General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat It Looks Like When a Hospital Erases $11.9 Million in debt
In 2018, the massive nonprofit health care system sued her for just over $11,500 in unpaid hospital bills, plus $3,800 in attorneys fees. In April, a Shelby County General Sessions Court judge ordered her to pay $150 per month toward the debt.
If she was lucky, the envelope contained only a warning. If she wasnt, it was another attempt to garnish her paycheck, even though she wasnt even getting one.
Nervously, she opened the letter. As of August 1, 2019, it said, your total amount due is $0 for docket ROBINSON, and we have notified the court that this account has been paid in full.
I had to read it a couple of times just to make sure, Robinson said. I couldnt believe it. I went crying around the house.
https://www.propublica.org/article/what-it-looks-like-when-a-hospital-we-investigated-erases-millions-in-medical-debt
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Now we haven't a hospital within 47 miles.
marble falls
(57,010 posts)Marcuse
(7,446 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,065 posts)problems, I don't want to be out of reach in case I need services. Perhaps you have an urgent care shop near you?
Scary indeed!
Take care and Best wishes to you all, rickyhall
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)When the ACA was implemented, nursing leaders were scrambling to work with schools, hospitals, and doctors groups to make sure they are enough to people to even provide care. Especially in rural areas. There is a little extra funding for people willing to go out to remote or hard to access areas.
Health insurance, universal, M4A, whatever, isnt enough. We need providers. We need hospitals. We need clinics. We need nurses. We need all the ancillary staff that makes healthcare work.
We have completely failed our rural communities.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)MFA, public option, some other reform, it doesn't matter: we have way too many hospitals. The problem is consolidating the right ones...
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)Into huge corporate groups. That doesnt mean keeping county hospitals open. Hospitals are also at the mercy of their equipment and ability. Not everyone can do the diagnostics needed. My hospital gets many transfers from out of state hospitals because we either can treat certain conditions, or have better diagnostic capabilities.
Complex aneurysms, Liver failure, heart conditions. Many disease processes and conditions, that smaller hospitals cant handle.
You are right, and Thats the thing with healthcare. People who think its about insurance alone are missing a lot of the story
Recursion
(56,582 posts)In the 19th century it was thought the high ground had fewer miasmas than low-lying land, so the hospitals were built there, and there they are still today.
There are 23 hospitals in Boston -- that's too many. But they're nearly all crowded into a small area next to each other. So huge swathes of the city are underserved. It's worse in rural areas, of course, but there it is. We need to have fewer, larger, hospitals, and they need to be in different places than they are. The economics of that will eventually force the closures, if nothing else (and MFA would accelerate that with the lower reimbursement rates). And you're right: a huge problem nobody's talking about is that nobody's going to magically create the nurses, medical aides, physicians, physicians' assistants, med techs, etc. that we'd need to actually provide healthcare for the entire country. There aren't enough providers as it is.
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)So I tend to think in terms of those networks. We probably have that many in Seattle, but it doesnt seen like it there are two main group consolidating, three if you count Kaiser.
What ALSO happens is that certain hospitals will avoid difficult, chronic or under insured patients. Hospitals get a bit more reimbursement from the government for being one of those hospitals, but its hard. (We are one that takes the more difficult cases) That crap need to stop.
Also, long term care facilities are refusing to take certain types of patients. The reimbursement does not pay for the actual care. They stay hospitalized long after medically necessary because of lack of placement
Its a giant cluster fuck
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)The value of debt forgiveness. Not that the rate would be substantial, but any could be too much.
SWBTATTReg
(22,065 posts)the medical bill is still better and I'm sure a gift to all of these people. Maybe they (the hospital) trued up the bills paid off, so taxes would be taken care of, but I kind of doubt it.
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)It all started back in 1973 when Richard M. Nixon made healthcare a for profit enterprise.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Also, for-profit healthcare existed long before 1973; all that law did was allow the creation of HMOs.
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)Define "not for profit" after reading this.
Dr. Michael Ugwueke, Methodists CEO
"Ugwueke, meanwhile, earned $1.6 million in total compensation in 2017, the most recent year for which such data is available. That same year, Gary Shorb, the hospitals CEO from 2001 to 2016, earned more than $1.2 million for serving as Ugwuekes adviser. In 2018, the hospital brought in $86 million more than it spent, according to an end-of-year revenue bond disclosure statement."
Recursion
(56,582 posts)tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)For an assistant and 86 million in net income sounds a little steep for a "not for profit" enterprise.
Net income after expenses... Profit?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)You can't possibly think that's even a rounding error in the overall budget, can you?
I'm also curious now if you understand the difference in for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises. Do you?
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)But perhaps there is a different definition since we are now living in an Oligarchy.