General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News apologizes for 'mistakenly' cropping Trump out of photo with Epstein, Maxwell
Fox News apologizes for 'mistakenly' cropping Trump out of photo with Epstein, Maxwellhttps://thehill.com/homenews/media/506096-fox-news-apologizes-for-mistakenly-cropping-trump-out-of-photo-with-epstein
The headline is the story, click link for details.
Just as an aside, I don't think there was any direct order from Trump's people,
merely that Fox understood what was required of them.
Chemisse
(30,817 posts)Which of course amplifies the message that the original photo conveys.
A mistake? Or passive aggressive?
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Explaining that he was merely stretching at his desk, with scissors in his hand, and he accidentally cut the girl's pigtail who was sitting in front of him.
captain queeg
(10,273 posts)After theyd already gotten their message out.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I am reminded of the history of such erasure of visual evidence that existed during the Stalinist era of Russian history, in which undesirable or inconvenient reminders of certain people were removed from the historical record by governmental photo correction artists. (This was before photoshop, so real artists were employed to paint over or replace figures in photographic documents).
One of the most fascinating books I read in the past several years is a collection of stories (which hang together as a novel if you read it correctly) by Anthony Marra called The Tsar of Love and Techno. A main character is one such unhappy photo restorer. I highly recommend it for its brilliant writing, which sometimes brought laughter and at other times real tears.
But this was real, as this New Yorker article recounts. Fox News is just serving as the governmental censorship arm for the administration, who must rid the historical record of all inconvenient truths.
How unreal can things get? As the sense of shared reality is eroded, more with each passing day, one wonders. Writing on the relationship between truth and politics in this magazine, fifty-one years ago, Hannah Arendt noted just how vulnerable factual truth is, using the example of the role during the Russian Revolution of a man by the name of Trotsky, who appears in none of the Soviet Russian history books. Thirty years after Arendt published her article, a British collector and historian of Russia, David King, published a study in the form of a photo albuma study of the disappearance of the physical record of Trotsky and a number of other Russians who fell out of favor, and out of history, during the Stalin era.
The book is called The Commissar Vanishes. The title is, incongruously, literal. Its specific reference is to a photograph, from 1919, of a second-anniversary celebration of the October Revolution. In the picture, Vladimir Lenin stands at the top of a set of stairs, surrounded by many unidentified men and children and a few recognizable men, including Leon Trotsky, stationed just in front of Lenin. By the time the photograph was published, in 1967, Trotsky had disappeared: he had been airbrushed out, along with several other commissars.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/photo-booth/the-photo-book-that-captured-how-the-soviet-regime-made-the-truth-disappear
Maru Kitteh
(28,343 posts)Nobody will believe it, and they must know that. So - is the apology meant to shame whoever made the decision to crop him out?