General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy wife and I have a comfotable retirement
We own our Condo outright and have an income in the upper 5 figures. This pays all our bills and expenses and allows us to go out for dinner and entertainment and travel. Not extravagantly, but enough to make us content. We have a nice Honda that take us where we need and with Medicare, out healthcare is taken care of.
Now if we had $10 or $20 or $50 million dollars we would have a more luxurious life, we could afford a better car, travel a bit more and stay in nicer places, flying first class would be great.
But I don't think our life is diminished because we don't have real wealth.
What made me think about this is all the Mega Rich assholes with more money than God, who have more than they can spend in 100 lifetimes. Many septuagenarian and octogenarians. Who could have a life full of adventure and enrichment. But instead all they want is another 3% tax cut to have more money they will never need. And they are willing to burn the country down to get it. They don't care about women's rights, LBGT rights, gun violence, climate change, education, healthcare, helping the unfortunate or anything else that might help people. They support the worst of us just to get their extra tax break, or destroy some regulation that prevents them from doing what they want.
Power and Greed is all that feeds them. And they will destroy anything that gets in their way, including the country.
OMGWTF
(3,991 posts)Lonestarblue
(10,157 posts)walkingman
(7,695 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,893 posts)people I know, (not the Uber Wealthy) and I have come to believe that their almost psychotic obsession with money, and making more money, is their greatest fear, and that is a fear of losing it......Most here, if they were to crash, would pick themselves up, dust themselves off, and get back into the game.
The Rich fear losing all their money, because they wouldn't have a clue how to recover, since most of them have only known a life of having everything they wanted and more.................AND there are a large group of them that were Trust Fund Kids and inherited their money.......they sure as hell didn't ever work a day in their lives.......
They all have extremely deep seated insecurities that are covered up by their wealth.............
Those who are anywhere near the top 1% are doing anything and everything, by hook or by crook, to get into that top 1%, while the getting is good.............
The Wizard
(12,556 posts)The phrase "In God We Trust" is on all the currency and none of the churches.
drmeow
(5,037 posts)Because our society worships money, and money doesn't make their home a health or fire hazard, it slips under the radar of typical hoarding behavior. But that doesn't stop it from being just as irrational and just a mentally problematic as any other hoarding habit.
Diamond_Dog
(32,174 posts)FHRRK
(524 posts)Learned a couple things over the past few months.
Went down to Fashion Island, a high end mall in Newport Beach, CA, wife had to return something. Anyway, rich people dress funny, $200 shirts, $200 jeans, designer tennis shoes, and they look like goofs. Lesson learned, dont hang around rich or rich wannabes.
Had to take a couple cross country flights, man the seats are tight, I am six foot two and my knees are into the back of the seat. First class, expensive and filled with rich goofs.
Lesson learned, drive whenever possible.
flying_wahini
(6,700 posts)Wonder Why
(3,336 posts)flying_wahini
(6,700 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,928 posts)and it's wonderful.
KPN
(15,677 posts)will be lookuing into it. Thanks for the tip PO.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,928 posts)that describes private rooms. https://www.amtrak.com/rooms?intcmp=wsp_promo-card_link_rooms_hpcard6
PatSeg
(47,750 posts)Whenever I watch British TV or movies with trains, I love the compartments in the older trains. They look so comfortable. What a pleasant way to travel.
KPN
(15,677 posts)edhopper
(33,663 posts)or sometimes for $100 or a little more, you can buy a seat with more legroom. Not anything like first class, but still better for a long flight.
Abnredleg
(671 posts)Costs less than First Class and has plenty of leg room.
Johnny2X2X
(19,271 posts)People who are rich and worked for it are cheap. Too many rich people to list who drive modest cars, live in modest homes, and wear off the rack suits. But new money and "fake money, they buy the $200 T-shirts, the $1200 shoes, and the Rolex watch.
I guess I dont get out enough. There were a lot of 25 to 35 year olds, dressed in the clothes, but some just looked bad.
