General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Kluwe: Here’s what’s wrong with Ayn Rand, libertarians
A world full of Ayn Rands would be a terrifyingly selfish place, writes the outspoken NFL star in his new book
BY CHRIS KLUWE
So I forced myself to read Atlas Shrugged. Apparently I harbor masochistic tendencies; it was a long, hard slog, and by the end I felt as if Ayn Rand had violently beaten me about the head and shoulders with words. I feel I would be doing all of you a disservice (especially those who think Rand is really super-duper awesome) if I didnt share some thoughts on this weighty tome.
Who is John Galt?
John Galt (as written in said novel) is a deeply flawed, sociopathic ideal of the perfect human. John Galt does not recognize the societal structure surrounding him that allows him to exist. John Galt, to be frank, is a turd.
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/chris_kluwe_heres_whats_wrong_with_ayn_rand_libertarians/
(more at link)
think
(11,641 posts)Great editorial and rant...
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)I think it would be great if he took BSC Shelly's seat.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)newsletter. When I had to go to work and got into the real world, I saw how much fantasy she spouted.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Those meant we were smarter than everybody else.
--imm
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I still have the newsletters tho. I went thru them recently to see if there were any articles by Alan Greensberg but there wasnt. I remember her association with him back then.
Hekate
(90,978 posts)John Rogers
Glad you outgrew it!
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Then again, watching a libertarian friend single handedly take on AND WIN IN COURT against Border Patrol checkpoint overreach makes me appreciate some of their issues.
But I guess the NSA metadata plainly shows that my associations are questionable from an establishment point of view.
Botany
(70,635 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Botany
(70,635 posts)It was a big screaming nothing ... it made so little of an impression on me that
I don't remember if it was "The Fountainhead" or "Atlas Shrugged." All I
remember is that it was really long.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Hekate
(90,978 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/]libertarianism-anarchy-for-rich-people[/url]
deafskeptic
(463 posts)Ever since I read that book, I've always thought her philosophy was fit only for narcissists and sociopaths.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Skittles
(153,261 posts)Boomerproud
(7,976 posts)but since they are so clueless, they don't understand the garbage they believe in.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Nice read. I really like this guy!
He'll be a nice fit for my fantasy team...
meow2u3
(24,775 posts)He has the makings of a good professor. Personally, I think he ought to enroll in grad school to get his Ph.D if he hasn't already.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)I have a co-worker who said last week that he thinks Atlas Shrugged is a masterpiece.
He is very intelligent, very conservative.
This opinion is an excellent rebuttal to his assertion. I'll use it next time he brings up Atlas Shrugged.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)And Pat, as we know is the best, the very best.
mtasselin
(666 posts)Chris, if you read this and ever get the chance to play in Green Bay please come and play here. When your career is over please go into politics, I think you would have a great future, as far as Ayn Rand goes it says a lot about lyin ryan that he makes his staff read this garbage. Good luck this season, stay safe. I applaud you.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Ayn Rand is the turd, and John Galt is just one of her farts.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Ayn Rand is what's floating in it.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)cause Ayn Rand is what created the stinking.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)of international CEOs
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Nearly fifty years ago a slightly older friend had just read "Atlas Shrugged" and recommended it to me whole-heartedly. I tried to read it. Couldn't get past the first couple of chapters because it was so boring, so badly written, so completely unbelievable. I do vaguely recall something about the monumental selfishness and self-centerdness of the main character, but happily no details remain in my memory.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)John Galt probably seemed like a sociopath because he was probably based on a sociopath. It has been reported that John Galt was based on William Edward Hickman. Hickman was a guy who killed a 12 year old girl. In addition, it seems that Ayn Rand liked sociopaths. Rand believed the ideal person was someone who did not care about other people.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/08/mark-ames-paul-ryans-guru-ayn-rand-worshipped-a-serial-killer-who-kidnapped-and-dismembered-little-girls.html
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Paul Ryan and others in the GOP party live by her writings and maybe thats why they don't give a shit about others especially the least of us.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You know how "they" are.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)Most of the atheists I know are pretty awesome people who care deeply about their fellow human beings. I do know one who cares less than deeply but he is an atheist and a teabagger republican. I'd say that not caring commonality is from the teabag side rather than the atheist side.
And isn't Paul Ryan a Catholic? Thankfully I know some wonderful catholic people too so I won;t throw them all under the bus just because Paul Ryan is one.
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)Not that he's better than Shane Lechler, but he's way more entertaining.
The only thing I read by her was Anthem, cause it was assigned in my Junior English class.
It just so happened I bought the album Rush - 2012 right after I read it, and after reading the lyrics to that song, I was like 'holy crap, this friggin song is a re-telling of the book Anthem!'. Then I noticed there's a note at the bottom that says 'Thanks to Ayn Rand' or some such.
I've heard Peart later clarify that he in no way subscribes to Rand's philosophies, he just got the idea for the song lyrics from that book.
ms liberty
(8,620 posts)The story was a jumping off point for him, so to speak. In 2112, he created a world of religion based authoritarianism, which his hero struggled against. Throughout his career, he has shown great disdain for both religion and authoritarians, up to and including their latest CD, the masterful "Clockwork Angels". This post brought to you by a dedicated Rush fan, lol!
