General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrances
(8,548 posts)Response to Frances (Reply #1)
Nevilledog This message was self-deleted by its author.
Doodley
(9,176 posts)liberalgunwilltravel
(338 posts)Do these nutters realize that we too have a right to self defense? They are literally threatening bodily harm. How are they going to ract when someone decides to drop them in their tracks?
Celerity
(43,734 posts)aggiesal
(8,955 posts)DSandra
(999 posts)This is the monster we have to deal with in America. A huge percentage of selfish assholes who refuse to do their part. This is the monster that American capitalism has created, dumbing down the nation and promoting a culture of greed and selfishness.
sop
(10,293 posts)enough
(13,270 posts)maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)this photo's probably not recent.
stopdiggin
(11,411 posts)that is now commonly used in support of arguments that are nearly the reverse of what Franklin was advocating at the time. (which is NOT to say that the liberty/security debate is not an important, and crucial, one)
https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famous-liberty-safety-quote-lost-its-context-in-21st-century
SIEGEL: And what was the context of this remark?
WITTES: He was writing about a tax dispute between the Pennsylvania General Assembly and the family of the Penns, the proprietary family of the Pennsylvania colony who ruled it from afar. And the legislature was trying to tax the Penn family lands to pay for frontier defense during the French and Indian War. And the Penn family kept instructing the governor to veto. Franklin felt that this was a great affront to the ability of the legislature to govern. And so he actually meant purchase a little temporary safety very literally. The Penn family was trying to give a lump sum of money in exchange for the General Assembly's acknowledging that it did not have the authority to tax it.
SIEGEL: So far from being a pro-privacy quotation, if anything, it's a pro-taxation and pro-defense spending quotation.
WITTES: It is a quotation that defends the authority of a legislature to govern in the interests of collective security. It means, in context, not quite the opposite of what it's almost always quoted as saying but much closer to the opposite than to the thing that people think it means.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,069 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)They don't even have the knowledge to reference his quote correctly.
Sometimes I imagine out founding fathers sitting around drinking ale and alternating between laughing uproariously at this nightmare and crying sadly.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,069 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Apparently wearing masks reduces our own chance of getting the virus (or if we do get it, more likely to be a minor case).
tblue37
(65,528 posts)"Your dead kids dont trump my constitutional rights" (to have guns).
StevieM
(10,500 posts)But your point is taken.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)roamer65
(36,748 posts)Forcibly if necessary.
lpbk2713
(42,774 posts)Drop a firecracker behind him and watch him wet his pants.
Patterson
(1,534 posts)belpejic
(720 posts)Might have a problem accessing his firearm if he had to respond to a noise behind him.
He'd probably fumble his weapon and shoot hisself in the toe.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,069 posts)Probably they drink and drive.
kairos12
(12,896 posts)rickyhall
(4,889 posts)I really have no problem with masks or condoms. However, I do have a problem with persecuting people just for getting high. That's where they fuck with my freedom.
Grokenstein
(5,730 posts)(collapses in coughing fit)
Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)chriscan64
(1,789 posts)"Freedom of religion" means a world free of the wrong religions.
keithbvadu2
(37,039 posts)Trumpsters don't like masks.
keithbvadu2
(37,039 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I kind of hate these people.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Its a gobsmacker!
They think theyre immune? That we are the only ones who can get it? Jesushchrist!
Response to lunatica (Reply #27)
Nevilledog This message was self-deleted by its author.
pansypoo53219
(21,008 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,317 posts)Because LEO's arrest people and put them in jail -- which is exactly sacrificing their liberty for the safety of the public at large. Don't want to trade your liberty for someone else's safety ? Just obey the law, and it shouldn't be a problem. If the law says wear a mask, wear a mask -- or go to jail.
Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #30)
Nevilledog This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lonestarblue
(10,155 posts)The federal government set the Food Rationing Program into motion in 1942 to control supply and demandand pricesfor food and basic commodities. Rationing was introduced to avoid public anger with shortages and to avoid only the wealthy being able to afford basic commodities. If the federal government had the right to issue ration books to every family in the US and enforce price controls, then it certainly has the right to issue an order to wear a mask in public. Of course we know that Trump will never do that.
During WWII people worked together and shared the sacrifices necessary in a world war. Todays privileged people like the ones in the OP and other Trump supporters refuse to work for the common good even though we are in a world war called a pandemic. Theyre not patriots; theyre the kind of people who would have insisted that other people should starve so that they could selfishly have all the food and gasoline they wanted whenever they wanted. Tribal politics have completely eliminated the notion of the common good and shared sacrifice.
Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)Cha
(298,018 posts)Fucking Brainwashed MORONS
Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)Yeah, they're morons.
Cha
(298,018 posts)do they have a fucking CLUE!
Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)It's unavoidable.
Cha
(298,018 posts)Smartest person in the World.. like their Putin PUPPET!
TeamPooka
(24,292 posts)Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)KelleyKramer
(9,011 posts)They seem nice
I bet they are wonderful neighbors
Pacifist Patriot
(24,654 posts)Ironically considerate of them.
Nevilledog
(51,281 posts)They're prone to no signal, faith-based lane changes.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I think it was more of a problem of people opening their eyes to see the reality of a sizable group of people who make up a weird nationalistic death cult.
Progressive dog
(6,931 posts)What do you suppose the badge on Wyatt Twerp's shirt is for and where is his horse?