Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,013 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:26 AM Apr 23

It's impossible to exaggerate just how badly the gag order hearing went for both Trump and lead attorney Todd Blanche.

Last edited Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:06 PM - Edit history (1)

UPDATE: Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 · 8:01:50 AM PDT · Mark Sumner

In just a few minutes, Blanche was forced to admit he had no case law to support his position, that he was speculating on the motivation of witnesses, needled the judge with a statement about “two systems of justice in this courtroom,” and got a warning that he was losing all credibility with the court. And this is the guy Trump is counting on to lead this case over weeks of testimony.

In a lot of ways, any fine resulting from this morning is going to be the very least of the damage. This. Was. Brutal.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/4/23/2236789/-Live-coverage-Trump-s-first-criminal-trial-continues-with-testimony-and-gag-order-hearing?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=top_news_slot_2&pm_medium=web#update-1713884510000
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/recap-of-trump-contempt-hearing

?w=1238&quality=80&ssl=1
https://digbysblog.net/2024/04/23/is-common-sense-prevailing/










61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's impossible to exaggerate just how badly the gag order hearing went for both Trump and lead attorney Todd Blanche. (Original Post) kpete Apr 23 OP
Where did Toddd Blanche get his Law Degree? ProudMNDemocrat Apr 23 #1
Trump University /nt localroger Apr 23 #4
LOL Escurumbele Apr 23 #32
Brooklyn Law School. Raven Apr 23 #5
Isn't that where Vinny Gambini got his? KS Toronado Apr 23 #28
You mean the 2 utes?? AZ8theist Apr 23 #48
That's him! KS Toronado Apr 23 #59
If any profs are there that taught him, they will not know him passing on the street now. Traurigkeit Apr 23 #44
Once you've decided to take a losing case with an uncooperative, uncontrollable client, unblock Apr 23 #7
He attended Brooklyn Law School cojoel Apr 23 #10
And these are the "totally professional" attorneys..... SergeStorms Apr 23 #49
Brutal perhaps but he seems unlikely to receive jail time so any sort of fine is a slap on the wrist. LonePirate Apr 23 #2
After much agonizing over the "just lock him up" question... Hugin Apr 23 #8
The judge can't, by NY law, impose a fine greater than $1000.00 per violation, MarineCombatEngineer Apr 23 #11
And to TSF, that's not even the slap on the wrist it would be to most of us. ShazzieB Apr 23 #14
No, but it's the first step, correctly IMHO, in escalating punishment MarineCombatEngineer Apr 23 #16
Thanks for the reminder! ShazzieB Apr 23 #47
4 Mother's Day fake cold pendants for Melania. Traildogbob Apr 23 #27
Especially when TSF isn't paying them from its pocket Traurigkeit Apr 23 #45
Can the judge by law imply an intermediate revocation? JT45242 Apr 23 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author MarineCombatEngineer Apr 23 #18
That's a great question, one which I don't have the answer for. MarineCombatEngineer Apr 23 #18
Can't they change the law? MichMan Apr 23 #36
Changing a law doesn't happen by waving a wand. And I doubt the NY legislature is going to do that onenote Apr 23 #41
This hypothesis about Trump's strategy makes sense. Thanks. TheRickles Apr 23 #12
-- it was set by the legislature. 3Hotdogs Apr 23 #13
The decision not to seek incarceration was made by the prosecutor. onenote Apr 23 #23
as you imply...the law forbids both... ret5hd Apr 23 #29
perfect analogy, recommended. tyvm, msfiddlestix Apr 23 #53
How is setting fines on a scale based on resources a two tiered... Hugin Apr 23 #35
The "law in all its majesty" Elessar Zappa Apr 23 #38
Baby steps. unblock Apr 23 #9
Maybe not jail time, but... LAS14 Apr 23 #46
House arrest is useless as he spews his garbage to the press at the courthouse or he puts it on social media. LonePirate Apr 23 #50
And this is why, the instant we have a Democratic majority on both Houses, soldierant Apr 23 #55
Reserve decision?? Timewas Apr 23 #3
So now trump fires this lawyer which leads to a several months delay while a new one gets up to speed. Srkdqltr Apr 23 #6
If I was the judge in that scenario.... lastlib Apr 23 #30
I doubt they can do that. But it will delay again which is the point. Srkdqltr Apr 23 #33
Do you really think that's what he's going to do? onenote Apr 23 #39
My guess is as good as anyone else's Srkdqltr Apr 23 #43
Despite the presumption of innocence, he knows he is guilty as hell and sees no reason to respect anything or anyone. Marcuse Apr 23 #15
One might get the feeling his lawyers are doing everything they can to lock him up. Bev54 Apr 23 #20
Apparently, "Truthing" is what Trump now does on his social media site since he stopped "Tweeting." sop Apr 23 #21
The Same Thing That's Been Going On For Awhile modrepub Apr 23 #22
It is such an assault to our language. SalviaBlue Apr 23 #40
Awesome!!! LymphocyteLover Apr 23 #24
I don't hear "jail", or even "next time it's jail". Sounds just peachy for Trump. Silent3 Apr 23 #25
(deleted) Silent3 Apr 23 #26
"Your client had to type it out. Use the shift-key and all." BumRushDaShow Apr 23 #31
Oh please. Sick of this legal analysis. The hearing itself is a win for Trump. 617Blue Apr 23 #34
He didn't post bond? onenote Apr 23 #37
I call it legal mumbo jumbo. triron Apr 23 #42
Did Merchan make his "you're losing credibility" comment in front of Jurors? Oopsie Daisy Apr 23 #51
I don't think so. I think I heard on Joy Reid AnotherDreamWeaver Apr 24 #60
I remember in the movie "My Cousin Vinny" (1992) 4lbs Apr 23 #52
That was a great scene JoseBalow Apr 23 #58
Ah, yes. Excellent. Thank you for finding that clip on YT. 4lbs Apr 24 #61
Is Blanche Even A Criminal Defense Lawyer? Deep State Witch Apr 23 #54
That's good but... Kablooie Apr 23 #56
So the Gaslight didn't work with Judge Merchan... Cha Apr 23 #57

