General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumspeople focus on abortion but Amy Coney Barrett will be nightmare for all but those who long for 50s
health care, workers rights, civil rights, environment
------------------------------------------
Amy Coney Barrett fought to undermine health care for millions in her attack on the Affordable Care Act, and publicly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts for his decision to uphold the law. She also fought efforts to ensure that all women have access to contraceptives. Barrett has been critical of Roe v. Wade, stating that the framework of Roe essentially permitted abortion on demand.
As a judge, Barrett sided against an African American worker who had been transferred to another store because of a companys policy of segregating their employees, finding that the companys separate-but-equal arrangement is permissible. She also joined a ruling siding against the Army Corps of Engineers efforts to protect wetlands in Illinois under the Clean Water Act, and has ruled to dismiss claims by workers who were denied access to justice to uphold workers denial of benefits.
She also would have ignored the First Step Acts lower mandatory minimum sentences in the case of Hector Uriarte, who had been unlawfully sentenced before the Act passed and was now being re-sentenced. The judges argued that the mere existence of a previous sentenceeven one vacated due to legal errormeant the First Step Act should not apply. This interpretation would have resulted in a mandatory additional 25 years imprisonment for Uriarte.
Like other Trump nominees, she has shown an inclination to rule in favor of the rights of the wealthy and powerful over the rights of all. The Alliance for Justice strongly opposes the consideration of Barrett for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://www.afj.org/nominee/amy-coney-barrett/
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)mindem
(1,580 posts)Somehow, only Democrats supposedly place activist judges.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)might as well pack it in. Steerage here we come.
But, yeah, we'll add more justices, cough cough, sure.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)Count on it and plan accordingly.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Will have to fall back on influencing them to do the right thing.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)It will be business as usual, there WON'T be any changes to the Filibuster or the Supreme Court.
But the subjects make for lively discussion and a rallying of the troops for the moment.
I plan to spend as little money in the U.S. going forward. If I travel in 2021, I plan to go outside the U.S.
Raven123
(4,829 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)to either self abort or find a quack. I read where many women after a unsanitized abortion bled to death, partly because of no insurance. The gawd fearing fake Christians feel no pain.
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)let them sit their in their robes thinking their backwards ignorant thoughts. Americans aren't going backwards with them.
mvd
(65,173 posts)This makes me sick. We absolutely need to proceed like there are no rules now. I know my disruption idea likely wont be done, but we do need to expand the Court and get rid of the filibuster. I prefer to keep the filibuster, but it is outdated in these political times anyway.
Feel awful about the whole thing.