General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSky Jewels
(7,281 posts)My favorite White House pet ever until Willow Biden (they're now tied). What a handsome boy!
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Ocelot II
(116,472 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)yardwork
(61,965 posts)NNadir
(33,634 posts)zuul
(14,632 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,876 posts)Danascot
(4,719 posts)johnp3907
(3,744 posts)Because they're so cute!
Historic NY
(37,494 posts)Goodheart
(5,372 posts)CatWoman
(79,310 posts)We have a winner!!!
KentuckyWoman
(6,708 posts)onenote
(43,160 posts)In federal court, prosecutors have no duty at all to present evidence helpful to the accused. And even if they were the socks case and the PRA arent exonerating to the charges brought against trump.
cojoel
(961 posts)Hardly a surprise...
onenote
(43,160 posts)And no discovery has taken place. So he hasnt violated anything.
yardwork
(61,965 posts)Trump could also rail about Patty Hearst and Jane Fonda. Neither exonerating nor relevant, like his little post.
marble falls
(58,546 posts)lastlib
(23,556 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 24, 2023, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)
I don't hear you! To my senses, you're just a low, dull, uninteresting gurgling noise.
(*FOOL -- Former Office-Occupying Liar.)
Maeve
(42,389 posts)As opposed to just laughing at the orange fool...
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/29/politics/fact-check-trump-presidential-records-act-talk/index.html
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/donald-trump-presidential-records-act-clintons-sock-drawer-defense-2023-06-09/
Short cut--he's as full of it as ever was
CatWoman
(79,310 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Maeve
(42,389 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,644 posts)calimary
(81,874 posts)Rhiannon12866
(208,822 posts)NowISeetheLight
(3,943 posts)Socks flushed the stuff down the litter box?
James48
(4,470 posts)And cant testify.
The Clintons had him euthanized so he couldnt tell any secrets.
I just told that to somebody on Facebook, and they believed me.
Jarqui
(10,150 posts)He's charged under the Espionage Act. Different laws
Doesn't matter what Clinton did. Has no bearing on what he did.
At issue is what Trump did relative to the laws Espionage Act.
It's a simple concept but obviously, it is beyond his ability to comprehend or be forthright about.
CaptainTruth
(6,665 posts)Did Clinton take boxes of classified socks & the DOJ said he could keep them or something?
It makes me think about Gilda Radner as Emily Litella on SNL channeling Trump:
What's all this fuss about classified socks? You can't classify socks, & I didn't take any socks. Why would I want classified socks, I have my own socks!
No Donald, not classified socks, it's classified docs, documents.
Never mind.