Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:03 AM Jun 2013

Let me make a prediction: Within the next week or so, it will be revealed

that NSA surveillance just stopped a serious and deadly terrorist attack on some event or in some place that scares the shit out of the American people.

They want us scared and compliant. Who is they? The people running these programs, the corporations making big bucks off of them and some in the gov't.

It will be revealed by the government that mass surveillance has staved off numerous attacks over the past few years.

There are powerful forces both within government and outside of it that want to shut this discussion down now. That's why you will never see Snowden prosecuted in a public trial.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let me make a prediction: Within the next week or so, it will be revealed (Original Post) cali Jun 2013 OP
Bookmarking...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #1
You crack me up. pacalo Jun 2013 #17
Nice little racket the DoD has going, isn't it? magellan Jun 2013 #33
Billions of dollars were used to construct a 1M sq. ft. NSA facility pacalo Jun 2013 #55
You can count on it Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #2
So the Obama Adminstration will be intentionally lying to us? brooklynite Jun 2013 #3
I didn't say that it would be outright lying cali Jun 2013 #6
not really in control Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 #10
Then this is our best chance in a long time to fight back against the spooks. Laelth Jun 2013 #14
NSA and Carlyle/NeoCons Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 #23
Excellent information. Thanks. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #26
Plausible deniability. nt NorthCarolina Jun 2013 #35
It was no accident that GWHB was VP relayerbob Jun 2013 #37
And Carter said it too. zeemike Jun 2013 #49
Top Career NSA, CIA etc Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 #54
Take Obama out of the equation. This business venture began with Bush/Cheney. pacalo Jun 2013 #18
Yes. They will continue to lie to us. morningfog Jun 2013 #31
CT nt riqster Jun 2013 #4
We may never see Snowden prosecuted because he is on the run. randome Jun 2013 #5
He said he wasn't hiding his identity. You've just posted his name. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #21
If so, then I'm wrong. randome Jun 2013 #36
Not quite so wrong. randome Jun 2013 #40
"Hong Kong Eddie"? Tarheel_Dem Jun 2013 #57
It's a Catch-22 for them. Revealing past successes now will prove they are needlessly secretive. reformist2 Jun 2013 #7
The reasonable way to battle this pipoman Jun 2013 #8
Wouldn't solve it marions ghost Jun 2013 #15
I suspect Verizon profits im some way from this agreement. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #29
Hmmmmm. sibelian Jun 2013 #9
You have been doing a lot of research on this matter, it appears. Laelth Jun 2013 #11
.... Tanuki Jun 2013 #12
What if it is proven that NSA surveillance has stopped Raven Jun 2013 #13
Then clearly those attacks were planned for just this eventuality. randome Jun 2013 #16
They already claimed it did temmer Jun 2013 #19
One governmental excuse for not stopping 9/11 is that you can't get a sip of water out of a AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #47
Proven by who? zeemike Jun 2013 #52
They already did. First with nebulous "helped to prevent terrorist plots", next one was "subway idwiyo Jun 2013 #20
You're predicting something that has already happened? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #22
So I suppose the subject of the conversation is cali. sibelian Jun 2013 #24
You make no sense. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #25
Ah, the "You make no sense" reflex. sibelian Jun 2013 #30
Well, it's either "You make no sense" or "It's old news and everybody knew about it." AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #48
Not much of a prediction, cali. Our law enforcement agencies do this about once a month. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #27
I can see them not revealing anything. It would give leakers a more power if the Government BenzoDia Jun 2013 #28
I predict more lies will be revealed and that the spying is even more extensive. morningfog Jun 2013 #32
That's my prediction, too Aerows Jun 2013 #38
And like a whole lot of other things they are saying lately - we will not believe them because we jwirr Jun 2013 #34
even better: datasuspect Jun 2013 #39
Sorry, but the surveillance already has stopped terrorist attacks. bushisanidiot Jun 2013 #41
And then there are the terrorist attacks that have been prevented that they cannot talk about bushisanidiot Jun 2013 #43
They could do better giving us broad outlines, perhaps, but I agree with you. randome Jun 2013 #45
well someone is a little behind.. frylock Jun 2013 #59
Coincidently of course, these stories all came out yesterday: JW2020 Jun 2013 #42
Bingo! Le Taz Hot Jun 2013 #44
that's a prediction that does not require psychic skills Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #46
you are so right. I have no psychic skills so I tend to make predictions cali Jun 2013 #56
NSA surveillance played little role in foiling terror plots, experts say n2doc Jun 2013 #50
The real question WovenGems Jun 2013 #51
Let me make a prediction: there will be a diversion with a call for greater "gun control" that will AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #53
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #58
Surveillance programs have stopped 'dozens' of terror attacks, NSA chief says Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #60

magellan

(13,257 posts)
33. Nice little racket the DoD has going, isn't it?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:43 AM
Jun 2013

They make war, then their dept the NSA secretly "saves" us from the terrorism it creates...and we not only pay for all of this but the services that are giving them our information too.

