General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy Question for Chris Christie: Uh...why OCTOBER? Why not wait a month, and save NJ $12 million?
Okay, so Chris Christie just announced he's going to hold a special election to fill the NJ Senate seat in October 2013. That will cost the State of New Jersey about $12 million to put on a special election.
So, my question is: Why not just wait ANOTHER MONTH and hold the election at the same time as all the other elections?
The reason is obvious (isn't it)? Because he doesn't want Cory Booker to be on the same ballot as he is.
He wants all the Booker-mania to be over with by then, all the Democrats would have spent all their money and energy electing Booker, and then they'll be too exhausted and broke to go out and campaign for Buono. In fact, a lot of the dumber Democrats are actually giving money to Christie.
Pretty good strategy from The Kingpin, but this strategy should be exposed for what it is.
1KansasDem
(251 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)Why is 'Mr. Fiscal Conservative' suddenly spending $12 million to hold a special election THREE WEEKS before the MAIN election?
Come on, Chris....THAT'S FOUR MILLION DOLLARS PER WEEK you'll waste.
Mr. David
(535 posts)Makes no sense except to Christie. If his ass gets pounded because Booker's name is on the ballot, then Christie is pretty unpopular than the media-hyped crap that we have been foisted upon.
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)reputation as the last smart Republican.
It's going to take all of five minutes to move this scandal from the blogs to the mainstream news outlets. Maddow has probably already SHOT her segment on it for MSNBC tonight. It'll be on ABC/CBS/NBC by the end of the week.
doggie breath
(30 posts)just appoint a Repub to fill out Lautenberg's term and save the money as well.
Mr. David
(535 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)5/5 for accuracy, and
5/5 for sarcasm
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Although, this is an interesting bonus.
Cha
(298,010 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,878 posts)If not, does that mean that NJ goes without full representation in the Senate for 4-5 months?
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Christie outlines special election for Lautenberg's U.S. Senate seat
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/christie_outlines_special_elec.html
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)If they win the Senate seat, their party can replace them on the ballot for the general election in November.
Chris Christie Proved Again Today That He's a Political Genius
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chris-christies-brilliant-election-play-2013-6
roamer65
(36,748 posts)Voter suppression, basically.
former9thward
(32,136 posts)He is not worried about a Democratic turnout. He is going to be reelected no matter when they hold the election.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)While some national Republicans are annoyed with Mr. Christies decision, they may not be privy to all the information he had about which Republican candidates might have been interested in Mr. Lautenbergs seat. Its plausible that Mr. Christie could have helped a reasonably good G.O.P. nominee to a narrow victory. But if none were interested in the race, it may have been a lost cause.
It may be reasonable to infer, then, that Mr. Christie evaluated the Republican field and did not like what he saw and that Mr. Booker is poised to win the Senate seat with relative ease.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/special-election-timing-in-new-jersey-points-to-a-weak-g-o-p-field/
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Make no mistake, if it were PO who did something like this, there would be a Congressional investigation and the Media would stay on the story like it were world war 3.