General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNipped *that* in the bud, I hope
Last edited Tue Feb 18, 2014, 12:32 PM - Edit history (1)
Caught our son listening to The Beatles tonight, I saw her standing there
It was bad.
She was just 17
You know what I mean?
And the way she looked
Was way beyond compare
So how could I dance with another?
"Woooh!"
I saw her standing there
Selecting a dance partner on the basis of looks? 17? And that "woooh" was pretty menacing.
Shut that down, right quick.
Told him to stick to instrumentals until we can sort through our music to see what's more reasonable for him. We gave him some polkas and chamber music to tide him over.
As the boy started listening to the new music we gave him, he began to weep uncontrollably, tears dripping down onto his loose-fitting unisex pantsuit. Tears of joy, I think, in recognition of our growing maturity as a civilization.
1000words
(7,051 posts)You spared him from a future of doing it in the road.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)1000words
(7,051 posts)McCartney wrote the song after seeing two monkeys copulating in the street while on retreat in Rishikesh, India, with the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. He marvelled in the simplicity of this natural scenario when compared to the emotional turmoil of human relationships. He later said:
"A male [monkey] just hopped on the back of this female and gave her one, as they say in the vernacular. Within two or three seconds he hopped off again and looked around as if to say, It wasn't me, and she looked around as if there'd been some mild disturbance ... And I thought ... that's how simple the act of procreation is ... We have horrendous problems with it, and yet animals don't."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Don%27t_We_Do_It_in_the_Road%3F
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)carrying on with her day.
1000words
(7,051 posts)Then again, isn't most of rock and roll about hot monkey love?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)We'll have asexual reproduction soon and we won't have to worry about this messy stuff anymore, but until then, let's establish some (more) rules for godsake.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)I also like the O'Jay's version:
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)You just blew my ever lovin' mind, not sure I'm gonna make it to 2-0-1-FIVE.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)oldhippie
(3,249 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)westerebus
(2,976 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)westerebus
(2,976 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Several years ago, my first time in Santa Fe, before I went to sleep my first night, I found what seemed to be a public radio station and set my radio alarm to go off on that station at 7am, if I recall correctly.
7am to 8am was polka music. OMG! I defy ANYONE not to be cheerful and energetic after waking up to polka music! Best music ever.
Not that I ever found the polka hour again, nor have I listened to much polka music in the years since. Sigh.
pscot
(21,024 posts)How amazing that we can have such totally opposite responses to the same music!
Dollface
(1,590 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)No beer in Heaven? Well, I'm changing MY plans for the afterlife.
Dollface
(1,590 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)And if you like that one, find out who stole the kishka.
&feature=player_detailpage
Since I am of Polish descent, I heard these all my life.
sybylla
(8,514 posts)In Wisconsin the Saturday and Sunday morning polka shows were a tradition when I was growing up, both on the radio and TV. Now, you can find an occasional radio station that has a Sunday morning program, but rarely.
When we vacation in the more sparsely populated northwoods of the state, there is a radio station that does a Sunday morning polka show. I used to share this joy with my sons, hoping they would grow up loving the stuff like I do.
Nope. They were not amused. Neither was my husband, but he always went along with it just to annoy the teens in the back seat. You might be able to resist the polka temptation, but you can never resist the temptation to annoy annoying teenagers.
Oddly, back when we lived in an apartment, our Mexican neighbors blared Mexican polkas through the walls on Sunday morning as they got ready for church. I was cool with it, but my husband insisted we remove ourselves to the other bedroom in short order.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Well done, Manny!
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,685 posts)Unisex pantsuit.
For once I got in while the popcorn is still hot.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)doing number nine, whatever that may be ..
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)But it involves a corkscrew, 3 midgets, a roll of scotch tape, a slab of streaky bacon, and a copy of the playbill from Waiting For Godot.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)I suppose this is the sequel to "Why Don't We Do It In The Road"
NealK
(1,870 posts)he'll get a Revolver and want a revolution to change the world.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)NealK
(1,870 posts)Diclotican
(5,095 posts)Electric Monk
What is "norwigian wood" ? Never experienced that expression before...
Diclotican
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Diclotican
(5,095 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
Aha - funny - as I am from Norway (Born and raised thank you) and never head that expression before.. But as I have listning to the song - I know I have heard it before - but never reqonized its name... Thats cool A beatles song dedicated to norway of all places
Diclotican
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Norwegian wood was John's slang for "cheap pine".
Diclotican
(5,095 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
Ah - but still "funny" Im from Norway
Diclotican
edbermac
(15,941 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)I had heard the prostitution thing before, and the lyrics COULD imply that. But I was right on the cheap pine!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)if you don't know what objectification is, it's okay- probably not your problem, I guess.
but flaunting idiocy is never a good thing. and jeeze, you are on a roll lately.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)though I would find that wholly, unsurprising ... anything to sow division among Democrats (and liberals and progressives).
I suspect this will intensify as we head into the 2014 elections.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that tripe would go unchallenged?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)African American? For not liking watermelon jokes? Did you imagine it too?
Gosh, I guess we just don't have enough of a sense of humor, right?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I missed that one ... But am wholly unsurprised that he would post something like that. I expect his posting (this kind of stuff) to increase as we head into 2014. MUST ... DIVIDE ... DU ...!/i]
Number23
(24,544 posts)So if he succeeds in dividing DU then so be it. Will be no loss to anyone and sure as hell not the Democratic Party.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I beg to differ.
Yes, he has a significant following on DU, and I believe that following is largely non-Democratically identifiers. But I also believe a significant portion of his following are merely misguided; but sincere Democratic allies, that have been sucked in. A divided DU would not be a good thing ... though you are right; it would likely have little, if any, effect on the larger Democratic party.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)I'm not a "manny follower" but I think most of the people who i.d. with him see themselves as farther to the left than American political culture has a place for at this time. I rarely comment on his posts, etc.
