General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Teabaggers must be celebrating!
Finally a scandal that Democrats care about! Guess if you throw enough shit at the wall, something will stick eventually! And who would have thought it would be something that's been going on for so many years? But hey, the media will play along so whatever works!
frylock
(34,825 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)Obama funded us just admit it and move on
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)You got nothing but outrage and snark. Color me not impressed.
Explain how a law passed by Congress in 2001 is President Obama's fault. Go!
metalbot
(1,058 posts)Congress passes a law in 2001 that says that the US govt can spy and wiretap any US citizen it wants as long as they are suspected of being a terrorist.
It's now 2013 and President Obama has chosen to act on the privileges that the law allows how many times and when?
I'm not arguing that what the Obama administration has done is illegal, I'm arguing that it's wrong.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)I'm just not sure it's the earth shattering scandal people are making it out to be. It's old news. And as you said, the President is acting on authority given him by the Congress. (that's been going on since the last administration).
If people don't like it, get after Congress to change the law or tell the President to stop the spying.
This isn't new. It's an old story.
eissa
(4,238 posts)I half expect to come here one day and see posters chanting "I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!!"
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)What the whistle was blown on? This has been going on for years. Didn't people already freak out about this when the Patriot Act was passed and then later in Bush's presidency when we found out what they were getting?
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)It appears that we're in the "Be paranoid - the scary President is watching you!" stage.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)I'd like someone to explain what's different about today than 2 weeks ago.
Number23
(24,544 posts)There are daily posts accusing those in participate in the BOG of being "unAmerican" apparently either unaware or uncaring just how much they sound like MICHELLE FUCKING BACHMANN.
Another one had an hysterical (in both senses of the word) post with a gillian recs where he said that you should reply with the 4th Amendment to every poster on this board that isn't screaming into their chins about this. Differentiating some of these people from even the most paranoid, deranged Freeper is getting harder by the day.
FSogol
(45,565 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)We can disagree on policy but attacking each other accomplishes nothing.
As I see it, Congress passed these laws, the POTUS has (continued to) use them and, if I'm not mistaken, the USSC has reviewed and upheld this before. We can disagree and even work to change it, but placing all the blame on President Obama is ridiculous. And blaming those who won't line up to attack is as well.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)This one comes from those with very high stakes and willing to go straight for the jugular.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Doesn't change the fact that they're loving watching the left go after each other over an old issue.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)wandy
(3,539 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)wandy
(3,539 posts)Hardware suppliers.
Software suppliers.
Hardware maintenance suppliers.
IT operations suppliers.
Cooling suppliers.
Facility maintenance suppliers.
Anaylst suppliers.
The firm that supplied Ed Snowden.
The NSA didn't get all that compute power down at BestBuy from the profits they made on one of their bake sails.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Our military industrial complex is so out of control all around. Knowing our history, they probably bought a warehouse full of obsolete equipment.
JW2020
(169 posts)The tech the NSA uses is probably 20 or 30 years ahead of anything on the shelf.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Normally you see government offices using equipment that could be considered antique.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)The President doesn't make laws. See: Constitution
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm more into talking with people who have, at the very least, heard of an executive order.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Why would he need an Exec Order when he has the Patriot Act and FISA courts?
FYI to the outraged: Your condescension isn't helping prove your point.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)My condescension is reserved for fascists who like our new Stalinesque setup. The exec order, since you didn't catch it, would be to stop this fucking abortion of a spy program. It can and should be done with an executive order, and should be followed up by killing the PA. But of course the GOP won't let that happen if they can help it. The executive order would at the very least stop the bleeding. He Pesident of the United States has acted in an extremely immoral and totalitarian manner. Don't give a fuck what party he's with, he gets no rest unless and until this shit stops completely. END.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)I may see it a bit over the top but at least I get where you're coming from.
