Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 07:53 AM Jun 2013

Woke up this morning to find out the Government has my phone records...

and the rest of my families. Yeah---we have Verizon.

So this is now what I have to tell my teenage kids.... watch what you say on your cell phones because the Government is listening.

If this does not shake this country to the core, then basically we have given up.

140 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woke up this morning to find out the Government has my phone records... (Original Post) trumad Jun 2013 OP
We incrementally find ways to justify this too Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #1
Don't worry. be happy. it's a democratic administration so cali Jun 2013 #2
Good point. We are democrats and must suport our president. In fact... leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #3
splendid idea, sport! cali Jun 2013 #6
I would too but I'm Verizon so I'm cool! East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #67
Should you be worried? blueamy66 Jun 2013 #4
My sister and I used to talk badly about Newt Gingrich on purpose... Phentex Jun 2013 #7
Is this a serious post? Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #8
no, it's not a serious post blueamy66 Jun 2013 #123
On the other hand... Bonobo Jun 2013 #9
What you just described is your Terrorism Quotient (TQ), goes with IQ into your permanent record leveymg Jun 2013 #51
Of course. It is what computers do well. Bonobo Jun 2013 #82
My attitude to this is "I know that you know that I know about you," so move on to real terrorists leveymg Jun 2013 #107
But then there are the conversations that they do mark you for additional scrutiny Savannahmann Jun 2013 #15
Awww the old if you don't have anything to hide meme... trumad Jun 2013 #18
Anyone who has nothing to hide should be suspect Generic Other Jun 2013 #27
I hear people who commit violent crimes sometimes shower to wash away evidence. GoneFishin Jun 2013 #46
I'll be showering later on today dlwickham Jun 2013 #126
I usually sneak in with ice water and make my hubby scream Generic Other Jun 2013 #132
actually I won't be showering dlwickham Jun 2013 #134
Hope you get that fixed soon! Generic Other Jun 2013 #137
Who cares? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #55
^^^This^^^ riqster Jun 2013 #87
Oooh, that hurt blueamy66 Jun 2013 #138
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about, right? Ed Suspicious Jun 2013 #60
I just threw up. WilliamPitt Jun 2013 #72
why?? blueamy66 Jun 2013 #124
My thoughts exactly HockeyMom Jun 2013 #78
Do you know everyone your family members call? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #106
Don't know about you. MynameisBlarney Jun 2013 #83
a recipe for fascism temmer Jun 2013 #95
And then there's the people who have phone sex with their boyfriends/girlfriends. Neoma Jun 2013 #101
And how much do you think it costs to cast a human glance at all those records? JDPriestly Jun 2013 #103
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #112
Naive yes marions ghost Jun 2013 #114
yeesh fishwax Jun 2013 #121
Well, of course we shouldn't care. We were just being hysterical when we got all excited back when sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #122
Well, let's play that out :) Babel_17 Jun 2013 #127
Notes from The Underground: The Merry Tipster Generic Other Jun 2013 #133
yours is a natural reaction, blueamy66 Skittles Jun 2013 #130
AND...they know where you live, where you work, what you eat, where you eat...etc. etc. etc. aristocles Jun 2013 #5
They told us about it before. zeemike Jun 2013 #71
They are not recording conversations. The records include only phone numbers. randome Jun 2013 #10
But now they know where you live! ucrdem Jun 2013 #11
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #41
And location. Tracking a persons movements can tell you a lot. dkf Jun 2013 #31
Yeah, well, they could look me up in the phone book, too. randome Jun 2013 #32
WaPo: Order reissued routinely every 90 days since 2006 dkf Jun 2013 #33
Yeah, there is that. You're right, maybe they intend to renew it. randome Jun 2013 #35
"Oh look, Agent Smith. Dave McGarrety is apparently having an affair with Linda from Accounts" alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #44
Telephone metadata and what it can tell the authorities about you dkf Jun 2013 #48
Well, yes, of course...I was joking alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #64
If they can get all the data on you by accessing a phone number how sure are you it won't be abused? dkf Jun 2013 #70
I'm not "sure" alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #109
Whew marions ghost Jun 2013 #117
No, I don't have "high trust" alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #125
Revisions to "minimization" (storage) rules allow NSA to hold onto your data essentially forever. leveymg Jun 2013 #84
And they are not interested in the OP's conversations treestar Jun 2013 #53
They have metadata not conversation data Shivering Jemmy Jun 2013 #12
surprised? piratefish08 Jun 2013 #13
J. Edgar Hoover's wet dream. Anybody remember J. Edgar here? xtraxritical Jun 2013 #92
Given all the phone companies except Qwest served us up for surveillance purposes under Bush* hlthe2b Jun 2013 #14
I always used to frequently call conservative friends, telling them... Pholus Jun 2013 #16
The funny thingy is- everyone (not me) posts their entire life on facebook, which NEVER was private graham4anything Jun 2013 #17
Everyone has Facebook---uhh..bullshit... trumad Jun 2013 #19
Two things. 1. Not everyone posts on FB. 2. 90% of my profile is inaccurate. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #52
Puleeeze. graham4anything Jun 2013 #59
i feel sorry for you, it must be terrible to be so frightened of the outside world hobbit709 Jun 2013 #63
Why does the NRA exist? Guess your post here should be directed at 100% of every gun owner graham4anything Jun 2013 #66
Why do you have this fixation about the NRA? hobbit709 Jun 2013 #69
Precisely Sherman A1 Jun 2013 #75
You're kidding, right? RevStPatrick Jun 2013 #20
Come on--- trumad Jun 2013 #21
Warentless wiretapping and metadata collection are two different things tridim Jun 2013 #26
Of course... and no duh trumad Jun 2013 #37
You are right - this is totally blatant; We-don't-care-that-you-know-it. What's left of the Bill of byeya Jun 2013 #50
That's the old stuff RandiFan1290 Jun 2013 #22
Finally, a true scandal... kentuck Jun 2013 #23
This particular court order does not cover eavesdropping. Only phone numbers, date/times. randome Jun 2013 #24
Can you prove that this is the only court order? Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #25
Of course I can't prove other court orders don't exist. randome Jun 2013 #28
Trust is gone Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #30
it won't burnodo Jun 2013 #29
From what I read Capobvious Jun 2013 #34
BUT--- that can easily lead to listening in. trumad Jun 2013 #38
So? Aerows Jun 2013 #43
If that's what you want to believe, sure. Myrina Jun 2013 #74
wow the people making excuses for this are unbelievable! boilerbabe Jun 2013 #36
They are hypocrites and wouldn't be defending this if it were done by a repug morningfog Jun 2013 #104
With just phone records Aerows Jun 2013 #39
What if you belong to a political party...what if you want some pot, what if you ....and on and on,, trumad Jun 2013 #42
Precisely Aerows Jun 2013 #45
If the gov't is keeping such good phone records on me Generic Other Jun 2013 #40
LOL wish I could rec your response. n/t DebJ Jun 2013 #76
It's ok. A Democrat is president. Besides, if you have nothing to hide, then why worry? Safetykitten Jun 2013 #47
Yes, because we trust Obama to have this kind of power, Seeking Serenity Jun 2013 #56
might wanna Capobvious Jun 2013 #49
1st reasonable post! handmade34 Jun 2013 #54
Yeh! Can you tell us how to do that? Other than a world revolution? Zorra Jun 2013 #65
I'll draft a stern letter for my Congressman, right now. leveymg Jun 2013 #77
The National Security Agency, which is part of the Department of Defense, serves at the pleasure Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #99
James Bamford has been telling us about this since 2002 Liberal In Texas Jun 2013 #57
And here is the list of words they are looking for. So be careful of their use. go west young man Jun 2013 #94
I assumed they were listening anyways....we all should be expecting this at all times. cbdo2007 Jun 2013 #58
Woke up this morning... Atman Jun 2013 #61
No doubt they were doing relationship/calling maps for the Tsarnaev brothers JCMach1 Jun 2013 #62
Nah. They were fully occupied with more important eavesdropping, Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #88
don't rule out all of the above JCMach1 Jun 2013 #110
For the minority of us who do give a shit, this is still not a surprise. This is the corporations Dustlawyer Jun 2013 #68
It's ok - the Obama Admin took them. And we know they're on our side. Myrina Jun 2013 #73
A few questions: panader0 Jun 2013 #79
It did begin under Bush. There may be other court orders relating to other carriers. randome Jun 2013 #85
A private hacker with the planet's largest data center might be able to do the same thing DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #113
Google? fleabiscuit Jun 2013 #80
The govenment takes our phone calls and prosecutes JEB Jun 2013 #81
Welcome to 2005. The data mining program never went away, and never geek tragedy Jun 2013 #86
Sounds bad but people are so naive think_critically Jun 2013 #89
Agreed - disgusting! dbackjon Jun 2013 #90
Many clueless people are in "I have nothing to hide" mode. They miss the big picture. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #91
I woke up this morning and found out that The Guardian is a right wing newspaper. QC Jun 2013 #93
The good news is ctsnowman Jun 2013 #96
You do know they were forced to right? William769 Jun 2013 #97
The People get the government that they elect. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #98
Simply quit carrying a cell phone. JohnnyRingo Jun 2013 #100
Same here. JoeyT Jun 2013 #102
This is nothing new! peace13 Jun 2013 #105
We'd better stop the false advertisijng about being "the land of the free and home of the brave". Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #108
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #111
They need to pay RainDog Jun 2013 #115
The government is not "listening" it is recording the arthritisR_US Jun 2013 #116
We are dolphins in a sea full of tuna. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #118
This is the most apt comparison I've seen.... truebrit71 Jun 2013 #119
Excellent analogy (nt) Babel_17 Jun 2013 #129
Thank you. nt woo me with science Jun 2013 #139
yep, it's outrageous ... and pretty unsurprising given the last 12 years fishwax Jun 2013 #120
"watch what you say on your cell phones because the Government is listening" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #128
Isn't this old news? Quantess Jun 2013 #131
Would have thunk you would have whistler162 Jun 2013 #135
Been following that advise for YEARS now nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #136
I kind of just assumed they are doing this with all telecommunications since the "Patriot" Act eShirl Jun 2013 #140
 

