General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoke up this morning to find out the Government has my phone records...
and the rest of my families. Yeah---we have Verizon.
So this is now what I have to tell my teenage kids.... watch what you say on your cell phones because the Government is listening.
If this does not shake this country to the core, then basically we have given up.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)That worries me more.
cali
(114,904 posts)it's all good.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)I'm writing AT&T to ask that they send my records to the NSA voluntarily.
cali
(114,904 posts)I'll join you and appeal to all my facebook friends to do the same.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)blueamy66
(6,795 posts)"What time are you picking me up for dinner"?
"I love you and miss you."
"How are the kids?"
"We're going camping. Wanna go?"
"The car was totaled. Gonna have to pay $10000 to fix it."
If you don't have anything to hide, why bother? If you have something to hide, well then.....
I understand on a small scale, but really, who cares? And maybe I am naive.....
Phentex
(16,334 posts)it seems the cell connections weren't as good a few years ago and you could hear some strange clicking noises. We'd joke about someone listening in so we'd make terrible comments about Newt just to see if we could make the feds come to the door.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)blueamy66
(6,795 posts)nt
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)What if you do business with someone in Turkey.
And what if that someone ALSO called someone who is suspected of something.
Suddenly you are implicated. On the list.
Next time you buy fireworks, or cold medicine or kerosene for the stove, you are on a double list.
Maybe you go to a protest next. Oops triple list. Muslim? Quadruple! And so on.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)'Terrorism quotient' records spark suspicions about Matrix
NEW YORK (AP) Before helping to launch the criminal information project known as Matrix, a database contractor gave U.S. and Florida authorities the names of 120,000 people who showed a statistical likelihood of being terrorists sparking some investigations and arrests.
The "high terrorism factor" scoring system also became a key selling point for the involvement of the database company, Seisint Inc., in the Matrix project.
Public records obtained by The Associated Press from several states show that Justice Department officials cited the scoring technology in appointing Seisint sole contractor on the federally funded, $12 million project.
Seisint and the law enforcement officials who oversee Matrix insist that the terrorism scoring system ultimately was kept out of the project, largely because of privacy concerns.
However, new details about Seisint's development of the "terrorism quotient," including the revelation that authorities apparently acted on the list of 120,000, are renewing privacy activists' suspicions about Matrix's potential power.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Cross referencing. Once they grab you, they will look at who else you call and what intersections there are to the 3rd or 4th degree. God forbid someone you know now talks to someone they know who talks to someone in Saudi Arabia. Now you are all on the list. And maybe you all you took out $5,000 in cash last year to buy a used car. Now you're really fucked.
This is nasty work and by a man we elected.
But what is worst of all is that now the only people that were organized in opposition to this kind of behavior have been silenced into saying shit like:
"Well if you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?"
We (You) are so fucked.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)already.
Maybe, that's exactly what makes people like us a perceived threat? If so, this country is surely doomed, as there are no real enemies more dangerous than the paranoids running our own government. I'd like to still believe that isn't quite the case. But, I could be wrong.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)"I can't believe Guantanamo Bay is still open"
"Can you believe another drone strike? What is this a video game to these people?"
"Are you going to the protest next week to try and stop the war in Syria?" (Assuming one gets fired up which is a pretty safe assumption. If not, just any old protest will do)
The idea of the PATRIOT ACT and these grab all the conversation systems absolutely violates the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments. Those are the ones that are supposed to protect you.
I suppose we come from two different points of view. You trust the Government and the Police. I do not, despite having our guy at the top, it is plain that the Government continues to operate like it did under Bushco. Take what they want, do what they want, and to hell with the consequences. If they are caught, then they'll pass legislation making it legal retroactively.
trumad
(41,692 posts)So I guess we have to be pristine perfect so the Gov doesn't bother us?
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)or let us all come to their house and watch them take a shower.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)We better put anyone who takes a shower on the list.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)you're more than welcome to attend
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I suppose the gov't wants to know this too?
