Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demovictory9

(32,449 posts)
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 02:38 PM Sep 2020

people focus on abortion but Amy Coney Barrett will be nightmare for all but those who long for 50s

health care, workers rights, civil rights, environment



------------------------------------------

Amy Coney Barrett fought to undermine health care for millions in her attack on the Affordable Care Act, and publicly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts for his decision to uphold the law. She also fought efforts to ensure that all women have access to contraceptives. Barrett has been critical of Roe v. Wade, stating that the framework of Roe essentially permitted abortion on demand.

As a judge, Barrett sided against an African American worker who had been transferred to another store because of a company’s policy of segregating their employees, finding that the company’s “separate-but-equal arrangement is permissible.” She also joined a ruling siding against the Army Corps of Engineers’ efforts to protect wetlands in Illinois under the Clean Water Act, and has ruled to dismiss claims by workers who were denied access to justice to uphold workers’ denial of benefits.

She also would have ignored the First Step Act’s lower mandatory minimum sentences in the case of Hector Uriarte, who had been unlawfully sentenced before the Act passed and was now being re-sentenced. The judges argued that the mere existence of a previous sentence—even one vacated due to legal error—meant the First Step Act should not apply. This interpretation would have resulted in a mandatory additional 25 years’ imprisonment for Uriarte.

Like other Trump nominees, she has shown an inclination to rule in favor of the rights of the wealthy and powerful over the rights of all. The Alliance for Justice strongly opposes the consideration of Barrett for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.

https://www.afj.org/nominee/amy-coney-barrett/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
3. omfg If we don't fight like we've never fought before, women and minorities
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 02:59 PM
Sep 2020

might as well pack it in. Steerage here we come.

But, yeah, we'll add more justices, cough cough, sure.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
7. Not gonna happen. The power structure isn't interested in rocking the boat.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:15 PM
Sep 2020

Count on it and plan accordingly.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
9. I'm not young enough or wealthy enough to move out of the country.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:29 PM
Sep 2020

Will have to fall back on influencing them to do the right thing.

sfstaxprep

(9,998 posts)
10. I Completely Agree
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:39 PM
Sep 2020

It will be business as usual, there WON'T be any changes to the Filibuster or the Supreme Court.

But the subjects make for lively discussion and a rallying of the troops for the moment.

I plan to spend as little money in the U.S. going forward. If I travel in 2021, I plan to go outside the U.S.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
6. Unfortunately there will be many women with no alternative but
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:04 PM
Sep 2020

to either self abort or find a quack. I read where many women after a unsanitized abortion bled to death, partly because of no insurance. The gawd fearing fake Christians feel no pain.


Demovictory9

(32,449 posts)
11. let the SCOTUS be the body of insane backwards dinosaurs. Concentrate on WH, Senate, House & blue
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:53 PM
Sep 2020

let them sit their in their robes thinking their backwards ignorant thoughts. Americans aren't going backwards with them.

mvd

(65,173 posts)
12. She sounds like she'd be worse than Scalia, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 03:54 PM
Sep 2020

This makes me sick. We absolutely need to proceed like there are no rules now. I know my disruption idea likely won’t be done, but we do need to expand the Court and get rid of the filibuster. I prefer to keep the filibuster, but it is outdated in these political times anyway.

Feel awful about the whole thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»people focus on abortion ...