General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs Snowden & Geenwald's story falls apart, the GOP has their next scandal lined up.
From the Washington Post: Presidential trips cost a lot.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-trip-to-africa-poses-special-challenges-enormous-costs/2013/06/13/29d9270a-cd29-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
while waiting for the far "left" to start their outrage too.
cali
(114,904 posts)think these are both just republican generated scandals.
One is- the trip to Africa
On is not- Massive surveillance on the American people.
Pathetic.
extreme partisanship causes serious brain damage.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Saving metadata does not equal massive surveillance on the American people. Your rhetoric has gotten loose and is running around wild. Clear example of ODS.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)9/11 was just the excuse our government needed to hand the MIC a blank check. (Of course the MIC has been very generous with their cash in return.)
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Oooooooooh MIC. Scary!
RC
(25,592 posts)A warrant he says. That would be funny if it weren't such a serous violation of the Constitution. What's with all the secrecy surrounding all this? Secret warrants. Secret courts, secret data gathering on EVERYBODY, by out own government, regardless of who and reason for collections!
If this were actually legitimate, why all the secrecy?
The very fact that the government is gathering all that information, meta-data, phone calls, E-mail context, and who knows what else, is a violation of the 4th Amendment. Never mind that contractors are doing the actual work, they are doing it with tax payers dollars, on behest of various agencies of the Federal Government. That is makes it violation of the 4th Amendment. Who here gave the the government or the contractors permission to collect that private data on ourselves? And the contents of the E-mails and phone calls are private.
They are not spying on American citizens? Bullshit, they are. Not only directly, but they are also using information from other countries for plausible deniability. This whole thin stinks to high heaven. Why do you think there is nothing wrong about it? Do you have a pay check involved here?
frylock
(34,825 posts)FISA is a CYA rubberstamp.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)In order for your numbers to have any meaning, we have to have something to compare them to.
So how many regular-old search warrants were turned down in regular-old courts?
The 0 rejections either means it's a rubber stamp, or it means the people making the requests get their ducks in a row first. We can get an idea of which it is by looking at other courts.
So what's the stats on other courts?
MattBaggins
(7,905 posts)cell phone bill?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)someone needs a time out from DU.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Surveillance requires a target, such as a wiretap or just trailing someone.
cali
(114,904 posts)no, the story about massive secret surveillance of the American people and all that entails, will not go away. Of course, some little idiots actually believe that this story is about Greenwald and Snowden.
It ain't.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)"some idiots" indeed.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)in the "some idiots" category, then you are the one who should own it, not Cali. As they say, 'If the shoe fits', but it's on you.
The TOS prohibit calling a DUer out, so, one must often speak in generalities. That's not passive aggressive.
For my part, I would say that anyone who thinks the NSA spying issue is about Greenwald/Snowden is sadly misinformed. I guess it's ok to say that.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)both parties would like to bury the NSA story and get back to the partisan bickering, get people watching the WWF match again.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)btw, one doesn't have to say alleged in that he killed Trayvon Martin, being that he admits he did it, and is not even
saying he didn't do it.
He did it.
and I gotta admit, I don't have any ego, but, what I said months ago about the media (alt media and mainstream media), well
it was indeed 100% correct.
IT's like Tidewater used to be the Mets minor league team. There was no one on Tidewater that didn't want to be on the NY Mets.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)won't have to deal with this, as the extremists are going to be rendered politically obsolete at the voting booth
in 2016 and by 2018 I predict a 6 to 3 democratic supreme court
80-20 votes in the senate/house will be the norm then with the obstructionists obsoleted at the booth.
and when Hillary accepts the nomination in 2016, standing on stage in synch with her will be Janet Napolitano, Elizabeth Warren, Kathleen Sebelius, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Deval Patrick, Caroline Kennedy, Gabbie Giffords, Al Sharpton and 100s of others
MattBaggins
(7,905 posts)like to subscribe to your news letter.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)and the good team is way back on its own 10 yard line needing 2 points to win
FIRST one has to get to midfield
and then one can think about bringing in the game winning field goal kicker.
But starting at the 10, nobody can kick a field goal that far. There must be forward movement, battles won and lost, to win a war.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)FSogol
(45,529 posts)Too much government contractor $$$ involved.