leeroysphitz

(10,462 posts)
3. Good point. We are democrats and must suport our president. In fact...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:01 AM
Jun 2013

I'm writing AT&T to ask that they send my records to the NSA voluntarily.

 

blueamy66

(6,795 posts)
4. Should you be worried?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:02 AM
Jun 2013

"What time are you picking me up for dinner"?

"I love you and miss you."

"How are the kids?"

"We're going camping. Wanna go?"

"The car was totaled. Gonna have to pay $10000 to fix it."

If you don't have anything to hide, why bother? If you have something to hide, well then.....

I understand on a small scale, but really, who cares? And maybe I am naive.....

Phentex

(16,334 posts)
7. My sister and I used to talk badly about Newt Gingrich on purpose...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:05 AM
Jun 2013

it seems the cell connections weren't as good a few years ago and you could hear some strange clicking noises. We'd joke about someone listening in so we'd make terrible comments about Newt just to see if we could make the feds come to the door.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
8. Is this a serious post?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:05 AM
Jun 2013
Who cares? You don't care that you are being spied on even though you are innocent?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
9. On the other hand...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:07 AM
Jun 2013

What if you do business with someone in Turkey.

And what if that someone ALSO called someone who is suspected of something.

Suddenly you are implicated. On the list.

Next time you buy fireworks, or cold medicine or kerosene for the stove, you are on a double list.

Maybe you go to a protest next. Oops triple list. Muslim? Quadruple! And so on.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
51. What you just described is your Terrorism Quotient (TQ), goes with IQ into your permanent record
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:22 AM
Jun 2013
Wish I were only kidding - read this oldie but goody: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-05-20-terror-database_x.htm?csp=34 ; see, related Cong. Research Service Study: http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32536.pdf?

Posted 5/20/2004 7:46 AM Updated 5/20/2004 10:52 AM


'Terrorism quotient' records spark suspicions about Matrix
NEW YORK (AP) — Before helping to launch the criminal information project known as Matrix, a database contractor gave U.S. and Florida authorities the names of 120,000 people who showed a statistical likelihood of being terrorists — sparking some investigations and arrests.

