Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam Schiff just announced House Intelligence official vote on impeachment (Original Post) dewsgirl Nov 2019 OP
im.ready evertonfc Nov 2019 #1
😒 dewsgirl Nov 2019 #2
Plus he has the votes so he is moving forward jimlup Nov 2019 #3
well, at least we ain't got locusts Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2019 #12
Great news. Can't wait for the report. Now, will all those who complained that Pelosi, et. al.... George II Nov 2019 #4
Ha malaise Nov 2019 #5
+1 myohmy2 Dec 2019 #17
gee... i wonder how the committee will vote orleans Nov 2019 #6
A real cliff-hanger! I'm on ... reACTIONary Dec 2019 #28
As exciting as this is, I don't think that Progressive Jones Nov 2019 #7
The main evidence is a timeline TrogL Dec 2019 #10
Of course they are. nt Progressive Jones Dec 2019 #16
Or noticeably DENVERPOPS Dec 2019 #35
Expect a lot more coverage by the media when it goes to the Senate. LiberalFighter Dec 2019 #32
Party line vote.. AZ8theist Dec 2019 #8
I'm worried that Nadler will let Gym Jordan get too much mouth play. I want him shut UP. ancianita Dec 2019 #24
Yea, I also worry about Nadler just a bit. Karma13612 Dec 2019 #27
I hope he sees how well Schiff's tough, tight method to shut gopers up can work for him. They'll ancianita Dec 2019 #29
Agree! N/t Karma13612 Dec 2019 #37
Is Gym Jordan on Judiciary too? yellowdogintexas Dec 2019 #33
Unfortunately, he was put in both Intel and Judiciary. What I hope it takes is removing him. ancianita Dec 2019 #34
I'm ok with OhioVoterBlue Dec 2019 #9
I'm ambivalent. That's just me. sprinkleeninow Dec 2019 #11
I keep thinking about that, too. murielm99 Dec 2019 #13
Yes, I know. That's why the ambivalence. sprinkleeninow Dec 2019 #14
I keep thinking that there is more and they don't want to/are dewsgirl Dec 2019 #20
That seems way too soon. Didn't a Judge just rule that McGahn can testify? Why the rush? Tarheel_Dem Dec 2019 #15
Exactly. progressoid Dec 2019 #22
Though judge did rule that way, WH (or DOJ) appealed. mwooldri Dec 2019 #25
Surely the courts could expedite cases that will determine whether or not a sitting POTUS will... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2019 #36
as we... myohmy2 Dec 2019 #18
Good points. BlueWI Dec 2019 #31
It remains to be seen what juvenile nickname Rump will come up with for Jerry Nadler. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2019 #19
He already did. "Fat Jerry."😔 dewsgirl Dec 2019 #30
Booyah! Pedal to the metal. Let's go! KPN Dec 2019 #21
Thanks Rep Schff. We're with you Adam. Mc Mike Dec 2019 #23
It's a done deal...hooray! at140 Dec 2019 #26
 

evertonfc

(1,713 posts)
1. im.ready
Sat Nov 30, 2019, 10:32 PM
Nov 2019

to get this moving. My guess is, with the public attention span, support for impeachment will not increase but most likely decrease.

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. Great news. Can't wait for the report. Now, will all those who complained that Pelosi, et. al....
Sat Nov 30, 2019, 11:35 PM
Nov 2019

....were moving "too slow" PLEASE apologize?

Our Democratic leaders were setting up their case, not twiddling their fingers or wringing their hands. They're not LEADERS for nothing!

On to the House Committee on the Judiciary and then to the Senate.

Progressive Jones

(6,011 posts)
7. As exciting as this is, I don't think that
Sat Nov 30, 2019, 11:54 PM
Nov 2019

there has been enough public display of evidence.
Is the Mueller Report off the table?

DENVERPOPS

(8,818 posts)
35. Or noticeably
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 09:17 PM
Dec 2019

Or noticeably only showing segments when a republican is asking a question or more realistically giving out the right wing talking points......

what a travesty..............

AZ8theist

(5,459 posts)
8. Party line vote..
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 12:16 AM
Dec 2019

It was a foregone conclusion that it would move out of committee. Now the real fun starts in Judiciary where all of his treason, financial crimes and obstruction will be on full display. I really like Schiff, but I'm really going to enjoy Chairman Nadler!!

