General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy are republican justices at RBGs memorial?
Why are they talking about her legacy? They cant wait to go back to work and undo her entire lifes work. Talking about how she faced discrimination in law school is such hypocrisy. I just cant with these people. The media doesnt have enough brains to memorialize her without soiling the entire thing, I feel sick.
Here is what Justice Ginsburg said just before she passed away: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."
The people who supposedly love and respect her, would respect her final
Wishes. Full stop!
bluestarone
(16,917 posts)They make statements about how great a lady she was. THEN now they want to install a person of the complete OPPOSITE? Give me a fucking break!
jimfields33
(15,786 posts)Even if I wasnt besties. Its the right thing to do. The liberal justices were all at scalias funeral. Just something people do.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)- remember BOTH sides think they are correct on their stances
Amishman
(5,556 posts)and they worked together and agreed on many issues. Not every case is 5-4, they agreed as often as they disagreed.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)It is morally and ethically bankrupt. Its a ducking show to these people. So no.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)but one's ideological opponent can still voice praise of the other at a memorial and to me is a sign of respect. If Scalia was alive today, he probably would offer some deep emotional testimony on the goodness of Ginsberg from firsthand knowledge.. Thats is respect
RazzleCat
(732 posts)it is a sign of respect. You can disagree with others yet respect them, as everyone else has said. What I am going to add is that not all Republicans are Trump Republicans, many are people who hold different views, but not Trumps, think of the republicans who created the Lincoln Project. Do I disagree with many of their political opinions, yes I do, but they also see Trump as an aberration, a danger to our country. You can be conservative and not a horrible person. Just a person I disagree with.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Get.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Surely we want justices that will undo the life's work of some republicans, like Citizens United.
Response to beachbumbob (Reply #2)
Amishman This message was self-deleted by its author.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)granddaughter will be there to seriously kick him in the nads!
2naSalit
(86,572 posts)And breaks his wretched neck.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)I would love that
2naSalit
(86,572 posts)a bout of spontaneous combustion!
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)We need to start looking at Repukes as RBG did.
The Ginsburg-Scalia Act Was Not a Farce
There is a lot for us to learn, not just from their friendship, but from their intellectual combat.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opinion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-antonin-scalia.amp.html
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)was not necessarily a political person. Her decisions were based on her interpretation of the law, they just happened to often become political issues. She believed in equality, which shouldn't be a political point of view. It is a human point of view.
JI7
(89,247 posts)PatSeg
(47,418 posts)before the law. She was a jurist first and foremost.
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Rice4VP
(1,235 posts)I wouldnt expect Obama to do McConnell or Trumps eulogies
DavidDvorkin
(19,473 posts)RBG herself gave a eulogy at Scalia's funeral. They were good friends. I think they actually dated briefly in college.
Polly Hennessey
(6,794 posts)lightening bolt strikes him.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)Response to onecaliberal (Original post)
Democracy2020 This message was self-deleted by its author.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)You become close, even with those you don't agree with. You know their families and what is important to them. I also believe that at this judicial level it is possible to respect someone as a brilliant jurist without agreeing with their interpretation of the law. If only the country could be like this right now.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Here is what Justice Ginsburg said just before she passed away: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)Your anger is misdirected.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Theyre also going to install dump to the presidency even though he is going to lose in a tidal wave.
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)and your anger is misdirected. They are mourning a friend and colleague - and I am confident Ginsburg would have wanted them there.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)We have dismissed Republican actions straight to authoritarianism.
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)Which has been my point. You are directing your anger at people who are grieving, going so far as to suggest that they have no right to grieve becuase they are about to install a puppet, when they have no power to do what you suggest they are about to do.
As I said in the beginning - your anger is misdirected.
In It to Win It
(8,243 posts)They don't let their work, political opinions or legal philosophies get it the way of their personal opinions of each others. They all seem to genuinely enjoy working together.
brooklynite
(94,510 posts)Are you saying that the media should choose not to show parts of the memorial service?
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Interjecting how trump is going to announce her replacement on Saturday.
sl8
(13,749 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)We have lost that. I did the eulogy for my friend who was the President of the Campus Republicans when I was President of the Campus Democrats. He and I disagreed about almost every policy, but we respected each other, yes that is possible. When he died a couple of years ago his wife called me and asked me to do this for him and I said of course.
I think they both Justice Ginsburg and Justice Scalia respected each others minds. They also shared a great love of the opera. I know it doesn't seem so right now, but it is possible to be civil and disagree.
cry baby
(6,682 posts)Thats just who she seemed to be.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)into a bedroom, closed and barred the door, pushed her on to a bed, and tried to rape her.
"YoU cAn ReSpEcT yOuR oPpOnEnTs derp derp derp."
treestar
(82,383 posts)One could disrespect Kavanaugh for those actions. But one who did not have those actions in their history, but similar views, could be respected.
nolabear
(41,960 posts)I know it seems odd in these currently insane times but they should be above the partisan madness.
Polybius
(15,390 posts)It was Antonin Scalia. This shows me that she was well-liked and got along with everybody. They have every right to be there, they knew her well.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Lifes work. Screw that bullshit.
Polybius
(15,390 posts)That doesn't mean they didn't respect and love her.
Imagine if a Republican said in 2016 about RGB and the other liberals at Scalia's funeral: "They knew him well and loved him so much now excuse me while they go undo his entire legacy and lifes work. Screw that bullshit."
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Polybius
(15,390 posts)Everyone is disagreeing with you. Hypocrisy is a bad thing to openly be proud of. You cant have one standard for Scalias funeral and another for RBGs.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)I guess we should just forgive everything going on because dump says he loves America too./
Polybius
(15,390 posts)They have every right to be there RGB loved Scalia the person. Was she disrespecting him by going against his legacy? Can't have your cake and eat it too. They had every right to be there.
onecaliberal
(32,831 posts)Im not sorry. Im out of fucks to give. These people support stripping every law that has helped the least of us progress in this country for the last 75 years. You can pretend these people are respectable all youd like, but I Will NOT.
Polybius
(15,390 posts)You were saying that by the conservative Justices going to her funeral, they were disrespecting her because they vote differently than her. Preposterous nonsense. In their mind they think we are activists for deciding abortion and gay marriage are protected, suddenly after two centuries. I don't agree with them on that at all, but that's how they believe the court works. We believe differently. They can be BFF's, and they were.
onenote
(42,700 posts)Xolodno
(6,390 posts)...you can disagree, but still be good friends with each other. A professional courtesy, where you can acknowledge you were on the right or wrong side, without major repercussions.
Moscow Mitch is trying to eliminate that. He's politicizing an institution that was set up to be void of politics as much as possible.
hardluck
(638 posts)OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)uriel1972
(4,261 posts)out of respect, perhaps some are there because it gors with job and perhaps some were there to gloat.
I would have been surprised if they hadn't turned up. Not that I have much time for those who have wrought such harm to so many.