The "high terrorism factor" scoring system also became a key selling point for the involvement of the database company, Seisint Inc., in the Matrix project.

Public records obtained by The Associated Press from several states show that Justice Department officials cited the scoring technology in appointing Seisint sole contractor on the federally funded, $12 million project.

Seisint and the law enforcement officials who oversee Matrix insist that the terrorism scoring system ultimately was kept out of the project, largely because of privacy concerns.

However, new details about Seisint's development of the "terrorism quotient," including the revelation that authorities apparently acted on the list of 120,000, are renewing privacy activists' suspicions about Matrix's potential power.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
82. Of course. It is what computers do well.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jun 2013

Cross referencing. Once they grab you, they will look at who else you call and what intersections there are to the 3rd or 4th degree. God forbid someone you know now talks to someone they know who talks to someone in Saudi Arabia. Now you are all on the list. And maybe you all you took out $5,000 in cash last year to buy a used car. Now you're really fucked.

This is nasty work and by a man we elected.

But what is worst of all is that now the only people that were organized in opposition to this kind of behavior have been silenced into saying shit like:

"Well if you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?"

We (You) are so fucked.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
107. My attitude to this is "I know that you know that I know about you," so move on to real terrorists
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jun 2013

already.

Maybe, that's exactly what makes people like us a perceived threat? If so, this country is surely doomed, as there are no real enemies more dangerous than the paranoids running our own government. I'd like to still believe that isn't quite the case. But, I could be wrong.



 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
15. But then there are the conversations that they do mark you for additional scrutiny
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

"I can't believe Guantanamo Bay is still open"

"Can you believe another drone strike? What is this a video game to these people?"

"Are you going to the protest next week to try and stop the war in Syria?" (Assuming one gets fired up which is a pretty safe assumption. If not, just any old protest will do)

The idea of the PATRIOT ACT and these grab all the conversation systems absolutely violates the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments. Those are the ones that are supposed to protect you.

I suppose we come from two different points of view. You trust the Government and the Police. I do not, despite having our guy at the top, it is plain that the Government continues to operate like it did under Bushco. Take what they want, do what they want, and to hell with the consequences. If they are caught, then they'll pass legislation making it legal retroactively.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
18. Awww the old if you don't have anything to hide meme...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:14 AM
Jun 2013

So I guess we have to be pristine perfect so the Gov doesn't bother us?

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
27. Anyone who has nothing to hide should be suspect
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:28 AM
Jun 2013

or let us all come to their house and watch them take a shower.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
46. I hear people who commit violent crimes sometimes shower to wash away evidence.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:58 AM
Jun 2013

We better put anyone who takes a shower on the list.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
132. I usually sneak in with ice water and make my hubby scream
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 05:18 PM
Jun 2013

I suppose the gov't wants to know this too?

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
55. Who cares?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:25 AM
Jun 2013

A lot of people wiser, and more knowledgable than you, but here is one reason you could understand... they often make mistakes.

 

blueamy66

(6,795 posts)
138. Oooh, that hurt
Fri Jun 7, 2013, 12:04 AM
Jun 2013

Not

Wait....who are you? Where do you live? What's your family name? Do you have kids?

Wait, I don't care what you say.

I offered my opinion. No need to call
me unwise or whatever.

Sometimes I hate DU

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
78. My thoughts exactly
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:04 AM
Jun 2013

My conversations with my family, only people I call, would probably put them to sleep.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
106. Do you know everyone your family members call?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jun 2013

Or everyone THOSE people call?
Or everyone THOSE people call?

Multiply that by xx and you're on some list somewhere.

MynameisBlarney

(2,979 posts)
83. Don't know about you.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jun 2013

But I'd rather not live in a country that records our every move.
And while we may have nothing to hide. It's only a matter of time before that doesn't matter.

 

temmer

(358 posts)
95. a recipe for fascism
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:40 AM
Jun 2013

"if you have nothing to hide..."

That's exactly what dictators all over the history have told their people: If you have nothing to hide which is detrimental to my blessed leadership, why bother?

It's up to the people, not the leadership, to define what's right and what's wrong.

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
101. And then there's the people who have phone sex with their boyfriends/girlfriends.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:47 AM
Jun 2013

Honestly, does the government REALLY need to know what gets you off? There's reasons people want privacy.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
103. And how much do you think it costs to cast a human glance at all those records?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:53 AM
Jun 2013

The fact that they have your records or mine and that those records are none of their business is bad enough. That they spend money on humans or machines to collect and sort through all that data is an enormous scandal. How many kids could have more vegetables, more milk, more meat for the amounts being wasted on Uncle Sam's morbid curiosity about whether I am checking to see the hours of my knitting shop. What a waste?

What percentage of calls are of any interest to any human being in the US government? It must be extremely small, so why are we paying for this "service"?

Same for collecting DNA on every person for every crime. There should be some limits. I wish our Supreme Court would do a better job. Somehow, it should not be OK to cut back on civil rights and privacy in order to spend more on surveillance and nosiness.

And the largest percentage of the collecting of this data is just for the sake of nosiness. They aren't going to find anything of any interest to anyone for most of their snooping.

Response to blueamy66 (Reply #4)

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
122. Well, of course we shouldn't care. We were just being hysterical when we got all excited back when
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:10 PM
Jun 2013

it was revealed that Bush was using the Telecoms to spy on the American people. It was against the law then but not to worry, Congress under Bush fixed that law and made it legal. Democrats of course were outraged because they didn't understand, as the Republicans were trying to tell them to no avail, that 'if we had nothing to hide we had nothing to worry about'.

Now we are learning that the Republicans, Bush/Cheney et al were right after all.

I remember my right wing adversaries telling me just what you just did, that why should I care if the NSA was listening to me ordering a pizza? I thought they just didn't get the implications of a Government spying on its own people.