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)our hot water heater isn't working
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Hot water is a luxury I really do appreciate!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)A lot of people wiser, and more knowledgable than you, but here is one reason you could understand... they often make mistakes.
riqster
(13,986 posts)blueamy66
(6,795 posts)Not
Wait....who are you? Where do you live? What's your family name? Do you have kids?
Wait, I don't care what you say.
I offered my opinion. No need to call
me unwise or whatever.
Sometimes I hate DU
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)bullshit
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)blueamy66
(6,795 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)My conversations with my family, only people I call, would probably put them to sleep.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Or everyone THOSE people call?
Or everyone THOSE people call?
Multiply that by xx and you're on some list somewhere.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)But I'd rather not live in a country that records our every move.
And while we may have nothing to hide. It's only a matter of time before that doesn't matter.
temmer
(358 posts)"if you have nothing to hide..."
That's exactly what dictators all over the history have told their people: If you have nothing to hide which is detrimental to my blessed leadership, why bother?
It's up to the people, not the leadership, to define what's right and what's wrong.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)Honestly, does the government REALLY need to know what gets you off? There's reasons people want privacy.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The fact that they have your records or mine and that those records are none of their business is bad enough. That they spend money on humans or machines to collect and sort through all that data is an enormous scandal. How many kids could have more vegetables, more milk, more meat for the amounts being wasted on Uncle Sam's morbid curiosity about whether I am checking to see the hours of my knitting shop. What a waste?
What percentage of calls are of any interest to any human being in the US government? It must be extremely small, so why are we paying for this "service"?
Same for collecting DNA on every person for every crime. There should be some limits. I wish our Supreme Court would do a better job. Somehow, it should not be OK to cut back on civil rights and privacy in order to spend more on surveillance and nosiness.
And the largest percentage of the collecting of this data is just for the sake of nosiness. They aren't going to find anything of any interest to anyone for most of their snooping.
Response to blueamy66 (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)but you're not alone.
Nobody should have access to that kind of information.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)it was revealed that Bush was using the Telecoms to spy on the American people. It was against the law then but not to worry, Congress under Bush fixed that law and made it legal. Democrats of course were outraged because they didn't understand, as the Republicans were trying to tell them to no avail, that 'if we had nothing to hide we had nothing to worry about'.
Now we are learning that the Republicans, Bush/Cheney et al were right after all.
I remember my right wing adversaries telling me just what you just did, that why should I care if the NSA was listening to me ordering a pizza? I thought they just didn't get the implications of a Government spying on its own people.
But thanks for straightening me out, and my apologies to all the Republicans I attacked back them for trying so hard to tell me the same thing.
because it's hard to tell what is a big joke like the government spying on the people, and what is not. I'm still where I was when Bush started this destruction of our rights. But then I'm stubborn about these things.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)"What time are you picking me up for the anti-war/anti NSA demonstration?"
"I love you and miss you, my closeted/married lesbian lover."
"How are my pot plants?"
"We're going to picket; Wanna go?"
"My law suit against the government is in trouble. I'll need 10,000 dollars or I'll have to drop it."
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Yes you never know where this snooping stuff will lead, do you?
JOURNAL
Day One:
Have begun to keep my eyes open. Strange men across the street painting the neighbors house. Using lavender trim if you get my drift. Another neighbor down the block observed in his hot tub last night way past dark. Also, conversation and peals of laughter emanating from house with unmowed lawn over in the next block.
Day Two:
Next door neighbors unmarried daughter putting on weight. A box of Tide on the front porch clearly a coded message signaling that her sailor has shipped out for 9 months at sea in case any other seaman in the fleet want to drop in for a visit. Down the street, the local mom and pop grocery store smells foreign. As in terrorist training camp. Clerk cryptically speaking into cellphone
not speaking American neither. And no Twinkies for sale. Whats up with that? Clearly a front for suicide bombers. Should be under 24 hour surveillance.