unblock

(52,314 posts)
7. Once you've decided to take a losing case with an uncooperative, uncontrollable client,
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:46 AM
Apr 23

The best legal education in the world won't keep you from looking like a fool.

SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
49. And these are the "totally professional" attorneys.....
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 02:08 PM
Apr 23

these are the good ones, the same attorneys he'll be using in the documents case in Florida.

This is what happens when you cheat attorneys earlier in life.

Karma is a bitch, Donnie boy!

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
2. Brutal perhaps but he seems unlikely to receive jail time so any sort of fine is a slap on the wrist.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:29 AM
Apr 23

He’s likely benefiting from a two-tiered justice system yet again.

Hugin

(33,198 posts)
8. After much agonizing over the "just lock him up" question...
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:50 AM
Apr 23

I personally have come to believe that in this case the judge is doing the correct thing.

Here’s my reasoning. Once a judge invokes the extremes of contempt proceedings, everything becomes a personal pissing match between the judge and the contemptuous one. It would push the actual facts of the case into the background as the goat rodeo takes up all of the attention.

Trump has plainly said that he doesn’t want the facts of this trial to become public. In fact he allegedly paid money to keep them from being widely known. I have come to believe that he is willing to do anything that will keep these facts from being known. Including intimidating witnesses/jurors and inciting contempt with a judge. Risking the unlikeliest outcome of being jailed. Yes, Trump is that desperate to keep the facts in this trial from being known.

That said, it would be nice if the fines were more severe. I assume that the scale of them has been set based on the resources of a typical defendant and not someone like Trump.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,423 posts)
11. The judge can't, by NY law, impose a fine greater than $1000.00 per violation,
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:55 AM
Apr 23

it sucks, but it's NY law.

ShazzieB

(16,497 posts)
14. And to TSF, that's not even the slap on the wrist it would be to most of us.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:12 PM
Apr 23

It's more like the buzzing of an annoying insect; something to be impatiently waved away.

Fines are going to have absolutely no effect on him.

ShazzieB

(16,497 posts)
47. Thanks for the reminder!
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:54 PM
Apr 23

Last edited Tue Apr 23, 2024, 03:31 PM - Edit history (1)

This (the escalation of penalties for contempt of court) is an area I'm not familiar with.

Traildogbob

(8,794 posts)
27. 4 Mother's Day fake cold pendants for Melania.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:08 PM
Apr 23

Of course not a once of work involved in that cash flow, as is the life of trump world.

JT45242

(2,288 posts)
17. Can the judge by law imply an intermediate revocation?
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:23 PM
Apr 23

Wondering if the judge could say after these fines. The next time TFG violates the gag order that he would be put on an ankle monitor and only allowed to travel between Trump tower home and court/lawyer meetings.

A violation once in ankle monitor would put him in jail.

There should be justice for all, and literally anyone else facing 34 felony counts who was trying to intimidate witnesses, court personnel, or jury members would likely have been put in a similar arrangement by now.

