General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSolly Mack
(90,799 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,755 posts)Add it to the list of the other GOP crimes against Americans.
PufPuf23
(8,849 posts)dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)2naSalit
(86,904 posts)And probably one of the primary reasons RWNJs wanted us out of the UN.
burrowowl
(17,655 posts)Has never signed the human rights treaty of which Eleanor Roosevelt was the principal drafter.
onecaliberal
(32,981 posts)spanone
(135,921 posts)SpankMe
(2,972 posts)And if there's any doubt that forced pregnancy isn't a part of the Republican plan, please see this current DU post regarding Alito's use of the concept of "domestic supply of infants" here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216670300.
From Trump's first day in office, I wondered how bad it would get. I never dreamed we'd get to this point. And I feel it will get worse.
erronis
(15,450 posts)rlegro
(338 posts)Because in phase one the controllers of forced pregnancy can favor the "production" of children among whites. Then when the white population is thoroughly in authoritarian control of society, they can breed minorities to any number for free labor, first being sure to remove their rights as citizens. Yup, it's the retro-slavery bunch. Remember how apologists for slavery isometimes still insist that, hey, slavery was good for them black folk, who were happy as slaves! And that is akin to the slippery idea that if a man is raping her, a woman should lay back and enjoy it. Sure-e-e-e-e.
housecat
(3,121 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,465 posts)dweller
(23,694 posts)stage left
(2,967 posts)For the brutal truth
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)into a banana republic and she scoffed at me. Watching the Handmades Tale I told my wife about a scene in an early episode when the main character has a flash-back to a time when society hadnt yet collapsed and completely subjugated women. She was remembering a time when her husband had to sign off and grant his permission for his wife to get her birth control pills and she looked at me like I was crazy. Looks at whats happening now.
FakeNoose
(32,866 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,706 posts)progressoid
(50,011 posts)This reinforces their hatred.
alwaysinasnit
(5,078 posts)Good egg
(27 posts)This is a statute of what document? A U.N document? More specific documentation, please.
dweller
(23,694 posts)✌🏻
RaDaR63
(89 posts)According to paragraph f of Article 7(2) of the ICC statute forced pregnancy means unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant with the intent of affecting ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. However this definition does not in any way affect national laws relating to pregnancy.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/f/forced-pregnancy/
Just so everyone knows what is being discussed. Posting without comment leaves everyone else guessing, assuming, or looking it up themselves. I don't know if this is suppose to be about Ukraine or SCOTUS.
dweller
(23,694 posts)This concerned the United Nations definitions of crimes against humanity, not the ICC, and I posted the link to the official document (post #14 above)
As for posting without comment, I follow the advice Ive read that he without womb, ovaries, Fallopian tubes or vagina, should just shut the fuck up
Since Im a male, when posting about abortion, I post without comment
✌🏻
RaDaR63
(89 posts)I had before I posted my reply.
The 1998 Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) is the document that reflects the latest consensus among the international community on this matter. It is also the treaty that offers the most extensive list of specific acts that may constitute the crime.
dweller
(23,694 posts)and what I posted in the OP (in jpg form) contains the text from the UN Definitions of Crimes Against Humanity provided in the link in post #14
✌🏻
RaDaR63
(89 posts)Providing a link doesnt equal comment, imho.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,673 posts)niyad
(113,788 posts)SunSeeker
(51,789 posts)Emile
(23,123 posts)Tanuki
(14,928 posts)..."What is it about the United Nations that sends the GOP into such a tizzy? That diplomats are encouraged to speak French? The United Nations intentions are the best, yet Republicans always assume the worst. They weep for the improbable horrors that could be but shed very few tears for the hardships in the here and now, such those suffered by the 1 billion disabled people worldwide who struggle with patchwork laws and official neglect. As comedian Jon Stewart noted, Republicans hate the United Nations more than they like helping people in wheelchairs.
The Republicans unreconstructed paranoia about an organization dedicated to global cooperation isnt new (remember Ron Paul warning of those black helicopters?). No, now its just been mainstreamed in the GOPs circulatory system, another example of the partys increasingly delusional, and ossified, worldview.
....
The 2012 Republican Party platform, for instance, declares that the GOP shall reject agreements whose long-range impact on the American family is ominous or unclear. Treaties singled out include the U.N. Convention on Womens Rights (clearly a dangerously lesbian document); the Convention on the Rights of the Child (a ploy to snatch American children away from their parents); the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (no doubt a prelude to full-scale gun confiscation); basically anything from the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development (tree-hugging); and the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (dastardly intentions detailed above).
Then there was last Julys Law of the Sea Treaty, which would have helped the United States expand our energy resources and secure our ships freedom of navigation. For those reasons, business leaders and environmentalists, former presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, and even military leaders and former Republican secretaries of state were all on board. But the U.N. bogeyman reared its blue-helmeted head, and the treaty went down to a watery grave.
Taking the crazy cake, though, is the right-wing hysteria over an obscure, nonbinding U.N. resolution known as Agenda 21 ,which suggests that communities adopt sustainable, smart-growth development plans. To Ted Cruz, the tea partys newly elected Senate darling, Agenda 21 is the grand scheme of George Soros to seize American property and abolish golf courses, grazing pastures, and paved roads. This is, as one New Hampshire state senator noted, real tinfoil hat material, and the same could be said for much of the current Republican orthodoxy. In todays GOP, the fevered fringe has gone mainstream."...(more)
malaise
(269,263 posts)Rec