Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 07:59 AM Jun 2013

What's all the drama about Verizon giving info to the NSA?

Nobody in the media seemed to give a damn when "Warrantless Wiretapping" became an actual term under George W. Bush. That phrase itself implies illegality, but nobody tripped when Bush did it *WITHOUT* a court order.

So the NSA under Obama collects information *WITH* a FISA court order, and people are starting to go ballistic?

Can we say double standard?

(I know folks here like me were outraged when Bush & Co. did this and shake our head at Obama's continuation of the Bush policies - just in a more legal fashion.)

Here's the history:

"In October 2001, President Bush issued a secret presidential order authorizing the NSA to conduct a range of surveillance activities inside of the United States without statutory authorization or court approval, including electronic surveillance of Americans’ telephone and Internet communications. This program of surveillance continues through today and works with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies.

In 2005, after the New York Times broke the story of the surveillance program, the President publicly admitted one portion of it—warrantless surveillance of Americans believed to be communicating with people connected with terrorism suspects—Senior Bush Administration officials later confirmed that the President’s authorization went beyond the surveillance of terrorists and conceded that the program did not comply with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The President, invoking a theory of limitless executive power to disregard the mandates of Congress, has reauthorized this warrantless surveillance more than thirty times, including after the Department of Justice found the program to violate criminal laws. President Obama has continued the program, but has given no public legal justification for it and, in some situations, appears to be strategically denying certain portions of it. For other portions, including the collection of telecommunications records, the Obama Administration says it can neither confirm nor deny its actions.

Shortly after the initial revelations, a whistleblower named Mark Klein came forward with evidence describing the specific AT&T facilities, including one on Folsom Street in San Francisco, where the handoff of customer communications is occurring. Mr. Klein's evidence confirmed what was already indicated by numerous newspaper reports and Congressional admissions—that the NSA is intercepting and analyzing millions of ordinary Americans' communications, with the help of the country's largest phone and Internet companies. EFF has brought two lawsuits to stop this illegal surveillance. In 2012, three NSA whistleblowers came forward to confirm Mr. Klein’s evidence, as well as other information about the warrantless surveillance."

https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/faq

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's all the drama about Verizon giving info to the NSA? (Original Post) KeepItReal Jun 2013 OP
Thank you. ucrdem Jun 2013 #1
Bullshit revisionist history. ugh cali Jun 2013 #2
I don't think it is revisionist history to point out that this practice has been Skidmore Jun 2013 #3
How soon we forget. kentuck Jun 2013 #4
Inaccurate disidoro01 Jun 2013 #5
This has been going on since long before Bush ....... oldhippie Jun 2013 #6
See? It's so good both parties agree that it's for our own good! I sleep better knowing such good... Safetykitten Jun 2013 #7
Maybe This Is Obama's Way Of Getting Rid Of This Once And For All....... global1 Jun 2013 #8
Lol disidoro01 Jun 2013 #10
That's some 3 Dimensional Chess I can support! KeepItReal Jun 2013 #11
And then what did Bush actually do with this information? treestar Jun 2013 #9

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
3. I don't think it is revisionist history to point out that this practice has been
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

present for a good while and that the shock being expressed on the left now is almost laughable. I remember long discussions about this on DU during the Bush years and many posters pieced together what was happening at the inception. Now if we all want to discuss pushing to limit the powers of the Patriot Act, let's do so. But nothing sets my teeth on edge as much as people who tracked this over the years suddenly being shocked with a capital "S". This type of thing happens too much and usually results in a loss of focus on what should be the main issue. Bush and his band of merry men in Congress unleashed something vile on the world in their overreactions. Congress basically washed its hands of its responsibility beyond that of handing wads of money over at that time to the executive to do what it would as long as Congress itself did not have to actually assume responsibility. Along with blank checks, it gave away its war powers and oversight while screaming "9/11" at every opportunity. I'm not shocked. Just waiting to see how much the left will give away by focusing on the shiny lights while ignoring the generator.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
4. How soon we forget.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:17 AM
Jun 2013

We just never expected a Democratic President to do the same. Safety before privacy. Tell the Congress to repeal the Patriot Act, otherwise expect to be surprised when the next President does the same thing. Make it illegal.

disidoro01

(302 posts)
5. Inaccurate
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:35 AM
Jun 2013

on a number of levels, it was wrong and spoken out againt years ago. It still is wrong and deserves to be brought into the public view.
What's wrong with wanting to live in a society where I am innocent until proven guilty? I don't appreciate our government assuming I am a criminal. I don't have anything to hide but that isn't the point.
I don't buy the argument that Obama is stupid and still carrying Bush's water. We elected change and we should expect better. This argument (it's taking place on other threads) where it's all Bush's fault falls on deaf ears to me...WE ELECTED CHANGE! TWICE!

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
6. This has been going on since long before Bush .......
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:51 AM
Jun 2013

Phone companies have been turning phone records over to the NSA since the 60's. And the old telegraph companies even before that. I was briefly associated with the NSA back in the day. I've been in the basement of the big black building at Fort Meade. In the early 80's there was a book published titled "The Puzzle Palace". If you can find a copy of it you may be amazed about what has been going on for decades.

On edit: Looks like the book is still available on Amazon. I remember when it first came out in the summer of 1983 I was working in the Theatre Intelligence Center for CINCPAC in Hawaii. Our Colonel was reading it in his office and we could hear him screaming all the way down the hallway. "They can't print this!" was the most frequent comment.

 

Safetykitten

(5,162 posts)
7. See? It's so good both parties agree that it's for our own good! I sleep better knowing such good...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Jun 2013

exists.

global1

(25,292 posts)
8. Maybe This Is Obama's Way Of Getting Rid Of This Once And For All.......
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:54 AM
Jun 2013

When Bush started all this and did this - the Repugs were behind this a 1000%. What did we hear? Oh yeah - 'well if you don't do anything wrong - you have nothing to be worried about.'

Every move that Obama makes the Repugs object to.

So maybe this is a good way to get the Repugs to back stopping all of this. Get the word out there that the Obama Administration is collecting all phone records. Get the Repugs to come out against it. Get bi-partisan support to stop it.

I wonder if this might be the intention?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
9. And then what did Bush actually do with this information?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:55 AM
Jun 2013

Did it really prevent any acts of terra?

I recall the outrage that the government wanted all credit card transactions. Well, the DU outrage, not the general public. Supposedly computers could detect patterns that would lead to terrorists.

The fact of phone calls being made might suggest someone has a tie to Al Qaeda, then they can tap the phones to find out. Then keep an eye on that person.

Still, what can they do to stop it? They had some information that Tamerlan was a possible source of trouble.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's all the drama abou...