Companies settle all the time because, even if they win, the publicity of a trial can cost you a LOT more.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
52. Okay, I had to look
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:39 PM
Apr 2012

I have both in my house at the moment.

Per tbsp, compared to Peanut butter (plain, smooth Kraft) Nutella has 2 g less fat (0.5g more saturated fat); 10 more calories; 1mg more cholesterol; 65 mg less sodium; 7g more carbs (10g more sugar); 1 gm more fibre; 2 gm less protein.

Not a huge difference to peanut butter, except for the sugar (more) and sodium (less).

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
56. My guess...
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:04 PM
Apr 2012

...is that they based the "healthy" part on the fact that they don't add any preservatives to it, or hydrogenated oils that most peanut butters contain. The exceptions being "natural" styles. And, in that regard, Nutella IS healthier. Hydrogenated oils, a.k.a. "trans-fats" are NASTY. and heavily contribute to vascular disease.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
58. Ask Nutella, Their Claim, Not Mine
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:08 PM
Apr 2012

They've dropped the health claim, that's good enough for me.

My choice is Justin's Hazelnut Butter - 7 grams of sugar, vs Nutella's 21 grams.


 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
40. So if a car company advertises that it gets 100 mpg...
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:29 AM
Apr 2012

...and I buy the car based on that fact, even if the true number was disclosed in the tiny, tiny print in the car manual, and subsequently find out that it only gets 20 mpg, if I sued that would be ridiculous too?

There's a difference between BS and blatant false representation...

You should not LEGALLY be able to say my product is 'X' when in fact it is the OPPOSITE of 'X'.

The fact that I have to argue in favour of this on a "liberal" website is alarming...

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
50. What if the car company says it is better for the environment?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:33 PM
Apr 2012

What if it IS better for the environment than the average car, but is MUCH worse than public transportation or riding a bike, is it being deceptive?

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
55. So, people are supposed to make their purchasing decisions based solely on advertising?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:55 PM
Apr 2012

If you want to buy a car based on an ad, without checking Consumer Reports, JD Power, DOE fuel efficiency reports, etc., then yes, suing the car company would be ridiculous, IMO. The information is out there, and easily accessible to all. That includes nutritional and ingredient labels on food products. I would rather see people exercise consumer savvy than run to court complaining that they were snookered--even though the facts were right in front of their faces. It shocks me that people automatically believe everything they hear or read, without bothering even read labels or check facts.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
59. "It shocks me that people automatically believe everything they hear or read.."
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:24 PM
Apr 2012

"... without bothering even read labels or check facts."

Hi, my name is TrueBrit, I live in the United States of America, which foreign country do you live in??

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
60. Sad, ain't it?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:34 PM
Apr 2012

Instead of teaching critical thinking skills, and encouraging people to check their facts before acting, we just solve everything by running to court.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
61. I mentored A young girl
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 03:31 PM
Apr 2012

They chose me because she wanted to lose weight, she was 11 at the time and obese. I taught her to read labels, told her McD's was a no,no!. Her grandma kept buying Twinkies. Her mom was a frequent visitor to McDonalds. Twinkles and McD's won!
Nutella really pushed the healthy claim to poor folks who don't read labels!

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
19. Oh good grief!
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:16 AM
Apr 2012

I didn't know that. I have never eaten it and it looks like I won't be starting anytime soon.

renate

(13,776 posts)
9. there's a label, for heaven's sake
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:43 AM
Apr 2012

I assume there was no accusation that the label was incorrect. If this were about advertisements for fast food, for which you have to go out of your way to get actual nutrition information, that'd be one thing, but this lawsuit was stupid.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
11. That was my thought too
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:53 AM
Apr 2012

anyone who has ever taken a bite of the stuff should have known it was overloaded with sugar without even looking at the label. I used to use it to make desserts with, because it was too sweet for anything else.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
16. Exactly
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 07:53 AM
Apr 2012

A misleading ad? Oh Heavens!!

If you can not be bothered to read the label then you have no one to blame but yourself.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
57. But the ad didn't specifically advise people to avoid this protect
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:05 PM
Apr 2012

and after buying some nutella the company didn't send representatives to their house to read through the ingredients and health facts with them to make sure they were making informed decisions.

