Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe $600 unemployment bonuses did not lead to people working less, Yale study finds
https://www.businessinsider.com/600-unemployment-bonus-payments-dont-cause-less-work-yale-2020-7?utm_source=reddit.comA report by economists at Yale University did not find any evidence that the $600 weekly jobless benefits authorized by Congress in March in response to the COVID-19 outbreak reduced employment in the US.
Findings suggest that in the aggregate, the expanded benefits "neither encouraged layoffs during the pandemic's onset nor deterred people from returning to work once businesses began reopening. "
"Workers facing larger expansions in unemployment insurance benefits have returned to their previous jobs over time at similar rates as others," the economists said. "We find no evidence that more generous benefits disincentivize work either at the onset of the expansion or as firms looked to return to business over time. In future research, it will be important to assess whether the same results hold when states move to reopen."
The $600 per week unemployment benefits that millions of Americans have been receiving under the CARES Act expire at the end of July. This comes as members of the Trump administration have been critical of these benefits to unemployed Americans, claiming they disincentivize people returning to work.
White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow in June told CNN that the measure was a "disincentive" to work, adding that "we're paying people not to work."
On the contrary, the study didn't find any evidence that recipients of more generous benefits were less likely to return to work. The researchers concluded that workers who received larger increases in their unemployment benefits relative to their wages did not experience greater declines in employment after the CARES Act was enacted.
The researchers used weekly data from Homebase, which is a company that provides time-sheet software and scheduling to small businesses across the U.S.
"The data do not show a relationship between benefit generosity and employment paths after the CARES Act, which could be due to the collapse of labor demand during the COVID-19 crisis," said Joseph Altonji, the Thomas DeWitt Cuyler Professor of Economics in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, and a co-author of the report.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 453 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The $600 unemployment bonuses did not lead to people working less, Yale study finds (Original Post)
flamingdem
Jul 2020
OP
I really don't think that Kudlow or the others meant this as an economic analysis
underpants
Jul 2020
#1
underpants
(183,007 posts)1. I really don't think that Kudlow or the others meant this as an economic analysis
They meant it as lazy good for nothing black people are taking your money. That simple.
appalachiablue
(41,199 posts)2. K /R Thanks for posting on this new report.
crickets
(25,990 posts)3. Puts paid to your excuses, Mitch. Sociopath. nt