General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBubba and his 21 burner phones.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Burner+phonefrom the Urban Dictionary:
Top Definition
burner phone
A prepaid cellular phone, replaced frequently (weekly) (monthly) to avoid leaving a trail and getting caught up in illegal activities
Dude you want some of that herb, hit me up on the burner phone.
by gmoney21 July 30, 2009
Burner phone
A separate phone used for business purposes, usually for drug deals. Also can be called "burn phone."
If yall need some kush, you can hit me up on the burner phone.
by Ingle July 24, 2006
http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/prince-andrew-sex-allegations-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-had-21-phone-numbers-for-bill-clinton-9959491.html
Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender at the centre of a scandal that has seen allegations levelled at Prince Andrew that he had sex with an teenager, possessed up to 21 phone numbers for former President Bill Clinton stored in his computer, it has been claimed.
Epsteins relationship with Mr Clinton has been previously reported on and it is known that between 2002-2005 he flew on the financiers private jet on numerous occasions, both on charitable endeavours to places such as Africa, as well as to Epsteins private Caribbean island, Little St James. It would later be alleged in court that Epstein organised orgies on that same private island in the US Virgin Islands.
Mr Clinton has faced no allegations over the events on the Caribbean island and in Florida, where police investigated claims that Epstein paid underage girls for sex. In 2008, Epstein, 61, pleaded guilty to a single charge of soliciting prostitution and was handed an 18-month jail sentence.
Vast right wing conspiracy of lies?
villager
(26,001 posts)Nation wouldn't survive it.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)Said Progressive would have to watch his/her back if they actually obtained the Oval Office, in spite of a permanently rigged system...
Scuba
(53,475 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)FSogol
(45,485 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Clinton was seen masticating in the White House!
FSogol
(45,485 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Sorry, in the words of Yoda, for 900 years have I marinated in comedy. My own counsel I will keep, on what is or is not, a "laughing matter".
....honestly, I didn't give half a fuck in 1998, I sure as shit don't now.
Unless there's some actual evidence actual laws were broken, what the consenting adults in that family do is between them, each other, and their respective pants.
FWIW, I'd love to see Liz Warren run. But not because of this... whatever it's supposed to be.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yeah, it's like all the dryers sprung a leak at the same time.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Chellee
(2,097 posts)pertaining to large juniper flavored drinks. Masoginistic.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Even in my aftershave drinking days, I wouldn't touch gin.
Chellee
(2,097 posts)The gin, not the aftershave.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Oh, I'd drink it in a pinch. But it was never my thing.
I was actually one of those English cider drinkers. It's amazing that I still have most of my teeth.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If Hillary is the nominee, cross your fingers there's no October surprise.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)... and she's done nothing to inspire "probable" voters. Meanwhile she's alienated the Democratic base by being pro-war, pro-TPP, pro-H1B Visas, pro-Wall Street and hanging with "The Family".
merrily
(45,251 posts)The Party has been backing her like crazy, quite obviously since 2012. Unless the Party changes its mind about her, she will VERY probably be the nominee. That is what I meant.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)The one that sends Bubba, Obama, Schumer, et al out to campaign for Democrats. Or not.
The one that has been saying for two years that, if Hillary chooses to run, she'll "clear the field." No one will even bother to run against her.
Response to merrily (Reply #145)
Beaverhausen This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Yet the oddsmakers make her a prohibitive favorite and she's trouncing her Republican Challengers in the polls. Of course all that can change but at this point I think I will go with empirical evidence and not this or that random poster's gut.
Oh, I like to play chess so if your retort is that she had a commanding lead at this time in 07 my rebuttal is if Barack Obama is on the ballot this election cycle I will reevaluate my opinion.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)voter gives a shit.
My fear is that she'll offer up some mealy-mouthed middle of the road campaign, poll-tested to the gills, that gives people shit like "my most inspirational bible verse" instead of taking the actual leadership positions that the American people need, even though they might piss someone off.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)underahedgerow
(1,232 posts)link. Same old tactics that the GOP always uses, isn't it? So it all depends on if we fall for it and how much we care about 15-20 year old allegations.
If you don't like Mme Clinton as the Democratic candidate, I'd be seriously interested in who should be considered as the clear contender?
Hekate
(90,690 posts)...and hang on to your seatbelt because it's already a bumpy ride.
