Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any legal historians? Why aren't petty juries allowed to ask questions of the witnesses? (Original Post) Recursion Jun 2013 OP
In some states they are. nt COLGATE4 Jun 2013 #1
in AZ and very few other states they can TorchTheWitch Jun 2013 #2

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
2. in AZ and very few other states they can
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 12:16 PM
Jun 2013

That was one thing I really liked about the Jodi Arias trial. The jury was allowed to submit questions to each witness anonymously, and the judge would address those questions to the witness to answer. It was really cool to see what the jury was thinking. It was noticeable that certain jury questions in the Arias trial were cleverly being snarky toward witnesses thereby showing their thoughts about a witness's testimony.

There's both good and bad about it though. By the jury being able to ask questions of each witness it alerts the attorneys of both sides and enables them to monitor their strategy. Overall though, I think it's something beneficial and should be something every state allows.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any legal historians? Why...