Rolex watch is classic,
flying_wahini
(6,700 posts)Its time to claw it back for our country. Many Americans are hurting.
AllaN01Bear
(18,768 posts)Marcus IM
(2,275 posts)NanaCat
(1,514 posts)Belonging to the religion doesn't exempt them from being awful people.
former9thward
(32,145 posts)Biden, Senators, House members, I don't think any of them support that concept.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)
exempt church should be permitted to own a jet. Ok to have a couple of buses, but no aircraft. If the preacher wants a jet, he can buy it with his after tax income.
Mega churches have become tax dodges. I would support making them file public tax returns also - even if theyre tax exempt. People should be able to see how these organizations spend their money.
NanaCat
(1,514 posts)The property isn't held in the name of the clergy--including the planes and expensive cars. The church members don't give to the clergy--they give to the church. They write the checks in the church's name, not the clergy's. The credit card swipe gets paid to the church, not the clergy. The church pays him (almost always) a salary from those coffers.
The obscene amount of funds are in the church coffers, not the clergy's. You tax where the money is, and the church is responsible for any abuses that take place in regards to that money.
Tax the churches.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)
to prevent wealth accumulation by the church organizations to begin with. I should have added that such orgs should not be able to hold investment property as well.
Many churches do great works. I have no problem with encouraging that. It was the reason they were given tax exempt status. By accounting for the use of the money, we could keep a better handle on making sure the money is spent for good causes.
Open a food shelter? Great.
Develop a condo complex? Tax it.
Sponsor missions to 3rd world countries? OK.
Put your pastor up in a $4m house? Not so much.
NanaCat
(1,514 posts)I don't give one bloody fig if any of them are on board with the idea, because politicians have always been behind where the people are when it came to doing things that are long overdue. It wasn't politicians that came up with the 40-hour work week or paid vacation and sick leave or Social Security or civil rights. It was the people demanding all of it that got politicians to enact laws for them.
Just because they're not on board is no reason not to seek to change the status quo. If everyone thought we needed anyone's permission to change anything, we'd still be living in caves.
former9thward
(32,145 posts)There is no evidence the majority (or even a significant minority) of people are in favor of taxing churches.
TexasDem69
(1,887 posts)Though hes way smarter than to even propose such a thing.
If they engage in political activity, then they have violated their 501(c)(3) status, and they need to pay for that privilege like every other organization that does so.
Elessar Zappa
(14,135 posts)A big part of our get out the vote effort relies on networks of black churches.
NanaCat
(1,514 posts)That refuses to play by the same rules as everyone else.
One law and tax code for them. Another for the rest of us.
Got it.
TBF
(32,140 posts)and I totally agree with you - my husband and I are probably the generation behind you and about the same. Working hard, driving our older cars to get our kids through college, saving for retirement. We've flown first class exactly once in the past 20 years, and only because I had leftover miles from canceled pandemic trips so I was able to do an upgrade. Which isn't even all that impressive to the uber wealthy with their private jets.
But the other part of MAGA is the evangelicals, and Donald definitely has his pulse on them, even if he can't hold a bible right side up. He's got them convinced he will put in people they want - and he did it with the Supreme Court. They are a weird crowd to be sure, a lot of them don't have much money to speak of so you'd think they'd look at dem policies. But they are too worried about their guns and controlling women's bodies.
live love laugh
(13,212 posts)Of course you know that already.
yardwork
(61,784 posts)If we were all as content as you and your wife, everybody on earth could have a great life, sharing resources and living happily together. But no. The greedy ones have to spoil it.
edhopper
(33,663 posts)we are not a rational or generous species.
JudyM
(29,294 posts)Its interesting but not surprising how conservatism has evolved into such a horribly stingy political philosophy, with such a smooth transition to tea party and now caving in to magats.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,551 posts)The filthy rich feed the GOP, the GOP reward the filthy rich, the power of each grows and enables feeding the greed even more. We, collectively, have rewarded the worst with more power so they grab more power.
live love laugh
(13,212 posts)They are now salivating for a repeat because they doubled their absurd wealth.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,551 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,881 posts)They are addicted to wealth. And always chasing money.
