General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF... Trump Says Confederate General Robert E. Lee 'Would Have Won Except for Gettysburg'
Link to tweet
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-says-confederate-general-robert-e-lee-would-have-won-except-gettysburg-1532765
President Trump has resisted calls by protesters against racism in the U.S. to get rid of vestiges of the Confederacy. He has said that his administration would not allow military installations that bear the names of Confederate leaders to be rechristened. At a July press conference, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the bases "are not known for the generals they are named after, the bases are known for the heroes that served at them." Trump also signed an executive order which would send protestors who deface historical monuments to jail for ten years.
"Robert E. Lee, whether you like him or not, he won many battles in a row," Trump said Friday. "He would have won except for Gettysburg."
Trump said U.S. protesters "have no idea what they're ripping down. They're ripping down in many cases greatness. They're ripping down our past. They're ripping down our history. That's where these guys begin. They take away your history."
Yea, nothing like a CURRENT US President celebrating a treasonous 19th century general who deliberately gave up his opportunity to lead the Union Army to lead the Confederate one!
And he does this in MINNESOTA ... about as Union territory as it gets (admitted 1858 to the union, I checked lol )
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,571 posts)Custer would have won except for Little Big Horn.
Charles VI would have won except for Agincourt.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Pandering to the racists once more via the Confederate crap.
unblock
(52,112 posts)He was already in retreat by Waterloo. That was merely when he got captured, but he was already lost by then.
Reaching Gettysburg was lee's high water mark. For Napoleon that was reaching Moscow.
Lee's Waterloo would be the siege of Petersburg or the surrender at Appomattox court House
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)still_one
(92,058 posts)liberaltrucker
(9,129 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,429 posts)The South couldn't continue. They would have surrendered anyway. They ran out of money, out of raw materials, and were running out of soldiers. They did NOT have a manufacturing base to keep in the business of waging war. Their secession was ill-advised from the start. Lincoln drove a stake through the heart of "foreign assistance" to the South by France and England by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. That killed the South's war effort.
PJMcK
(21,988 posts)The continuing celebration of the Confederacy by some, mostly Southerners, has always baffled me.
They were traitors. They were losers. The Confederacy was poorly thought-out as the could never sustain a war effort, mainly for the reasons you point out.
The idea that "the South shall rise again" is totally bogus, offensive and frankly, stupid since the Southern States cannot sustain themselves-- even today!-- without the Federal assistance provided by primarily Northern States. And if they did rise again, would they try to secede again? The phrase is meaningless.
Trump knows jack shit about everything (or is it nothing?). He is the most stupid person I've ever seen in public life and that's saying a lot, eh, Goehmert & Jordan?
Johnny2X2X
(18,967 posts)He knew strategy, but made several massive blunders that should have forever sullied his name as some great general. The fact he was lionized is pure racism. Lee was too arrogant and it cost him big over and over.
Celerity
(43,057 posts)They sent parts of the Imperial fleet to both coasts, and were given a heroes' welcome in NYC, etc.
THE GRAND PROCESSION OF OUR RUSSIAN VISITORS THROUGH BROADWAY, UNDER ESCORT OF THE MILITIA AND POLICE.
This original Civil War Harper's Weekly features a dramatic illustration of the Russian Fleet. The picture is captioned, "The Russian Fleet, Commanded by Admiral Lisovski, Now in New York Harbor.
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/the-american-civil-war-the-union-told-all-the-european-countries-if-they-recognized-the-confederacys-legitimacy-it-was-equal-to-declaring-war-against-the-union.html
http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/1863/october/russian-ships.htm
At the time Russia was involved in the 'Great Game' with the British Empire, thus the old 'enemy of my enemy is my friend' rationale.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Game
Grins
(7,188 posts)And controlled the Mississippi River. And they already controlled the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers. Confederacy was cut in half, no major seaports.
Then it was good-bye Chattanooga, and hello Atlanta!
BKDem
(1,733 posts)if you don't count all the people who voted against him.
[And...we didn't.}
Aristus
(66,274 posts)TEB
(12,822 posts)Who kept up the pressure after lee bagged Richmond in trying to hook up with Johnston army of Tennessee. Shitler is a moron remember we rammed the ramparts and took the airfields in revolutionary war.
brush
(53,726 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 21, 2020, 12:20 PM - Edit history (2)
could've captured the trapped British army.
If this, if that, fuck trump and his idolatry of a failed traitor and cruel slave owner.
And Lee lost when Lincoln finally called in Grant from the west where he had prevailed by blocking the Mississippi, a confederate supply route. Grant, no cautious scrub or political appointee, kicked Lee's ass.
Johnny2X2X
(18,967 posts)He was a fool for not making a deal with Russia for a path to resources thru the caucuses. He could have made a temporary deal, defeated the West and then set his sights on Russia. Russia wanted a deal.
brush
(53,726 posts)more than the generals (where have I heard that before?). But didn't he and Stalin sign the non-aggression pact, which was smart until Hitler outsmarted himself and invaded Russia anyway before defeating the British. It was really a comedy of errorsholding back from capturing the British army at Dunkirk and invading Russia when he had the pact with them.
Just dump mistakes of an earlier "stable genius", another prime example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. And from what I understand although they invaded Russia later than the generals wanted to originally, which would come back to bite them later, they advanced far into Russia and were poised to captured Stalingrad. Hitler intervened though, splitting the force in two and sending half south to the capture oil fields in the south and the other half to continue on to Stalingrad, another huge mistake by the stable genius as the Russian winter helped Russian forces outlast the Germans who surrendered after several months of the siege of Stalingrad.