PS. We'll need a much more liberal supreme court to change infringements on the 4th amendment. Blowing up the Democratic Party will not accomplish that.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)"As Snowden & Geenwald's story falls apart"
After days of listening to DU Authoritians bend over backwards to say this is great stuff. I tend to jump the gun
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)erosion of our civil liberties.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)worked hard to get Obama elected in 2008.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Because they were disappointed.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)This is a sounding board. It's useful to gauge the mood of the left but not to chastise the electorate.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Not everything spells doom
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)and some do have an agenda, but this is an issue that needs push-back. People who have done nothing wrong have gone to jail and been sent off to other countries to be tortured in the name of fighting terrorism. Not to mention the money that is being spent on these surveillance programs.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)...a new version of that 90s show that became so tedious. The purpose is two-fold. First...to try to taint this administration as being inept and/or corrput with one "scandal" or poutrage after the next. Eventually the rushpublicans will find something to grab onto...a new "blue dress". Maybe they'll find a video of President Obama jaywalking...surely he's broken the law and this will be sufficient grounds for article of impeachment. Eventually the corporate media is so consumed with scandal fever that its all they'll talk about...making it all but impossible for the Obama administration to push for any meaningful legislation. Nullification is at play here.
The second game is to innoculate themselves from any future scandals. They'll tire us out from the non-stop investigation until their toady is elected. Then...you see the "get over it" attitude again. Ya know...any time a real scandal is uncovered, the media will rush to say how "aren't we tired of that...we went through this during the Obama years"...and thus illegal wars can be waged and the economy gutted. It's worked before...
FSogol
(45,529 posts)KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)...but "they suck more". Yep, part is to suppress Democratic turnout in 2014 and we're already seeing how the rumor gets the attention while the facts get lost in the outrage. It's also to buck up their fractured party and try to gloss over their own "philosophical" differences. The game is also to try to slime Hillary Clinton...a preemptive strike to try to make her vulnerable in 2016 and hope they create enough angst on this side of the sandbox that she'll be rejected again and nominate a weaker candidate. Being term limited, President Obama is now also a "lame duck"...and this is part of that process.
flamingdem
(39,328 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts).. in clear violation of the 4th Amendment?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)And the Supreme Court hasn't upheld provisions of the Patriot Act?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Dodge the question. Some "laws" are wrong. Some "laws" violate our basic RIGHTS as clearly described in the Constitution.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)and are declared unconstitutional, they are still the law.
Every single right has its limitations. You can't yell fire in a crowed theater, you can own an Abrams Tank, etc.
Courts will need to decide whether saving raw metadata is acceptable or a violation of the 4th. So far, they have.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Money is speech in your book? Corporations are people?
Because, of course, judges are gods that NEVER make bad rulings.
meh.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)before they can save it, this is clearly a violation of our 4th amentment rights.
The people in these secret courts making secret interpretations of laws and rubber stamping secret orders KNOW what they are doing is against the constitution and is undermining our democracy, otherwise they would be doing all of this in the light of day.
Hey, any wistleblower out there who is willing to get their names out in public?
treestar
(82,383 posts)the word "unreasonable" creates issues. There have been many cases in the courts about whether searches are reasonable or not.
Quoting the Amendment alone shows you know nothing beyond it other than the words.
bornskeptic
(1,330 posts)Persons, houses, papers, or effects? Clearly it isn't persons, houses, or effects. Papers can legitimately be extended to include any communication in a modern context, but those aren't being searched or seized without a warrant either when the subject is an American person. What's being seized is telephone company records of communications, not the communications themselves. Non-Americans aren't protected by the Fourth Amendment, so there's no evidence of any Fourth Amendment violation in any of what's been "revealed" recently.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... with tree stumps than Authoritarian Apologists.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 14, 2013, 11:15 AM - Edit history (1)
I don't think you're going to see liberals getting upset about the cost of protecting the President.
You might like to see that, because it would confirm your biases, but I doubt you'll actually see it.
-Laelth
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 14, 2013, 09:13 AM - Edit history (1)
On edit: By looking back, this isn't really true: DUer's fell for the: cost of his India trip was too high "scandal."
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)What does the cost of a presidential trip abroad have to do with secret surveillance of the public? Excuse me, but this smells like a red herring. I've a mind to forward your post to the NSA.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)They also have your next response!
randome
(34,845 posts)Game over, man!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Hey! hey! NSA, take this post and shove it away, then pull it out of your ass on another day.
frylock
(34,825 posts)this isn't a GOP scandal ffs.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)that seems to be a real scandal. and if they aren't talking about it - that tells you a certain kind of news as well.
you'd think they would be all over it like shit to a blanket?
hughee99
(16,113 posts)on the NSA issue.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)it is our responsibility as Americans to be sure that they don't..this op is ridiculous
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...that Democrats would figure out how to control the narrative, so they could outflank the Republicans instead of letting them always frame the arguments.
Finally, some Democrats seem to have gotten the hang of it: You include special qualifying phrases in your reports, that subtly express your opinion without it being obvious. You make sure it is all part of a larger narrative, so you only have to salt your stories and headlines with a couple of code words to dredge up the narrative that has been planted. That sort of thing.