Obligatory disclaimer: I have not yet settled on a candidate for 2016, but s/he will have a D after their name.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Daily-Mirror. RAW and Gawker are bullshit gossip sites.
dsc
(52,162 posts)but I don't see the word burner in your excerpt and up to 21 could be 1 it could be 2 etc. I can easily see having multiple numbers (I have three myself where I can be reached).
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)the trail leads to burner phones and how and why they are used. Before today, I had little idea what burner phones were and what they were used for.
Of course having 21 different phone numbers, or up to, is more that slightly strange. I know people around Bill's age and remembering one is hard enough.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)'course, Bill needed a big suitcase to carry around 21 of these:
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)and, of course, the Inebriati :
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)DU is like Hotel California.
You can get kicked out, but you can never leave.
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
Smart feller, that Nobel Prize winning physicist.
Sid
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And it is one of the most brutally truthful things anyone has said in the last hundred years.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)♫ I'm just a burner, they can't trace me. Use me in drug deals, then replace me. ♫
dsc
(52,162 posts)but the whole concept of a burner phone is to use it for a very short time and then discard it. That would seem to preclude anyone having 21 of them at one time.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)Use one for a week, trash it. Get a new one, repeat and rinse. All the while supplying your contacts with the new numbers = possibly 21 phones.
dsc
(52,162 posts)that is my point. They would delete the previous ones unless they were still active which means they likely aren't burner phones.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)but I also think, that when you get to be that rich and that powerful, you begin to believe you truly are invincible and bad things can't ever happen to you and rules and laws are for other people.
dsc
(52,162 posts)the number would literally be useless and thus you would delete it so you wouldn't call it by accident. My sister had cell phone issues at one point and went through several numbers I deleted the old ones so when I called her I actually got her. Otherwise I got either nothing or a recording.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... I have contacts in my phone I haven't called or had anything to do with in years. Deleting them is just so much...... trouble.
I actually did go through my phone about 5 years ago and deleted everyone I didn't need, cleaned it all up - took several hours. Then I synced the damn thing with my laptop and it put every one of them right back on there. I said "never again".
Hekate
(90,690 posts)I bet Hillary bought him those phones, too.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)AHA! Add this to your screed: "Clinton had AT LEAST 21 maybe MORE!!"
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Then again I'm a campaign staffer, and the phones that campaigns use for phonebanking are typically burner phones.
The Best Buy employee had a funny look on his face.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Though a burner means he is throwing them away so he can't be tapped. You wouldn't be able to reach him unless he supplied you a new number. The 21 numbers thing lacks context.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)A separate phone used for business purposes, usually for drug deals. Also can be called "burn phone."
If yall need some kush call Bill Clinton, you can hit him up on his burner phone.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)I just smoked the last of my Clinton Chronic.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)TY for that link! That gave me about 3 hours of entertainment! Dana Carvey is a fookin comedy mastermind! His Ross Perot had me ROFLMAO!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Phil Hartman as Bill Clinton with the bong... priceless.
Rex
(65,616 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Placed up against a ziplock baggy, three/four fingers is usually close to an ounce. So I've been told.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)How much is a pound now?
zappaman
(20,606 posts)It isn't that much more expensive especially if you know a grower.
There is soooo much out there, it's ridiculous.
Or, like here in California, you can grow 7 plants if you have a medical card, which costs around $30.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will see people getting high in their cars, in parking lots, et cetera.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)No nasty "ditch weed barely get you high" stuff.
All potent and you get a choice between indica and sativa.
Nice to know what you are ingesting...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Last time I partook Clinton was just beginning his first term.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)It is dangerous, imo, now because to get cheap deals you have to mess with people in drug cartels. Which can be very unhealthy. A good pound costs about 400 dollars. Trash weed is half that.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)And an additional two google numbers that forward to two of the phones! TOP THAT!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)books CDs and DVDs, music lessons, I had a dedicated line for my mom when she was ill.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)waddirum
(979 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)and given him your number 21 different times.
I think you miss a very, very large point.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Concentrate on the year 2008.
Now, does your story say Epstein had 21 current numbers since 2008? (that's your cue to make something up now.)
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)There are others doing that as well. I am very pleased to be so entertaining for you. As for this story, we will see if anything else becomes public or if Dertshowasshole buries it by intimidation.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Would you like some advice from someone who can troll with the best of them when he feels so inclined?