How can people be expected to function when they are merely provided with all necessary information but not someone to read and interpret it for them?

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
64. McDonalds Doesn't Claim to Be Healthy
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:27 PM
Apr 2012

Nutella was - but NO MORE.

The entire ad was based on it being a healthy choice.

Not a stupid lawsuit, what's stupid is to assume people in this country will read labels after they just heard umpteen times how healthy it is for your kids. You're pretty much saying that poor and illiterate families should gamble on healthy food choices based on possible false advertising.





grasswire

(50,130 posts)
10. YES!
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:52 AM
Apr 2012

That advertising has always bothered me.

Keep that sugary stuff out of the kids' breakfast, please.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
13. That
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:14 AM
Apr 2012

would be up to the parents don't you think. Take a look at a box of cereal when you get a chance, some are pretty grim.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
14. I'd never tasted Nutella until a couple of months ago when there were samples at the grocery store.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:53 AM
Apr 2012

They had it spread on little pieces of bread. My very first thought was that it would be great heated up on ice cream, but it didn't belong on bread. In any case, it's nothing I would ever buy.

Spike89

(1,569 posts)
54. Actually filled with froot(TM)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:52 PM
Apr 2012

Froot is a trademarked substance consisting of equal parts sugar, food dye, and sometimes lemur dung. Any confusion arising from the similarly pronounced seed-bearing objects growing on trees and bushes is purely intentional.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
18. I would be interested in the details. How much of the settlement do lawyers get?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:09 AM
Apr 2012

How does a consumer have to prove they qualify for a piece of the settlement? How much is the settlement per person?

A lot of these class action suits are scams. Let's say a company defrauds consumers to the tune of $100 million dollars. The class action lawyers and company lawyers are happy to settle for $20 million settlement. The suing lawyers get $10 million for doing a little research and negotiating from $100 million to $20 million. Not a bad pay day. The consumers may get a few dollars if they have the proof needed to qualify (some times very difficult). Or they may get a coupon for 5% off their next purchase. So of the $100 million dollars defrauded from the consumers, the corporation gets to keep 80% off the top, the lawyers get 10% for doing very little and the consumers get squat. Also, that money unclaimed by consumers (which I am guessing is a lot because of the trouble required for next to nothing), the corporations of course get to keep. Looks like a win-win if you exclude the consumers.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
22. Local News Said
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:07 AM
Apr 2012

it works out to about $4.00 per person who takes the time to send a letter claiming you thought it was healthy.

It more a victory in false advertising vs class action.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
26. As much as I am for responsible advertising.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:21 AM
Apr 2012

.... I'm for responsible parenting even more. "Healthy" is a subjective term. Any moron could look at the Nutritional Facts on this product and see that calling it healthy would be a huge stretch.

Check the label before you eat something. Be thankful that these labels are required at all.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
35. If the idiot mom was too stupid to read the label of what she's
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:45 AM
Apr 2012

putting inside her child's body then she's going to need far more help than a lawsuit can provide.

I don't give our kids anything without reading a label. Nutella is practically fucking cake frosting.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
38. I know many people are enjoying the opportunity to mock and scorn, but its not a stupid lawsuit.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:06 AM
Apr 2012

Yes, reading labels and learning to understand the information there is important.

However, false advertising is a separate issue.

I'm sure this will be lost on those more interested in playground insults.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
43. I agree 100%
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:31 AM
Apr 2012

This isn't a case of something being "mis-leading", they are bald-faced lies. And that is illegal.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
63. This Is A Huge Win IMO
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:18 PM
Apr 2012

like I said in my post, I wrote the SEC too after reading where a lady in Canada failed. I figured my e-mail would go nowhere, so I'm glad someone at the SEC took it seriously.

Nutella is huge, huge, huge around the world - and the story about it is warm and fuzzy. I bet the original recipe didn't have all the sugar and whey. They market to kids and tired parents who don't read labels, or cook.

Candy Bar in a jar!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nutella to Pay $3 Million...