But thanks for straightening me out, and my apologies to all the Republicans I attacked back them for trying so hard to tell me the same thing.

because it's hard to tell what is a big joke like the government spying on the people, and what is not. I'm still where I was when Bush started this destruction of our rights. But then I'm stubborn about these things.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
127. Well, let's play that out :)
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jun 2013

"What time are you picking me up for the anti-war/anti NSA demonstration?"

"I love you and miss you, my closeted/married lesbian lover."

"How are my pot plants?"

"We're going to picket; Wanna go?"

"My law suit against the government is in trouble. I'll need 10,000 dollars or I'll have to drop it."





Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
133. Notes from The Underground: The Merry Tipster
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 05:27 PM
Jun 2013

Yes you never know where this snooping stuff will lead, do you?

JOURNAL
Day One:
Have begun to keep my eyes open. Strange men across the street painting the neighbor’s house. Using lavender trim if you get my drift. Another neighbor down the block observed in his hot tub last night way past dark. Also, conversation and peals of laughter emanating from house with unmowed lawn over in the next block.

Day Two:
Next door neighbor’s unmarried daughter putting on weight. A box of Tide on the front porch clearly a coded message signaling that her sailor has shipped out for 9 months at sea in case any other seaman in the fleet want to drop in for a visit. Down the street, the local mom and pop grocery store smells foreign. As in terrorist training camp. Clerk cryptically speaking into cellphone…not speaking American neither. And no Twinkies for sale. What’s up with that? Clearly a front for suicide bombers. Should be under 24 hour surveillance.

Day Three:
Birkenstock footprints. Nuff said.

Day Four:
Standing on stepladder, peeking over the fence, observed neighbor sunbathing bare naked. And no sunscreen. Uncircumcised, but who’s looking?

Day Five:
Noticed neighbor surreptitiously sneaking empty beer bottles into the recycling. After he left the scene, counted several dozen bottles. Coors Light. Perp didn’t go to work. Likely called in sick.

Day Six:
Neighbor’s dog urinated on newly erected flagpole.
Day Seven: Headcount of neighbors in church indicates considerable backsliding. On my return home, found a copy of the Constitution lying in the trash can.

Week Two
Sex, Lies, and Videotape Edition
Day 8:
Noticed healthy Catholic couple down the block only have two children. Married five years. Seems like something’s not adding up here. Should notify Vatican Tips Hotline as well as Justice Dept.

Day 9:
Observed Baptist deacon purchase lotto ticket at 7-11. Scanned contents of neighbor’s mail while he was at work. Noted subscription to Hustler Magazine. Noted offensive material on pages 17-20, 24, 26, and 30-37. Alerted mailcarrier.

Day 10:
Witnessed neighbors viewing pornography rented from local video store. Have receipt for rental of one DVD Butt Pirates of the Carribbean. Although the shades were drawn, the unmistakeable sounds emanating from the premises make it clear several state and federal laws were undoubtedly violated, possibly simultaneously.

Day 11:
Followed children collecting milk money for UN Children’s Relief Fund clearly some kind of low down commie idea.

Day 12:
Perused library checking the reading material of patrons. Caught my liberal neighbor red handed—reading. She appears to be accessing sites on the internet with information about reproduction and birth control in full view of other library patrons who all pray silently that she get professional help.

Day 13:
Found in a public library restroom stall: a contact number for some kind of surreptitious meeting with someone named Bambi.

Day 14:
Neighbor didn’t come home all night. Raised voices overheard. Sound of doors slamming. Engine revving. Neighbor drove off without buckling seatbelt.

Week Three
Dumpster Diving
Items found in suspicious neighbors’ trash cans:
A gray toupee
Box of shredded documents
Empty prescription bottle of Oxycontin
Rogaine
Discarded Grecian Formula--Raven Black
HIV test result negative (reconstructed from torn up paper)
Delinquent bill--3rd warning
Soldier of Fortune Magazine order form for Ginsu Knives
Copy of Father Flannigan’s Boy’s Town
A jury duty summons
A crop dusting manual
Directions for care of leaking breast implants
2 overdue library books
A badly altered report card
Lice Shampoo
Fundraising letter from the GOP (someone has blacked out
Cheney’s teeth and drawn in horns on his forehead)

List of license numbers of individuals observed parking illegally in handicapped space—uncertain how this came to be found in a neighbor’s trash as list was just compiled this very morning by this investigator. Must make a note to administer lie detector tests to family members.

Skittles

(153,254 posts)
130. yours is a natural reaction, blueamy66
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 05:02 PM
Jun 2013

the problem is, thinking that "If you're not doing anything wrong you've got nothing to worry about" is a prime component of fascist leaders.........and history is littered the bodies of people who did nothing wrong

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
71. They told us about it before.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Jun 2013

they called it Total Information Awareness...but they quickly drop that title so that we would not be to concerned as they implemented it.

We will now be monitored in everything we do...because they can.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. They are not recording conversations. The records include only phone numbers.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:07 AM
Jun 2013

Geeze, the hair-on-fire brigade is out in full force today!

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
32. Yeah, well, they could look me up in the phone book, too.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:39 AM
Jun 2013

Until we have a rationale -for a program that expires next month- I'm not ready to throw in the towel on my lifestyle.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
35. Yeah, there is that. You're right, maybe they intend to renew it.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:45 AM
Jun 2013

Still, maybe there's a reason for it. I'm curious to hear but I'm not really worried, either.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
44. "Oh look, Agent Smith. Dave McGarrety is apparently having an affair with Linda from Accounts"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:56 AM
Jun 2013

"Well, we already knew he was into the kinky porn, so this is no surprise."

"Mark it down in our book of future-use intelligence..." (Ominous music, darkening cubicle...)

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
48. Telephone metadata and what it can tell the authorities about you
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:01 AM
Jun 2013

Discussing the use of GPS data collected from mobile phones, an appellate court noted that even location information on its own could reveal a person's secrets: "A person who knows all of another's travels can deduce whether he is a weekly churchgoer, a heavy drinker, a regular at the gym, an unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, an associate of particular individuals or political groups," it read, "and not just one such fact about a person, but all such facts."

