Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:11 AM Mar 2020

The true death rate at this point is 6.3%

You don't count the active cases. There are 68000 recoveries and 4600 deaths. 4600/72600 = 6.3%

This thing is 30 to 50 times more lethal than the flu.

It's self-quarantine time for everyone.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The true death rate at this point is 6.3% (Original Post) The_jackalope Mar 2020 OP
But we don't know how many cases there really are The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2020 #1
Exactly. You can tell death rates of those diagnosed, but not of those who have it uppityperson Mar 2020 #3
but the same applies to flu AlexSFCA Mar 2020 #7
Not the same. TwilightZone Mar 2020 #16
If you become identifiably symptomatic The_jackalope Mar 2020 #5
That's true of many diseases. What we don't know about this one The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2020 #9
Less deadly than Ebola or Rabies. GulfCoast66 Mar 2020 #21
Agreed. TwilightZone Mar 2020 #8
yes, but we also don't know the number of deaths accurately either lapfog_1 Mar 2020 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Mar 2020 #33
The number we're getting for the flu is the Mortality Rate mr_lebowski Mar 2020 #2
That also ignores those left with lung damages, etc Jarqui Mar 2020 #4
and the long term probable outcomes for those people lapfog_1 Mar 2020 #24
No, it's not. TwilightZone Mar 2020 #6
Dr. Fauci Turin_C3PO Mar 2020 #19
I'm going with Fauci on this too. Blues Heron Mar 2020 #26
Same n/t obamanut2012 Mar 2020 #32
The denominator is totally unknown. Iran, the US, and many, many other places are totally failing RockRaven Mar 2020 #10
Yeah but it's just people over 50... GulfCoast66 Mar 2020 #11
My niece posted one today mountain grammy Mar 2020 #15
Not idiots. Many of them are highly intelligent. Cultist. GulfCoast66 Mar 2020 #18
You're right about their intelligence. Turin_C3PO Mar 2020 #20
We were scheduled to go to the Netherlands PJMcK Mar 2020 #12
We don't have enough data to have a true death rate Marrah_Goodman Mar 2020 #13
Our 5th day staying at home because we can eleny Mar 2020 #14
It varies a lot depending your age. C_U_L8R Mar 2020 #17
Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Finland: 1766 cases, 1 death blitzen Mar 2020 #22
I'm going with Fauci on this - 1% Blues Heron Mar 2020 #25
Fauci doesn't know the number either... It's sometimes fatal JCMach1 Mar 2020 #27
Hmmm. I read recently that 270,000 people in this country were hospitalized with flu. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2020 #28
Everyone is an expert on this. CentralMass Mar 2020 #29
I was going to edit my post to say this, but well done for beating me to it obamanut2012 Mar 2020 #31
Nope, not even close obamanut2012 Mar 2020 #30

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
1. But we don't know how many cases there really are
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:14 AM
Mar 2020

because not nearly everyone has been tested; also, some people with mild symptoms (or none) might never have sought medical attention at all so they are not included in any statistics re: total cases. So we really can't tell what the case fatality rate is vs. actual infections.

AlexSFCA

(6,137 posts)
7. but the same applies to flu
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:19 AM
Mar 2020

it’s not like everyone gets tested for flu. Mortality rates are assessed the same way for all viruses. It’s all relative not absolute rates. It may not be 6.3% but it is 30x deadlier than flu.

TwilightZone

(25,464 posts)
16. Not the same.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:31 AM
Mar 2020

There's a difference between not testing all individuals and hardly testing anyone at all. The numbers will become more refined as more information becomes available and more testing is done. For the moment, the situations aren't comparable on a global basis.

For example, in South Korea, where they're doing lots of testing, the rate is 0.77%. That's likely much closer to a real number, certainly much more so than 6%.

https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-death-rates-by-age-south-korea

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
9. That's true of many diseases. What we don't know about this one
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:22 AM
Mar 2020

is the actual proportion of deaths to infections. It is clearly more dangerous than seasonal flu, but less dangerous than Ebola or rabies if you get those diseases. It will be a long time before we have reliable statistics.

lapfog_1

(29,199 posts)
23. yes, but we also don't know the number of deaths accurately either
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:57 AM
Mar 2020

How many old people have died in China or South Korea due to corona virus that were ascribed to "the flu" or something else (pneumonia).

Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #1)

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. The number we're getting for the flu is the Mortality Rate
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:14 AM
Mar 2020

Which is inherently different from the Case Fatality Ratio you're calculating with the COVID-19 numbers (and not comparable in the way you're doing there).