Good thing we're not in a war, trump would probably try to overrule his generals as his idol did.
unblock
(52,112 posts)And hitler would have won except for Stalingrad.
Anyone who ever tried to conquer the world would have won except for the battle they lost at their high water mark.
Duh.
LuvNewcastle
(16,834 posts)At least when he loses the election he'll have a teaching job at West Point to fall back on.
BKDem
(1,733 posts)Salviati
(6,008 posts)Minnesota was the first state to send volunteers to the Union army. Granted the confederate cancer has metastasized everywhere in this country, but for the folks in Minnesota who do care about the civil war, praising the confederates is not going to go over well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Minnesota_Infantry_Regiment
BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)the United States? Get out!!
Blue Owl
(50,235 posts)Had their bigger ones not sunk their smaller ones
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...if not for the Battle of Bowling Green, and its unfortunate massacre...
malaise
(268,641 posts)That is all
marble falls
(56,974 posts)CTyankee
(63,882 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,584 posts)He was a great counter puncher, and a good tactician, but with one exception any time he tried to take the strategic initiative, it bombed on him. He gets credit for being audacious, but he inevitably won more often because of ineptitude and indecision from the Union generals, who were usually picked for political reasons, not for their abilities.
Most of Lee's "brilliant" moves were made out of desperation, from being outmaneuvered strategically and having to make desperate decisions to rectify situations. His best offensive campaign, in the Seven Days Battles, was capped by a disastrous and costly frontal assault at Malvern Hill, which wouldn't have been quite so damning if he hadn't repeated the mistake at Gettysburg with Pickett's Charge, that glorious excercise in futility that is marked for some reason as the high water mark of the Confederacy. What it marked was the final death knell of Napoleonic tactics in an era of rifled muskets and massed artillery.
Lee? Character issues aside, he is rather overrated IMHO.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Klaralven
(7,510 posts)The 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment was the very first group of volunteers the Union received in response to the Souths assault of Fort Sumter at the beginning of the United States Civil War. Minnesota's Governor Ramsey offered 1000 men to Lincoln immediately upon learning of the attack on the fort. He just happened to be in Washington when the news broke. Those men volunteered for a three-year commitment (1861-64) which was much longer than other states. During combat actions, the 1st Minnesota sustained substantial casualties at the battles of First Bull Run 20%[1] and Antietam (28%)[1] and a staggering 82%[1]at the Battle of Gettysburg. It is most noted for its actions on the second day there.
At a dire moment, Major General Winfield Scott Hancock, commander of II Corps ordered the First Minnesota to charge into a Southern brigade. They were outnumbered by at least 5 to 1, but it was Gen. Hancock's only option to buy time for reinforcements to arrive. One survivor stated afterward that he expected the advance to result in "death or wounds to us all..."[2] The regiment immediately obeyed the order. Gen. Hancock was amazed at the unit discipline, valor, and the tremendous casualties taken in carrying out his order. This action preserved the Union's position on the Ridge exactly as he had hoped.
Post war, both General Hancock and U.S. President Calvin Coolidge were unrestrained in their praise for the actions of the 1st Minnesota. Gen. Hancock, who witnessed the action firsthand, placed its heroism highest in the annals of war:[3] "No soldiers on any field, in this or any other country ever displayed grander heroism". Gen. Hancock ascribed unsurpassed gallantry to the famed assault stating: "There is no more gallant deed recorded in history".[4] Emphasizing the critical nature of the circumstances on July 2 at Gettysburg, President Coolidge considered: "Colonel Colvill and those eight companies of the First Minnesota are entitled to rank as the saviors of their country".[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Minnesota_Infantry_Regiment
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)He might as well be talking about his favorite color or how he likes his morning coffee. He is not talking about issues important to Americans right now.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Botany
(70,434 posts)Such as the great history of the C.S.A. fighting a war of treason in order to violently destroy
the United States so that human beings can be kept as slaves because God made them less
human as white people.
This is just Trump reaching out to his klan/racist dumb fuck base.
BTW Trump knows nothing about the Civil War does he even know about Antietam and if McCellan
had followed Lee after that battle the war could have been over or that Grant had won control
of the Mississippi River all the way to New Orleans and with that and a naval blockade the south
was doomed.
SWBTATTReg
(22,059 posts)generals, Longstreet was against the entire engagement to begin with, not to get caught in a meat grinder as they were w/ Gettysburg, which was kind of the South's last gasps in trying to bring the war to an early and quick end, by winning Gettysburg and then threatening Wash. DC or the like to force an early end to the war.
Lee got greedy and cocky, with the first successful minor engagements of Gettysburg and thus, decided to stay in position and fight the Union (despite the poor positioning of his forces). By then, the North by then finally got rid of the political generals (worthless) and finally replaced their generals w/ actual soldiers who knew how to fight. The North was actually in a good position and Lee walked right into it, despite Longstreet's misgivings.
trump should leave his stupid comments to himself and leave the civil war questions to Newt G. who's actually wrote some books on the engagement(s).
dameatball
(7,392 posts)LeftInTX
(25,089 posts)Every day, he has a rally
cayugafalls
(5,639 posts)F*ck you Trump, you Nazi twit.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)if it wasn't for that damn iceberg.