General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow/Should Biden respond to "Debate Me challenge" ? Let's hear your suggestions:
I'll start:
I don't debate rapists.
MichMan
(12,002 posts)Think. Again.
(8,855 posts)marble falls
(57,502 posts)TwilightZone
(25,517 posts)Don't need to make this any more complicated than that.
President Biden is not ruling out debating former President Trump, as the pair prepare for a likely head-to-head match-up in Novembers presidential election.
It depends on his behavior, Biden said when asked Friday whether hed commit to a debate with the former president.
(snip)
The Biden campaign dismissed Trumps call for debates as thirsty for attention just before the president took the podium to deliver the high-profile State of the Union address Thursday evening.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4519792-biden-doesnt-rule-out-debating-trump-general-election-2024/
Liberal In Texas
(13,613 posts)get a picture of the policy differences. Not one person shouting over the other with his talking points.
The microphones should be shut off when not answering a direct question. Since TFG can talk so loud it can be picked up on President Biden's mic, they should consider putting them in different studios. They can hear each other but not be allowed to talk over each other. They can both be seen via what is called in the business a "2 box" or split screen.
It's unlikely the magats would agree to this.
karynnj
(59,510 posts)I agree that the moderators must control the mics. I have mixed feelings on two studios. I would be against the idea with anyone but Trump. Trump's disruptive behavior makes it a reasonable idea.
hlthe2b
(102,525 posts)ms liberty
(8,626 posts)TwilightZone
(25,517 posts)No reason they can't do it again this time.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-biden-will-have-mics-cut-during-opponent-s-answers-n1243954
Fiendish Thingy
(15,707 posts)Johonny
(20,956 posts)Here is a list if three moderators to chose from . . .
What do you do with a bully. Call their ass.
GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)pfitz59
(10,419 posts)'Moderators' with spines would be nice. Putting Trump in a shock collar like 'invisible fence' would be nice. Instant fact-checking should be required. Yeah, debate the orange turd.
karynnj
(59,510 posts)There is a time to every thing ... and the time for Presidential debates, you might remember, is in the fall. I will gladly accept your offer for the Presidential debates to be run, as is the norm, by the non partisan committee on mutually acceptable dates.
Johnny2X2X
(19,271 posts)I feel like we go through this every election year, where there's talk of calling off the debates, but they always happen.
ForgedCrank
(1,786 posts)my opinion that Americans are owed proper debates so they can see for themselves what they are voting for. Joe Biden will have no issue handling this.
However, I would say that in order to cut out the slanted media control, the candidates should be able to provide the questions for their opponent rather than allowing a moderator or the news outlet control the entire thing. We've seen what they do, and they can't be trusted to be fair and not inject their own biases into the flow, that needs to be eliminated as a problem.
albacore
(2,408 posts)Not between Biden and trump, anyway.
I'll bet that trump will have so decompensated by any proposed debates that everybody will know he's demented - even the MAGAs - and the Repubs will be scrambling for a candidate.
That.. or trump will have a stroke or heart attack and be out of the running.
Hugin
(33,222 posts)Or possibly at Mar-a-largo itself. (to monetize on the event) I would reject it and mention something about TSFs fear of extradition.
617Blue
(1,282 posts)Not much more to it than that other than demonstrating why there's only one choice in this race.