The primary purpose of large-scale databases such as the NSA's call records is generally said to be data-mining: rather than examining individuals, algorithms are used to find patterns of unusual activity that may mark terrorism or criminal conspiracies.

However, collection and storage of this information gives government a power it's previously lacked: easy and retroactive surveillance.

If authorities become interested in an individual at a later stage, and obtain their number, officials can look back through the data and gather their movements, social network, and more – possibly for several years (although the secret court order only allows for three months of data collection).

http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/jun/06/phone-call-metadata-information-authorities

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
64. Well, yes, of course...I was joking
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:41 AM
Jun 2013

This is clearly a "big data" / "find patterns" operation, as is much data collection. The idea of the big bad government drilling down into everyone's petty and inconsequential affairs (no pun intended) is just silly: a silly view of government, a silly view of surveillance, and a silly view of even basic resources. Anyone who has seen the government in action knows that they have neither the resources nor concern to attend to every individual's private foibles. Hell, Tsarnaev the Elder was basically flagged as a terrorist and was posting radical Jihadi videos to fucking YouTube, and they did nothing but interview him.

Here's the basic rule of thumb for people living in paranoid fantasy world: yes, the government no doubt collects all manner of information about you, but it is done in tranches with information about tens of MILLIONS of others. Billions of pieces of data. That collection is run through algorithms (if the government is lucky) to detect patterns, maybe. Nobody gives a shit about YOUR information. There is a kind of odd inflation of the self to think that MY conversations are the ones "the government" is monitoring out of the billions of pieces of data they collect. More cult of the individual nonsense. No. They monitor conversations in the aggregate, a wholly different thing. Can they theoretically drill down to MY conversation? Of course. That's how all database logic works. But nobody cares to do it. I'm not that important. And neither are you. It's the aggregate that counts.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
70. If they can get all the data on you by accessing a phone number how sure are you it won't be abused?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:50 AM
Jun 2013

Or hacked?

It can obviously be shared between agencies.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
109. I'm not "sure"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jun 2013

I live in the real world. I deal in probabilities. Even if the government collected every email and web site and phone conversation I ever had, the probability that this would have any effect at all on my life are so close to zero that it's scarcely worth thinking about. And they're not doing *that.* Am I SURE? Of course not. I'm not a child, and I don't look for certainties. I am of the practical/actionable type, and here's what that tells me: 1) the US government is not going away any time soon; and yet, it is limited in all kinds of ways that paranoid fantasies about government power ignore; 2) Data collection is in its literal infancy - computer scientists and everyone else are just now discovering the true import of collecting trillions of pieces of data and running operations on giant data sets; what we've seen to date is child's-play in this regard; 3) Data collection and analysis is mostly a matter of aggregates and patterns; it remains largely unconcerned with individuals.

So, do I want "the government" doing this stuff? I really don't care that much, because it affects my life in ZERO negative ways. Do I think it can be "abused?" Of course, anything can. What do I think is mostly going on: career civil servants charged with building intelligence are doing that. I neither trust nor distrust government - it's mostly people trying to do the right thing. Frankly, I don't really care if the government knows all my associations: hell, I give that information to Mark Zuckerberg and all his advertiser clients for free, and so does mostly every else on this board.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
117. Whew
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jun 2013

I'd say you have a high trust in government & corporate.

---------------

As for Mark Zuckerberg owning your info--

"Surprising? Facebook CEO’s New Political Group Bankrolls Ads That Bash Obama, Support GOP Sen. and Promote Keystone Pipeline"
Apr. 30, 2013 5:00am Liz Klimas

Earlier this month, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a political group that was composed of leaders in the tech industry, which would promote policies like immigration and education reform in the hopes of growing the country’s global economy.

Mark Zuckerbergs FWD.us Ads Support Oil Drilling and Bash Some Obama Policies

As Business Insider pointed out, it might be unexpected that FWD.us is funding ads that praise GOP leaders and support the Keystone pipeline and oil drilling, given the general support of the Silicon Valley and tech community for President Barack Obama and environmental tendencies. FWD.us, which was founded by NationBuilder’s co-founder Joe Green, LinkedIn’s Reid Hoffman, Bill Gates and others in addition to Zuckerberg, though expresses that it is non-partisan.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/30/surprising-facebook-ceos-new-political-group-bankrolls-ads-that-bash-obama-support-gop-sen-and-promote-keystone-pipeline/

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
125. No, I don't have "high trust"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jun 2013

Some people's positions are just so skewed toward the paranoid that they mistake lack of absolute distrust for "high trust."

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
84. Revisions to "minimization" (storage) rules allow NSA to hold onto your data essentially forever.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jun 2013
NSA call database
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The United States' National Security Agency (NSA) maintains a database containing hundreds of billions of records of telephone calls made by U.S. citizens from the four largest telephone carriers in the United States: AT&T, SBC, BellSouth (all three now called AT&T), and Verizon.[1]

The existence of this database and the NSA program that compiled it was unknown to the general public until USA Today broke the story on May 10, 2006.[1] It is estimated that the database contains over 1.9 trillion call-detail records.[2] According to Bloomberg News, the effort began approximately seven months before the September 11, 2001 attacks.[3]

The records include detailed call information (caller, receiver, date/time of call, length of call, etc.) for use in traffic analysis and social network analysis, but do not include audio information or transcripts of the content of the phone calls.

The database's existence has prompted fierce objections. It is often viewed as an illegal warrantless search and a violation of the pen register provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and (in some cases) the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The George W. Bush administration neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the domestic call record database. This contrasts with a related NSA controversy concerning warrantless surveillance of selected telephone calls; in that case they did confirm the existence of the program of debated legality. The program's code name is Stellar wind.[4]



http://www.cato.org/blog/nsa-surveillance-violated-constitution-secret-fisa-court-found
It’s cause for concern any time government exceeds the bounds of the Fourth Amendment, but it should be truly worrying when it’s in the context of mass-scale spying by the NSA. Based on what little we know of the NSA’s programs from public reports, a single “authorization” will routinely cover hundreds or thousands of phone numbers and e-mail addresses. That means that even if there’s only “one occasion” on which the NSA “circumvented the spirit of the law” or flouted the Fourth Amendment, the rights of thousands of Americans could easily have been violated.