Response to JT45242 (Reply #17)

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,423 posts)
18. That's a great question, one which I don't have the answer for.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:27 PM
Apr 23

Maybe some of DU's resident lawyers can answer, member, onenote, could probably give a good synopsis of NY law.

onenote

(42,753 posts)
41. Changing a law doesn't happen by waving a wand. And I doubt the NY legislature is going to do that
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:28 PM
Apr 23

because of this case.

onenote

(42,753 posts)
23. The decision not to seek incarceration was made by the prosecutor.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:57 PM
Apr 23

The reasons for that likely include the reasons you give in your post. But there is another reason: prosecutors rarely seek, and judges rarely impose, jail time for criminal contempt the first time the issue is raised and particularly in a case where the contempt didn't disrupt the trial in front of the jury. Rather, they take an "escalation" approach where the severity of the penalty will turn on whether the offender persists in violating a gag order after having been penalized one or more times.

And wouldn't basing the penalty on the ability to pay be a form of two-tiered justice? Should the fine one pays for drunk driving depend on one's bank balance?

ret5hd

(20,516 posts)
29. as you imply...the law forbids both...
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:10 PM
Apr 23

the rich and the poor from sleeping under the bridge.

so everything is equal.

Hugin

(33,198 posts)
35. How is setting fines on a scale based on resources a two tiered...
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:21 PM
Apr 23

System? Right now with the fixed system, a $1000 fine is one fiftieth of the average American’s annual income. It isn’t even petty cash for some of the worst offenders such as Trump.

Elessar Zappa

(14,037 posts)
38. The "law in all its majesty"
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:27 PM
Apr 23

forbids rich and poor alike from sleeping under bridges, to beg in the streets, to steal their bread”. Anatole France.

Yes, I believe fines should be tailored to assets. That’s much fairer in my mind.

unblock

(52,314 posts)
9. Baby steps.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:50 AM
Apr 23

True, mere mortals would already be in jail, but fine first, let him accumulate more violations, jail later when it's an even more solid call.

Yes he is absolutely benefitting from a system that mollycoddles him. But he won't change his ways and the trial isn't over any time soon. His jail cell awaits.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
46. Maybe not jail time, but...
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:53 PM
Apr 23

... why not house arrest? One day on a Wednesday or weekend for every time he violates the gag order? A fine would be laughable.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
50. House arrest is useless as he spews his garbage to the press at the courthouse or he puts it on social media.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 02:12 PM
Apr 23

A device free confinement along with a non-stop police escort to and from the courtroom are the only ways to prevent further violations from him. Other defendants would already be jailed for those actions yet he remains free.

soldierant

(6,914 posts)
55. And this is why, the instant we have a Democratic majority on both Houses,
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 09:46 PM
Apr 23

Dems need to take up Bennie Thompson's bill to strip Secret Service protection from a convicted felon.

I gather the Secret Service is right now considering ways to deal with the situation should his conduct lead to some kind of lockup for contempt, and that's good, and they may even coe up with ideas which could be applied toan actual felony sentence, but it doesn't solve the problem.

Timewas

(2,196 posts)
3. Reserve decision??
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:36 AM
Apr 23

Not going to make any decision on it, so much for hard core judge.Not even a wrist slap and t rump went right back to disparaging the entire court within minutes..

Srkdqltr

(6,315 posts)
6. So now trump fires this lawyer which leads to a several months delay while a new one gets up to speed.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 11:45 AM
Apr 23

Planned shi...stuff ? You think?

lastlib

(23,278 posts)
30. If I was the judge in that scenario....
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:10 PM
Apr 23

...I would APPOINT an attorney for him--the one he fired. Then proceed.

Srkdqltr

(6,315 posts)
33. I doubt they can do that. But it will delay again which is the point.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:16 PM
Apr 23

There is no straight forward with him. Everything goes round about and back again . Delay delay.

Marcuse

(7,506 posts)
15. Despite the presumption of innocence, he knows he is guilty as hell and sees no reason to respect anything or anyone.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:13 PM
Apr 23

sop

(10,240 posts)
21. Apparently, "Truthing" is what Trump now does on his social media site since he stopped "Tweeting."
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:39 PM
Apr 23

Henceforth Trump will refer to his constant spreading of lies on Truth Social as "Truthing," and the media will go right along with it. WTF is going on in this country?

modrepub

(3,502 posts)
22. The Same Thing That's Been Going On For Awhile
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 12:55 PM
Apr 23

The rich and powerful tilt everything in their favor. I think we've all seen some of it in our lives. The coaches kid getting to play a little bit more than the others. Stupid rich kids getting into college and spending most of their time at the frats partying. Football team members getting to cut class to go to pep rallies. And so forth.

