Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2020, 03:59 PM Jun 2020

'Time for a change:' Cherokee Nation removes monuments dedicated to Confederate soldiers

snip/

Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr., in a prepared statement, said both monuments, placed on capitol square nearly 100 years ago when the property was a county courthouse and owned by the state, needed to be removed because "it was time for a change."

“We’ve suffered for centuries with too many others telling our story for us as they see fit,” Hoskin said a news release. “It’s difficult to tell our story when we have non-Indian-driven monuments talking about the Confederacy, when they greet people as they come into our Cherokee Nation museum. It was time for a change.”


https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/time-for-a-change-cherokee-nation-removes-monuments-dedicated-to-confederate-soldiers/article_901f5b5f-7bc8-5a51-9220-279a7046a5e2.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Time for a change:' Cherokee Nation removes monuments dedicated to Confederate soldiers (Original Post) Bradshaw3 Jun 2020 OP
Wow! moose65 Jun 2020 #1
The so-called Five Civilized tribes were on the Confederate side Bradshaw3 Jun 2020 #2
General Stand Watie Ex Lurker Jun 2020 #4
Not that simple tirebiter Jun 2020 #3
H*** B**** is likecsaying the N word Ex Lurker Jun 2020 #5
I agree n/t Bradshaw3 Jun 2020 #6
Some of that was covered in the article Bradshaw3 Jun 2020 #7
Stand Watie not "Sam" BannonsLiver Jun 2020 #8

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
2. The so-called Five Civilized tribes were on the Confederate side
Sat Jun 13, 2020, 04:11 PM
Jun 2020

Some of the Choctaw and Cherokee owned slaves but not all of their leaders were happy about treaties signed with the Confederacy. Some fought in Indian Territory and some in other theaters. And, of course, the awful Daughters of the Confederacy used those ties to propogate the Lost Cause narrative through statues decades later.

tirebiter

(2,533 posts)
3. Not that simple
Sat Jun 13, 2020, 05:55 PM
Jun 2020

Last edited Sat Jun 13, 2020, 08:09 PM - Edit history (1)

The mixed breeds were the slave owners as were the tribal leaders. The full bloods joined reluctantly. Then after the first battle most left and joined the Kansas all Indian Regiment and fought for the north. Slavery was the issue. Stand Watie was the first Brigadier General in the Confederate army.
The mixed breeds did include freemen, some of whom were slave owners. The full bloods took seriously the fact that the nation had sworn allegiance to the United Ststes of America. So, anyway, it was a bit complicated. The tribal leaders cut a deal with a Richmond because Richmond was willing to pay upfront for a deal. Near the end of the war the tribal leaders changed their minds and escaped to the north. They took with them a lot of Confederate cash which was by this time worthless. Bad decisions.

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
7. Some of that was covered in the article
Sat Jun 13, 2020, 07:08 PM
Jun 2020

Some of it is debatable. If you truly know the history then you should know that his name was Stand Watie, not Sam. Also, the term you used is racist.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Time for a change:' Cher...