I'm against domestic spying, for the record. I think I ran out of outrage back in 2001 when PA passed.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I do get pretty heated about this stuff. Have a good evening.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)This data collection plan has so much momentum behind it, Obama and his executive order would be pulverized. What we can work toward is moderating and modifying and we need democrats with power to be able to do that.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)The unlimited power that this promises, all of the money that has been invested, along with the political maneuvering it took to initiate makes it a behemoth. Obama might just as well try to keep the ReThugs honest. After-all, it's the right thing to do as well.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)But first things first. He needs to stop this now.
siligut
(12,272 posts)If he did try, something would stop him, he knows this.
George Gently
(88 posts)programs?
Say hello to a Republican President who signs his own magic Executive Order.
And there goes the Supreme Court.
Democratic Presidents are not allowed the same tools as Republican Presidents?
Here's a gigantic book that everybody can read except the government?
Silliness.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)in his very own personal thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2988340
And here he is tonight, innocent Andy, wanting to have the whole thing patiently explained to him again.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)in NOT freaking out!
I'm just an Obama apologist probably paid by them though.
Progressive dog
(6,922 posts)they made me work as a volunteer. I'm not allowed to discuss what the NSA is blackmailing me with. Have to go now, got to fill my quota.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Being paid to post on message boards would be great! Unfortunately I'm far too stubborn to stay on script. Oh we'll!
Response to ucrdem (Reply #25)
Post removed
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)bye.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm glad to see we have a point of agreement finally.
eissa
(4,238 posts)The manpower and personnel required to spy on a nation of nearly 400 million would be astronomical. Tracking communications to identify patterns that might affect national security is hardly "spying on everyone." Corporations know more about us than our government.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)if they haven't gotten to quite everyone yet, it's only because they're still building capacity.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Back in 2001. What's new now?
Still waiting...
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If the totalitarian crowd thinks that chiding people into accepting this East German bullshit is going to have a good effect, they're going to be in for a surprise. It's a principle thing, and it's immovable. Obama's entire legislative agenda can suck it for now. We have a constitution to save...from our own guy.
sigmasix
(794 posts)Patently inane claims like "Obama is spying on everyone" will result in a loss of legitimacy for you and any future "the sky is falling!" claims you may wish to share with DUers. This meme is being pushed as an object of comfort and faith to the enjoyers of Obama Derangment Syndrome and loads of woo belief from "libertarians".
President Obama has asked for the executive branch powers to be reigned in on more than one occasion- Republican congress critters are the ones that refuse to allow legislation to re-balance the branches of government.
I'd love to see which republican executive has made the same attempts to restrain executive branch power during thier administration. That's because every republican president during the last 70 years has worked to increase executive branch power. It is very unusual to have a president that withdraws from executive branch reaches for power- it's even more unusual to have an executive remove power from the branch. This puts him in the company of great executive branch holders like George Washington- history contains facts like this that are irrefutable. Non-reality based partisan operatives hate this fact.
President Obama is an honest, intelligent and patriotic American- not a partisan robot of the Koche brothers and ALEC, disguised as a human being.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Doesn't mean he won't/hasn't made mistakes or done things I disagree with but I'm frankly happy to have someone I respect in The White House.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)I'm at a loss. And I've tried several times (less provocatively) to engage in discussion but I've been ignored or got snark.
Idk if people think they're the smartest one on the message board or they just honestly can't debate this topic.
I'm getting this image of the government spying on some old lady. Why would they waste all that manpower?
And is there no one who should be spied on, ever? There are some people out there who might be proper subjects of spying.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)(well, now that Greenwald/Snowden have just opened sooo many eyes all of a sudden) is to drill down on the porn habits of a bunch of people on the internet.
I get popups on some websites based on online shopping I've done. I hardly think the President gives a rat's ass about that, and it ain't the government mining that information.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)A path that could really hurt his own party.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is just ludicrous to call such a thing a "scandal."
