Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:23 PM Feb 8

Jesus Christ here is another one, god dammit!!!

https://www.threads.net/@deanobeidallah/post/C3GlMunJwyv/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==


Why would Merrick Garland pick as special counsel to investigate Biden a diehard GOPer who Trump liked so much that he personally appointed him US Atty of Maryland in 2018?! That explains the BS in the report on Biden's memory. This was a political hit job!!
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jesus Christ here is another one, god dammit!!! (Original Post) Eliot Rosewater Feb 8 OP
Yes, it was claudette Feb 8 #1
A Pleasure To Be In Agreement, Ma'am The Magistrate Feb 8 #6
They really do. They're flooding the zone with their high-decibel hollering right now yliza Feb 9 #19
Yep. Hur is a devout Trump cultist dalton99a Feb 8 #2
That's just Merrick, bending over to be fair... dchill Feb 8 #3
Goddamn infuriating, why does Garland do this!!! Eliot Rosewater Feb 8 #4
It obvious to me that his purported "fairness..." dchill Feb 8 #5
I know, I just have to be careful how I say it. Eliot Rosewater Feb 8 #7
People who say they don't want to appear to be doing... dchill Feb 8 #9
So it isn't a matter of personal animus? limbicnuminousity Feb 9 #30
Uh, he's bending over to be fair. dchill Feb 9 #31
Well then Eliot gab13by13 Feb 8 #8
Maddening Eliot Rosewater Feb 8 #10
How quickly we forget when it is convenient for something to be forgotten. Beastly Boy Feb 9 #15
let me know the next time appointing a rethug so rethugs won't complain about something Takket Feb 8 #11
Thank you Eliot Rosewater Feb 8 #12
A red flag went up for me when McConnell voted to confirm Garland. jalan48 Feb 8 #13
A simple answer Beastly Boy Feb 8 #14
Yep. TwilightZone Feb 9 #17
Not Really, Sir The Magistrate Feb 9 #18
Trump had Bill Barr to redact anything he didn't like from doc03 Feb 9 #16
Let's not forget that Garland was approved for a Supreme Court... rubbersole Feb 9 #20
Obama originally picked Garland Sky Jewels Feb 9 #22
Understood, we can't say what we, never mind Eliot Rosewater Feb 9 #28
He moderated several of their events and was listed as an "expert" on their website. Sky Jewels Feb 9 #29
On MSNBC tonight this was compared to the remarks by James Comey. Rhiannon12866 Feb 9 #21
There's something very wrong with Garland. Irish_Dem Feb 9 #23
Indeed. He needs to go. triron Feb 9 #24
He hires a man who is partisan and unprofessional. Irish_Dem Feb 9 #25
Garland had no idea that his guy was a partisan hack and unprofessional? Irish_Dem Feb 9 #26
I've defended Garland before. The Unmitigated Gall Feb 9 #27

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
6. A Pleasure To Be In Agreement, Ma'am
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:30 PM
Feb 8

Too many among our leadership seem to think there really is some great scorer in the sky, who asks not did you win or lose, but how you play the game. There isn't, and down here nobody much cares either. Who wields power, and who does not, is all that matters.

yliza

(73 posts)
19. They really do. They're flooding the zone with their high-decibel hollering right now
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 01:56 AM
Feb 9

The colossal rake-stomp in Congress yesterday has been shoved out of the news cycle. Instead it’s dogpile on Biden, with no mention of how utterly inappropriate it was for Hur to make those remarks.

dchill

(38,527 posts)
3. That's just Merrick, bending over to be fair...
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:27 PM
Feb 8

...he just never found out that you're supposed to bend over backwards.

dchill

(38,527 posts)
5. It obvious to me that his purported "fairness..."
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:30 PM
Feb 8

...is heavily weighted by his Federalist leanings. Leanings are usually definably not upright.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
7. I know, I just have to be careful how I say it.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:31 PM
Feb 8

I do not understand why he is still in that position.