I learned this today, so ... just sharing

https://www.britannica.com/science/case-fatality-rate

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
4. That also ignores those left with lung damages, etc
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:16 AM
Mar 2020

And if it overloads the hospitals, there will be a lot of deaths due to that not directly due to this virus

lapfog_1

(29,199 posts)
24. and the long term probable outcomes for those people
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:59 AM
Mar 2020

up to 9% of those that catch this pathogen have lung damage. Many so severe that the next cold or flu they catch will be life threatening.

TwilightZone

(25,464 posts)
6. No, it's not.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:18 AM
Mar 2020

We don't know how many unknown cases there are (obviously) and until someone comes up with a valid known/unknown ratio, all stated death rates using your formula are simply wrong. We can't just ignore that there are cases that may never be symptomatic and/or won't be tested. There are tons of cases we don't know about and they would all need to be considered for a true mortality rate.

South Korea's mortality rate, for example, with lots of testing is about 0.77%.

https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-death-rates-by-age-south-korea

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
10. The denominator is totally unknown. Iran, the US, and many, many other places are totally failing
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:23 AM
Mar 2020

to test people who should have been tested. We've got no clue how many people have been infected and recovered.

Do not mistake me for someone who thinks this virus is anything other than terrible. But the true mortality rate for all infected persons is not known at this time.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
11. Yeah but it's just people over 50...
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:24 AM
Mar 2020

And those with high blood pressure, diabetes and such Sad I have to add it.

I am one not afraid to dive into the right wing hell hole site that won’t be named. I hear worse from some of my family.

Those blunder heads are just starting to realize that the people most likely to die of this are them! And are starting to get jittery. Well, except the majority who are still arguing that it is just the flu. A few are upset trump neglected to explain it is just the flu.

If so many others were not going to die I would be all Darwin Award on them. Unfortunately many of us here are also at high risk. Including my wife.

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
15. My niece posted one today
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:30 AM
Mar 2020

Says virus caused by Schumer and Pelosi and the media trying to under mine the pres Seriously, under mine!. They’re idiots.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
18. Not idiots. Many of them are highly intelligent. Cultist.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:34 AM
Mar 2020

That is the description. They have been fed the same message over and over with no counter message until it has become ingrained in their synapses.

They truly will take deprogramming. Which will not happen.

Once trump is gone they will find another to fill the void.

Turin_C3PO

(13,964 posts)
20. You're right about their intelligence.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:37 AM
Mar 2020

The two Trumpers I know are my uncle and my grandpa. My grandpa has a PhD and was a professor for years. My uncle is a colonel in the Air Force with a Masters in chemistry. Both are very smart yet they lap up whatever filth Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are spewing that day. It’s mind boggling.

PJMcK

(22,031 posts)
12. We were scheduled to go to the Netherlands
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:24 AM
Mar 2020

Then Trump opened his stupid mouth.

I don't have confidence that American citizens will be allowed back into the country. Accordingly, we're cancelling our trip.

I'm looking at a $4,500 loss if the airlines and hotel are unwilling to make some arrangements. They might and they might not. The truth is, I understand their circumstances all too well. In the end, I'll eat the loss because the alternatives could be far more expensive.

So, we'll hang out at our mountain house in the Catskills and limit our contact with others.

Some country you're running, Trump.

Marrah_Goodman

(1,586 posts)
13. We don't have enough data to have a true death rate
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:26 AM
Mar 2020

Very few people have been tested here. I do agree that people need to start to isolate themselves as much as is possible.

eleny

(46,166 posts)
14. Our 5th day staying at home because we can
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:27 AM
Mar 2020

We shopped and ordered stuff two weeks ago. Deep freeze is full. Spritz or wipe down delivered packages. Big yard so we can sort of take walks around here and do some gardening on warm days.

But I think I'm going to need a day away from all media. It's getting rough. Especially after Trump's "going through the motions" address tonight.

Be well!

Blues Heron

(5,931 posts)
25. I'm going with Fauci on this - 1%
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 01:00 AM
Mar 2020

we've been through this BS on here too many times. The mild cases aren't in your number. Stop trying to scare people.It's bad enough as it is.

JCMach1

(27,556 posts)
27. Fauci doesn't know the number either... It's sometimes fatal
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 02:39 AM
Mar 2020

And much more so than flu. Act accordingly.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,848 posts)
28. Hmmm. I read recently that 270,000 people in this country were hospitalized with flu.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 03:05 AM
Mar 2020

30,000 died. That's an 11% death rate. O!M!G! Flu kills at least 10 percent of those it infects!

So yeah, if you use those numbers, rather than the very many more who get sick but who are NOT hospitalized, the death rate seems huge. In reality, a huge percentage of those who get it have mild or no symptoms, but they are not being counted in these statistics.

Get a grip.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
30. Nope, not even close
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 05:49 AM
Mar 2020

Many people have probably had it already, including in the US, or have a mild "cold" and think that's all it is. Posting this scarebait is REALLY irresponsible of you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The true death rate at th...