Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDr. Fauci is brilliant, and he's got a GREAT delivery, too. Testifying at a House Hearing now...
He's on top of every minute detail of this pandemic, and he's practical and not all gloom and doom, either.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 611 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dr. Fauci is brilliant, and he's got a GREAT delivery, too. Testifying at a House Hearing now... (Original Post)
George II
Jul 2020
OP
Fauci always sounds naive to me in his unwavering faith that the FDA will not allow an unsafe vaccin
soothsayer
Jul 2020
#2
Yeah, there's no reason to be skeptical of anything associated with Trump 🙄🙄🙄
uponit7771
Jul 2020
#5
JustAnotherGen
(32,034 posts)1. If you are listening - not on tv
As I am - he's so clear and concise.
This man knows his shit.
George II
(67,782 posts)3. Yes, he's on top of every detail and aspect of this crisis.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)2. Fauci always sounds naive to me in his unwavering faith that the FDA will not allow an unsafe vaccin
Im super skeptical
BannonsLiver
(16,545 posts)4. Yes, I prefer DU epidemiologists as well
And we have so many!
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)5. Yeah, there's no reason to be skeptical of anything associated with Trump 🙄🙄🙄
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)6. Ha! I'm fine with fauci
Just sounds naive when he says the guy told me and went on record saying theyd make sure it was safe.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)9. Plus we've got this crook ginning up the research
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-sketchy-past-of-moncef-slaoui-trumps-coronavirus-vaccine-czar
Snip
N]ot only is Avandia effective, it is actually superior to the most widely used medicines Slaoui testified at one point, adding at another: "We also diligently communicated to physicians and patients Avandia's scientifically established safety risks."
I know this, because I was the U.S. Senate Finance Committees lead investigator on the bipartisan investigation of GSK and Avandia, and our reports found that GSK had bullied critics of the drug, hid data, and misled the public. By testifying before Congress and the American public that the drug was fine and by working with his colleagues to undermine a study that found it was dangerous, Slaoui assisted GSKs strategy to deny the drugs dangers, which ultimately led to a $3 billion federal fine to settle criminal and civil liability related to several of the companys drugs, including Avandia. The month after Slaoui testified, FDA scientists presented an analysis estimating that Avandia had caused approximately 83,000 excess heart attacks in America since coming on the market.
Snip
N]ot only is Avandia effective, it is actually superior to the most widely used medicines Slaoui testified at one point, adding at another: "We also diligently communicated to physicians and patients Avandia's scientifically established safety risks."
I know this, because I was the U.S. Senate Finance Committees lead investigator on the bipartisan investigation of GSK and Avandia, and our reports found that GSK had bullied critics of the drug, hid data, and misled the public. By testifying before Congress and the American public that the drug was fine and by working with his colleagues to undermine a study that found it was dangerous, Slaoui assisted GSKs strategy to deny the drugs dangers, which ultimately led to a $3 billion federal fine to settle criminal and civil liability related to several of the companys drugs, including Avandia. The month after Slaoui testified, FDA scientists presented an analysis estimating that Avandia had caused approximately 83,000 excess heart attacks in America since coming on the market.
Lulu KC
(2,579 posts)7. Yes! I enjoy him.
And marvel at his age.
UTUSN
(70,786 posts)8. He's got the delivery that MUELLER got washed out of him by years of bureaucratic legalese.