The thread he posted in response to the watermelon/African American history month - I didn't have anything to say about any of that, but I took his thread as a parody of his own culture - I assume he's Jewish, but maybe not. So, he was identifying with the way his cultural history gets associated with particular foods, even if he doesn't consume them himself. I didn't take it to mean an insult, iow, and, it seems, when he realized some did take it as an insult, he apologized.
But maybe I'm wrong. I tend to assume people here are not trying to be offensive and I try to extend a generosity toward others here that I would like to have extended toward myself until someone makes it a point to insult me directly, which, fwiw, many women and men have done who have formed a clique on this site. Then I will give back what I get until I decide not to bother any more.
I also understood people who said the stereotype is more accurately about southern culture, not African American culture - because white people in the south eat the same foods - and tho "grits" may more often be associated with white southern culture - well, every white person I knew growing up ate watermelon and chicken. But I would never say this on such a thread b/c I didn't think that was really the point - the point was associating all African Americans with southern culture alone.
In this thread, Manny was taking what some people perceive here from others who seem to "get the vapors" over current culture - and, apparently, that joke has some currency here.
It wasn't a mean post, but it was a funny one in the context of the latest argument that goes on often here between a few insistent people on both sides, and others who comment on the moment.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but respect your interpretation.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and the despicable practice here of a few of trying so hard, failing, but never giving up, to try hard to discredit anyone how doesn't agree with them 100% on everything, was made obvious once again, by the comments here trying to turn it into something it was not.
And they make this OP absolutely on target.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)and some here are trying to smear Manny with false claims of talking about watermelon when he didn't? As in, this is not entirely honest outrage, but political r-f-ing?
I don't follow who is on what side in that contested space here, but I think you align with Manny - is that right?
Because what I have seen on this board in relation to some who discuss feminism is nothing more than conventional attitudes toward females dressed up as "objectification." No always, tho. but there are more than a few who meet this description, to me.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)But I sure see all the "yay, a sexist lyric! It's funny!" crap
..
Music is full of violence against women. Rock and Blues, and Appalachian mountains/Old Time fiddle and banjo tunes often sing about killing women.
It's interesting historically, and good tunes should be loved; but it's also important to understand messages and how ideas that used to be accepted without question do change. Same way we examine and denounce media messages of unregulated capitalism, "safe" fracking or racism.
This is just an attempt to mock the problem of sexism.
If I had seen that watermelon one
..
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)it doesn't exist.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)so you're saying that the posters talking about it just made it up out of thin air. What a weird thing to make up.
I'll have to check, if I think of it tomorrow, because I'm not comfortable taking your word for it. Seeing as how you think sexism is a laugh riot.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I think that you, and some others, are projecting that.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)that is mild
.not particularly sexist, and do a meta-comedy shtick mocking discussions that attempt to identify sexism and how it is harmful to us all?
the most blatantly sexist members are all here giving you high fives.
I'm not projecting.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)that is mild
.not particularly sexist, and do a meta-comedy shtick mocking discussions that attempt to identify sexism and how it is harmful to us all? Your post implies that identifying sexism and defending ourselves against the people here who enjoy it is "being over the top".
the most blatantly sexist members are all here giving you high fives, and you're giving them right back.
I'm not projecting.
PS well, I saw the gefilte fish post
didn't check all your stuff, though. Really need to get offline.
BUT, regardless of whether or not you posted a shtick mocking African Americans, I see you have the good sense to distance yourself from any such thing. In other words, you know very well that doing such a thing--being racist-- is not O.K.
But, with regard to sexism
.you're not showing any awareness that there's anything wrong with it. Even your apologia is self-serving. "Of course it's wrong. Of course we must deal with gender-ism! But I'm just making a joke to point out that you're all over-the-top".
But this post we're currently in-- you're just mocking the discussions that have been going on here because of a number of T&A trolly flame-bait posts lately. And topping it off by throwing an insult at me. (accusing me and others of projection)
I'll bet if a Black DU member challenged you on a racist remark, you might deny, you might explain that wasn't your intent, but you sure as shit wouldn't throw in an insult for added value.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)But in the watermelon and chicken thread he claimed not to know and understand the history etc. But didn't stop him from posting a thread or three about it.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Thanks very much to you and JustAnotherGen for not letting this shit slide.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I wanna find it. Curious to see the wording and what he's going to a lot of trouble to deny.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 20, 2014, 01:02 AM - Edit history (1)
at those taking offense at watermelon references.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024478358
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I saw the gefilte fish post
.actually, I didn't find it offensive (but I hadn't looked at the comments in the watermelon/fried chicken threads, so I wasn't aware that there was a blow-up; I didn't make the connection. Also, I grew up Jewish, so self-deprecating Jewish humor is nothing new to me. I always thought it was funny.)
Anyway, I'm sick of this shit. I think I made a good point above when I said
But, with regard to sexism .you're not showing any awareness that there's anything wrong with it. Even your apologia is self-serving. "Of course it's wrong. Of course we must deal with gender-ism! But I'm just making a joke to point out that you're all over-the-top".
But this post we're currently in-- you're just mocking the discussions that have been going on here because of a number of T&A trolly flame-bait posts lately. And topping it off by throwing an insult at me. (accusing me and others of projection)
I'll bet if a Black DU member challenged you on a racist remark, you might deny, you might explain that wasn't your intent, but you sure as shit wouldn't throw in an insult for added value.
"
There's a WORLD of difference in the tone of the gefilte fish post (it was self-deprecating humor). The "nip this in the bud" post is a mockery of women who feel used and insulted by not only T&A crap in public, but also, by the CRAPPY attitude of its defenders. He takes a real problem and reductio ad absurdam, makes it a story that insults women. Featuring ridiculous women objecting to everything to the point of idiocy.