Even when they have more money than they can ever spend.
It is like a hoarding addiction.
Yes like most addictions they will destroy everything and everyone who gets in the way
of their drug of choice, cash.
And yes money gives them power and they are addicted to that as well.
Their sickness is destroying humans and the planet.
SWBTATTReg
(22,205 posts)When does it (the hunt for yet more money) end?
It's a disease, and it's a sad one really. To have it all, and yet, still not have 'it'.
markodochartaigh
(1,175 posts)Greed can never be satisfied.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,116 posts)It's usually how they GOT so rich.
Tribetime
(4,721 posts)And because of medical pills he was never able to retire and died at eighty two doing uber. I also don't ever think I'll be able to retire.
LittleGirl
(8,292 posts)and I'm very sorry to hear about your Dad. That is not how most ND grads end up.
OldBaldy1701E
(5,203 posts)edhopper
(33,663 posts)and I understand that we are fortunate. Others retire with much less. If a couple has worked their whole lives they should get around $60K from Soc Sec. But some don't get that.
And the fact that what we have can be viewed as wealth (not disagreeing) shows you how obscene the billionaires' wealth is.
moonscape
(4,676 posts)about 1.8k/month. 4.9k/mo = maximum benefit for a single person retiring at 70 yo.
Couples have a better gig
a lot of people do not get full SS benefits. I think right now that is near $3K a month.
dpibel
(2,894 posts)So, $42,000 per couple.
A considerable range on that chart (e.g., for two retired workers, it's more like $45,800), but if you're in the high five-figures on SS alone, you're pretty high up on the bell curve.
We have pensions from union jobs also.
dpibel
(2,894 posts)Just to be clear.
Infinite accumulation of wealth is a disease. That should be cured.
mopinko
(70,361 posts)i dont understand why giving full to 1 spouse, but half to the other is considered fair. each shd get 75%.
and i dont get y a widow doesnt get the full bennie.
my rep has been screaming about this for a couple decades.
Abstractartist
(10 posts)You are absolutely correct. A simple way to address this aspect of our GOTV efforts
.
Simply put, if you are lower or middle class, under a trump dictatorship, your taxes are going up and up and up
Vote blue complete down ballot
state, local, federal. From President Biden down
Go Blue
twodogsbarking
(9,924 posts)No travel costs to work, clothes and not paying contribution to retirement. Have Medicare but pay more for insurance than ever.
Living costs low with low interest mortgage. Retirement good.
Bettie
(16,147 posts)sitting on their piles of gold, eternally angry that someone might get a coin or two.
GoneOffShore
(17,345 posts)moonscape
(4,676 posts)game of money to see it as a necessary commodity for the struggling. How many lives they could impact if only theyd open their hearts and wallets is heartbreaking.
Christopher Reeves talked about before his paralysis when hed show up at a benefit for those disabled as he was and how little actually penetrated. It took what happened to him he said to gain compassion that lasted outside the walls of a given institute..
TexasDem69
(1,887 posts)I think someone like Bill Gates, who is definitely mega rich. But what the cutoff? Seems like $100 million would qualify as mega rich, though even then is that cash in the bank or stock or what?
liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)I plan to work until I am 70.
I have 2 pensions that payout in lifetime annuities. That money, I can and plan on taking now, because every month I dont, is money that I dont get. It is not like I need to hold off on the withdrawal. Its a payment from now until my wife and I are in the ground.
Then I have 3 401K plans that make sense to sit on until I need them. Then my wife has a 401K as well plus some stock. We think that we will be comfortable, but not ready to retire.
I just want enough to live comfortably and do some travel.
Warpy
(111,445 posts)Which would be annoying and amusing if only they didn't also think that their ill gotten fortunes make them wiser than rhe rest of us. And they do. Anyone who tries to disabuse them of this notion is quickly shown the door, I've watched it happen.
Old money never mentions the subject of money. New money can talk of little else. Both think money confers godlike wisdom.
