Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PCIntern

(25,582 posts)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:08 AM Apr 2012

Whereas, I might suppose that James West and Artemus Gordon wouldn't have approved...

And whereas it is true that the two SS Agents on The Wild Wild West had had their share of women, or at least the implied share of women, interestingly, they never "did it" whilst on the case, only after, IIRC.

And whereas, getting laid, whilst important, is somewhat less important than the safety of the President of the United States,

Be it resolved that this won't happen again.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whereas, I might suppose that James West and Artemus Gordon wouldn't have approved... (Original Post) PCIntern Apr 2012 OP
It's not about the fictional sex of James Bond, it's about the sex of the biblical Judith HereSince1628 Apr 2012 #1
I have a feeling there will be many more heads rolling madokie Apr 2012 #2
Maybe it goes higher, maybe not, but I agree some supervisory folks will be sacked HereSince1628 Apr 2012 #3
What do you mean? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #4
loved the wild, wild west spanone Apr 2012 #5

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
1. It's not about the fictional sex of James Bond, it's about the sex of the biblical Judith
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:49 AM
Apr 2012

Using sex as a tool is one of the oldest ploys available in literature.

In a country like the United States, it is still possible to compromise someone with evidence of sex.

And when I say compromise, I mean it in the sense of blackmail.

It's not just about a 'possible' security breach in slipping up and leaving a copy of the Presidential itineray out where a foreign agent/prostitute/Mata Hari can see it.

It's about the real security breach of a team whose members engaged in risky behavior that could make one or more of its members vulnerable to coercion and thus undermine the capacity to fully function in a security role.

I don't think this team will have this problem again, as I think this particular team will be dissolved out of existence.





madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. I have a feeling there will be many more heads rolling
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:55 AM
Apr 2012

This goes higher. I'll never believe it doesn't

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. Maybe it goes higher, maybe not, but I agree some supervisory folks will be sacked
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:15 AM
Apr 2012

partly because they will be seen as having allowed a problem with adherence to mission discipline to develop. An important second reason for sacking them will be to motivate the next supervisor to keep the team's big heads in control of their little heads at all times.

I have no doubt this particular team will be broken into pieces.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whereas, I might suppose...