General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren claims Trump is 'flirting with treason' and that Republicans are 'a party to it'
Stephen Proctor
Thu, September 24, 2020, 11:29 PM PDT
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/elizabeth-warren-claims-trump-flirting-treason-republicans-party-to-it-062906915.html
...
When Donald Trump says that he is not necessarily going to accept the will of the voters, hes flirting with treason, Warren said in response. Hes saying, peaceful transition of power doesnt matter to him. All that matters to him, once again, is Donald Trump and whatever Donald Trump wants.
Trump and Senate Republicans are making a hard push to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Trump has spoken openly about his desire for the Supreme Court to decide the election. If his nominee is appointed, there will be a 6-3 conservative majority on the court. Trump has been spreading unfounded conspiracies about mail-in voting fraud, something that even his own hand-picked FBI director, Christopher Wray, has said is not happening on a national scale. Some believe Trump is doing this to sow doubt about the results of the election before a single vote is even tallied, giving him an excuse to take the election to the Supreme Court. Republican senators have recently joined Trump in prematurely talking about the Supreme Court deciding the election.
These Republicans senators, to enable him in that, to support him in that, and to start to talk about the Nov. 3 election as if this isnt about voters getting their choice, but its about Supreme Court justices getting their choice, Warren said, means that they are a party to it.
...
Lindsey Graham has simply said, Donald Trump has my proxy on this. Senate doesnt need to look at it. If the presidents good, Lindsey Graham is good. Man, theres a man with a spine, Warren quipped, a spine kept in a box somewhere else, because he certainly doesnt have it to exercise for himself....
MORE AT LINK
--------------------
We need to hear this everyday and have these sentiments echoed by mainstream editorials etc.
mzmolly
(50,984 posts)spot on!
blm
(113,037 posts)Warren......knows how to punch.
andym
(5,443 posts)liberalla
(9,234 posts)Cha
(297,029 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)He's having sex with it.
LuckyCharms
(17,424 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,262 posts)but I think your statement is better.
ihas2stinkyfeet
(1,400 posts)calimary
(81,179 posts)Probably more like raping it than merely having sex with it.
Sure feels that way today...
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)WVreaper
(620 posts)tanyev
(42,540 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,949 posts)... "flirting"? I think they've gone all the way.
blm
(113,037 posts)Yavin4
(35,427 posts)marieo1
(1,402 posts)Elizabeth Warren, I hope and pray you keep fighting for all of us. Thieves and culprits have infiltrated the republican party. You are our voice, please keep fighting for us. Thank You for your voice..........we need you!!
not_the_one
(2,227 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,101 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,115 posts)Sen Warren has a way with words, she sees things that are on the edge of consciousness for the rest of us and then verbalizes them.
speaknow
(321 posts)About time. When are the Dems going to go for
the throat? Try this one. If we take the Senate and
the WH, we can abolish the Supreme Court and
start a new. Or we'll pass new ACA and Roe v Wade.
Tell those boot lickers they are wasting there time, then
ask that POS has he called for the moving trucks yet?
bucolic_frolic
(43,115 posts)Because, isn't that what they're doing? The Court is basically ignoring the Bill of Rights here and there.
There have been trial balloons about redoing a background check on Kavanaugh and comparing to his Senate testimony.
Why not embrace the McConnell Rule in January and recall the Barrett confirmation because the rule was misapplied? I mean we're going to have to be creative, see loopholes in the Constitution the way Mitch did. If Mitch can ignore nominations at his pleasure, why can't we blend timelines from one Congress to another? I mean everything's up for grabs now, isn't it?
And it wouldn't surprise me to see Thomas retire before Thanksgiving. They are that devious.
calimary
(81,179 posts)andym
(5,443 posts)to abolish the SC, and I don't think anybody is seriously suggesting anything like that. Changing the number of justices however is possible. If the ACA and Roe v Wade are found unconstitutional they cannot easily be re-enshrined via legislation. Perhaps a better ACA that works differently can be passed as legislation (no mandate, but an explicit tax), but depending on how Roe v Wade is dismantled, it might not be possible to create constitutional legislation to reinstate abortion rights, only an amendment would be possible, or of course changing the composition of the court to subsequently overrule the Trump court decision.