Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,014 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 11:25 AM Apr 22

DA's Opening Statement: "This case is about a criminal conspiracy. Donald Trump corrupted the 2016 election"

............

The first line of Colangelo's opening was, "This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up - Donald Trump corrupted the 2016 election." He said that it all began when Trump and Michael Cohen met with National Enquirer publisher David Pecker In August 2015 to suppress negative stories about Trump. He said that Trump gave Cohen $130,000 to pay Stormy Daniels to silence her. He covered up the payments by falsifying his business records.

Colangelo said that Trump's claim that the payments to Cohen were for legal services was a lie, and he falsified 34 separate invoices to cover up the fact that it was being done for election purposes. He said that Pecker served as the "eyes and ears" of the Trump campaign, keeping his eye out for stories that could hurt Trump so he could make him aware of them. This is what they called their "catch and kill" strategy. At the same time, Pecker was publishing positive stories about Trump is several different publications and running stories attacking his opponents.

Colangelo then gave several examples of stories they ran such as accusing Ted Cruz's father of being involved in the JFK assassination and Ben Carson of committing medical malpractice.

He then said that they carried out three separate "catch and kills":

1. A doorman for Trump was trying to sell a story that he had information that Trump fathered children with women. He was paid $30,000 and Pecker suppressed the story.

2. Former Playboy model Karen McDougal was shopping her story through her attorney that she had a year-long affair with Trump. Pecker paid her $150,000 and suppressed the story. However, Pecker later became upset about his because Trump wouldn't reimburse him.

3. The Stormy Daniels payment through Michael Cohen for $130,000 to cover up Trump's sexual encounter with the porn star.


Cohen then recorded a conversation with Trump about this and Colangelo said that tape will be played in court. He said Trump is on the tape saying they should pay in cash and label the payment "advisory services." However, Pecker's lawyer advised against taking the payment so it was never made. He said that they would present evidence in the form of a "flurry of text messages" and a "barrage of phone calls" to suppress the story.

MORE:
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/das-opening-statement-in-trump-trial
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DA's Opening Statement: "This case is about a criminal conspiracy. Donald Trump corrupted the 2016 election" (Original Post) kpete Apr 22 OP
This was the whole point Johnny2X2X Apr 22 #1
All the prosecution needs to do is show that Trump paid Stormy Daniels to keep quiet. MichMan Apr 22 #2
Will Chump's lawyers now turn to the classic "Boys will be boys" defense? Ping Tung Apr 22 #3

Johnny2X2X

(19,114 posts)
1. This was the whole point
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 11:32 AM
Apr 22

It was done to help his campaign. That's a crime.

These crimes don't happen and we porbably never have a President Trump.

MichMan

(11,969 posts)
2. All the prosecution needs to do is show that Trump paid Stormy Daniels to keep quiet.
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 12:03 PM
Apr 22

It was done to prevent her from saying anything before the election. That makes him automatically guilty of election fraud and is not in dispute.

The source of the money or any falsification of business records really doesn't need to be proven, correct?

Ping Tung

(671 posts)
3. Will Chump's lawyers now turn to the classic "Boys will be boys" defense?
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 12:09 PM
Apr 22

Or, will they rely on the "Wicked lady tempts innocent boy" reasoning?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DA's Opening Statement: "...