Moving from confirmed fact to mild—but I think reasonable—speculation, there is something about the peculiar phrasing of these statements worth noticing: “collection carried out pursuant to the Section 702 minimization procedures.” Minimization procedures are the rules designed to limit the retention and dissemination of irrelevant information about innocent Americans that might get picked up during authorized surveillance. In ordinary criminal wiretaps, it makes sense to talk about “collection carried out pursuant to… minimization procedures” because, under the stricter rules governing such spying, someone is supposed to be monitoring the wiretap in realtime, and ensuring that innocent conversations (like a mobster’s spouse or teenage kids chatting on the house line) are not recorded.

But that’s not how FISA surveillance normally works. As a rare public ruling by the FISA Court explains, the standard procedure for FISA surveillance is that “large amounts of information are collected by automatic recording to be minimized after the fact.” The court elaborated: “Virtually all information seized, whether by electronic surveillance or physical search, is minimized hours, days, or weeks after collection.” (Emphasis mine.) In other words, minimization is something that normally happens after collection: First you intercept, then you toss out the irrelevant stuff. Intelligence officials have suggested the same in recent testimony before Congress: Communications aren’t “minimized” until they’re reviewed by human analysts—and given the incredible volume of NSA collection, it’s unlikely that more than a small fraction of what’s intercepted ever is seen by human eyes. Yet in the statements above, we have two intriguing implications: First, that “collection” and “minimization” are in some sense happening contemporaneously (otherwise how could “collection” be “pursuant to” minimization rules?) and second, that these procedures are somehow fairly intimately connected to the question of “reasonableness” under the Fourth Amendment.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
53. And they are not interested in the OP's conversations
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:24 AM
Jun 2013

so OP likely will never have standing to challenge this law.

Shivering Jemmy

(900 posts)
12. They have metadata not conversation data
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:08 AM
Jun 2013

I don't know if that makes a difference for you but I think accurate capture of the extent matters.

piratefish08

(3,133 posts)
13. surprised?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:09 AM
Jun 2013
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/

"The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy."

hlthe2b

(102,468 posts)
14. Given all the phone companies except Qwest served us up for surveillance purposes under Bush*
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:10 AM
Jun 2013

does anyone think this is really limited to Verizon? AT&T even set them up with offices to do so.

--> I was told once by my parents to watch what I said and wrote because the government could pose a threat.....
They were living and working in Iran at the time... prior to the Shah's overthrow.

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
16. I always used to frequently call conservative friends, telling them...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

that it was just to ensure that we had neighboring cells when I was "rounded up."

Ahhh, the Bush years.

These days they call me for the same reasons. Too bad it seems just as relevant now.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
17. The funny thingy is- everyone (not me) posts their entire life on facebook, which NEVER was private
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

ol' Zucky from day one has harvested every piece of info and every photo

yet those that facebook have never worried about that.

What do I care who is listening- Hey, I use charmin ultra with aloe.
the supermarket discount card and my credit card paid for it

If they know that, why would I care what else they know?

After all, we are all free and conversing here.

On an international board. Billions of people could be reading this.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
52. Two things. 1. Not everyone posts on FB. 2. 90% of my profile is inaccurate.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:23 AM
Jun 2013

My theory on data mining activities is to swamp them with false data.

I don't use discount cards, around here the stores without them are cheaper than the ones with.

Almost all my purchases are cash.

The problem with them knowing everything is that you never know what they will decide to use against you.

But you are perfectly happy with Stasi type surveillance, most of us are NOT. And if you had ever experienced it you wouldn't be in favor of it.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
59. Puleeeze.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:35 AM
Jun 2013

I wish there were cameras when little Etan Paitz was kidnapped and killed in NYC
Perhaps they could have quickly ID'd the killer and Etan would have been alive.

Yet, the people who don't want people watching think nothing of taking cell phone photos of everybody and anything

There ARE bad people out there. I know it doesn't fit the soundbytes, but bad things have happened and do all the time.

If it saves ONE life a week, it is worth it.

And why in the world wouldn't anyone who buys a gun want a national data base.
Wouldn't they want to know who stole their gun if it is stolen?
Why the secrecy?

and as others have said, many/most had telephone lines that were party lines back "then".
And everyone was listening

and everyone knew it.

I myself wouldn't mind the machine in the movie "The Dark Knight". Pretty cool machine.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
63. i feel sorry for you, it must be terrible to be so frightened of the outside world
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:41 AM
Jun 2013

that every form of surveillance known to man must be necessary to make you feel "Safe"

I refuse to spend my life in fear of "could have beens"

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
69. Why do you have this fixation about the NRA?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:45 AM
Jun 2013

Anyone that disagrees with you is automatically a NRA supporter.

And why do you keep bringing stuff up that has NOTHING to do with the OP.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
20. You're kidding, right?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:16 AM
Jun 2013

You've been here on DU for a dozen years.
You've probably seen it all.
And you're just now finally getting around to telling your kids that "the government" might be listening to their phone conversations?
Do you really think there is even the slightest possibility that this issue could "shake this country to the core"?

Frankly, I think your OP sounds pretty silly, coming from you.
Because I know that you know the score, but here you sound like a newbie.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
21. Come on---
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:18 AM
Jun 2013

I know the score---- but today's announcement is really like no other to date.

They use to hide the fact that they cherry picked... now they're just pulling them all in.......

tridim

(45,358 posts)
26. Warentless wiretapping and metadata collection are two different things
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:28 AM
Jun 2013

Just because 2000-2008 seemed so unreal at the time, doesn't mean it didn't happen. I know you know this stuff.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
37. Of course... and no duh
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:50 AM
Jun 2013

but don't you think this is as big as it gets? You know the score as well.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
50. You are right - this is totally blatant; We-don't-care-that-you-know-it. What's left of the Bill of
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:16 AM
Jun 2013

Rights won't help you...Civil liberties? Go take a history class for that.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
23. Finally, a true scandal...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jun 2013

..and it will die a silent death.

Because both Parties have approved of such spying and eavesdropping.