Day Three:
Birkenstock footprints. Nuff said.
Day Four:
Standing on stepladder, peeking over the fence, observed neighbor sunbathing bare naked. And no sunscreen. Uncircumcised, but whos looking?
Day Five:
Noticed neighbor surreptitiously sneaking empty beer bottles into the recycling. After he left the scene, counted several dozen bottles. Coors Light. Perp didnt go to work. Likely called in sick.
Day Six:
Neighbors dog urinated on newly erected flagpole.
Day Seven: Headcount of neighbors in church indicates considerable backsliding. On my return home, found a copy of the Constitution lying in the trash can.
Week Two
Sex, Lies, and Videotape Edition
Day 8:
Noticed healthy Catholic couple down the block only have two children. Married five years. Seems like somethings not adding up here. Should notify Vatican Tips Hotline as well as Justice Dept.
Day 9:
Observed Baptist deacon purchase lotto ticket at 7-11. Scanned contents of neighbors mail while he was at work. Noted subscription to Hustler Magazine. Noted offensive material on pages 17-20, 24, 26, and 30-37. Alerted mailcarrier.
Day 10:
Witnessed neighbors viewing pornography rented from local video store. Have receipt for rental of one DVD Butt Pirates of the Carribbean. Although the shades were drawn, the unmistakeable sounds emanating from the premises make it clear several state and federal laws were undoubtedly violated, possibly simultaneously.
Day 11:
Followed children collecting milk money for UN Childrens Relief Fund clearly some kind of low down commie idea.
Day 12:
Perused library checking the reading material of patrons. Caught my liberal neighbor red handedreading. She appears to be accessing sites on the internet with information about reproduction and birth control in full view of other library patrons who all pray silently that she get professional help.
Day 13:
Found in a public library restroom stall: a contact number for some kind of surreptitious meeting with someone named Bambi.
Day 14:
Neighbor didnt come home all night. Raised voices overheard. Sound of doors slamming. Engine revving. Neighbor drove off without buckling seatbelt.
Week Three
Dumpster Diving
Items found in suspicious neighbors trash cans:
A gray toupee
Box of shredded documents
Empty prescription bottle of Oxycontin
Rogaine
Discarded Grecian Formula--Raven Black
HIV test result negative (reconstructed from torn up paper)
Delinquent bill--3rd warning
Soldier of Fortune Magazine order form for Ginsu Knives
Copy of Father Flannigans Boys Town
A jury duty summons
A crop dusting manual
Directions for care of leaking breast implants
2 overdue library books
A badly altered report card
Lice Shampoo
Fundraising letter from the GOP (someone has blacked out
Cheneys teeth and drawn in horns on his forehead)
List of license numbers of individuals observed parking illegally in handicapped spaceuncertain how this came to be found in a neighbors trash as list was just compiled this very morning by this investigator. Must make a note to administer lie detector tests to family members.
Skittles
(153,254 posts)the problem is, thinking that "If you're not doing anything wrong you've got nothing to worry about" is a prime component of fascist leaders.........and history is littered the bodies of people who did nothing wrong
aristocles
(594 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)they called it Total Information Awareness...but they quickly drop that title so that we would not be to concerned as they implemented it.
We will now be monitored in everything we do...because they can.
randome
(34,845 posts)Geeze, the hair-on-fire brigade is out in full force today!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Oh wait . . .
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)They have my address! The Government has my ADDRESS!!!! America is doomed!
dkf
(37,305 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Until we have a rationale -for a program that expires next month- I'm not ready to throw in the towel on my lifestyle.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
dkf
(37,305 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Still, maybe there's a reason for it. I'm curious to hear but I'm not really worried, either.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)"Well, we already knew he was into the kinky porn, so this is no surprise."