Evolve Dammit
(16,817 posts)Tom Yossarian Joad
(19,235 posts)GoodRaisin
(8,933 posts)if you sit a lot, like some of us.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I was stressed about retiring for many years, fearing poverty or having to work until I dropped (and leaving nothing for my partner). At least I really enjoyed my work.
We moved to a state with way lower cost of living and, while certainly not flush, we're comfortable with our Social Security and my modest pension. I'm so thankful I had a good union job until we retired. I don't think we could have done it, otherwise.
Mr.Bee
(188 posts)Accomplishment.
When you don't work, when you have no real challenges in life, you never have a feeling of accomplishing something.
It's hard to be satisfied with anything when it's not something you've accomplished though hard work.
You've felt it, I've felt it, it gives life meaning.
In the example of someone like Darn Old Trumpf, he has an office, he goes to 'work', but what sense of accomplishment does he really get sitting there not working with his hands, not getting his blood coursing?
And because of that, these types of people can never be satisfied.
Mr.Bee
(188 posts)When middle-class workers retire, we don't quit working, we find ways to keep busy. We get our accomplishment working in the flowerbed, cooking, painting, woodworking, building or doing little things we do ourselves, not getting someone to do it for us.
Accomplishment. Satisfaction.
Going to work for decades in the same job is a mind killer.
A person needs to develop hobbies to stop the mental decay, and something to build on when retired.
Money is just a tool.
Once you have enough, stop chasing it and enjoy life.
DFW
(54,505 posts)I started my job at age 23. I'll be 72 in a week, and I'm still at it. Call it mental decay if you want, but that would had to have set in very early. I'm still in a different country every day, speaking several languages every day despite my (apparent) mental decay. Today, I'll have to use German, Polish, English, Catalan, Spanish, Dutch and French, and it's just 1 PM here. I'm in Germany today, France tomorrow, Spain Wednesday, etc.
I don't think about chasing money. I think about fleeing boredom.
calimary
(81,594 posts)Accomplishment. Satisfaction. And for me, not having to get up at 3:30 or 4am to get to work in time to put together the 6am newscast. It was great for the ol' ego and it made for a nice series of resume credits but getting up that early EVERY DAY was HARD!!!
I like sleeping in.
NanaCat
(1,514 posts)I spent some part of my life, including the last 14 years, as a stay-at-home wife. I haven't ever thought of my housework as 'work,' but as daily life maintenance, like bathing or brushing my teeth. It's simply something I try to do as quickly and efficiently as possible so I can get to what interests me more. Which usually involves serving Her Royal Highness (the cat, of course), reading, or venting about politics online or playing stupid games on the computer. That's really the bulk of how I spend my time these days.
So I don't have accomplishments in the sense you mention, but I'm still happy with my life most of the time, despite my slacker lifestyle.
PatrickforB
(14,604 posts)I have always felt there is something freakish about people who work so feverishly to amass billions of dollars.
The more money they have, the more they seem to worry. The more money they have, the more selfish they seem to get.
There is just something wrong with that, on many different levels.
Enough is the ticket. More than that just gives cause for worry.
JHB
(37,166 posts)Not the Divine Right of Kings, but the Divine Right of Money.
And they will bankroll entire crusades to defeat the infidels who have other priorities.
bluestateboomer
(505 posts)My wife and I have a comfortable retirement thanks to our unions, virtually free public education, and the benefits of Social Security and Medicare. All of us, whatever the age, deserve the same.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)LiberalFighter
(51,327 posts)pwb
(11,311 posts)second thoughts about Mail order now.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,151 posts)I think it's strange that people in later years focus on controlling the lives on young people. not trying to making sure that future generations have clean water and air, but trying to block them from voting so that their civil rights are curtailed to fit the view of people who won't even be living in 20 years... I'm looking at you Koch Bros and McTurtle.
oldsoftie
(12,668 posts)Neither party is serious about it because they want to be reelected. So they talk about it and kick it down the rod. And here we are at 34 trillion and rising millions a minute.