Suffragettes and second wave feminists were mocked in the same way, tarred as a group of ignorant hags, moralizing prudes, over-reacting, man hating etc. etc. you know the drill.
And that kind of repeated INSULT, intended to shut out women who don't like the game, is totally accepted.
OK well, we're not gonna solve it right this red-hot minute, and I have to get offline.
Thanks, bettyellen!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)say WOW, I wasn't aware it's a thing to you African American , and BTW- why don't you get over it? Is both condescending and pretty ignorant. But you can see that's exactly how that's how entitled he feels. To mock, and then sort of apologize and ask to be taken seriously on shit he doesn't give two shits about. Hadn't given it a thought prior, except to mock it. Unless he's satirizing himself for being full of hot air, it ain't funny.
Basically, that's the take on feminist issues- can't be bothered to even understand WTF he is gassing off about. It's pretty bizarre. His take is exactly the same as people who spew hatred here- that's not actually satire, it's copycatting sexist bullshit. It actually works better as satire of MRA idiots. To cap it off, everything is served with a side of condesendenton, in case we missed he's trying to assign everyone their place here. Yeah, I know the drill, we're supposed to not realize you were mocking feminists here until you explain the next day- WTF really? Who needed that explained? What is flying over who's head here, LOL.
Autumn
(45,106 posts)Your search - htt://www.democraticunderground.com/10024478358 - did not match any documents.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Just fix the mistake and it'll take you right there.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)You're usually so spot on, Manny. This thread? Not so much.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)TheMathieu
(456 posts)LOL.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)You shit-stirrer, you...
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Dude, get the popcorn.....
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)10:30 PM
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Mon Feb 17, 2014, 10:24 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Nipped *that* in the bud, I hope
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024518482
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Trolling attempt/Flamebaiting (A bit of both)
Best to nip this in the bud.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Feb 17, 2014, 10:30 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Did Manny alert on him self again?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: With no context, this should stand as satire. If it is flamebait, let it stand as a record of assholishness.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
1000words
(7,051 posts)A shut-out.
TheMathieu
(456 posts)It rights the wrong I was done earlier.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)good work, jurors.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)I mean, I can remember back before polka music was ever allowed to be heard by anyone under the age of 21, and here Manny is encouraging his kid to listen to it!
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And it lead to a life of depravity...Manny should know better than that.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)they'd have an entirely different perspective.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Nipped that in the bud.
Jeeeezus Keeeerist. Alert on this?
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)But you know what? Fuck that.
I am 55 yrs old. I am a cancer survivor. I am a divorced woman, remarried. Yeah buddy, no womam is "invisible" after 40 or 50 I will do what ever the fuck I want. I will give my opinion. I don't particularly give a fuck if it's is the "right" opinion.
I don't walk on any fucking egg shells.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)You've got a great attitude.
At 65, I'm not, nor will I ever be "invisible" again. I tried to be for a few years but I was miserable.
And I really don't care for someone trying to tell me what to think.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)No Button, No Cry.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)!!!
westerebus
(2,976 posts)Some body is not in a good mood.
I was number 2.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Eventually the admins should do something about it ...unless the admins are the alerters.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But I remain unbowed.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #121)
MannyGoldstein This message was self-deleted by its author.
westerebus
(2,976 posts)A slight distinction given the current dust up.
westerebus
(2,976 posts)How do I reply?
or
or
maybe
hard to tell...
packman
(16,296 posts)I understand that got some guy called Elvis wiggling his hips on that Utubey thing on the internet tubes.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)WTH is WRONG with you!?!?
That's why we drink it here (Right Here!)
When we're gone from here,
all our friends will be drinking all our beer!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He even played that in churches in the South a time or too! Was quite irreverent to those people even in the 1990's
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Poor misquote from WC Fields.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)How much time do you have?
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)your faults. Saves you the bother, eh?
edbermac
(15,941 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Lost it at the unisex pants comment. Seriously no matter what it's about, you always make me laugh.
TexasTowelie
(112,247 posts)How could they possibly corrupt your boogie woogie boy?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Yep ...they actually wrote that song.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Sleepy LaBeef
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)And Tony Bennett.
The Way You Look Tonight?!?!
Some day, when I'm awfully low
When the world is cold
I will feel a glow just thinking of you
And the way you look tonight
TheMathieu
(456 posts)Lex
(34,108 posts)I think it's attempting the former but is landing squarely in the latter.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)The OP is satire, poking fun right exactly where it needs to be poked.
kcr
(15,317 posts)Mocking Feminists. Not the first thing I think of when I think progressive. Hmm, maybe he forgot to sign Third Way Manny.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)No...I don't suppose you are.
I am willing to bet that the intent of the OP isn't to mock anyone but DU as a whole.
If you have been here any length of time at all, you know this board and its members have a tendency to get riled up over specific subjects and this latest flood of threads is indicative of that.
This week it was the Sports Illustrated cover.
Soon it will be Hooters again.
Then it will be circumcision.
Then breast feeding in public.
Ad infinitum.
Take it for what it is. Satire.
Lex
(34,108 posts)Same old. Same old.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)Lex
(34,108 posts)NealK
(1,870 posts)kcr
(15,317 posts)I joined DU about a month after Skinner started it, so I've been here a long time. I know mocking when I see it.
Your posting activity really took off lately, eh?
mock·ing
ˈmäkiNG/
adjective
adjective: mocking
1.
making fun of someone or something in a cruel way; derisive.
"the mocking hostility in his voice made her wince"
So you think the OP was "cruel" ? Was it "derisive"?
I suppose it is all in the eye of the reader.
There is a very good reason I do not post in most of the flame war/controversial topic threads.
The same reason that, though I call myself a Heretic and I am indeed an Atheist, I rarely post in the Religion forum.
It's because I have had all these arguments years ago and I now see them as tedious.