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It's a huge scandal. You'll be made to understand that in the full course of time.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It has been established that this takes place under FISA, a duly passed law.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)He's spying on hundreds of millions of Americans. He wanted to keep that secret from his targets for a period of 25 years. His DNI is lying to Congress--not that Congress seems to give a shit, but people with morals do. Obama has greatly hurt the Democratic Party (not that some of the Congressional Dems aren't also complicit), and there may be a measurable effect in the mid-terms. The President has damaged foreign relations, and you haven't heard the last of that by a long shot. This is one hell of a scandal, but you go right on telling everyone it isn't, and let me know how that works out for you.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)The super-secretive NSA, which has generally been barred from domestic spying except in narrow circumstances involving foreign nationals, has monitored the e-mail, telephone calls and other communications of hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of people under the program, the New York Times disclosed last night.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"progressives" and "libertarians" that frequent this site, as of late.
blue neen
(12,335 posts)you know, with Firedoglake being in financial trouble...
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The president has hypnotized us all, we have no minds since we don't agree. But better than what conservative sites call Obama supporters.
Here we're just authoritarian swooners, fascist enablers, Obamabots, Obama ass kissers and the always popular sheeple.
At least they don't use the N word here, which I've been called too many times. Why does it feel the same, though?
Maybe I'm just paranoid.
Except you, 1StrongBlackMan. I think...
JI7
(89,281 posts)and anyone who doesn't hate him is the same shit i'm seeing in other forums that are non political but might have some political discussion.
i bet most of them didn't even vote for Obama.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)many posting here self-describe as a "Democrat"; but only as the 3rd or 4th descriptor ... but never before after "progressive."
Number23
(24,544 posts)After all of the stupid shit we've seen tossed at this president from some quarters, I don't think he'll be alone.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)whether on the left or the right, imo, are equally as nutty.
But that's the beauty of an alternate political philosophy that only (really) exists in the meeting room of the local library ... you can pretend that it's a legitimate, workable philosophy.
G_j
(40,372 posts)what they think? I know I don't.
Progressive dog
(6,922 posts)how to feel yet. They'll know when they're given the signs to hold. They used to let the really smart ones copy the suggested signs but that didn't work well.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)They love the Patriot Act so how do they shift on it now? They have to agree with Obama (oh no!) or hope for extremely hort attention spans and inability to use "the google."
I've seen Teabagger's signs so I understand their confusion.
Progressive dog
(6,922 posts)and they will campaign on anything that they can sell.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)I'm definitely in the "boy that cried wolf" mode with the Republican scandals but I think the NSA thing is actually a real scandal. Don't even recognize the wolf since the Repukes have falsely cried wolf so many times in the last few months.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)The thing is, they know from Clinton that keeping up the shit slinging works. They might even come across a real issue,
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)fighting terrorism? Pushing this story undermines the right-wing mime that Obama is a terrorist sympathizer or at least soft on terrorism. However terrible the expansion of the surveillance state is - outside of limited circles - I doubt we will see many Republicans wanting to make much out of it. You got McCain, Graham and Boehner and several other prominent Republicans defending the NSA surveillance program and calling for Snowden's head on a pike. This scandal causes way too much cognitive dissonance for the right-wing mind.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)If he HAD ended it.
Initech
(100,117 posts)With George W. and the Patriot Act, and now they've finally got a scandal they can turn around and use on the Democrats. USA! USA! USA! USA!
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)There's a reason they've spent the last five years trying to get you to forget George W Bush ever existed, and playing the old "STOP BLAMING DUBYA" card. All to get to this point. The "thanks for blaming the black guy" meme has never sounded more correct.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Come on, scandal, what scandal? Exactly what is it that we've hadn't already known for years!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)now being discussed openly, that's fine by me.
I don't know why I'm to worry about Teabaggers? Have they ever been a serious political force? They're a side-show as far as I can see.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)But they've been able to keep moderate Republicans put of office and others in office from working with Democrats and the President for fear of being "primaried." We should not underestimate their influence.
rucky
(35,211 posts)and not worry about what the kids think.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)I'm surprised you didn't know that.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Just because we disagree with you is the same as me tagging tagging you for blindly following the media scandal circus. It is unproductive and adds nothing to the debate.
As far as being consistent with our beliefs, as I've said several times, I'm concerned about the Patriot Act and have been since 2001 when it was passed by Congress. I just don't see how this is NOW a scandal nor how it's all President Obama's fault.