General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlito and Thomas kept bringing up Comstock. That scared abortion rights supporters.
Antiabortion activists have spent several years resurrecting the Comstock Act, arguing that a future Republican administration could use the 151-year-old law to block the mailing of all abortion-related drugs and materials to effectively ban abortions nationwide.
The Supreme Court may be about to hand them a legal road map.
Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Clarence Thomas repeatedly invoked the Comstock Act during Tuesdays oral arguments regarding the abortion drug mifepristone, pressing lawyers about whether the 1873 federal law should apply to abortion drugs sent through the mail today. Alito rejected the Biden administrations argument that the law is obsolete it has not been applied in nearly a century with the conservative justice insisting that Food and Drug Administration officials should have accounted for the law when expanding access to mifepristone by mail in 2021.
This is a prominent provision. Its not some obscure subsection of a complicated, obscure law, Alito said. Everybody in this field knew about it.
The Supreme Court is reviewing whether the FDA wrongly approved and expanded access to mifepristone, and based on questioning during Tuesdays hearing, legal experts anticipate that the court will rule to preserve the health agencys authority. But some experts and Biden officials fear Alito and Thomas are planning to write a separate opinion focused solely on the Comstock Act, arguing that the law remains viable and providing legal cover to a future administration that seeks to invoke it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/03/26/comstock-act-supreme-court-abortion-pill/
Traildogbob
(8,739 posts)Will fight for that as Precedent. Word for word.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)odins folly
(156 posts)In the next Biden/ Harris, Democratic controlled congress to get rid of that particular albatross law once and for all.
Whenever they find some biblical/ archaic law that hinders progress, overturn IT!!!
Diraven
(519 posts)Than the 17th century witch hunter Alito cited to strike down Roe.
seleff
(154 posts)Since they say they're textualists.