I apologize if that isn't "progressive" enough for you.
On the other hand, I just don't give a damn.
Now, knowing this board as well as I do, that statement alone will get SOMEONE thinking, if not saying, that I am a misogynist because of it. And that is also indicative of how absurd this board has become.
kcr
(15,317 posts)But that's okay. I've already explained it before. It's my husband's old account, and he's okay with me using it. I lost the password to my account and when I tried to make a new account with DU3, the new verification crap was glitching and I lost patience with it and I just started using his account.
How should I know why the OP does it? Why does anyone stir shit on DU?
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)You said you joined a month after the formation. Just curious. And since your user name is just letters, I was looking to see if I was conversing with a man or a woman.
Why does anyone stir shit on DU?
Why does the internet exist?!?
Pfthh
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)-app
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Thanks!
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Will be a day when a young woman employee of Hooters is on the Cover of Sports Illustrated, while breast feeding her baby who has just been circumcised.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)With a Pitbull by her side.
And a Corvette.
A Corvette with a "I Love the Olive Garden" bumper sticker.
TheMathieu
(456 posts)Not sure why some are ovaryacting to it.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)what he has failed to mention is that his son is 38 and lives in his basement
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Shame
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)are you saying a 38 y/o is a child, really ... ?
is that what you are trying to imply?
too funny.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
polly7
(20,582 posts)People all over the world are suffering right now ...... many adults are having to live in situations they probably wouldn't choose to d/t the economy, lack of employment, and many other reasons. That you choose to insult a person who doesn't even post here for something you know absolutely nothing about says more about you than I think you'd care to imagine.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)It doesn't matter how old your child/children get they will ALWAYS be your child/children.
My daughter is 28 and yes, she's still my child. I gave birth to her & raised her so she is my child always and forever. Whether she lives with me or not--she doesn't.
Same goes for my 22 year old son.
I'm a pretty laid back person I usually brush most shit off. BUT if you go after my child/children it's on.
That is beyond low. Attack the OP no reason to go after his son.
Response to one_voice (Reply #278)
Tuesday Afternoon This message was self-deleted by its author.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)and has an IQ higher than mine (and probably yours).
And he's a damned nice kid, too.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thank you for your rescue efforts Manny !!!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)And Manny, have you SEEN how they Polka these days???
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Thanks!
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)The band leader, Fritz Hasselhoff, would smash his accordion and jump into the mosh pit to end the show. Our fans were wild, but they all brought amazing casseroles to the events.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)Rock on Manny!
JUST BECAUSE POLKA
Just because you think you're so pretty
Just because you think you're hot
Just because you think you've got something
That no body else has got
You've caused me to spend all my money
You laughed and called me old Santa Claus
I'm telling you, Baby I'm through with you
Just because, just because
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)actually my fave line in that album is "she came through the bathroom window...."
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)The Bathroom Window was from Abbey Road.
By the time Abbey Road rolled around, they couldn't even manage writing whole songs, it seems. John and Paul just stitched together several partial songs for You Never Give Me Your Money/Here Comes the Sun King/Mean Mr. Mustard/Polyethlene Pam/She Came in Through the Bathroom Window/Golden Slumbers.
....but it still turned out pretty dang good for their final album.
My favorite line from Abbey Road is the short bit at the end
"And in the end...the love you take, is equal to the love..you make."
P.S. I am a Beatles fan....lolol.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)and he ended the concert with that final medley that culminated in "and in the end..."
It was #%^*ing awesome.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)and the like....but never any of the Beatles.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)sure enough i was wrong.
ananda
(28,866 posts)And turn myself about ... like that.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)LOVE it.
ColumbusLib
(158 posts)Love the Beatles too.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)1000words
(7,051 posts)Thumb!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)sir pball
(4,743 posts)The ladies LOVED ol' Ludwig.
And never forget, he wrote a trifling little piece at least partly because he was in love with a 17-year old girl who rejected him..
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Well Done!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)"Sleeping Beauty" was only [font size=24] 16![/font]
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)NBachers
(17,120 posts)and G. Gordon Liddy's coming over to keep you secure.
You're in good hands, Manny
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)The last two days in GD have been laughable.
Thank you for bringing GD back to sensible levels.
I'm going to do some dancing:
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Go to post 101, play Sleepy's boogie woogie music while watching the dancin' on post 109 - perfectly synchronized!
"Whole lotta shakin' goin' on!"
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)It does work!
JVS
(61,935 posts)the things that they love but then go on to excuse the behavior by claiming it's getting better.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I do mind that John Lennon beat the hell out of the women in his life and gets worshiped like he's fucking Gandhi simply because he wrote one truly great song and got killed by a nut.
Yeah, I cried the day Lennon died and even if he was an asshole it is still sad he died but damn, that man was a major-league asshole. No hero of mine.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)He is no hero of mine.
However, too young to know any better when he passed away.
Thinking about it, was I even born yet... Hmmm...
Nitram
(22,813 posts)It seems to me John changed a great deal for the better after working through some serious emotional issues. In fact, that's exactly what he was saying: "I USED TO Be cruel to my woman...but it's getting better all the time." I think they call it redemption.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Even Lennon admitted he thought it went too far.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Point well made.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 18, 2014, 11:14 AM - Edit history (1)
of the man card, right? you know. the norm. kinda like a couple whites get together and mock black voice on bigotry. you know, immediate solidarity, unity, bonding. peer group. high fives, all around.
hey... lets try it. then we can all have a good giggle at the expense of our AA community.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)"watermelon problem". Wow, the beat goes on.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)shameful. i know i say that too often. i cannot imagine a human being, that feels they have the right to mock, ridicule, insult others simply for standing up for what they believe in, civil rights, legal rights, human rights.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Sure....use the oppression smilie.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)"gender war" suggesting and stating hofs are the big bad meanies picking and bullying on all of du.
yet, here is another thread, one of many, starting shit, insulting, mocking, snarking at a group of women.
some might want to reflect who the issue is. not us. inevitably it is some one else throwing the first punch. and for whatever reason, the board has a huge ass issue with the women ending the fight with a knock out. becomes us as the issue.
got it.
the last couple days, repeatedly, i have seen this in GD
might check how many OPs i have start, whining about this shit, or created flambait.
might wnat to check how many of the flamebait threads were started by people like you manny, with no greater intent but to mock women on du.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Yet another poster who refuses to try to see the world from outside their bubble, and thinks it's all just something to make fun of.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Be specific, please. My son would love his Beatles back!
Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #141)
Post removed
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)because of objectification of females, and so forth. Do you agree or not?
If not, why?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)thread of like minded duers playing along with you.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I thought that I was doing the right thing by getting rid of music that objectifies women. But now you're angry at me.
I guess I'll have to figure this out on my own.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Unless you worked hard to disguise it. Sorry if I hurt you.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)because African Americans and women have been ticked off his list.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)Thanks for the update on your completely disingenuous discussion tactics.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)~You starting over or something?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Charitable characterization.
How about "accusing people of awful stuff without producing evidence"?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And for your subsequent apology.
History, Manny. Now you've made your mark here. It's completely fair to speculate who you'll deride next for "over sensitivity".
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Have a nice day.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Seriously?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Okay then, good day.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Call on me!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024472335
I can't try to identify 'intent' by a poster at DU - but I think once again - what gets said in PM's and in other places away from DU in speaks volumes.
Just in case you forgot - this was *I think* in response to black Americans and specifically those at DU (to include this star member) being kind of about a school celebrating black history month by serving 'stereotypical' foods. I think MrScorpio did a pretty good job - if anyone is interested in digging into this stereotype of pointing out just why the school was being ignorant.
Then the same poster posted an apology.
Okay - so in the 'margins' we all sort of discussed it and well - it's like when someone says, "Hey no offense!" after making a joke about black people around black people.
You wink, smile, maybe even nod your head - but that individual is never to be respected again. Polite is one thing- respect or taking seriously is another.
In real life - nothing to do with DU or even this thread - just in real life I tend to treat those people that I encounter as too wet to step on and too low to kick because they *think* they've gotten away with something but then I can always come to DU and ridicule them or snicker and giggle about it with my husband.
Just snicker and giggle - because you aren't crazy. That happened. We both know it happened. And from this distance it seems so obvious . . .
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Has become a real pastime here at DU.
Of course you can't "get away" with it unless you play it real dumb- while angrily calling for links. Not indulging anyone who needs to play at ignorance. Not fetching links for the willfully obtuse.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Let me fetch that other link for you!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024478358
We really need a blinking while innocent smiley/emoticon at DU.
And now this one goes in my journal too - for safe keeping.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Not buying it.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)But we both need to write that and post it - and I'm glad you did. I'm glad I did.
They can't 'alert' on us. No profanity, no personal attacks . . . and neither of our user names begin with a lower case 's'.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Old Days. And when called out REPEATEDLY by posters who accused the OP of racial insensitivity, actually did the blinking "who me?" bit. And I'm sure that was minutes before launching yet another attack on President Obama and another "God I SOOOO love FDR!1" post.
But yeah, we're not supposed to notice all of this. We're supposed to just clap like bleating sheep ignoring the not even subtle dog whistles and bullshit. As disgusting as the posts you linked to were they are merely side dishes on the hot steaming plate of crap this person deals out regularly and to overwhelming applause from the masses here. Welcome to DU, JAG.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'd ask you to shoot me a link but I
Have no right- usually tell
People to piss off, lol.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)I wonder if they were on ignore at the time. For awhile I had a few key words completely trashed so I wouldn't be bothered by nonsense.
Is that one where I would have to give my new "canned" response of "Oh Fiddle Dee!"? Sounds like it would be REALLY appropriate for that one!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)brigade of BOGgers met every single OP by that particular poster with sourcechecking, short, appropriate posts noting the sources, and the fallacies of the argument, and relentless linking to other outrageous and sometimes contradictory OPs, and you know what happened? Fewer and fewer people started recc'ing those threads, and fewer and fewer posting in them.
Eventually, BBI just kept posting righter and righter memes....and got their pizza.
Catch this--
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4339715
Number23
(24,544 posts)Sounds like a hell of a plan.
marble falls
(57,102 posts)You just give Manny a slam and accusation and leave his question completely unanswered directly. Unless you think turnabout is fair play.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)then gets all cutesy with the denials.
marble falls
(57,102 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and of course- there's the puppy stomping.
marble falls
(57,102 posts)women than you think.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Seriously sea - because someone needed the vapors because they read the word 'fuck' or something. It doesn't bother me - we do it in this house often!
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I posit that many people minimize and trivialize the abuse suffered by women, and further pretend that they're merely being satirical rather than acknowledging their own vulgar truths and cowardice...
No rationalizations necessary though, as the allegations would be little more than allegations.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Perhaps the noob in me, but when I started reading the first post I assumed manny was a woman. Interesting, that's messed up, going to have to think about it. Thanks.
edit> BTW, fleabiscuit > dude
1000words
(7,051 posts)again.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Isn't it a shame?
DLevine
(1,788 posts)It's a shame that it's ok to mock DU feminists but not ok to call someone out on it.