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Hekate
(90,690 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)Has anyone come forward and said that Bill Clinton has done anything wrong or illegal, because if not then all you are doing is trying to create an issue that does not exist.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)BS.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)And how about Hillary's enabling Bill's lewd behavior. She doesn't exactly set an example for women's rights and empowerment. Indeed, it's an embarrassment. I'd take Warren any day over Hillary. Please Elizabeth, I'm beggin you to run.
Gman
(24,780 posts)It's not an issue. Plain and simple.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)If the same thing were alleged about Bush's cousin's, roommate's, barber, many of the same people who think this story is a waste would be talking about Bush's ties to underage sex trafficking.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Well, nowhere, beyond the confines of Democratic Underground.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)there's a lot of people with a LOT of power an money who have an interest in keeping Clinton out of trouble. If he's even in any trouble in the first place, you can be sure no one is going to talk. I'm not sure why Clinton would have a bunch of burner phones, though (if the story is even true), doesn't he trust that his phone calls and call records would be kept private?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Is Bill Clinton running for something?
Now, post about Haiti, or something.
Sid
Response to SidDithers (Reply #7)
Post removed
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)It's not like it was hard to figure out. It was pretty obvious, really. I mean, I knew back in October.
Names might change, but posting patterns and opinions rarely do.
And no, the information didn't come from MIRT, though MIRT does, on occasion, discuss returnees. I wasn't on MIRT in October.
Sid
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Hekate
(90,690 posts)Sadly, I am not one of them, so I miss out on some of the fun. However, I do recall many of the names of the dear departed, and the aggravation they caused.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)"I'm not going to kill you. I want you to do me a favor: I want you to tell all your friends about me."
"WHAT ARE YOU?!"
"...I'm Batman."
to Sid:
LahDeeDah
Posting Privileges Revoked
Revoked by Skinner (Administrator)
Jan 28, 2015
Previously banned.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
zappaman
(20,606 posts)But they'll be back!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Because she doesn't have the same stuff as he has in his pants, or some such malarkey. She's missing that special something!
Just like we needed those intellectual giants and glowing examples of emotional maturity, wannabe Prez's, McCain or Romney! Because Obama was and still is... uh... you know... that special word. At least he had the 'right stuff... just not enough.'
Like this guy:
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Apply icon liberally as needed...
BTW, half the American population won't forget those who think HRC is incompetent or sleazy because of her husband who seriously pissed her off.
Are all women with philandering husbands at fault now?
That accusation won't hunt.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)A woman is only as good as the man secretly running her.
Apparently.
Sid
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Most excellent!
olddots
(10,237 posts)isn't he a vegetarian now ?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I prefer my phones (and burgers) to be done well, not well done.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)As cheap as I am, even I would go see it.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)... would have five land line numbers for me, three work numbers, two cell numbers and (if you're special) two google numbers that forward to my cell for work purposes.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)again, y ou are missing a huge, big, humongous point here. But I know you aren't here to make a serious one. Just one of those shiney things to follow.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)But again, you're not following the timeline and you're filling in the gaps with your imagination.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Clinton would have multiple phones at home and the offices of his organizations and places where he travels.
The whole "burner phone" claim is bullshit.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)If you can come up with a good reason, I will listen but what you said here is not a good reason. Of course Clinton wouldhave tons of different phone numbers, there is the Foundation then the other one, Initiative something or other. Loads of numbers, but does he change those as well so often? I doubt it.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)They were from Epsteins computerized phone directory. It included Clinton's personal assistant, his schedulers, etc., and even what appeared to be his personal numbers at the time.
However, none of them were ever reported to be "burner" phones.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Where does the article mention "burner phones"?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I am curious why anyone would need 21 phone numbers, and burner phones came up in another conversation. I find this fascinating as I really didn't know much about those things and why they are used, now I do.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Maybe you should read reply 30...or not.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)numerous phones she was using to orchestrate the deaths of four Americans in BENGHAZI!
He needed to be able to reach Hillary in order to summon her to come and help restrain the countless underage girls that Bill was sexually abusing.
Sound about right?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)MineralMan
(146,308 posts)"it has been claimed?" Really. By whom? Where's the evidence of this? Allegations by whom?
This is bogus crap. When you find some actual person who has actual evidence, then you have a story. Right now you have nothing but anonymous claims. That's what you bring to DU? Really?