"Mark it down in our book of future-use intelligence..." (Ominous music, darkening cubicle...)
dkf
(37,305 posts)Discussing the use of GPS data collected from mobile phones, an appellate court noted that even location information on its own could reveal a person's secrets: "A person who knows all of another's travels can deduce whether he is a weekly churchgoer, a heavy drinker, a regular at the gym, an unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, an associate of particular individuals or political groups," it read, "and not just one such fact about a person, but all such facts."
The primary purpose of large-scale databases such as the NSA's call records is generally said to be data-mining: rather than examining individuals, algorithms are used to find patterns of unusual activity that may mark terrorism or criminal conspiracies.
However, collection and storage of this information gives government a power it's previously lacked: easy and retroactive surveillance.
If authorities become interested in an individual at a later stage, and obtain their number, officials can look back through the data and gather their movements, social network, and more possibly for several years (although the secret court order only allows for three months of data collection).
http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/jun/06/phone-call-metadata-information-authorities
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)This is clearly a "big data" / "find patterns" operation, as is much data collection. The idea of the big bad government drilling down into everyone's petty and inconsequential affairs (no pun intended) is just silly: a silly view of government, a silly view of surveillance, and a silly view of even basic resources. Anyone who has seen the government in action knows that they have neither the resources nor concern to attend to every individual's private foibles. Hell, Tsarnaev the Elder was basically flagged as a terrorist and was posting radical Jihadi videos to fucking YouTube, and they did nothing but interview him.
Here's the basic rule of thumb for people living in paranoid fantasy world: yes, the government no doubt collects all manner of information about you, but it is done in tranches with information about tens of MILLIONS of others. Billions of pieces of data. That collection is run through algorithms (if the government is lucky) to detect patterns, maybe. Nobody gives a shit about YOUR information. There is a kind of odd inflation of the self to think that MY conversations are the ones "the government" is monitoring out of the billions of pieces of data they collect. More cult of the individual nonsense. No. They monitor conversations in the aggregate, a wholly different thing. Can they theoretically drill down to MY conversation? Of course. That's how all database logic works. But nobody cares to do it. I'm not that important. And neither are you. It's the aggregate that counts.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Or hacked?
It can obviously be shared between agencies.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I live in the real world. I deal in probabilities. Even if the government collected every email and web site and phone conversation I ever had, the probability that this would have any effect at all on my life are so close to zero that it's scarcely worth thinking about. And they're not doing *that.* Am I SURE? Of course not. I'm not a child, and I don't look for certainties. I am of the practical/actionable type, and here's what that tells me: 1) the US government is not going away any time soon; and yet, it is limited in all kinds of ways that paranoid fantasies about government power ignore; 2) Data collection is in its literal infancy - computer scientists and everyone else are just now discovering the true import of collecting trillions of pieces of data and running operations on giant data sets; what we've seen to date is child's-play in this regard; 3) Data collection and analysis is mostly a matter of aggregates and patterns; it remains largely unconcerned with individuals.
So, do I want "the government" doing this stuff? I really don't care that much, because it affects my life in ZERO negative ways. Do I think it can be "abused?" Of course, anything can. What do I think is mostly going on: career civil servants charged with building intelligence are doing that. I neither trust nor distrust government - it's mostly people trying to do the right thing. Frankly, I don't really care if the government knows all my associations: hell, I give that information to Mark Zuckerberg and all his advertiser clients for free, and so does mostly every else on this board.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I'd say you have a high trust in government & corporate.
---------------
As for Mark Zuckerberg owning your info--
"Surprising? Facebook CEOs New Political Group Bankrolls Ads That Bash Obama, Support GOP Sen. and Promote Keystone Pipeline"
Apr. 30, 2013 5:00am Liz Klimas
Earlier this month, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a political group that was composed of leaders in the tech industry, which would promote policies like immigration and education reform in the hopes of growing the countrys global economy.
