General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe election is already over in 35 states.
This is a swing state election at the presidential level. (Aren't they all.)
Focus your energy on those states.
Ignore national polls.
Also - read Rick Wilson's book.
TwilightZone
(25,532 posts)This cannot be stressed enough.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)MANative
(4,114 posts)ooky
(8,943 posts)for sure can't take them to the bank.
Personally I think its going to come down to 7 states unless there is a major surprise somewhere.
Takket
(21,733 posts)the only thing that matters in 50.1% in enough states to add up to 270EVs
doc03
(35,473 posts)Ohio anymore. Has any Democrat ever been elected without Ohio? If we get someone that can carry Ohio we will win.
SCantiGOP
(13,879 posts)doc03
(35,473 posts)so goes the nation."
SCantiGOP
(13,879 posts)Your "as Ohio goes..." comment reminded me of watching the FDR series on PBS years ago.
When he was re-elected in 1936 he carried 46 of 48 states. You could likely win a bar bet by asking which two states he didn't carry. One was Maine, and the other was..........the Republican stronghold of Vermont.
Until then, Maine had a long history as a swing state that had voted for the winner in enough elections to get the title of "As goes Maine, so goes the nation." A headline after the '36 election read, "As goes Maine, so goes Vermont."
Amishman
(5,559 posts)Non-college educated blue collar workers have drifted away from the party. Private sector unions have declined our advantage with those that remain has declined as well. Social issues hurt us with this crowd.
doc03
(35,473 posts)win the presidency IMO.
Whiskeytide
(4,464 posts)... we cant have a moderate candidate in this election. No matter who wins the primary, they will be painted by republicans and the MSM as a wild-eyed, slobbering, gun taking, baby killing, income redistributing, anti-capitalist socialist. They are good at messaging. It will stick in a lot of states.
Perhaps we need to worry more about turning our base out by strongly and unabashedly embracing democratic principles instead of battling with them for the middle. They seem to always beat us at that game.
TwilightZone
(25,532 posts)He's probably better qualified to blunt that argument than any other candidate.
EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)We can't fall in that trap again.
Give them a transformational candidate, they'll come out. Status quo forget it.
TwilightZone
(25,532 posts)The most recent were in October. Biden, Sanders, and Warren had leads on Trump at the time, but no idea if the same would hold true today. Trump's approval there has been hovering around even to slightly underwater, which is higher than ideal if we're to win it. And a bit inexplicable.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,464 posts)We *can* win without Ohio (Kerry came somewhat close to winning electorally in 2004 without it, although there's still some dispute about the vote-counting in Ohio in 2004), but it definitely makes the electoral math harder. We carried Ohio in 2008 and 2012 with Obama (hell, we even got Indiana, which was a huge a** fluke), but it seems to have regressively gotten redder since then and a lot of Blue Collar Dems apparently went for Trump over manufacturing/jobs that they (somehow) thought that Trump would bring back for them. Some of the midwestern states that (narrowly) helped Trump win in 2016 have gone more Democratic and soured on Trump, so, there is a possibility that Ohio might be winnable this year. I think that it will depend largely who we choose as our Presidential nominee as to who will Ohio this year. Sanders or Biden would probably play well in Ohio. Not sure how the rest of the nominees would fare. I'm not from Ohio, so I can't speak for it, so Ohioans, please feel free to critique my response.
marked50
(1,377 posts)I am not from Ohio. Ohio has some bad gerrymandering from 2010 by the Republicans. Solidifying Republican control of Sec of State Office and Legislature. And from that all sort of voting suppression has spawned ( even before 2010). Draconian voter Id's, roll purges, etc. The task to counter is difficult. Remember Ken Blackwell-one of the worst Sec of States.
doc03
(35,473 posts)Clinton signed NAFTA. I think he was suckered in to that, from day one the Republicans have been hammering
Democrats on NAFTA even though it passed with mostly Republican votes. I think Obama may have promised to make some reforms
with NAFTA, I don't know if he did. But Trump ran against NAFTA and got rid of it. That was a brilliant strategy
for him. He got rid of NAFTA and came back with the USMCA. I think there was a pension bail out for the miners and other things the Democrats
got through. But guess what he will take the credit for that too. I couldn't believe in the debates the other night when
the Democrats spent several minutes praising the changes made with the USMCA. That was like a campaign ad for Trump.
Polybius
(15,554 posts)A lot of people moved, making Ohio more conservative and Virginia more liberal.
maxsolomon
(33,475 posts)As did blue-collar manufacturing and resource extraction jobs.
CONSERVATIVE businessmen sent their factories to Communist China for the cheap labor, and the abandoned workers blamed Liberals who couldn't stop it.
Walmart came in and destroyed retail in nearly every small town, transforming small business owners into underpaid wage slaves, who blamed Liberals who couldn't stop it.
Plus Abortions.
handmade34
(22,759 posts)can't be stressed enough!! so who thinks Bernie will win the swing states??