Response to DLevine (Reply #226)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)my battles more judiciously.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)call out. Now, there's a couple of others to go before Manny gets a trifecta.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)For being so darned over sensitive when it comes to watermelon jokes? And who is next?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Can you link to it?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Old stuff, and I am not. Start with MG and all tenses of the words apology. Because he did, thank god, try and smooth that one over.
marble falls
(57,102 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Scan above the post that says rock on ^^^
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Thanks.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)just not give a fuck what that says about you.
i have a brother that has lied for a lifetime. a chronic liar. all his life. even when there was no need to lie, he does. i asked him once why? why do you lie when you know we know you are lying.
even when we call out his lie, he lies.
he told me, keep the lie going and you do not have to hear or own the shit.
i do not get the person that lives under the illusion simply denying makes a truth. totally fuckin beyond my ability to understand
but, whatever.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)And you jump right in!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)productive for any minority group.
head down and take the shit. not gonna happen. it gets worse. free for all.
and that would be any kind of situation you choose to look at. not just women issues, or attacks toward hof. keeping silent is not the answer. it is part of the problem.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)This is a mocking thread on the Internet. Is it a boulder, a rock, a pebble, or a grain of sand that keeps women from achieving full equality? React accordingly.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i can name ten that i had no interest in.
thank you for the advice.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Threads that use sexist tropes to the political detriment of women are all the rage here.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)from the injudicious and impulsive? Good luck!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)forceful person there is on DU, right?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)making demands of me to do something for you I could not possibly do.
It really was quite forceful. and uncalled for, and really had nothing to do with the thread. I guess you could say you were my first in a hat trick? There were more than three in there for me though.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #165)
Post removed
marble falls
(57,102 posts)1000words
(7,051 posts)Two hides in one thread.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)"wrongness" of the SI swimsuit issue.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)regardless, starting an OP to specifically insult women, womens concerns is wrong. always wrong. and that should be called out by everyone or it is only a contribution to bullying at will.
tell me. i hear manny also had a long ole post with a joke about the pres and watermelon. cause people played in that thread, did it make mocking AA and our AA community right?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Enough is enough.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)For an apology? Please hold your breath, while you look up thread where others posted the link.
If you genuinely don't remember any of it, perhaps you need a neurologist?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Put up or shut up.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And you did acknowledge it. Not sure how back pedaling now is a smart plan. Doesn't fool anyone.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)At least not in the English language that I speak.
As Benjamin Franklin wrote, "Half a truth is often a great lie."
Which would make you a great...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 18, 2014, 07:43 PM - Edit history (1)
You referred to it as making fun of a situation- ignoring that the situation involved people reacting to prejudice-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4478358
Do you actually think anyone believes this crap? Seriously?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Holy cow.
Anything else that I "obliquely" confessed to?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)This OP is a sarcastic slam at feminists here. That you lack the courage to admit it changes nothing. I know you'd prefer people believe you didn't also mock African Americans who are insulted by watermelon jokes by devoting an OP to doing just that- but that horse left the barn. You can't Unring those bells and pretend you're not belittling good people here. It happened. And here you are again.
You've been enjoying creating a hostile environment for women and people of color to the extent that a lot of people now believe you're just here to fuck up DU and be divisive. It is what it is.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Most others, not so much.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Your "slightly risky swipe" was at The expense of people- African Americans who were calling out racism. They are not a "situation" you commented on, but people with a progressive pov that you thoughtlessly mocked.
Kind of like this thread- except here you pretend it's not a "swipe" at feminists. Not sure why you'd think that's credible.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4478358
There's really no other defense for this crap.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)cntrygrl
(356 posts)song recorded by the Coasters, Get An Ugly Girl To Marry You in '63. Lyrics:
Chorus:
If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life,
Never make a pretty woman your wife.
So from my personal point of view,
Get an ugly girl to marry you.
Chorus
A pretty woman makes her husband look small,
And very often causes his downfall.
As soon as he marries her, then she starts,
To do the things that will break his heart.
But if you make an ugly woman your wife,
You'll be happy for the rest of your life.
An ugly woman cooks meals all the time,
She'll always give you peace of mind.
Chorus
Don't let your friends say you have no taste,
Go ahead and marry anyway.
Her face is ugly, her eyes don't match.
Take it from me, she's a better catch.
Chorus
Say, man?
Hey baby!
I saw your wife the other day.
Yeah?
Yeah, and she's sure is ugly. Ha!
Yeah, she's ugly, but she sure can cook, baby!
Yeah, alright.
Unfortunately, she has acne.
That's a shame, baby.
Yeah, baby.
Autumn
(45,106 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)RBStevens
(227 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... both ways!
Don't mess with badass Tina!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I don't want her you can have her she's too fat for me, hey!
Gosh Manny, you're slipping.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And I suppose a 17 year old of today knows more than one of 1963. the younger generation actually does make friends with members of the opposite sex first. A lot of progress has occurred in real life people. Naturally men of 1963 were fully privileged and once they married her, could expect her to be what they wanted her to be rather than herself.
malthaussen
(17,204 posts)"Well, she was just 17, you know what I mean?"
Presumably, they meant she was just 17.
Always reminds me of "Little Queenie." Which the Beatles covered in their Hamburg days.
-- Mal
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Wow, Manny. Declaring as "beyond the pale" a Beetles song about a young lady who is so attractive that she puts thoughts of exclusivity into the singer?
I think your war isn't with "Republicans" or even "Conservatives". It's with the natural tendencies of the human race.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Shameful, shit-stirring post.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)I think that you need to point that out to him
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Oh dear God... you don't think that song was about...
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Think of dancing as a metaphor to hold off the censors of the day
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)and has been since 1885: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/0/20097046
But "she was just sixteen" wouldn't scan so well ...
