Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 07:44 AM Sep 2012

Mitt's Comments Were Wrong - The Real View Is The 99% Are Moochers.

Think About It. The 1% actually think that anyone who gets a decent paycheck does not deserve is. They want to drive wages down even further than they are. When you hear conservative back chatter that even conservatives hate Romney that he is not conservative or extreme enough you have to wonder what they want. Draw your own conclusions.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt's Comments Were Wrong - The Real View Is The 99% Are Moochers. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Sep 2012 OP
Yes that is their view... Kalidurga Sep 2012 #1
Using the 47% number allows them to continue to dupe the non-wealthy into supporting them... porphyrian Sep 2012 #2

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. Yes that is their view...
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 09:31 AM
Sep 2012

The reality is that 100% are moochers. The biggest moochers are in fact the 1%. The 1% benefit from taxes way more than the average person. When the 1% get a hand out it is always much bigger than anyone that is in the 47% will get and even bigger than what they will get over their entire lifetime. The 1% will never pay regressive taxes either. Many in the 1% have never paid into SS, yet they will be able to collect, I don't know how that works. They own corporations, but the land those corporations is on is in many cases not taxed. If we went through the entire tax code, which I am not willing to do, I would wager we will find thousands of pages of tax code that benefit the 1% and that code not only doesn't help the 99% it probably hurts us. In any case we all benefit from the investments that the Federal government puts in infrastructure.

 

porphyrian

(18,530 posts)
2. Using the 47% number allows them to continue to dupe the non-wealthy into supporting them...
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 09:43 AM
Sep 2012

...against all evidence that it is not in their better interest. For example, a plumber in a trailer park has an easier time believing that they are in the larger half of America than they are in the 1%.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt's Comments Were Wron...