Most of the rich a privileged are smart enough to keep it on the down low. tfg doesn't have their "class", he just blasts his choice of music and doesn't care what the rest of us think.

The real question in my mind is how does the privileged class respond when people like tfg sh-t in their back yard? Up to this point, their response has been totally underwhelming.

SalviaBlue

(2,918 posts)
40. It is such an assault to our language.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:28 PM
Apr 23

So Orwellian. They think they can create a reality as they wish it to be… it’s Psychological warfare. Scary thing is that works with some people.

Rule of thumb:

Every accusation is a confession.

Every “Truth” is a lie.

Silent3

(15,259 posts)
25. I don't hear "jail", or even "next time it's jail". Sounds just peachy for Trump.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:01 PM
Apr 23

This gag order hearing only went badly for the country.

BumRushDaShow

(129,409 posts)
31. "Your client had to type it out. Use the shift-key and all."
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:15 PM
Apr 23


See....

No wool being pulled over Merchan's eyes.

617Blue

(1,281 posts)
34. Oh please. Sick of this legal analysis. The hearing itself is a win for Trump.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:18 PM
Apr 23

He won't be sanctioned. In the other trial he didn't post bond. He's not going to prison and his assets aren't going to be seized. Legal bills are the only repercussions for many of these MAGA sleazebags.

onenote

(42,753 posts)
37. He didn't post bond?
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 01:27 PM
Apr 23

He posted it. It was challenged. He responded to the challenge and the judge -- not exactly a softie -- accepted the revised terms of the bond. AG James also accepted it -- indeed, she was the one that said that Trump should have another seven days to come up with an acceptable bond.

So are both James and Engoron now weak links who want to go easy on Trump? Because the trial and the verdict in the fraud case suggest otherwise.

4lbs

(6,861 posts)
52. I remember in the movie "My Cousin Vinny" (1992)
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 02:38 PM
Apr 23

lawyer Vinny (played by actor Joe Pesci) from Brooklyn, NY was found in contempt by the Alabama judge (played by Herman Munster - Fred Gwynn)

He evidently didn't know what he was doing and began arguing with the judge regarding procedure.

Judge: "There are only two things I want to hear from you: 'Guilty' or 'Not-Guilty' If you say anything else, I will hold you in contempt."

Vinny: "I think I get the point."

Judge: "No. I don't think you do. Once again, you fail to grasp court procedure. You are now in contempt."

Vinny finally says "Not Guilty" and court resumes.

Afterwards, the Judge instructs the bailiff to take Vinny into custody, because the contempt still holds. Either pay the fine, or do the jail time.

He was fined $200 or two days in jail (might have been one day in jail). His fiancee (played by Marisa Tomei) bailed him out (paid the fine of $200). He was out later that day.

He got fined/jailed once or twice more for violating other court etiquette/procedure. Like not wearing a suit in court, talking BS out of turn, etc.

All this was in the arraignment hearing. The actual trial didn't even start yet.

Also, remember, this was the DEFENDING LAWYER that was held in contempt. The clients/defendants (one played by Karate Kid himself Ralph Macchio) shut up and said nothing during all this.

JoseBalow

(2,429 posts)
58. That was a great scene
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 10:04 PM
Apr 23

I love that movie!



Here's an oldie but a goody you might like, 30 days for criminal contempt...



It's that easy, Judge Merchan!

4lbs

(6,861 posts)
61. Ah, yes. Excellent. Thank you for finding that clip on YT.
Wed Apr 24, 2024, 11:38 AM
Apr 24

I couldn't find it or else I would have posted it.

Hmm... "Bond Court". I'll have to check it out.

Deep State Witch

(10,450 posts)
54. Is Blanche Even A Criminal Defense Lawyer?
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 04:00 PM
Apr 23

Okay.... I thought I heard someone on MSNBC last night say that Blanche was a corporate lawyer. If so, I'm surprised that he's even able to represent someone as a defense attorney in a criminal case. Because it sure doesn't seem like he knows what he's doing in front of a judge and jury.

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
56. That's good but...
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 09:52 PM
Apr 23

will it result in more justice?

The judge still is pussy footing around any effective punishments.
Without a consequence that makes a difference it doesn't matter how bad it went for Trump and his lawyer.

Merchan may have to go easy so he doesn't give Trump a opportunity to complain or appeal, but it still stinks.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's impossible to exagge...