Not to mention that the ridiculous two year delay in appointing the special council will be why Trump skates on everything.

Or as Dean Obeidallah points out Cori Bush is investigated but Jim Jordan and others are not investigated for being 100% involved in an insurrection.

dchill

(38,527 posts)
9. People who say they don't want to appear to be doing...
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:37 PM
Feb 8

...things that are "too political" are busy making careers out of being political. That doesn't explain why he's still in that position, but it also DOES.

limbicnuminousity

(1,404 posts)
30. So it isn't a matter of personal animus?
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 07:54 PM
Feb 9

Garland is the kind of guy who would pick a name out of a hat? It's a genuine question, I don't know enough about Merrick Garland to have a feel for this. Why would he orchestrate a hitjob?

gab13by13

(21,398 posts)
8. Well then Eliot
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:36 PM
Feb 8

maybe I shouldn't tell you this but, the special counsel, Weiss, who indicted Hunter Biden, was also appointed a US Marshall by Trump.

Also, remember when Trump fired Comey? Magat Senator Mike Lee went to Trump and recommended that Trump replace Comey with, hmm, um, er, Merrick Garland.

Beastly Boy

(9,419 posts)
15. How quickly we forget when it is convenient for something to be forgotten.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 12:23 AM
Feb 9

Lee wanted Garland out of the DC Court of Appeals, for Trump to appoint a conservative judge there. Got nowhere with that.

Maddening!

Takket

(21,620 posts)
11. let me know the next time appointing a rethug so rethugs won't complain about something
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:39 PM
Feb 8

works out well for Democrats.

Beastly Boy

(9,419 posts)
14. A simple answer
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:55 PM
Feb 8

When a Republican exonerates Biden (the eventual outcome which I suspect Garland was expecting regardless of the SC's political affiliation), the SC's decision leaves no possibility of doubt, even among Biden's staunchest detractors. All they are left to drool over is a supposed SC's remark about Biden's age, which, upon elementary examination, turns out to not be the SC's remark about Biden's age.

TwilightZone

(25,476 posts)
17. Yep.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 12:32 AM
Feb 9

We've chosen to fixate on the petty nonsense tacked on to the report instead of the big picture, which is that a Republican SC not only did not find anything to charge but clearly detailed why President Biden was not charged and Trump was.

We're missing the forest for the moss growing under one rock.

The Magistrate

(95,255 posts)
18. Not Really, Sir
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 01:02 AM
Feb 9

He'll be just one more RINO Deep State operative whose disloyalty to MAGA is unmasked by refusal to charge the obviously guilty old crooked Joe with all the crimes he committed.

doc03

(35,363 posts)
16. Trump had Bill Barr to redact anything he didn't like from
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 12:29 AM
Feb 9

the Meuller report. We never found out for years what was redacted.

rubbersole

(6,723 posts)
20. Let's not forget that Garland was approved for a Supreme Court...
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 02:26 AM
Feb 9

..nomination by none other than that liberal stalwart Orrin Hatch. Obama asked his advice and took it. Mitch McTurtle screwed them both.

Sky Jewels

(7,135 posts)
22. Obama originally picked Garland
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 02:58 AM
Feb 9

because he thought he’d be palatable to the GQP.

Can’t really express my thoughts safely on these topics….

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
28. Understood, we can't say what we, never mind
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 06:48 PM
Feb 9

Isn’t there a federalist Society connection to Merrick Garland?

Irish_Dem

(47,347 posts)
25. He hires a man who is partisan and unprofessional.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 04:29 PM
Feb 9

A total slime ball.

And he didn't realize it until it was too late?

Something is very off here.

The Unmitigated Gall

(3,829 posts)
27. I've defended Garland before.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 05:13 PM
Feb 9

No more.
This is beyond the pale.
Just as the national media is coming around to considering Trump's obvious cognitive decline, out comes this POS.

AG Garland is now the second to allow unqualified, musing opinions to be released in what should be purely a factual document.

Unforgivable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jesus Christ here is anot...