Wouldn't it be great if Darrell Issa had Verizon? And the Justice Department was listening to his calls also?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
24. This particular court order does not cover eavesdropping. Only phone numbers, date/times.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:24 AM
Jun 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
25. Can you prove that this is the only court order?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:27 AM
Jun 2013

Oh wait you can't.

And this court order wasn't supposed to be made public till 20+ years into the future.....

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
28. Of course I can't prove other court orders don't exist.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:31 AM
Jun 2013

I'm saying I would like to hear the rationale for this but since we already knew data was being furnished to the government for years now, I don't see this as a reason to run around with our heads on fire.

Let's get some details about it first. Then we can set our hair on fire!

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
43. So?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:56 AM
Jun 2013

That information can easily be abused, too. Do you want some agency knowing that you are having an affair? How about if someone that is under investigation accidentally dials the wrong number. You get your records pulled - for no reason - other than because you have a phone. You don't think that is dangerous as hell? Now suppose you have some kind of shady activity going on, not illegal, but because of your records being pulled - for no reason - you are suddenly under surveillance.

This is WRONG WRONG WRONG.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
74. If that's what you want to believe, sure.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jun 2013

Because we know NOBODY EVER oversteps their bounds and does underhanded shit on the sly when they have the creds to do so ...

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
39. With just phone records
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:52 AM
Jun 2013

You can find out who someone talks to on a daily basis. What if they are having an affair? Is it anyone's business? Well, gee, I want to know, so I'll use a "dirty" phone and call that person. Then I get their phone records. BOOM. Extortion and blackmail.

That's just one example. But we also know that many entire calls are recorded. Anyone who doesn't think this is dangerous as hell due to the potential for abuse by corrupt individuals (and institutions) is FAR FAR too naive.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
42. What if you belong to a political party...what if you want some pot, what if you ....and on and on,,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:55 AM
Jun 2013

the slippery slope for sure.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
45. Precisely
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:57 AM
Jun 2013

This will lead to nowhere good, and has probably already caused damage that we the public aren't even aware of.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
40. If the gov't is keeping such good phone records on me
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:53 AM
Jun 2013

why the fuck don't they shut down the asswipes from Texas who call me three times a day on my cellphone to ask for someone I have never heard of and to tell me that a cop is on the way to my house to arrest me for a payday loan that person owes on?

Maybe the spies need to share their info with the "Do Not Call" department.

Also, they don't need to spy on me to know I think they are all fucking assholes.

I think they need to have a "Do Not Spy" registry next.

Seeking Serenity

(2,840 posts)
56. Yes, because we trust Obama to have this kind of power,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:26 AM
Jun 2013

because we know he will use it only for purposes that are pure.

Anyone else? Storm the Bastille!

handmade34

(22,759 posts)
54. 1st reasonable post!
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:25 AM
Jun 2013
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/patriot-act-10-years-later


"...Since the Patriot Act was first enacted, lawmakers have authorized extension after extension, refusing to make any meaningful changes to the law. This is despite the fact that — according to Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) — there are two versions of the Patriot Act: one that the public sees, and a secret interpretation that the government keeps to itself. Senator Wyden has stated, “When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry.” Furthermore, since its passage, the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General has repeatedly found widespread blatant abuse of the statute. Yet, earlier this year, Congress passed a four-year extension of expiring Patriot Act provisions, which are now set to expire on June 1, 2015..."


Zorra

(27,670 posts)
65. Yeh! Can you tell us how to do that? Other than a world revolution?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:42 AM
Jun 2013

A lot of us have been wanting to take care of that since it was first enacted.

Seems that "Sunset Provision" thing didn't take care of it at all.

 

Nimajneb Nilknarf

(319 posts)
99. The National Security Agency, which is part of the Department of Defense, serves at the pleasure
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jun 2013

of the President.

No law compelled the NSA to push for Verizon's records.

Liberal In Texas

(13,601 posts)
57. James Bamford has been telling us about this since 2002
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:33 AM
Jun 2013

in "Body of Secrets." Then again in 2009 in "The Shadow Factory." And in numerous posts on the internet. And we first learned about he NSA's existence in 1983 in "The Puzzle Palace," a book the NSA tried to keep from being published.

From 2011:

Around the country, in tall, windowless telecom company buildings known as switches, NSA technicians quietly began installing beam-splitters to redirect duplicate copies of all phone calls and email messages to secret rooms behind electronic cipher locks.There, NSA software and hardware designed for “deep packet inspection” filtered through the billions of email messages looking for key names, words, phrases and addresses. The equipment also monitored phone conversations and even what pages people view on the Web — the porn sites they visit, the books they buy on Amazon, the social networks they interact with and the text messages they send and receive. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/62999.html

From 2012:
...and for the first time since Watergate and the other scandals of the Nixon administration—the NSA has turned its surveillance apparatus on the US and its citizens. It has established listening posts throughout the nation to collect and sift through billions of email messages and phone calls, whether they originate within the country or overseas. It has created a supercomputer of almost unimaginable speed to look for patterns and unscramble codes. Finally, the agency has begun building a place to store all the trillions of words and thoughts and whispers captured in its electronic net. And, of course, it’s all being done in secret. To those on the inside, the old adage that NSA stands for Never Say Anything applies more than ever. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/nsa-whistleblower/

Pretty much I've assumed for years NSA has recorded every phone conversation, every email post, every DU post or reply I've made or done for years.
Hello NSA
 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
94. And here is the list of words they are looking for. So be careful of their use.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:36 AM
Jun 2013
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82701103/Analyst-Desktop-Binder-REDACTED When multiple words from the list pop up in your online or phone conversation then you raise flags.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
61. Woke up this morning...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:38 AM
Jun 2013

I was listening to this disc a couple of years before anyone heard of the Sopranos...a client was a radio station, and the morning dj gave me a stack of discs they were going to throw out. Alabama 3 was one of them...a rare double disc with outtakes and remixes. I was also give a disc by a loser band called "The Arcade Fire."

JCMach1

(27,582 posts)
62. No doubt they were doing relationship/calling maps for the Tsarnaev brothers
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:39 AM
Jun 2013

searching for conspiracies...

