General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney Senior Advisor Don Senor Undermined U.S. Security Interests Today
It happened during an interview with Andrea Mitchell while he was trying to distinguish Mitt Romney's policy regarding Iran's nuclear program from President Obama's. That was not an easy task because both policies are identical. After making some standard hawkish noises, Senor quickly scurried back toward the center under Mitchell's questioning to deny that Mitt Romney has advocated for any military action against Iran. No, Romney simply believes that a threat of possible U.S. military action against Iran must be credible to give diplomacy a chance to work.
What Senor said next after Andrea Mitchell pointed out that President Obama has left the option of military action on the table was interesting to say the least:
"They say it is on the table, no one believes that. Yes they say it's on the table but no one believes it is on the table. We're not saying the military option should be used but we are saying that the threat of military action should be credible so it focuses the Iranian leadership on reaching some diplomatic solution..."
There is more but that pretty much sums up the salient point. All parties seemingly agree that a credible threat of possible U.S. military action against Iran is a critical component of any effort to pursue a diplomatic alternative to war. All parties understand that Barack Obama will be President of the United States at least until next January and quite possibly until January 2017. Obama is our Commander in Chief. If the U.S. decides to attack Iran more than likely Barack Obama will be issuing the order. If Iran takes the potential of U.S. military action against it seriously it will be because they take the words of Barack Obama seriously when he says that the military option is on the table.
Clearly Mitt Romney's Senior Advisor doesn't take those words seriously. And by casting dispersion on the words of the United States President he directly undermines the credibility of possible U.S. military action against Iran should that nation persist in seeking the ability to produce nuclear weapons.
Here's the link to the video of Senor's interview. The portion directly quoted begins at about the 5:55 marker.
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/mitchell-reports/49166564#49166564
niyad
(113,966 posts)Cha
(298,078 posts)carrier.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)niyad
(113,966 posts)speedoo
(11,229 posts)He lied to he American people when he was the spokesman for BUsh/Cheney/Rice in Iraq and he's lying
now. He is incapable of speaking the truth.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis. He was at the center of the actions that produced that. The fact that he's even near a Presidential campaign should be cause for universal outrage. He should be in prison. It's bad enough that he's a liar; he's also remarkably stupid and blinded by ideology. A deeply foolish, dangerous person.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Interfering in our foreign policy. Despicable!!
M_M
(163 posts)of Scooter Libby.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,919 posts)tanyev
(42,677 posts)Or managing a convenience store.
MinM
(2,650 posts)Different day, same old sh*t from our spooky middle-eastern "expert" from Canada.
MinM
(2,650 posts)Dan Senor seems to be right out of central-casting, for the weasel-like State Department tool, in Oliver Stone's Salvador.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3693058&mesg_id=3693827