Mark Zuckerbergs FWD.us Ads Support Oil Drilling and Bash Some Obama Policies
As Business Insider pointed out, it might be unexpected that FWD.us is funding ads that praise GOP leaders and support the Keystone pipeline and oil drilling, given the general support of the Silicon Valley and tech community for President Barack Obama and environmental tendencies. FWD.us, which was founded by NationBuilders co-founder Joe Green, LinkedIns Reid Hoffman, Bill Gates and others in addition to Zuckerberg, though expresses that it is non-partisan.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/30/surprising-facebook-ceos-new-political-group-bankrolls-ads-that-bash-obama-support-gop-sen-and-promote-keystone-pipeline/
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Some people's positions are just so skewed toward the paranoid that they mistake lack of absolute distrust for "high trust."
leveymg
(36,418 posts)From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The United States' National Security Agency (NSA) maintains a database containing hundreds of billions of records of telephone calls made by U.S. citizens from the four largest telephone carriers in the United States: AT&T, SBC, BellSouth (all three now called AT&T), and Verizon.[1]
The existence of this database and the NSA program that compiled it was unknown to the general public until USA Today broke the story on May 10, 2006.[1] It is estimated that the database contains over 1.9 trillion call-detail records.[2] According to Bloomberg News, the effort began approximately seven months before the September 11, 2001 attacks.[3]
The records include detailed call information (caller, receiver, date/time of call, length of call, etc.) for use in traffic analysis and social network analysis, but do not include audio information or transcripts of the content of the phone calls.
The database's existence has prompted fierce objections. It is often viewed as an illegal warrantless search and a violation of the pen register provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and (in some cases) the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The George W. Bush administration neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the domestic call record database. This contrasts with a related NSA controversy concerning warrantless surveillance of selected telephone calls; in that case they did confirm the existence of the program of debated legality. The program's code name is Stellar wind.[4]
Its cause for concern any time government exceeds the bounds of the Fourth Amendment, but it should be truly worrying when its in the context of mass-scale spying by the NSA. Based on what little we know of the NSAs programs from public reports, a single authorization will routinely cover hundreds or thousands of phone numbers and e-mail addresses. That means that even if theres only one occasion on which the NSA circumvented the spirit of the law or flouted the Fourth Amendment, the rights of thousands of Americans could easily have been violated.
Moving from confirmed fact to mildbut I think reasonablespeculation, there is something about the peculiar phrasing of these statements worth noticing: collection carried out pursuant to the Section 702 minimization procedures. Minimization procedures are the rules designed to limit the retention and dissemination of irrelevant information about innocent Americans that might get picked up during authorized surveillance. In ordinary criminal wiretaps, it makes sense to talk about collection carried out pursuant to minimization procedures because, under the stricter rules governing such spying, someone is supposed to be monitoring the wiretap in realtime, and ensuring that innocent conversations (like a mobsters spouse or teenage kids chatting on the house line) are not recorded.
But thats not how FISA surveillance normally works. As a rare public ruling by the FISA Court explains, the standard procedure for FISA surveillance is that large amounts of information are collected by automatic recording to be minimized after the fact. The court elaborated: Virtually all information seized, whether by electronic surveillance or physical search, is minimized hours, days, or weeks after collection. (Emphasis mine.) In other words, minimization is something that normally happens after collection: First you intercept, then you toss out the irrelevant stuff. Intelligence officials have suggested the same in recent testimony before Congress: Communications arent minimized until theyre reviewed by human analystsand given the incredible volume of NSA collection, its unlikely that more than a small fraction of whats intercepted ever is seen by human eyes. Yet in the statements above, we have two intriguing implications: First, that collection and minimization are in some sense happening contemporaneously (otherwise how could collection be pursuant to minimization rules?) and second, that these procedures are somehow fairly intimately connected to the question of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment.
treestar
(82,383 posts)so OP likely will never have standing to challenge this law.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)I don't know if that makes a difference for you but I think accurate capture of the extent matters.
piratefish08
(3,133 posts)"The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trailsparking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital pocket litter. It is, in some measure, the realization of the total information awareness program created during the first term of the Bush administrationan effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans privacy."