Capone and Nitti would be green with envy.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
55. Billions of dollars were used to construct a 1M sq. ft. NSA facility
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:37 AM
Jun 2013

in Utah, & there are satellite facilities in other states.

I suspect that's why the Republicans are angry about the bad publicity -- their anger surely isn't on behalf of Obama. They're crying the loudest, yet they'd like nothing more than to impeach him.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
2. You can count on it
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:10 AM
Jun 2013

It's just like the war on drugs, so is the war on terror, it's business and never ending. How many children today actually know nothing more than that we have ALWAYS been at war against terror?. 1984? You better believe it.

brooklynite

(94,858 posts)
3. So the Obama Adminstration will be intentionally lying to us?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:10 AM
Jun 2013

or do you subscribe to the "Obama's not really in control of the intelligence community" theory...?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
6. I didn't say that it would be outright lying
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

embroidery around the edges, an emphasis on some aspect are possibilities. Yes, I think all administrations twist the facts, reveal partial truths. And I do tend to believe that some cutouts operate outside the President's knowledge.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
10. not really in control
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jun 2013

is my take.


As Bill Clinton said:



Someone else makes all the decisions



"You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions. ... You may find you can get away with virtual presidents, virtual prime ministers, virtual everything."
Quote by:


Bill Clinton

Source:
Sep 5, 1998, Dublin, Ireland



Now I want you all to think what he's talking about here
and take what he said literally not to the american people but to Ireland.



JFK wasn't in control of the intelligence community either and wanted them disbanded.

Dulles/CIA pulled shit on Truman
Eisenhower and Kennedy which they didn't have control

Reagan got caught up in their shit too....






Laelth

(32,017 posts)
14. Then this is our best chance in a long time to fight back against the spooks.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:26 AM
Jun 2013

Don't you think?



-Laelth

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
23. NSA and Carlyle/NeoCons
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:52 AM
Jun 2013

It paid $2.54 billion for Booz as a deep recession took hold. Fearing the risks of taking on too much debt in the midst of a financial crisis, Carlyle put up 50 percent cash instead of its normal 30 percent. It borrowed the rest to buy the company, which was then privately held.

Upon the close of the deal, the less profitable international and commercial business was spun off to become Booz & Co., leaving Carlyle with a government-only company.

After the split, the new Booz Allen Hamilton established an incentive-based compensation structure that gave the remaining partners a stake in the firm’s success. In effect, said one person close to the deal who was not authorized to speak publicly, “you got to eat what you killed.”

The incentives helped spur profits.

“Everybody has a responsibility, depending on your title, to bring in a certain amount of business,” said William Loomis, managing director at financial services firm Stifel Nicolaus.

Booz Allen, which employs 24,500, had a net profit of $219 million on revenue of nearly $5.8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31. For the same period ending in 2010, the year the company went public, the company earned $25 million on $5.1 billion in revenue.

George A. Price Jr., senior equity research analyst for aerospace, defense and government services at BB&T Capital Markets, said “they’ve got a great brand, they’ve focused over time on hiring top people, including bringing on people who have a lot of senior government experience.”



http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/nsa-revelations-put-booz-allen-hamilton-carlyle-group-in-uncomfortable-limelight/2013/06/11/8f4d9138-d2ca-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html


I find the money trail fascinating and they are also able to illegally mine data ... think of banking trends, Liber etc.








The trick is to keep themselves hidden from view a bit and let others do the bidding for them and have secret agencies to ensure that they remain in power.



"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
- John Lennon

"I spent 33 years in the Marines, most of my time being a high-class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism."
- General Smedley Butler, War is a Racket (1935)


Yes keep up the good fight

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
49. And Carter said it too.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:57 AM
Jun 2013

When asked by a reporter what surprised him most about being president he said "I am surprised at how little power I have"

We have long been ruled by Oligarchs, but we just don't believe it because we believe the theater we see preformed on the TV.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
54. Top Career NSA, CIA etc
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jun 2013

Just wink at each new administration and go about their secret little businesses and agendas.

Some may have clearances that even the president doesn't have knowing how to hide secrets for so long.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
18. Take Obama out of the equation. This business venture began with Bush/Cheney.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:32 AM
Jun 2013

Too many billions (or trillions) have been invested -- way before Obama came along.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
5. We may never see Snowden prosecuted because he is on the run.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

After saying "I'm not going to hide" no less.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
36. If so, then I'm wrong.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:53 AM
Jun 2013

I just tried to watch the video again but I must have missed it. Do you know where that comes in?