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Dedicated to what, I can't say for sure.
egduj
(805 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Congratulations, you win 1 internet.
Sid
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Man, you keep worrying this like a puppy with a piece of rawhide.
FSogol
(45,485 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)FSogol
(45,485 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)We really have no idea if she supports Warren. Or any Democrat.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)that a lot of Clinton supporters would be annoyed as they think of her as a threat. I put that graphic up because I like Warren and really appreciate the real hard work she has put in. It's really silly to twist that into something you would rather believe, but go ahead, no skin off my nose. Everyone knows that Warren supporters are not exactly welcomed here.
That's just a weeny bit different than what you said, isn't it?
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Actually your first quote was even more bizarre - that you got special treatment when you put up the Warren sig.
There are A LOT of Warren supporters who are brilliant prolific posters (who don't make up shit and drag right wing crap into DU)
zappaman
(20,606 posts)I contributed to her campaign for senate even though I live in California.
Glad she won and just recently donated to Kamala Harris' campaign thru Elizabeth's site.
I feel welcome here.
You sure do seem to make a lot of shit up.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)People who post divisive bullshit designed to weaken the left, now they might have a problem here.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The people here at DU are either going to vote for Hillary or not, depending on the opportunities given at the polls. Your spreading of negative disinformation isn't really going to change that. You are also not going to gain any votes for your preferred republican candidate by going negative. Have a meeting with your buddies on that other site and come back with a new strategy. I am proud of you for your efforts. It takes determination to spread this much bullshit.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Nothing about that in that story. In fact even the phones were just "allegations." You made up the "burner phone" thing out of whole cloth? Why?
This line is also in the story: "Mr Clinton has faced no allegations over the events on the Caribbean island and in Florida,"
What's your point here? You make up "burner phones," and try to tie Clinton to sex with underaged girls. Again, there is no evidence whatsoever that indicates that he had anything to do with that. No evidence? It didn't happen.
Find evidence, not anonymous allegations. Find a reference to "burner phones," or don't mention them, please. Please don't make things up. That's not a nice thing to do.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It's sure not like something I care to listen to. It sounds like all the RW propaganda I've ever heard about the Clintons. It's old and tired. and Wrong.
FSogol
(45,485 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)My favorite Drudge story was the bi-racial love child Clinton allegedly made with a young woman who lived in a Little Rock project when he used to go on his daily jogs.
i remember they were discussing the angle to get it in the mainstream on FAUX NEWS so they decided to go with the deadbeat dad angle.
FSogol
(45,485 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Vast right wing conspiracy of lies?"
I'd suggest a vast turd-ball flung at the wall to see if it sticks.
Just a suggestion-- innuendo, implications and conjecture are a rather big turn-off to rational voters. If you're simply attempting to sway to lowest hanging fruit, you're doing a good job. However, on the off chance you're attempting to persuade the rational voter, I'd suggest avoiding the Rush Limbaugh style of journalism (and if you're honest with yourself, you know that is precisely what you are doing, regardless of how you rationalize, or maintain a pretense of a sincere and genuine curiosity).
Me? No idea who I'll cast my primary vote for yet, I'm patient, the primaries haven't even started, and most of my attention is directed towards policy and analysis... but to be perfectly honest, posts such as yours viscerally tempt me to cast my ballot for the guys you hate.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Might as well be on a RW site. Same old crap around here.
You might want to note that the woman making the allegations against Epstein and prince Andrew denied being with Bill Clinton and said that she never saw him in any sexual situations with anyone.
"During the period that Roberts worked for Epstein he was good friends with Clinton, but she denies sleeping with him despite rumors to the contrary.
'I have seen reports saying or implying that I had sex with former President Bill Clinton on Little St James Island,' she writes in the filing.
The island, part of the U.S. Virgin Islands, is owned by Epstein.
'Clinton was present on the island at a time when I was also present on the island, but I have never had sexual relations with Clinton, nor have I ever claimed to have had such relations. I have never seen him have sexual relations with anyone,' Roberts wrote."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2921218/I-never-slept-Bill-Clinton-Sex-slave-Virginia-Roberts-denies-rumors-relations-former-President-explosive-court-filings.html
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It's odd that they're all on right-wing sites, like:
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/01/06/bill-clintons-21-burner-phone-numbers-in-billionaire-pimps-contacts-trips-to-teen-sex-runners-private-island-170681
and
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huge-news-bill-clinton-may-end-hillarys-career-shocking/
and
http://twitchy.com/2015/01/05/report-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-had-21-different-numbers-for-reaching-bill-clinton/
and
http://victorygirlsblog.com/bill-clinton-involved-in-prince-andrews-sex-scandal-what-it-may-say-about-hillary/
Odd coincidence, huh? They all date to early January. Weird, eh? And they're all based on no actual information. Strange, isn't it?