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)hlthe2b
(102,468 posts)does anyone think this is really limited to Verizon? AT&T even set them up with offices to do so.
--> I was told once by my parents to watch what I said and wrote because the government could pose a threat.....
They were living and working in Iran at the time... prior to the Shah's overthrow.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)that it was just to ensure that we had neighboring cells when I was "rounded up."
Ahhh, the Bush years.
These days they call me for the same reasons. Too bad it seems just as relevant now.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)ol' Zucky from day one has harvested every piece of info and every photo
yet those that facebook have never worried about that.
What do I care who is listening- Hey, I use charmin ultra with aloe.
the supermarket discount card and my credit card paid for it
If they know that, why would I care what else they know?
After all, we are all free and conversing here.
On an international board. Billions of people could be reading this.
trumad
(41,692 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)My theory on data mining activities is to swamp them with false data.
I don't use discount cards, around here the stores without them are cheaper than the ones with.
Almost all my purchases are cash.
The problem with them knowing everything is that you never know what they will decide to use against you.
But you are perfectly happy with Stasi type surveillance, most of us are NOT. And if you had ever experienced it you wouldn't be in favor of it.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I wish there were cameras when little Etan Paitz was kidnapped and killed in NYC
Perhaps they could have quickly ID'd the killer and Etan would have been alive.
Yet, the people who don't want people watching think nothing of taking cell phone photos of everybody and anything
There ARE bad people out there. I know it doesn't fit the soundbytes, but bad things have happened and do all the time.
If it saves ONE life a week, it is worth it.
And why in the world wouldn't anyone who buys a gun want a national data base.
Wouldn't they want to know who stole their gun if it is stolen?
Why the secrecy?
and as others have said, many/most had telephone lines that were party lines back "then".
And everyone was listening
and everyone knew it.
I myself wouldn't mind the machine in the movie "The Dark Knight". Pretty cool machine.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)that every form of surveillance known to man must be necessary to make you feel "Safe"
I refuse to spend my life in fear of "could have beens"
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Anyone that disagrees with you is automatically a NRA supporter.
And why do you keep bringing stuff up that has NOTHING to do with the OP.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)You've been here on DU for a dozen years.
You've probably seen it all.
And you're just now finally getting around to telling your kids that "the government" might be listening to their phone conversations?
Do you really think there is even the slightest possibility that this issue could "shake this country to the core"?
Frankly, I think your OP sounds pretty silly, coming from you.
Because I know that you know the score, but here you sound like a newbie.
trumad
(41,692 posts)I know the score---- but today's announcement is really like no other to date.
They use to hide the fact that they cherry picked... now they're just pulling them all in.......
tridim
(45,358 posts)Just because 2000-2008 seemed so unreal at the time, doesn't mean it didn't happen. I know you know this stuff.
trumad
(41,692 posts)but don't you think this is as big as it gets? You know the score as well.
byeya
(2,842 posts)Rights won't help you...Civil liberties? Go take a history class for that.
RandiFan1290
(6,258 posts)We've now moved on to "voluntary" door to door searches by the police.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)..and it will die a silent death.
Because both Parties have approved of such spying and eavesdropping.
Wouldn't it be great if Darrell Issa had Verizon? And the Justice Department was listening to his calls also?
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)Oh wait you can't.
And this court order wasn't supposed to be made public till 20+ years into the future.....
randome
(34,845 posts)I'm saying I would like to hear the rationale for this but since we already knew data was being furnished to the government for years now, I don't see this as a reason to run around with our heads on fire.
