Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
This is priceless! From the Court's decision in TRUMP v. HILLARY CLINTON
It came out yesterday, 19 January 2023
US District Court, So. District of Florida
DONALD J. TRUMP Plaintiff, v. HILLARY R. CLINTON, et al., Defendants.
After waiting six years, in a suit filed in March of 2022, Trump alleged that Hillary Clinton and others had orchestrated “a malicious conspiracy” to spread false information that his campaign had colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential race. The one he claimed he "won" that was actually given to him by legal default.
So how'd that turn out...?
U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, in a searing 46-page judgment wrote Trump is a “prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries.”
That's our boy!
Let's start with Page ONE of the Court's decision:
"This case should never have been brought. Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start. No reasonable lawyer would have filed it. Intended for a political purpose, none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim. Thirty-one individuals and entities were needlessly harmed in order to dishonestly advance a political narrative. A continuing pattern of misuse of the courts by Mr. Trump and his lawyers undermines the rule of law, portrays judges as partisans, and diverts resources from those who have suffered actual legal harm. - Case 2:22-cv-14102-DMM, Page 1.
Whoa!!! And that's just the opening paragraph! It can only get worse and it does - here:
"...we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose. Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer. He knew full well the impact of his actions. As such, I find that sanctions should be imposed upon Mr. Trump and his lead counsel, Ms. Habba." - Case 2:22-cv-14102-DMM, Page 6.
BOOM! Trump and his parking lot real estate lawyer, Alina Habba, have been fined almost $1 million by the judge!
More deliciousness from the dish-best-served-cold; the Judge:
"The deliberate use of a shotgun pleading is an abusive litigation tactic which amounts to obstruction of justice. This case involved three categories of shotgun pleadings condemned by the Eleventh Circuit. ...I find that the pleadings here were abusive litigation tactics. The Complaint and Amended Complaint were drafted to advance a political narrative; not to address legal harm caused by any Defendant.
The 819 paragraphs of the 186-page Amended Complaint are filled with immaterial, conclusory facts not connected to any particular cause of action." - Case 2:22-cv-14102-DMM, pages 6-7.
In their Amended Complaint, Trump and Habba cited a letter from the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliff, to Senator Lindsey Graham as evidence of a false collusion:
"Ratcliff’s letter stated that Clinton and her campaign conceived the false Russia collision [sic] story to protect Clinton’s presidential bid, which was at the time, in trouble because of revelations about her illegally using a private email server to handle classified information. Ratcliff confirmed in the letter that Obama, Comey and Strzok knew about it. - Case 2:22-cv-14102-DMM, page 8.
And the Coup de Grace! You read the Judge's personal footnote on that:
"This provocative allegation stirred my curiosity, so I looked up the Ratcliff letter. The allegation in the Amended Complaint fails to mention that the information came from a Russian intelligence analysis and that Mr. Ratcliffe commented:
The (intelligence community) does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.” - Letter from John Ratcliff, to Sen. Lindsey Graham, Sept. 29, 2020, almost four years after the election."
NB: In 2016 when this 'conspiracy' allegedly took place, Ratcliff was not Director of National Intelligence, he was a not-so-great member of Congress and Reich-wing toady.
"Mr. Trump’s lawyers saw no professional impediment or irony in relying upon Russian intelligence as the good faith basis for their allegation.
Trump used RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE to back his claim and attack U.S. citizens. That's balls of solid brass. No wonder the Judge was pissed.
Read it all here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.302.0.pdf
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
That is why. And, this has worked regardless of whether or not he actually has the money he says he does. This is just how in awe we are of those who have a lot of the green god.
That's our boy!.....Grins...
He's so clueless, he just might. 
I can't wait until Chump starts suing his own lawyers for malpractice.
Is part of the deep state!
/s, if it’s needed!!!
But it’s a delicious read, throughout! Both the writing AND what the writing’s about. Absolutely yummy!
