General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsempedocles
(15,751 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Less than a year before she lands there.
niyad
(113,216 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)who aspires to be a true Journalist turns into another POS propagandist.
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)sexual assault or sexual harassment are probably true, not all of them are true. I believe that the alleged allegation from Christine O'Donnel's niece and the Tara Reade allegation are both nonsense.
paleotn
(17,902 posts)A lot of that going around. Kind of a self sorting between decent human beings and self serving scumbags. At least it allows us to identify the self serving scumbags so they can be fired, blackballed and marginalized.
LisaM
(27,800 posts)In a way, it's good that they accused him of something that's provably wrong, though (and that it was re-tweeted without vetting), because it starts weakening this whole charade.
It's part of the whole mindset that it's easier to ask forgiveness than seek permission mindset.
sop
(10,145 posts)Trump's Ukraine scheme literally blew up in his face, getting him impeached. The Hunter/China thing just brought more unwelcome attention to Trump's suspicious loans from Chinese banks, Princess Ivanka's sleazy trademark deals and Mitch's SIL's chicom connections.
Tara Reade's tale of sexual victimization just becomes more toxic with each passing day, besmirching the very people pushing the story, certainly not Biden. Now this bit of unsubstantiated calumny. You'd think a "professional journalist" would at least confirm whether Joe was even present at the event in question. She and her network should be sued for libel.
So far, Biden's accusers are batting "zero." And Joe? Well, he's probably been politically inoculated from any future attacks by these bungled dirty tricks. Who will they go after next? Jill? His dead son, Beau?
gab13by13
(21,287 posts)that Biden has a hole in his tongue?
Lonestarblue
(9,963 posts)NBachers
(17,097 posts)You can leave your own comment here: https://abcnews.go.com/feedback?cat=ABCNews.com%20comments&cid=clicksource_4380645_footer_feedback
Fire Sasha Pezenik. She has lied in an attempt to slander Joe Biden, and has repeatedly shadowed her comments and articles with anti-Biden slant.
ABC News has as much liability for Pezenik's lies, as Pezenik does herself. Her so-called "apology," after the damage has been done to Biden's good name, is ineffectual and worthless. If you don't fire Pezenik, your news is unreliable and worthless as well. Putting her on "restricted" status is ABC trying to cover for her lies.
Fire Sasha Pezenik.
Cha
(297,059 posts)BonnieJW
(2,261 posts)I live near DC and Sinclair owns our NBC affiliate.
oasis
(49,367 posts)dalton99a
(81,428 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,121 posts)Columbia indeed. Not fit to edit weather forecasts.