This headline has all the elements:
As Snowden & Geenwald's story falls apart, the GOP has their next scandal lined up
First, you have the lead-in: "As Snowden & Greenwald's story falls apart"
Says who? There are critics, to be sure; but Greenwald has responded to much of the criticism. Furthermore, many of Snowden's claims have not even been denied. The strongest technical challenge to the Greenwald story is the notion of the NSA having "direct access" to company's servers. But this is not really much of a challenge at all. See Greenwald's latest for details:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/14/nsa-partisanship-propaganda-prism
Next, you have: "the GOP has their next scandal lined up"
And there is the narrative, that some hope will be bought hook, line and sinker: that the whole NSA surveillance scandal is just one of the many GOP attempts to smear President Obama. And like any good made-up narrative, there is a grain of truth, so it is easier to plant the narrative in people's minds. Yes, it is true, the GOP is lining up scandals as best they can. But is this one of them? Unlikely. First, you need to look at who is on which side of this issue. It is really very interesting. There are conservative Republicans supporting Obama on this, there are liberal Democrats opposing Obama on this. There are far right Republicans opposing Obama on this, and there are centrist Democrats supporting Obama on this.
In other words, this story does not fall neatly along the ideological lines we are used to in present-day politics. So even if someone, somewhere, pushed this story in order to discredit Obama (for which I have seen zero evidence), it has gone way, way beyond that.
Okay. Now that we've got the hang of this narrative thing, let's try to use it to push true narratives, not false ones, m'kay?
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)FSogol
(45,529 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...you ain't got much.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...much like the Southern phrase "Bless your heart".
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Guess which term of "endearment" I'm thinking toward you right now?
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...but yes, it was a barb for sure.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Did the blue pill go down nicely?
You deny this.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/earth-insight/2013/jun/14/climate-change-energy-shocks-nsa-prism
And this
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/13410
Damn partisans!!!!
FSogol
(45,529 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)See how wrong you are. But I love the smear.
So instead of dealing with the issue at hand...you are right, there is ratfucking going on, it's bipartisan, and it is of the Constitution...you are concerned about one man, in this comedy of errors going back to 1947.
We are an empire...and this is not partisan. This is national policy.
Enjoy the blue pill. Go back to sleep.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)To your first question, NYET, no, lo. It s not owned by Koch in any way, shape or form
To the second, go back to sleep...you really are a damn partisan.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)And yes, I am a Democrat, All the rat fuckers in the world won't change that.
NYET, no lo?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You were told no in several languages.
Well, sorry if I put my country...before my party. I took an oath to the Constitution, not one man.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Enemies, foreign and domestic and everything...
I know...shocking.
And this intel apparatus is bipartisan. Try connecting a few dots...why do you think Mitch McConnell and Diane Feinstein agree...let's not mention Boenher and Pelosi.
It started in 1948 with a super duper secret intel agreement... Jaysus, really...go back to sleep.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Are you an elected official?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)FSogol
(45,529 posts)ignore the rest of the 1947, 1948 word salad.
Lo!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will give it to you anyway...remember to tip Truman on the way out
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/13410
And bury Frank Church or 2000 era John Conyers.
I call this 911 derangement syndrome plus it's ok as long as my side does it.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)More word salad: "will give it to you anyway...remember to tip Truman on the way out" & "And bury Frank Church or 2000 era John Conyers." & "I call this 911 derangement syndrome plus it's ok as long as my side does it."
Pro tip: Conversations work better it you you don't just throw about non sequitur after non sequitur and expect everyone to know what you are thinking.
Have a nice afternoon and stay hydrated.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Has potential red pill effect.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Came to that conclusion after the anti-wind woo it published.
Response to FSogol (Reply #71)
Post removed
A HERETIC I AM
(24,379 posts)Because the above was pure gold.
GOLD, I say!
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)A few weeks ago you said it was imminent.
Answer the question.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)both of them would gladly shift focus to the stupidest thing Issa could dream up.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Not that Assad is a good man.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)and it isn't about Republicans out to get Obama...it's about our government spying on us, in secrecy, against our constitutional rights. Don't conflate a trip to Africa with the NSA's horrible, immoral, illegal, disgusting spying on all Americans.
There's NOT ONE single person here on the ground that I've talked to about the NSA spying who isn't up in arms about it...dems, repubs, independents...no matter their political persuasion they are all wanting the Patriot Act dismantled and the NSA curtailed. Only one of those people actually said the "I've got nothing to hide" meme initially and, when it was explained more thoroughly what the NSA has been doing, that person dropped the meme like a hot potato.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If you're trying to draw a corollary between the massive spy program and Republicans complaining about the price of a Presidential trip, you'll need to actually provide some evidence for a claim that seems ridiculous on its face.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Yeah, I saw that headline on good ol' rightwing Yahoo News this morning.
Yahoo started carrying entries from Michelle Malkin's blog every once in awhile, too.
Now, that's infotainment!
treestar
(82,383 posts)malaise
(269,182 posts)the Obamacare repeals and the bogus investigations.