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Nicely done.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Put another log on the fire
Cook me up some bacon & some beans
And go out to the car & change the tire
Wash my socks and sew my old blue jeans
Come on baby you can fill my pipe & then go fetch my slippers
And boil me up another pot of tea
Then put another log on the fire babe
And come & tell me why you're leaving me
Now don't I let you wash the car on Sunday
And don't I warn you when you're gettin fat
Ain't I a gonna take you fishin' with me someday
Well a man can't love a woman more than that
And ain't I always nice to your kid sister
Don't I take her driving every night
So sit here at my feet cause I like you when you're sweet
And you know it ain't feminine to fight
So put another log on the fire
Cook me up some bacon & some beans
Go out to to the car & lift it up & change the tire
Wash my socks & sew my old blue jeans
Come on baby you can fill my pipe & then go fetch my slippers
And boil me up another pot of tea
Then put another log on the fire babe
And come & tell me why you're leaving me
TomClash
(11,344 posts)fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)The Beatles were the Justin Bieber of the day, who sold to a particular demographic through a corporation. Meh, the 4 biebs before they got moody.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)Seriously
napkinz
(17,199 posts)brooklynite
(94,595 posts)Physically objectifying AND gender role stereotypes.
The horror.....
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Watch this. Hopefully it will help.
As originally posted by Jamaal510.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024513257
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This video might help clear up some of YOUR confusion!
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)That this is 2014? I know the fact society progresses is a hard pill to swallow, but it happens regardless.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)sexual repression. Sexual repression is regressive, not progressive.
My wife is the perfect 'feminist'. When I met her, she drove a nicer car than I did, in fact she still does. She only wears makeup when she goes to work, otherwise not (she doesn't need it to look hot). She has always been sexually aggressive and is extremely feminine. She is an alpha female and a workaholic. She enjoys attention from men, and knows how to get what she wants. She is also extremely loyal as a spouse. She is the best of all worlds, IMHO.
She is scared of mice though. Seriously, if she sees a mouse she screams to high heaven....just like that cartoon wife standing on the chair in the kitchen. I love everything about her.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)You didn't watch the video did you? What are you afraid of?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Didnt you hear? Repressed heterosexuality is the new feminism! Or so a very tiny group of people would have us believe.....
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Are those who deliberately choose to misunderstand and/or oppose equality, who insist on making caricatures out of feminist ideas because they are desperate to hang on to or prop up privilege. Laci Green makes videos about sex. Obviously she isn't suggesting repression. She begins the video by talking about how she wants to promote sex positivity. That should have been clear to anyone who understands the English language. Laci's point was about women acting as subjects, just as men do, rather than objects. Remember the bit about acting rather than being acted upon? Anyone who learned how to diagram sentences, which I'm guessing you are old enough to have done, should know the difference between a subject and an object. In her analogy, the object is the scissors and she is the subject. The object exists for her to do something to, just as the media presents women as objects for male pleasure rather subjects acting according to their own sexual interests.
Amazing, it is possible to have a full sex life without reducing women to objects. It's possible to enjoy sex without elevating the profits of corporate capitalism above human rights. Believe it or not, it's not being sexually uptight to oppose pedophilia or rape, or support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as it is used to combat sexual harassment and a hostile work environment. As much as you find it difficult to comprehend, your sexuality is not intrinsically linked to capitalist commodity fetishism. Human beings did manage to procreate before Sports Illustrated and rape porn. I know that concept is shocking to some around here. They can't image a human existence before they took their instructions of what to think and feel about women from corporate media conglomerates. Nonetheless, people have been happily having sex for thousands of years.
If you still make that comment about sexual repression after watching the video, it's clear that you choose not to understand.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)People dont like OTHER peoples objectification, but everyone does it. Men objectify women, women objectify men. Gay men objectify other gay men and lesbians objectify other lesbians.
Folks always have and always will objectify people they are attracted to. The urge to objectify is universal, and so long as it's fairly and respectfully indulged, it's not offensive, not a problem, and not news.
Feminism also objectifies women, but in a different way.
The 'sexual repression of heterosexuality' comment had nothing to do with the video. It has to do with the ongoing message pushed in these 'gender wars' threads.
Just my 2 cents....
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)or you don't want to understand. Because if you had, you wouldn't continue to repeat the same nonsense. It isn't particularly complicated. It's geared toward high-school and college kids.
There is no message of sexual repression by feminists. There is an excuse by men who insist that only they should have full dominion over everything in life, including what is posted on DU. They use that trope as excuse for holding on to power and demeaning and disrespecting women on this site. Most people can see through the whole charade perfectly clearly. It's all about asserting male domination. They don't respect feminists and indeed most of the members of this site enough to bother to listen to their concerns. That is as true for African Americans and Muslims as it is for feminists, as is evident to anyone who bothers to read the threads in the AA and Muslim groups. All they care about is themselves, what they want, and their determination to maintain DU as their little fiefdom of power, perhaps because they lack power in their own lives.
The kind of shit that goes on in DU hasn't been acceptable in any workplace that follows the law, in any congressional office, or Democratic Party office in well over 25 years. I don't know where people have been the last few decades that this sort of thing comes to news to them. It is all prohibited by federal law as part of a hostile environment.
Whatever. I'm done dealing with people who make clear that my concerns don't matter enough to even attempt to understand. I don't exist to them as a full human being with equal rights, so they don't exist to me.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
treestar
(82,383 posts)to want equality. This is like the false charge of "prudery." Why is your wife illustrative of anything? She is one person in a patriarchal society. Glad she meets your needs (until some day she decides she wants to do something you don't want her to do).
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)As I said, she is an alpha female. My wife is perfectly illustrative of a woman being simultaneously feminine and feminist.
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #247)
treestar This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #247)
treestar This message was self-deleted by its author.
treestar
(82,383 posts)yeah why can't women be subjects too.
Chaco Dundee
(334 posts)You should have bought some lederhosen for the kid to go along with that polka and a chamberpot to go with the chamber music.now there would have been some tears of joy.or you could have explained that the beatles where not much older then 17 when they wrote the lyrics and that is quite normal at that age.you could have said their outstanding creations are still loved after 50 years of success which enriched all music,as well as polka and select chamber music..
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Teaching your child to drink booze - shame!