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)the Lolita Express. If you go to google and then the news tab and type in Lolita Express you can see a pattern in the sources. dailymail.co.uk and mirror.co.uk should be instant red flags. And then RAW and Gawker...and then nothing. 5 entire sources, with the biggest two being the same source! LOL!
I have no idea if the Clinton were on that plane, but I seriously doubt they would get on one called the Lolita Express. I've bought some stupid shit in my day...but have a hard time believing it. The plane IOW, was dubbed the 'Lolita Express' by the daily-mirror gee two British tabloids of ill repute.
What worries me more is the FACTS...that some rich asshole got only one month for having sex with underage girls. Over 30 of them, but that is not a direct correlation with Bill Clinton flying on that plane...which was probably called whatever planes have written on them in letters and numbers.
If they did in fact actually board a plane with the words Lolita Express on them, I would shit my pants. And since the sources lead back to ONE source (mirror owns dailymail), I have to conclude this is another spear campaign.
If I was the Clintons, I would distance myself from known pervert billionaires.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)sox. Not to mention that people with large lives often have multiple telephone contacts. Burner phones are very popular security features. A burner allows me to give you 'my phone number' for purpose without opening my life to you entirely.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)LawDeeDah, you connect the dots.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Then they'll unleash this. Will be Monica 2.0, except this time the girl is underage.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The actual facts of the story do not in fact support your conclusions here.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)One doesn't need facts beyond reasonable doubt to defeat a rival in an election.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)I can also point out similar tactics failed to defeat Clinton 3 times (two elections and one impeachment.)
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)You mean in New York? Uh, yeah sure. We can nominate anyone to run in NY and they'll probably win.
This is a national election, not New York. In the only national contest Hillary ever ran, she ran against an unknown guy as a inevitable favorite and lost spectacularly. And she didn't have to deal with the allegation that Bill was on a plane with underage girls.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Even then, all his allegations of cheating before Monica were well known but dismissed. He will not be given the benefit of the doubt now as an admitted cheater.
And if it was ever proven that he was on a plane with underage sex workers, God help us. There is no way to explain that. Hillary would be toast, and it would affect the senate and house races.
It isn't fair that she's tainted with his behavior, but life isn't fair. My question is, why put the party's welfare at risk when we do so well in presidential elections anyway? The demographic trends make it almost hopeless for the GOP. Against the GOP's joke candidates, we win if we run a clean candidate with no skeletons. So why take the risk? The GOP is hoping we run someone who has a huge scandal, it's the only way they can win.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)You're the one who said false allegations against a candidate can torpedo a candidacy and used John Kerry as an example.
Not only did the swiftboating NOT defeat Kerry, the allegations against Clinton failed to bring him down three times.
So what other examples do you have?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I heard he flew on someone's jet. Big whoop.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)he was on the plane with underage girls who were hired by a wealthy man to engage in sex acts?
A plane called the "Lolita Express"
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It 's also ironic you are rocking an avatar of Dr. King lest we forget that before the great man was assassinated his character was first.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Your prophecies will indeed, certainly be allowed all the credibility they actually warrant.
I believe this is from Proverbs... "The prudent keep their knowledge to themselves, but a fool's heart blurts out folly." You are blurting.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)You're looking in the wrong place for someone who cares about your biblical wisdom.
Try the Religion forum.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Not wisdom... just a suggestion to keep foolishness and prophecies to oneself.
Try the Creative Speculation forum.
(Six of one, half a dozen of the other-- inserts distinction without a difference below to maintain pretense you have an actual point. Bless your little heart...)
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)on a political forum? Okay. I'll take that advice under consideration.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Strategy is fine. Foolishness and prophecies are simply foolishness and prophecies, regardless of how you rationalize it otherwise.
Bless you little heart... you really do have nothing substantial to ad, do you? I'll slowly back way from the inane, and you can insert below any additional foolishness you'd like to pretend (to yourself if no one else) is relevant, and feel oh so special about how clever your foolishness is.