Hmmmmmmm

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
88. Nah. They were fully occupied with more important eavesdropping,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:28 AM
Jun 2013

probably listening in on people ordering their pot prescriptions and other imminent threats to national purity.

JCMach1

(27,582 posts)
110. don't rule out all of the above
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:17 AM
Jun 2013

in fact that's just one big part of the problem with this type of 'warrant' ...

Dustlawyer

(10,499 posts)
68. For the minority of us who do give a shit, this is still not a surprise. This is the corporations
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:45 AM
Jun 2013

and the 1% consolidating their power and authority even more! They have to go further to identify the troublemakers and to know best what to say to the rest of the sheep to keep them in line! By the time the protests begin again they will be ready!

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
73. It's ok - the Obama Admin took them. And we know they're on our side.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 09:57 AM
Jun 2013

Keeping them safe from the Darrell Issa. Or keeping us safe from terra.
Or something like that.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
79. A few questions:
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:05 AM
Jun 2013

Didn't this begin under Bush?
Why is it only Verizon?
Couldn't a private hacker do the same thing?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
85. It did begin under Bush. There may be other court orders relating to other carriers.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:19 AM
Jun 2013

And yes, a private hacker can do the same thing.

Since FISA warrants require review by Congress, I'm sure both parties are involved. I'm not particularly worried about it but it plays into the hands of those who want to see the sky falling at every step.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
113. A private hacker with the planet's largest data center might be able to do the same thing
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:34 AM
Jun 2013

In other words, a good hacker might be able to get into Verizon's databases to get at this information, but call records for every call would make it quite impossible for that hacker to store even a small fraction of the stolen data. More to the point, we'd prosecute a hacker for doing such a thing, but we almost certainly won't prosecute anyone in the government for doing this. After all, it was blessed by a secret court.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
80. Google?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:14 AM
Jun 2013

Or is your poison Bing? Got any store "membership" cards? Finding any friends on your device? Posting your location? Taking any geo-tagged picts? Ya, we're all really outraged.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
81. The govenment takes our phone calls and prosecutes
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jun 2013

Bradley Manning for releasing theirs. This bullshit has got to stop.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
86. Welcome to 2005. The data mining program never went away, and never
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:20 AM
Jun 2013

made any pretense of going away.

 

think_critically

(118 posts)
89. Sounds bad but people are so naive
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jun 2013


The outrage about this is so funny to me. Don't folks know that companies like facebook,twitter, and google collect all kinds of information about you all the time without anything resembling a court order. I searched for a swing set via google and now all I see is ads about swing sets. People put their entire lives on facebook and then are outraged when the government mines phone records for data. This all looks bad no doubt, but the digital privacy ship sailed a long time ago. If you post all your business on facebook or use google at all then you probably need to leave this topic alone.

QC

(26,371 posts)
93. I woke up this morning and found out that The Guardian is a right wing newspaper.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:36 AM
Jun 2013

You have to admit, that's a pretty startling revelation, too.

ctsnowman

(1,903 posts)
96. The good news is
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:41 AM
Jun 2013

I doubt the bloated bureaucracy can make much sense out of the data. Just my HO. The bad news is that we are cutting off heating assistance to people so we can pay for this. I can't believe so many Du'rs are so on board with this though. There is loyalty and then there's just blind following... damn near worship.

Peace.

 

Nimajneb Nilknarf

(319 posts)
98. The People get the government that they elect.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:44 AM
Jun 2013

If you don't like the actions of the current Executive Branch, perhaps you should consider that carefully the next time you have an opportunity to vote for a President.

JohnnyRingo

(18,672 posts)
100. Simply quit carrying a cell phone.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:47 AM
Jun 2013

I don't know how much privacy one expects when broadcasting their conversation through the air. The same stands at a lesser range for cordless land line phones. I'm not running cover for this or any other administration, but some people would demand ironclad security in obviously unsecure situations.

OnStar is another device that allows the govt and others to spy on people, but just like cells, many choose not to live without it.

This really isn't new, Guilliani brought down John Gotti in part by tapping his cell phone. The govt was listening in even when it was idle in his shirt pocket, and that was in the '90s. No one can expect privacy has become more secure since then with the advent of GPS and smart phones.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
102. Same here.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:52 AM
Jun 2013

The people making excuses for it would be positively fucking livid if Shrub did this. It wasn't Shrub, so we get "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear!".

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
105. This is nothing new!
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jun 2013

If you think * and shooter didn't have access to this information you are kidding yourself. They invented the mechanism to spy on all citizens legally. Go figure. If you were protesting this during the * insanity you will also remember that you got your own personal camera man to go along with you. Pictures , stalking the whole scene.

Things have been rotten for quite some time now. This is just pinning it all on Obama. I am not excusing his administration jut noting that he did not invent this.

Response to trumad (Original post)

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
115. They need to pay
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:47 AM
Jun 2013

when they're listening to you and your wife engage in a little telephone foreplay, they should pay you for your services.

But, hey, if you're not doing anything wrong, why should you care, right?

It's just your private life.

arthritisR_US

(7,300 posts)
116. The government is not "listening" it is recording the
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jun 2013

number called and its point of origin. No content is involved.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
118. We are dolphins in a sea full of tuna.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jun 2013

Since we don't know any tuna personally, we should just ignore the huge net coming our way. After all, it's not us the net is targeting. No worries here...

That's what I'm seeing from those who claim they aren't concerned about this.

It sickens me.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
128. "watch what you say on your cell phones because the Government is listening"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 01:12 PM
Jun 2013

This wasn't wiretapping.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
131. Isn't this old news?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 05:05 PM
Jun 2013

I'm having a bit of deja vu. I know we've had these discussions at the DU and elsewhere, several years ago!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
136. Been following that advise for YEARS now
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 07:19 PM
Jun 2013

that said, they know so much anyway... that... oh never mind... USA, USA, USA... we live in the freest, happiest country in the world... and nothing you tell us will mar that.

(And some will need this... )

This is getting so kafkaesque and orwellian.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Woke up this morning to f...