General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums*Brand New A + Rated Marist Likely Voter National Poll* Biden:52% Klansman 43%
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/npr-pbs-newshour-marist-poll-results-election-2020-president-trump/#sthash.tsiS1feL.0dmSXdSF.dpbsWas Closest To The Mark In 2016
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article112635048.html
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Joe could win nationally by 20 points and still lose the election if the swing states go for Trump by just a few tenths as they did in 2016.
We must GOTV in the states that actually matter.
Johnny2X2X
(18,973 posts)He wins by 9 points and there's zero chance he doesn't win the EV.
And this poll is great, best pollster out there.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)It's more like 3.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)State polls are not independent variables. When national polls go one way, state polls generally go the same direction to varying degrees.
Demsrule86
(68,490 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)...laying out the odds of Biden winning as a function of net popular vote victory. If he wins the popular vote by 3 points it's a toss up, at 4 points it's 80%, and at 5 points it's 98%. (Our system is really broken.)
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)But not 20!!!
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)He wins just by 6%, and he wins. 20% and he wouldn't win lol.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Extremely unlikely and exaggerated to make a point, to be sure, but it is absolutely within the scope of possible.
As blue states get bluer but battleground states stay ultra competitive, our national margin grows with no real advantage.
Biden could win by 10 million votes and still lose the election if those votes are in the wrong states.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Shifts don't happen along the extremes you suggest. That's because the national ideological numbers do not change appreciably, and the ideological numbers dictate how the nation votes in federal races. If moderates/independents are slanting appreciably one way or another there's going to be a reason for that which attaches everywhere, not merely in the blue states.
Nate Silver properly gave Trump more chance than other compilers in 2016 because he understood that dynamic, that an unforeseen shift would be felt everywhere. The dummy analysts who fixated on state polls alone looked at each state as rigid 85% Hillary likelihood here and 81% Hillary likelihood there, without grasping that they'd all fall together upon a shared variable.
State polls are junior varsity polls. They are poorer funded, less sophisticated, devote less time, more prone to flawed approach, and so forth. It is silly to rely on state polls and proclaim national polls don't matter. Somehow it became conventional wisdom to boost state polls while scoffing at national polls. It should be the other way around. That's why you are receiving justified blowback.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)To quote your aforementioned Nate Silver:
Joe Bidens lead in national polls has narrowed to 7 percentage points, but he remains favored to win the election because we have a number of high-quality state polls that contain mostly good news for him.
BannonsLiver
(16,313 posts)And moreover, they matter to people who like to be informed, and who are capable of discussing data points rationally. Give it a whirl sometime.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)mahina
(17,625 posts)Its worth checking out. Its not one number
honest.abe
(8,617 posts)Ohiogal
(31,929 posts)Cause thats what he is!
Yeehah
(4,568 posts)Boggles the mind.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)All that matters.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)However, it's really bad in this country!
I don't consider it a "personality trait" like some scholars who have studied it. I'm convinced that it's awful behavior that can be learned, and the decades of right-wing hate-media helped bring us here.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)Capt. America
(2,477 posts)SunSeeker
(51,523 posts)I'll take that!