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...what will happen when you get to Dear Prudence, (a song written by John Lennon especially for Prudence Farrow to cheer her up! It worked).
- My god man, this could change the world!!!!
K&R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Beatles
Dear Prudence, won't you come out to play
Dear Prudence, greet the brand new day
The sun is up, the sky is blue
It's beautiful and so are you
Dear Prudence won't you come out and play
Dear Prudence open up your eyes
Dear Prudence see the sunny skies
The wind is low the birds will sing
That you are part of everything
Dear Prudence won't you open up your eyes?
Look around round
Look around round round
Look around
Dear Prudence let me see you smile
Dear Prudence like a little child
The clouds will be a daisy chain
So let me see you smile again
Dear Prudence won't you let me see you smile?
napkinz
(17,199 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Hasn't it been documented the he was physically and verbally abusive to both of his wives and a monumental asshole to his oldest son?
napkinz
(17,199 posts)From what I've read, Yoko helped him to see the light.
That's why he dropped out of the music scene in 1975 and spent the next five years devoting himself to Sean.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Biography/expose in 2008 was pretty clear that he continued to knock her around even after he dropped out.
Eh? Not a fan of the Beatles. For music from the golden oldies era I'd rather listen to The Doors. Even just comparing Lennon to Lenny Kravitz (my gen x era) - he blows Lennon away.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)You missed the mark in a big way this time.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Which is pretty fucking spineless, if you ask me. Now he wasn't mocking people being bothered by watermelon jokes with his stupid Jewish food jokes.
It's always the same BS, there is no allowing for context- it's been all about mocking feminists or African Americans and saying "who ME?" *blinks innocently*.
Not going to play this "game" as these kids like to call it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Suppliedeth it.
Amen.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Well you should see Polythene Pam
She's so good looking but she looks like a man
Well you should see her in drag dressed in her polythene bag
Yes you should see Polythene Pam
Yeah, yeah, yeah
Get a dose of her in jackboots and kilt
She's killer-diller when she's dressed to the hilt
She's the kind of a girl that makes the "News of the World"
Yes you could say she was attractively built
Yeah, yeah, yeah
This thread is a new low, it broke the internet for me -- because it made me sympathize with the HoFers more than the anti-HoFers. This week, the anti's keep reminding me of this, over and over, every thread...
"...I'm a m-model, you know what I mean, and I do my little turn on the catwalk... I shake my little tush on the catwalk..."
Just goes to show this objectifying schtick is anything but new (roughly the same age as tv, and me). And it's getting real boring by now. I keep thinking this fad has to end sometime, but no, decade after decade it never does. And all the while, it's taken to be so trendy, the latest thing. HA! That does crack me up!
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Truly.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Wanting to censor the Beatles. Do you think one single poster actually believes that? But... As long as he sticks to the script, right?
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Do they represent disdain for women? Misogyny even?
Or is it more likely that they reflect the fact that, in this world of economic troubles, murder, mayhem and climate change, people want sex and sexuality to remain lighthearted and fun enough to enable us to, yes, look at some T&A without flipping out and making it into a huge issue.
First world problems indeed.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)marble falls
(57,102 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Unless you were here then, which I doubt, you couldn't possibly relate.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Which is why it sold a zillion copies in the US and elsewhwere?
Or am I missing something in your claim?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)and the US picked up the Beatles second hand.
You want to post some lyrics try Wynonie Harris.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Where the same stuff happens?
You sure about that?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)and so would not necessarily have related aside from which I didn't mention your dance halls. You made what you wanted to of the words oblivious to the fact that in most of our dance halls the average age was only about 17 anyway then.
You might also like to try substituting another teen number if you can find one with two syllables. Its just a song with no malintent.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Get "carried away" being offended by racist jokes. Love all this stuff where you display ignorance over topics - racially charged words and their history, what objectification actually is (and it's not about that song)- and go on to ridicule "the situation" created by DUers who give a shit discussing it here.
I guess there's not enough room in GD for "other" peoples concerns. God forbid!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)You're utterly full of bull, but your unflappability in the face of cold, hard reality earns you plucky-points.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Not so much that it is discussed but this thread has 4 posts...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014731316
and this one is over 270.
It pisses me off.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Sad to say.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)this is really interesting....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/02/i-crashed-a-wall-street-secret-society.html
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)or preface your remarks with photos of Ukrainian women when you do post.
Just trying to help.
Additionally, there are a LOT of threads on Ukraine situation now.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)"Wine, Women and Song."
An endorsement of date rape? I say we nuke from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i blame it on my sisters who played this on the stereo and of course dick clark
and this one!
onehandle
(51,122 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Manny's humor or the people getting super upset by Manny.
It's as if people have never been in a Manny thread.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)And, believe me, it's worth clicking on the link. Lawrence appears at the end. (And you have wonder why the first announcer is coughing.)
napkinz
(17,199 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i got to stay up late cause my grandmother watched lawrence welk.. it`s a long story.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)There's no reason to worry about objectification... someone screaming "Suck my dick!" from a car is exactly the same as a cute Beatles song!
Thanks, Manny, I've really seen the light.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)In an alternate reality.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)When you get threatened in the street as part of your everyday life (as opposed to being scolded on the internet) then you can talk to me about objectification, righty-o?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)1000words
(7,051 posts)Delightfully cartoonish, at times.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Now it just cracks me up, that's even more addictive than the anger was.
I've been laughing since I logged on this evening.
1000words
(7,051 posts)There were times I would scream at the screen. When I stopped taking it so seriously, I knew it was time to finally create an account.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)We all like attractive people. But this is a political discussion board not Facebook.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Few of the objections to the SI thing have anything to do with "prudishness" - more to do with how unattainable standards of beauty affect people's (moreso women's) self-esteem.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)is very hypocritical.
SI swimsuit issue is older than me and way before I was born.