Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SWBTATTReg

(22,166 posts)
6. Ouch! A subtle dig at Mr. Greenwald...he doesn't really help his case, eh, by unsubstantiated
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 06:20 PM
Oct 2020

attacks. My humble opinion is that those in the know will read these words by the editors of The Intercept written about Mr. Greenwald, and thus question any relationship that they may initiate w/ Mr. Greenwald, or at the very least, be very cautious in any dealings w/ such a person.

themaguffin

(3,826 posts)
2. Glenn is a fucking asshole.I don't read the Intercept, so I don't care, but I
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 05:36 PM
Oct 2020

follow him, Matt Taibbi and few others on Twitter to keep tabs on their agenda.

Any time I call them out, I get replies from trumpers.

Yes, trumpers LOVE them. Why? Because both spent the last 4 years dismissing anything about trump and going further to mock those in media who bring it up (or Democrats), and then now, with no irony, or scrutiny, treat the Rudy pushed story.

Seriously, fuck them

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
3. The Intercept just became a significantly better publication ... addition by subtraction you might
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 05:43 PM
Oct 2020

say.

I actually find it to be pretty decent publication, aside from the jokers like Greenwald and (much to my chagrin given his work at RS) Taibbi.

I don't seek to only read things that take the side of the story that I prefer, I like unvarnished facts and knowledge. There's definitely been cases where I got that from the Intercept.

For the same basic reason I'm pretty much neutral on Michael Moore and Bill Maher.

Flame away

 

Earthshine2

(4,044 posts)
7. No flames here ...
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 06:27 PM
Oct 2020
a significantly better publication ... addition by subtraction

Yes.

pretty decent publication, aside from the jokers like Greenwald and (much to my chagrin given his work at RS) Taibbi.

Yes, yes, and yes.

unvarnished facts and knowledge. There's definitely been cases where I got that from the Intercept.

Yes.

For the same basic reason I'm pretty much neutral on Michael Moore and Bill Maher.

Yes and yes.

Flame away

No.
 

Earthshine2

(4,044 posts)
9. I used to like Greenwald, so I dislike disliking him now. But, he never seems to be on my side.
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 06:34 PM
Oct 2020

I think his previous journalistic successes went to his head.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
11. I think he's calculated he gets more attention doing what he's doing now, makes him stand out more
Thu Oct 29, 2020, 06:40 PM
Oct 2020

Becoming all about the money and fame is what I'd guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The editor of the interce...