Have at it, good luck, and doggonit... people like you!!!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Maybe you do better with faith than logic and spelling.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Since he spelled everything else right wouldn't it be fairer to attribute it to a typographical erro.
I'm just kicking the thread because there's comic gold within.
We get it. A lot of people on this site hate Bill and Hill's guts. It's kind of odd behavior for an ostensibly Democratic board but being here as long as I have been I am used to it.
It's the clumsiness of the attempts to undermine them that I find amusing.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Different office locations, for example?
I'm not saying the gist of the OP is untrue, but if you are going to claim 21 disposable phones, you should at least present some evidence to back it up.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,318 posts)The gist of the OP is indeed untrue. These were not 'burner phones'.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I'm almost tempted to recommend it myself
#lol@burnerphones
zappaman
(20,606 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I post on a potpourri of boards. I like that word. The goal is to make your interlocutor jump the shark before you do. The OP was on a roll with the sex plane thread but this thread is an example of imperial overreach.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)"Plethora" for $500.00 doesn't have the same ring.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Though I doubt she was referring to a blue dress.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Dumb post.
FSogol
(45,485 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)All facts get thrown to the wayside in your determination.
Bravo!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)He said that was one band that was totally pulled out of somebody's ass.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Seriously, I can think of several cogent reasons why one might not support HRC in the Primaries, but this shit is inane.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)But hardly a peep about Netanyahu and Boehner conspiring to discredit our DEMOCRATIC President.
Interesting.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)babylonsister
(171,066 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)another attempt to smear Hillary Clinton with something that her husband may or may not have done.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)The minute Charlie Hebdo hit Twitter the Epstein Conspiracy people were screaming that this was a false flag to distract from their story of the century.
This.Story.Is.Not.Being.Ignored.By.The.MSM.
Please let real journalists handle it. Because when you start dragging YOUR conspiracy theories into it, that just makes it harder to get very real criminal cases taken seriously.
Chill.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Seriously, who the fuck in their right mind would get on a plane called the Lolita Express? That sounds so fucking unbelievable.
"Its illegal for an American citizen to travel to another country solely to have underage sex, even if its legal in that country. Having sex in a private plane en route would be considered the same thing, according to legal references.
Epstein cut a deal in 2008 and pled guilty to one count of soliciting sex from an underage girl, which netted him all of one month in a Florida jail. But federal prosecutors allege his activities are far more extensive.
He abused as many as 35 underage girls, according to federal prosecutors."
ALL OF ONE MONTH!?
WOW.
Again, why would anyone get on a plane called the Lolita Express? Unfuckingbelievable.
So Epstein is into tweens...how fucking totally gross. I hope people here that have kids that are 14-16 think about that before replying. I am surprised the Clintons are friends of this ghoulish character.
Hekate
(90,690 posts).....really.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I'm glad I went to google and the news tab to look...all of 5 sources! Where is reuters? Where is the US press on this? RAW? Oh give me a fucking break!
RAW use to be a word spit in disgust around here on DU2. Gawker is just an online gossip site!
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)or The American Spectator, only trashier. Besides, the Clintons would not get on a plane called the Lolita Express all painted pretty on the side. That's just stupid.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,318 posts)As a guide:
Daily Mail is a right wing tabloid, but likes to think it's respectable. Anti-immigrant.
Daily Mirror is a populist leftish tabloid. Can be unreliable, but it was strongly against Bush*, and the invasion of Iraq.
The Independent, linked in the OP, is centrist, and a 'broadsheet' - ie non-tabloid, and on the whole reliable. You may find RW opinion in it, but, on the whole, it would be called left in the USA - pro-environment, for instance, and Robert Fisk writes for it.
Of the 3, only the Mail can be compared to the National Review or American Spectator. Fox News would be closer for it, however.
* eg its front page after the 2004 election:
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)the notion is ludicrous.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)dissentient
(861 posts)"Bubba and his 21 burner phones"
zappaman
(20,606 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Hekate
(90,690 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Is that you?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)I'm sure the OP will return soon.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)What was their previous incarnation?
QC
(26,371 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)I had that the first time she posted.
1. "I hate William Pitt.
2. "I hate Hillary."
Geez and I am not even the super duper resident troll buster.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I am in the year 1995 and need to get back to the year 2015