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)of dedicated Rush fans.
I also read Anthem because of the album. Hallalujah, it was a LOT shorter than Atlas Shrugged and that's about the only nioce thing I can say about it. That and it spawned a great album.
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)I could write out every word to the entire 22 minute song off the top of my head right now ... despite having heard it about 3 times in the last 20 years. So ... yeah. I know what it's called
BTW, I saw Clockwork Angels here in Phoenix a few months back. The way things went down, I ended up in the 5th row, center ... for free.
It was friggin awesome. I hadn't seen 'em since the early 80's when I saw the GuP and Power Windows tours.
ms liberty
(8,620 posts)I saw the Clockwork Angels tour on May 3rd in Raleigh (best seats we've had so far!), and on October 30th in Charlotte and it was magnificent both times. I loved the string section, and the band has deliberately been looser on this tour than usual, which was an awesome treat. I saw the previous tour, the Time Machine tour twice too, when they performed Moving Pictures in its entirety, and were performing the two songs from Clockwork Angels that they had recorded by then, which was Caravan and BU2B. Because they were doing all of Moving Pictures, it was far more precise, although Alex went on an unplanned riff at the Greenville SC show which me and mr liberty caught immediately and really cracked up about! Ged and Neil gave him this quizzical look, like, dude - where you going?
Wolf Frankula
(3,604 posts)Her biggest failing is her characters. They don't have conversations, they make speeches to each other. The villains are one dimensional cardboard cutouts, the heroes and heroines are impossible Randian. The situations are totally unbelievable and false. The action is flat, when it is not nonexistent. She was a bad writer, a bad playwright and a bad human being.
Wolf
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And her followers are pretty much the same. They whine, they wreck, they steal and they throw tantrums...and then later they get over it and pretend they weren't ever wrong.
Of course, there are some people, like Greenspan, who NEVER grow out of it, and wreck entire societies in the name of the "moralness" of capitalism(and yes, he did use the word "moral" .
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Succint and to the point.
DinahMoeHum
(21,825 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)It took an NFL player to cut Ayn rand clearly, simply, and down to size.
I hope this guy becomes a writer after soaking the NFL for every penny he can.
DinahMoeHum
(21,825 posts)Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)Or both, depending on your portfolio.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)And Rand did idealize sociopaths. She was fascinated by a real life gruesome, sadistic serial killer and gushed about him in her journals.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)?? Whatever the reason, he shows it by idolizing Ayn Rand, who idolized... Same for Rand Paul and the others. How he got elected not only puzzles me, but scares me as well.
demigoddess
(6,645 posts)I read about half of it. It was so stupid and repetitive. And selfish. This guy thought he should be successful and admired just because he was new and he thought he was terrific. Self-centered trash with no plot that I could see so I pitched it back to the library. I was in Mississippi at the time. Do you think that tells us something??
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)That was a weird moment for someone who had been reading fiction since elementary school. He was obviously the protagonist / "hero," but he was self-centered jerk. There was no suspending disbelief after a certain point.
I was in college in Florida (so I wouldn't be too hard on Mississippi) and gave the book back to the girl who loaned it to me. We stopped dating shortly after.
novenator
(5 posts)I can't believe he actually wasted his time by reading Atlas. Libertarians that demand someone read that ugly propaganda piece have the same philosophy as religious proselytizers: brainwash by volume. Luckily, Chris Kluwe is a Viking at heart and managed to not get suckered into their simplistic cult.
Don't get me wrong, I share some views with libertarians: more open borders allowing a freer flow of people, ending marijuana prohibition, bringing the troops home, defunding the military-security complex, ending domestic espionage, restoring civil liberties, etc.
Where libertarians lose it is by focusing the majority of their efforts to unleashing corporate tyranny through their trickle down and deregulation economic hypotheses. They would take unprecedented wealth inequality and expand it so that 90% of us are suffering even worse so the oligarchs and plutocrats could live even more lavish lifestyles. No amount of "free market" fairy dust will ever satiate greed and cruelty.
demigoddess
(6,645 posts)whenever we have gotten to that point, the lower class usually finds a guillotine or something like it.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)So her reflections on life were of the mindless, heartless, the no-empathy zone. Her writings strike me as something being worked out, something ugly and lifeless. I can see why conservatives like it because the distractions of the human bonding, the nature of love, the complexity of human need is non-existent. All that is left is simplistic slogging through of push/shove I win you lose mentalities.
Conservatives have simple little minds, they can grasp simple little things.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)because he didn't believe in getting help from anybody else. He didn't have any insurance ('cause that's socialism), didn't belong to any church or other community group that might have helped him out, and, of course, didn't believe in getting organ transplants (or allowing anyone else to perform surgery on him). He considered doing dialysis on himself, but it requires a complex machine and as smart as he thought he was, he just couldn't make all the components from scratch by himself. He also thought about researching a cure on his own, but he couldn't bear the thought of allowing existing research performed by others to influence his efforts to master the subject.
He eventually decided the best he could do was to spend his last days high on weed he grew himself. So you could say he died happy. Selfish and stupid, but happy.
rwsanders
(2,613 posts)(Sorry I've posted this before, but I still make myself laugh with it).
Apophis
(1,407 posts)video games.