Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion to the lawyers here
What options does the House have concerning nunes? Can the House vote on a rule to shut off his microphone? The rethugs determine who is on their committees BUT surly he should be RECUSED!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 863 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question to the lawyers here (Original Post)
bluestarone
Nov 2019
OP
It will be fun optics watching Republicans defend him. Hope to see that on TV.
Midnight Writer
Nov 2019
#5
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,609 posts)1. I think Pelosi can remove him.
Or remooooove him.
bluestarone
(16,872 posts)3. That would be nice
Or maybe ethics committee remove his ass.
bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)2. Unfortunately, best option is to refer him to the ethics committee
Hope they expedite but it is an evenly divided committee between dems and reps
Midnight Writer
(21,717 posts)5. It will be fun optics watching Republicans defend him. Hope to see that on TV.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)4. Unfortunately what goes around can come around.
The reps play a petty game, they dont see things as fair and lawful. The senate can push back without reason other than tit for tat. The house has to choose positions against unreasonable foes so I imagine they'd need to be careful with censure and censor.
Just my opinion. I'm no lawyer.