Let's get some details about it first. Then we can set our hair on fire!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)sorry but this administration screwed up big time.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)and we have
Capobvious
(13 posts)It's the location of the calls, length of time, but not the actual conversations
trumad
(41,692 posts)That information can easily be abused, too. Do you want some agency knowing that you are having an affair? How about if someone that is under investigation accidentally dials the wrong number. You get your records pulled - for no reason - other than because you have a phone. You don't think that is dangerous as hell? Now suppose you have some kind of shady activity going on, not illegal, but because of your records being pulled - for no reason - you are suddenly under surveillance.
This is WRONG WRONG WRONG.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Because we know NOBODY EVER oversteps their bounds and does underhanded shit on the sly when they have the creds to do so ...
boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)NO FUCKING COMMENT. :shudder:
morningfog
(18,115 posts)administration.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You can find out who someone talks to on a daily basis. What if they are having an affair? Is it anyone's business? Well, gee, I want to know, so I'll use a "dirty" phone and call that person. Then I get their phone records. BOOM. Extortion and blackmail.
That's just one example. But we also know that many entire calls are recorded. Anyone who doesn't think this is dangerous as hell due to the potential for abuse by corrupt individuals (and institutions) is FAR FAR too naive.
trumad
(41,692 posts)the slippery slope for sure.
This will lead to nowhere good, and has probably already caused damage that we the public aren't even aware of.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)why the fuck don't they shut down the asswipes from Texas who call me three times a day on my cellphone to ask for someone I have never heard of and to tell me that a cop is on the way to my house to arrest me for a payday loan that person owes on?
Maybe the spies need to share their info with the "Do Not Call" department.
Also, they don't need to spy on me to know I think they are all fucking assholes.
I think they need to have a "Do Not Spy" registry next.
DebJ
(7,699 posts)Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)because we know he will use it only for purposes that are pure.
Anyone else? Storm the Bastille!
Capobvious
(13 posts)get that patriot act thing taken care of then..
handmade34
(22,759 posts)"...Since the Patriot Act was first enacted, lawmakers have authorized extension after extension, refusing to make any meaningful changes to the law. This is despite the fact that according to Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) there are two versions of the Patriot Act: one that the public sees, and a secret interpretation that the government keeps to itself. Senator Wyden has stated, When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry. Furthermore, since its passage, the Department of Justices Office of the Inspector General has repeatedly found widespread blatant abuse of the statute. Yet, earlier this year, Congress passed a four-year extension of expiring Patriot Act provisions, which are now set to expire on June 1, 2015..."
Zorra
(27,670 posts)A lot of us have been wanting to take care of that since it was first enacted.
Seems that "Sunset Provision" thing didn't take care of it at all.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Nimajneb Nilknarf
(319 posts)of the President.
No law compelled the NSA to push for Verizon's records.
Liberal In Texas
(13,601 posts)in "Body of Secrets." Then again in 2009 in "The Shadow Factory." And in numerous posts on the internet. And we first learned about he NSA's existence in 1983 in "The Puzzle Palace," a book the NSA tried to keep from being published.
From 2011:
From 2012:
Pretty much I've assumed for years NSA has recorded every phone conversation, every email post, every DU post or reply I've made or done for years.
Hello NSA
go west young man
(4,856 posts)cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)I was listening to this disc a couple of years before anyone heard of the Sopranos...a client was a radio station, and the morning dj gave me a stack of discs they were going to throw out. Alabama 3 was one of them...a rare double disc with outtakes and remixes. I was also give a disc by a loser band called "The Arcade Fire."
JCMach1
(27,582 posts)searching for conspiracies...
Hmmmmmmm
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)probably listening in on people ordering their pot prescriptions and other imminent threats to national purity.
JCMach1
(27,582 posts)in fact that's just one big part of the problem with this type of 'warrant' ...
Dustlawyer
(10,499 posts)and the 1% consolidating their power and authority even more! They have to go further to identify the troublemakers and to know best what to say to the rest of the sheep to keep them in line! By the time the protests begin again they will be ready!
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Keeping them safe from the Darrell Issa. Or keeping us safe from terra.
Or something like that.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Didn't this begin under Bush?