Pres Obama had a comnisssiion empaneled to come up with solutions. They presented their findings and everyone ignored them.
And here we are.
Scrivener7
(51,084 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,928 posts)I live on about half of what you apparently do.
And I have a good life. Yeah, more money would be nice, but I get to do most of what I want to do.
c-rational
(2,600 posts)them first, and I mean that figuratively. We dems have always been the reasonable ones, and the opposition the snarling tyrants. The best way to crush them is at the ballot box and then full spead ahead with drastic reforms, in the face of the snarling and hyperventilating pearl clutching right wing opposition that suggests we will hurt their capitalisti system. No self doubt.
LoisB
(7,252 posts)RipVanWinkle
(237 posts)Oliver Goldsmith
Bluethroughu
(5,206 posts)Seinan Sensei
(372 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,257 posts)a 90% marginal tax rate on this country's highest earners.
But, we can't do that now because it would "kill the economy", or some such crap.
Roy Rolling
(6,943 posts)Is not having what you want, its wanting what youve got.
I think shes on to something. 😂
DFW
(54,505 posts)According to Beñat Le Cagot:
"....a man is happiest when there is a balance between his needs and his possessions. Now the question is: how to achieve this balance. One could seek to do this by increasing his goods to the level of his appetites, but that would be stupid..........Ergo? Ergo, the wise man achieves the balance by reducing his needs to the level of his possessions......"
tblue37
(65,538 posts)czarjak
(11,332 posts)F-U? Christ-like.
Goodheart
(5,352 posts)I'm not resentful, except that higher income people don't appreciate what it actually took to get them there. If they did, studies show that their likelihood of giving help to others would increase:
[link:https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218762252|
DFW
(54,505 posts)I know a guy in Dallas who is very smart and very lucky. I don't know his exact worth, but I think it is somewhere between $50 million and $100 million. He still works because, like me, he is terrified of boredom. He gives lots of it away precisely because he knows he'll never spend it all. He funds foundations for addicts, dance performance troupes, education, etc. He definitely appreciates his luck, and is fully aware that most people will never get the chance to do what he is doing. He pays all taxes due, but has plenty left over. He definitely does not sit on it just to count it on spare moments during weekends. He has no such spare moments. I doubt he is unique, but people like him seldom seek headlines--or mentions on sites like this one.
BlueTexasMan
(165 posts)We regulate monopolies to ensure fair competition, why not put an eye on excessive profit taking to bolster the working population? Make America Fair Again!
KPN
(15,677 posts)You've expressed my personal thoughts and experience perfectly!
Response to edhopper (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
William769
(55,150 posts)GP6971
(31,269 posts)edhopper
(33,663 posts)is between $50K and $99K. We live in NY so expenses are higher than most.
What donations we give is none of your business.
But thank for playing. Wonder if you will be around long enough to read this?
Response to edhopper (Reply #97)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Permanut
(5,706 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,181 posts)... if you ask him how he is. I never argue with him about it because he wants to retire and needs to sell his business to do so. He just says he did well until 3 years ago. Then he will launch into how he hates living in CA. He puts the most negative thoughts about it in your face. Mainly that it's "unaffordable" for retirement and full of Democrats.
It's an amazing balancing act he does because he is so sweet otherwise. He's addicted to right wing news outlets. He inherited that from his dad (different dads) along with the business. Says he voted for "SHitler" because of regulations. 12 years earlier he said he voted for Bush because of late term abortion!! I asked what if his wife needed one to live and he said she might sacrifice herself, even though she was raising 3 boys. He thinks he makes me feel better about the dangers of Climate Change by telling me some made up science he read about.
Last summer I told him I see where he gets his info from reading his Facebook posts. It was the only time I felt I held up a mirror. It was a painless way of saying we get totally different info. Saturday he suddenly ragged on NBC. I didn't ask why because there is real anger there and the wedge would only deepen. I love him and wish only the best for him. But he and so many others have been dragged from facts with highly paid for "altrrnative facts".
I will miss him when he moves to Arizona to retire.