HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Found on the internet: Ta...

Sun May 3, 2020, 03:03 AM

Found on the internet: Tara Reade, serial accuser.





Also found: https://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

I don't know the truth about this, but if true it should be shouted from the rooftops.

22 replies, 3850 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply Found on the internet: Tara Reade, serial accuser. (Original post)
Lunabell May 2020 OP
The Magistrate May 2020 #1
RandySF May 2020 #2
Cha May 2020 #3
Cha May 2020 #5
SunSeeker May 2020 #4
UpInArms May 2020 #15
WhiteTara May 2020 #18
peasant one May 2020 #20
WhiteTara May 2020 #21
oasis May 2020 #6
yuiyoshida May 2020 #8
TomVilmer May 2020 #7
canetoad May 2020 #10
TomVilmer May 2020 #12
DenverJared May 2020 #17
The_REAL_Ecumenist May 2020 #11
UpInArms May 2020 #16
Cha May 2020 #13
The Magistrate May 2020 #19
UTUSN May 2020 #9
mahatmakanejeeves May 2020 #14
Lunabell May 2020 #22

Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 03:10 AM

1. It Is True Enough For Agit-Prop Work, Ma'am

Much of this has been in circulation almost from the start. One of the theft accusations is new, but well backed up. This omits the bankruptcies, which may have contained elements of fraud. Not all of the assault accusations are sexual.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:16 AM

2. Didn't she also accuse a former employer of anti-white discrimination?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #2)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:19 AM

3. Yes, it's around here someplace.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #2)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:31 AM

5. Evidently Reade sued the YWCA for racial discrimination...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:25 AM

4. Seems correct, but the photo does not look like her, or it's a REALLY old photo. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #4)

Sun May 3, 2020, 06:47 AM

15. A more recent photo

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UpInArms (Reply #15)

Sun May 3, 2020, 08:21 AM

18. And what a slutty outfit for her interview

with a major publication

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhiteTara (Reply #18)

Sun May 3, 2020, 09:51 AM

20. Don't judge people by what they wear

Women are always judged by their appearance and their clothes. It is wrong and it should stop. Please stop.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to peasant one (Reply #20)

Sun May 3, 2020, 01:41 PM

21. Sorry, but those cut out sleeves

are so inappropriate for a major news interview when you are accusing someone of assaulting you 20 something years ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:32 AM

6. Expose the sham. K and R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #6)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:58 AM

8. I wish I could K &R your message but

maybe this message will help with exposure. K&R !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 04:47 AM

7. For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus...

... you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomVilmer (Reply #7)

Sun May 3, 2020, 05:06 AM

10. So are you saying

There is truth in her allegations?

My impression is she would be called, 'an unreliable witness.'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to canetoad (Reply #10)

Sun May 3, 2020, 05:24 AM

12. Just quoting Joe Biden's word...

... since this woman is a victim... of something, and such pain should not be made into memes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomVilmer (Reply #12)

Sun May 3, 2020, 06:52 AM

17. She is a victim of her own stupidity and some Bernie supporters

 

like Katie Halper, Cenk Uygur and Brihana Joy Grey among them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomVilmer (Reply #7)

Sun May 3, 2020, 05:17 AM

11. I agree with what you've posted in the abstract BUT this "woman" has added to the most recent,

(hint: her accusations evolve), she can't "find" the reports where she accused him of the fuckery she claims, admitted that she DIDN'T accuse him of what she's accusing him of NOW in 1993 & can't seem to explain why; the archives in the federal government where such an accusation would be located have NOTHING, NADA & NONE of her claims at all: she had fifty eleven aliases & seems to have made a habit of accusing everybody & their brother of everything she can think of; she has a problem with
1) telling the unvarnished truth
2) Sanity, as she claims that she both idolises pootie-poo & says that he's in love with her...I guess?
3) scheming, stealing money & services from folks
4) setting up gofundme accts left, right & centre & claiming that some shambling stranger did this on her behalf when called on it.
5) Oh & did I mention that she cancelled her grand interview with fauxspews Yesterday? I would NEVER have

As a survivor of child rape, ( I was 5 YEARS OLD & endured full penetration of an ADULT man for a year EVERY SINGLE DAY for a YEAR except THE WEEKENDS! I had another assault when I was 19 by a Iranian creep who I mistakenly thought was a friend) & funnily enough, I've NEVER changed my testimony...EVER. Imagine that
She's proven herself unbelievable by her changing what she original claim was every chance she got...So do I think that shes believable?

Uh, NOPE!! I've had friends who were sexually assaulted & kept it themselves because of the fear of being labelled & shamed, as I did until I was 17 years old, when what I laughingly refer to as "my father" was in the middle of calling me a whore, (I didn't even have my first date until I was 20 YEARS OLD). So, there's WAY TOO MUCH SMOKE around her while she screams that there's no fire at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The_REAL_Ecumenist (Reply #11)

Sun May 3, 2020, 06:52 AM

16. Thank you

....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomVilmer (Reply #7)

Sun May 3, 2020, 05:27 AM

13. Not in Tara Reade's case.. she is her own worst enemy.

But you have to have read all the history to know what you're talking about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomVilmer (Reply #7)

Sun May 3, 2020, 08:58 AM

19. That Line Is Over, Sir --- Dashed, Diddled, And Done

An accuser gets a hearing. Once heard, people decide, using intelligence guided by experience in examining character and evidence.

When dealing with the general run of sexual harassment claims, lewd looks or words, a quid pro quo involving sexual favors, insistence on meetings outside the office or business hours, which are not criminal behaviors, however unwelcome or even distressing they may be, it is all very well to presume the claim has weight. In a civil matter, only a very slight edge in favor of the charge is required, after all. But a criminal charge requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and that standard, as a matter of cultural expectation, applies out of court as well as in. Reade made a charge of criminal assault, and has done so without any evidence beyond her word, and examination of her character, as revealed by her history, leaves no reason whatever to believe her unsupported word in any matter, let alone in a criminal charge.


"Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for."



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Lunabell (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 05:34 AM

14. Is "I found this on the internet" the new gold standard for accuracy?

How does this differ from "some people are saying"?

If you were a journalist, would you say that you had done sufficient research for an article based on this to be published?

No, thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #14)

Reply to this thread