General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDealer Backs Down On Plan To Sell Smart Gun After Pro-Gun Activists Threaten To Kill Him
more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/02/maryland-smart-gun_n_5255104.html
Maryland gun store owner Andy Raymond reversed his decision to sell the nations first smart gun on Thursday after receiving online death threats from gun-rights activists protesting the technological milestone as a encroachment on the Second Amendment.
Raymond, the co-owner of Engage Armament, had called the decision to sell the Armatix iP1 handgun a really tough decision after similar attacks against Californias Oak Tree Gun Club recently forced the store to back away from its association with the new smart gun.
<snip>
Earlier in the week, Raymond told The Washington Post he was selling the smart gun because Marylands gun-control laws had already essentially put us out of business.
Although Raymond viewed gun advocates opposition to the smart gun as the antithesis of everything that we pro-gun, pro-Second Amendment people should be, he took to the stores Facebook page Thursday night to apologize for his decision to sell the weapon.
Maybe I got mislead about this. Its [sic] still my responsibility, Raymond wrote. I stood, I tried to stand on the ideal that we could get some fence sitters and anti gunners into our fold. Maybe Im either too young or too old to realize thats not sturdy enough [sic].
Kingofalldems
(38,423 posts)And so civilized too.
pscot
(21,024 posts)and what they're capable of.
Logical
(22,457 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)A gun store owner wants to give customers the option of purchasing a smart gun so that if some terrorist, like the nutters who threatened his life, were to get their hands on the gun they'd be incapable of using them.
That's all these nutters want. The ability to steal guns and use them in their terrorist activities.