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
40. Not quite so wrong.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:23 AM
Jun 2013

In an interview in Hong Kong today he said "I am not here to hide from justice". So my observation is still valid.

Hong Kong Eddie. LOL!

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
8. The reasonable way to battle this
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:20 AM
Jun 2013

is for Verison to lose 50% of their subscribers overnight...once upon a time, service companies fought overreaching court orders which they believed violated their customers. Verizon should have alerted the media themselves, or fought the subpoena..people should go out and buy tracfones..but alas, the complacency of the American people is at an all time high..couldn't operate without an iphone..

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
15. Wouldn't solve it
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:27 AM
Jun 2013

not the way to go. The telecom biz is massive and they always win. The people should not have to fight Verizon directly. People won't go with less convenient alternatives.

Policies, laws, regulation, consumer protections. Make them bend to our will with real pressure. Abstinence is unrealistic.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
9. Hmmmmm.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jun 2013

That's slightly too overt. They'll need to set up the expectation that the story CAN be changed before changing it. If you're not careful you can confuse and distract people rather than mould their opinions.

I don't think it'll be like that, anyway. If they're watching the way the narrative's unfolding just now they might try something like revealing the use of NSA surveillance to target something tangentially related to terrorism like drug smuggling and ooooh my goodness, it's so cool that we got all these drug smugglers. They will need to be bold now. They will have to specifically address the issues raised, it'll have to change from "we need to get the terrorists to protect you." to something much more overt along the lines of "we need to get the data to control you and you need that" although I'm not sure how they'll phrase it.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
11. You have been doing a lot of research on this matter, it appears.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:24 AM
Jun 2013

And I appreciate what you've shared with us here.

As for the political strategy of those who wish to defend the program, I wonder whether the program's proponents can release such information. It's supposed to all be super-secret. I am sure they want to show how beneficial the program has been (if they can, which I doubt), but, if they do, they will blow the whole "this must all be secret or we will tip off the terrorists" argument.

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

-Laelth

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. Then clearly those attacks were planned for just this eventuality.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:28 AM
Jun 2013

I mean, the NSA is playing Nth dimensional chess here.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

temmer

(358 posts)
19. They already claimed it did
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:40 AM
Jun 2013

but claim is no proof. In most cases it's impossible to prove that an event (terror attack) that didn't happen would have happened without one specific condition (surveillance). Because there are always multiple conditions for an event to occur.

So if they come up with a "proof", give it to a logician.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
47. One governmental excuse for not stopping 9/11 is that you can't get a sip of water out of a
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jun 2013

fire hose.

If you can't get a sip of water out of a fire hose, it makes no sense to build a Niagra Falls super-spy-upon-all-Americans project.

Intelligent people who sincerely want to find a needle in a haystack don't keep adding hay to the haystack.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
52. Proven by who?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jun 2013

They are the only one that knows...so sure they will prove it.

That is how secrets work.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
20. They already did. First with nebulous "helped to prevent terrorist plots", next one was "subway
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:41 AM
Jun 2013

plot" that was promptly debunked. I am sure there will be some more bullshit shortly.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
30. Ah, the "You make no sense" reflex.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:06 AM
Jun 2013

It's a bit twitchy, these days, isn't it?

Try "I can't answer your question".
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
27. Not much of a prediction, cali. Our law enforcement agencies do this about once a month.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:02 AM
Jun 2013

"I predict that, just to scare us with their 'science', the astronomers will make the moon completely disappear within the month."

BenzoDia

(1,010 posts)
28. I can see them not revealing anything. It would give leakers a more power if the Government
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:03 AM
Jun 2013

reveals something everytime something is leaked.

Just a guess. Depends on how desperate they are I suppose.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
34. And like a whole lot of other things they are saying lately - we will not believe them because we
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:47 AM
Jun 2013

are losing our trust in our own party officials.

bushisanidiot

(8,064 posts)
41. Sorry, but the surveillance already has stopped terrorist attacks.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:27 AM
Jun 2013

Diane Feinstein and another senator were on a Sunday news program outlining
exactly which threats were stopped.

So, you're a little behind.

bushisanidiot

(8,064 posts)
43. And then there are the terrorist attacks that have been prevented that they cannot talk about
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:30 AM
Jun 2013

without giving away what they know to the terrorists they are trying to stop from committing terror.

Look at the movie Argo. Until that movie, I had no idea that President Carter actually FREED hostages in Iran.
He had to keep it quiet and lost the election because the country was under the impression that he didn't
know what he was doing, which was far from the truth. There is so much regarding terrorism that the government
can't tell us for fear it will blow a hole in a plot they are trying to uncover.