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
27. Yea, I also worry about Nadler just a bit.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 01:56 PM
Dec 2019

When we had earlier public hearings with Nadler, I noticed that he does get a bit flustered sometimes. I hope he is on his A game this time around. If not, we could lose the perception of an edge despite having the majority vote in the House. I am also worried about Rep Collins who has already stirred up a $h!tstorm before the first hearing on Wednesday.

I know we won’t get a conviction, but I do look forward to the (hopefully) inevitable impeachment.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
29. I hope he sees how well Schiff's tough, tight method to shut gopers up can work for him. They'll
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 02:36 PM
Dec 2019

push back. But he, as Judiciary Chair, should have them removed for obstructing the impeachment articles.

Obstructing. Must. Stop.

 

OhioVoterBlue

(16 posts)
9. I'm ok with
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 12:40 AM
Dec 2019

A party line vote, as long as the report from Schiff makes it easy for voters in those districts that will decide to reelect or dump their idiot reps based on facts. "Reelect me bc I used to be in favor of the founders, and now I'm on the side of fifth columnists".

sprinkleeninow

(20,246 posts)
11. I'm ambivalent. That's just me.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 01:12 AM
Dec 2019

Remember the looks on the faces of Di-Fi and grassley upon emerging from that meeting two years ago?

Wonder if what they saw/heard would be revealed if it was so disturbing to have kinda shaken them.

murielm99

(30,736 posts)
13. I keep thinking about that, too.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 02:56 AM
Dec 2019

There must be more. There has to be more. I think there should be more articles of impeachment, too. He has done so many criminal things and more of those need to be investigated.

sprinkleeninow

(20,246 posts)
14. Yes, I know. That's why the ambivalence.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 03:24 AM
Dec 2019

I am conflicted as to why they're issuing this at a point like you stated of having so much more criminality he committed.

I pray to God [I do] that our leadership conducting this serious matter is on the perfect path. Mb I been reading an excess of both sides of views and opinions. I just feel somewhat uncomfortable and want it gotten resolved
properly.

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)
20. I keep thinking that there is more and they don't want to/are
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 11:50 AM
Dec 2019

Last edited Sun Dec 1, 2019, 12:29 PM - Edit history (1)

afraid to release it publicly, "for the public good". As if the public couldn't handle it. I would bet my life on the fact, they have to be very aware of Trump's Russia collusion and all it entails. Some of them have seen the actual Mueller Report.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
15. That seems way too soon. Didn't a Judge just rule that McGahn can testify? Why the rush?
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 09:17 AM
Dec 2019

I don't feel good about this. If McGahn has been compelled, there are certainly more witnesses (like Bolton) who can be subpoenaed as well.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
25. Though judge did rule that way, WH (or DOJ) appealed.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 01:10 PM
Dec 2019

House Democrats don't want to hang around and have things dragged out through the courts.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
36. Surely the courts could expedite cases that will determine whether or not a sitting POTUS will...
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 11:11 PM
Dec 2019

be impeached and possibly removed from office. It just seems to me that the import of such a case would take precedence over just about anything.

myohmy2

(3,162 posts)
18. as we...
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 10:49 AM
Dec 2019

...play serious and chase the impeachment facts, trump and the republicans are attacking and discrediting the process as partisan...

...we have a slight problem...

...our leaders haven't been responding harshly enough in the impeachment political arena for not wanting to make it look partisan confirming the republican 'partisan' lie...

...what we need are non-impeachment participating Dems to blast not trump, but to more aggressively blast all republicans that attack and discredit the impeachment process...

...call out their patriotism, call out their morals, call out their intelligence...call them traitors, call them whatever you want, but call out and challenges these bastards more strongly in the political arena...

...we're winning the legal but we're coming up short on the political...

...IMO...

BlueWI

(1,736 posts)
31. Good points.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 03:46 PM
Dec 2019

Supporting impeachment is a responsibility for everyone who believes in the rule of law. We the public and our non-committee reps have a job to do.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,175 posts)
19. It remains to be seen what juvenile nickname Rump will come up with for Jerry Nadler.
Sun Dec 1, 2019, 11:37 AM
Dec 2019

But with Gym Jordan, Louie Gohmert, and Matt Gaetz on the Judiciary Committee, I imagine we'll be treated to new and exciting levels of dumbfuckery.

I suggest that, to protest the unfair treatment of their messiah, they set themselves on fire the very first day. Just a suggestion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Schiff just announce...