Why is it only Verizon?
Couldn't a private hacker do the same thing?
randome
(34,845 posts)And yes, a private hacker can do the same thing.
Since FISA warrants require review by Congress, I'm sure both parties are involved. I'm not particularly worried about it but it plays into the hands of those who want to see the sky falling at every step.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)In other words, a good hacker might be able to get into Verizon's databases to get at this information, but call records for every call would make it quite impossible for that hacker to store even a small fraction of the stolen data. More to the point, we'd prosecute a hacker for doing such a thing, but we almost certainly won't prosecute anyone in the government for doing this. After all, it was blessed by a secret court.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Or is your poison Bing? Got any store "membership" cards? Finding any friends on your device? Posting your location? Taking any geo-tagged picts? Ya, we're all really outraged.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Bradley Manning for releasing theirs. This bullshit has got to stop.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)made any pretense of going away.
think_critically
(118 posts)The outrage about this is so funny to me. Don't folks know that companies like facebook,twitter, and google collect all kinds of information about you all the time without anything resembling a court order. I searched for a swing set via google and now all I see is ads about swing sets. People put their entire lives on facebook and then are outraged when the government mines phone records for data. This all looks bad no doubt, but the digital privacy ship sailed a long time ago. If you post all your business on facebook or use google at all then you probably need to leave this topic alone.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)You have to admit, that's a pretty startling revelation, too.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)I doubt the bloated bureaucracy can make much sense out of the data. Just my HO. The bad news is that we are cutting off heating assistance to people so we can pay for this. I can't believe so many Du'rs are so on board with this though. There is loyalty and then there's just blind following... damn near worship.
Peace.
William769
(55,148 posts)I have verizon also but being a gay activist, I already assumed they have my records.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
(319 posts)If you don't like the actions of the current Executive Branch, perhaps you should consider that carefully the next time you have an opportunity to vote for a President.
JohnnyRingo
(18,672 posts)I don't know how much privacy one expects when broadcasting their conversation through the air. The same stands at a lesser range for cordless land line phones. I'm not running cover for this or any other administration, but some people would demand ironclad security in obviously unsecure situations.
OnStar is another device that allows the govt and others to spy on people, but just like cells, many choose not to live without it.
This really isn't new, Guilliani brought down John Gotti in part by tapping his cell phone. The govt was listening in even when it was idle in his shirt pocket, and that was in the '90s. No one can expect privacy has become more secure since then with the advent of GPS and smart phones.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)The people making excuses for it would be positively fucking livid if Shrub did this. It wasn't Shrub, so we get "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear!".
peace13
(11,076 posts)If you think * and shooter didn't have access to this information you are kidding yourself. They invented the mechanism to spy on all citizens legally. Go figure. If you were protesting this during the * insanity you will also remember that you got your own personal camera man to go along with you. Pictures , stalking the whole scene.
Things have been rotten for quite some time now. This is just pinning it all on Obama. I am not excusing his administration jut noting that he did not invent this.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Response to trumad (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RainDog
(28,784 posts)when they're listening to you and your wife engage in a little telephone foreplay, they should pay you for your services.
But, hey, if you're not doing anything wrong, why should you care, right?
It's just your private life.
arthritisR_US
(7,300 posts)number called and its point of origin. No content is involved.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Since we don't know any tuna personally, we should just ignore the huge net coming our way. After all, it's not us the net is targeting. No worries here...
That's what I'm seeing from those who claim they aren't concerned about this.
It sickens me.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...well done...
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)This wasn't wiretapping.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)I'm having a bit of deja vu. I know we've had these discussions at the DU and elsewhere, several years ago!
whistler162
(11,155 posts)already told them that!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that said, they know so much anyway... that... oh never mind... USA, USA, USA... we live in the freest, happiest country in the world... and nothing you tell us will mar that.
(And some will need this... )
This is getting so kafkaesque and orwellian.