I stand with President Obama. I wish more had stood with President Carter in 1980.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
45. They could do better giving us broad outlines, perhaps, but I agree with you.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:32 AM
Jun 2013

They do have a tough job and they are doing it.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

frylock

(34,825 posts)
59. well someone is a little behind..
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:48 PM
Jun 2013
NSA surveillance played little role in foiling terror plots, experts say

Obama administration says NSA data helped make arrests in two important cases – but critics say that simply isn't true


<snip>

But court documents lodged in the US and UK, as well as interviews with involved parties, suggest that data-mining through Prism and other NSA programmes played a relatively minor role in the interception of the two plots. Conventional surveillance techniques, in both cases including old-fashioned tip-offs from intelligence services in Britain, appear to have initiated the investigations.

<snip>

Michael Dowling, a Denver-based attorney who acted as Zazi's defence counsel, said the full picture remained unclear as Zazi pleaded guilty before all details of the investigation were made public. But the lawyer said he was sceptical that mass data sweeps could explain what led law enforcement to Zazi.

"The government says that it does not monitor content of these communications in its data collection. So I find it hard to believe that this would have uncovered Zazi's contacts with a known terrorist in Pakistan," Dowling said

<snip>

Davis said that the discovery of the sana_pakhtana@yahoo.com email – and in turn the link to Zazi – had been made by traditional investigative work in the UK. He said the clue-driven nature of the inquiry was significant, as it was propelled by detectives operating on the basis of court-issued warrants.

<more>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/12/nsa-surveillance-data-terror-attack
 

JW2020

(169 posts)
42. Coincidently of course, these stories all came out yesterday:
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jun 2013
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/bomb-threats-richmond-virginia-airport-princeton-university-atlanta-19380521

Bomb Threat Outbreak Shuts Down Airports, Schools
Richmond, Va., airport, Princeton University and Atlanta state capitol were all threatened


http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/11/18892497-la-to-texas-flight-diverted-after-bomb-threat?lite

LA-to-Texas flight diverted after bomb threat
By Jeff Black, Staff Writer, NBC News

A Southwest Airlines flight carrying 143 passengers from Los Angeles to Austin, Texas, was diverted and forced to land in Phoenix on Monday evening after a bomb threat was phoned in, officials said.

While the plane was in the air, U.S. F-16 fighter jets were sent to monitor the situation, Michael Kucharek, a spokesman for the joint U.S.-Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), told Reuters.

Southwest Airlines flight 2675 landed safely in Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, where passengers were removed from the plane, an airline spokesperson said.

“Out of an abundance of caution, the captain of Southwest Airlines flight 2675, en route from Los Angeles to Austin, safely landed in Phoenix to look into a possible security threat,” the airline said in a statement.
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
56. you are so right. I have no psychic skills so I tend to make predictions
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:38 AM
Jun 2013

rooted in history and reality.

WovenGems

(776 posts)
51. The real question
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jun 2013

Why all hoopla now and not back in the seventies when NSA started? Or since then? Its mission is no different now.
The answer to that question could be interesting.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
53. Let me make a prediction: there will be a diversion with a call for greater "gun control" that will
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jun 2013

rally some of the-government-can-do-no-wrong-if-we-are-afraid types.

It doesn't have to be a call for meaningful reform to focus upon mental health issues or stopping the early release of violent criminals who have used guns in their criminal activities. It doesn't have to be a meaningful call for legislation that would be rationally related to a goal of reducing unnecessary gun violence. It doesn't even have to be a call for legislation that could be passed with the support of all Democrats or most Democrats.

All it has to be is a call for "gun control" with a few emotional words so that some will respond by saying such things as "gun nuts," "NRA talking points," "assault rifles," "automatic pistols," "cop-killer bullets." Anything to bring out the emotional reaction of those who are easily swayed by emotional words when they are afraid or want to "do it for the children."

For those who want to do something "for the children," they can stay focused upon the Niagra-Falls-spy-upon-all-Americans programs.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
58. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jun 2013
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. H.L. Mencken

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
60. Surveillance programs have stopped 'dozens' of terror attacks, NSA chief says
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:43 PM
Jun 2013

The Patriot Act provision that allowed the National Security Agency to collect phone records has helped thwart "dozens" of terror events, Gen. Keith Alexander said Wednesday at a congressional hearing on cybersecurity.

Alexander promised that records showing the secret surveillance program was critical to disrupting terrorist plots will be made public within a week.

Read more at:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/12/live-updates-cybersecurity-hearing/#liveblog-entry-46364

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let me make a prediction:...