Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGetting closer & closer to Wyden & Udall's iceberg-NSA Bypassed the Fourth Amendment for 3 Years
How NSA Bypassed the Fourth Amendment for 3 Years
By: emptywheel Tuesday August 20, 2013 10:16 pm
A new WSJ story not only expands on previous descriptions of the practice.
The systems operate like this: The NSA asks telecom companies to send it various streams of Internet traffic it believes most likely to contain foreign intelligence. This is the first cut of the data.
These requests dont ask for all Internet traffic. Rather, they focus on certain areas of interest, according to a person familiar with the legal process. Its still a large amount of data, but not everything in the world, this person says.
The second cut is done by NSA. It briefly copies the traffic and decides which communications to keep based on what it calls strong selectorssay, an email address, or a large block of computer addresses that correspond to an organization it is interested in. In making these decisions, the NSA can look at content of communications as well as information about who is sending the data.
These requests dont ask for all Internet traffic. Rather, they focus on certain areas of interest, according to a person familiar with the legal process. Its still a large amount of data, but not everything in the world, this person says.
The second cut is done by NSA. It briefly copies the traffic and decides which communications to keep based on what it calls strong selectorssay, an email address, or a large block of computer addresses that correspond to an organization it is interested in. In making these decisions, the NSA can look at content of communications as well as information about who is sending the data.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324108204579022874091732470.html
But it reveals the illegal program continued for 3 years, during which the telecoms and NSA simply policed (or did not police) themselves.
For example, a recent Snowden document showed that the surveillance court ruled that the NSA had set up an unconstitutional collection effort. Officials say it was an unintentional mistake made in 2008 when it set filters on programs like these that monitor Internet traffic; NSA uncovered the inappropriate filtering in 2011 and reported it.
[snip]
Paul Kouroupas, a former executive at Global Crossing Ltd. and other telecom companies responsible for security and government affairs, says the checks and balances in the NSA programs depend on telecommunications companies and the government policing the system themselves. Theres technically and physically nothing preventing a much broader surveillance, he says.
[snip]
Paul Kouroupas, a former executive at Global Crossing Ltd. and other telecom companies responsible for security and government affairs, says the checks and balances in the NSA programs depend on telecommunications companies and the government policing the system themselves. Theres technically and physically nothing preventing a much broader surveillance, he says.
.....................................
Remember, those filters got set in the wake of the FISA Amendments Act. The telecoms doing the initial pass had just gotten immunity. While I think it possible that one of the telecoms got cold feet and that led to the FISA Courts discovery of a practice that had been going on 3 years, Im highly skeptical that the timing of the immunity and the overly broad filters was randomly coincidental.
I think were getting closer and closer to the iceberg Ron Wyden and Mark Udall warned us about.
http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/08/20/how-nsa-bypassed-the-fourth-amendment-for-3-years/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 652 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Getting closer & closer to Wyden & Udall's iceberg-NSA Bypassed the Fourth Amendment for 3 Years (Original Post)
kpete
Aug 2013
OP
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)1. K&R
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)3. I think we are closer, but I don't think we are close...
just a feeling.